Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Premier League 23/24
Comments
-
How Arsenal were voted into the top flight over Tottenham in 1919 | Football News | Sky SportsSELR_addicks said:Anyway, good on the 'plucky' billionaire state-owned club run with blood money.
Because Arsenal have always been saints.
Quite impressive given they're the one team currently in the top flight, who haven't won promotion to it.3 -
Having to go back over a 100 years isn't really the gotcha you think it is.ForeverAddickted said:
How Arsenal were voted into the top flight over Tottenham in 1919 | Football News | Sky SportsSELR_addicks said:Anyway, good on the 'plucky' billionaire state-owned club run with blood money.
Because Arsenal have always been saints.
Quite impressive given they're the one team currently in the top flight, who haven't won promotion to it.
Saudi Arabia are still beheading people to this day by the way.4 -
ForeverAddickted said:
How Arsenal were voted into the top flight over Tottenham in 1919 | Football News | Sky SportsSELR_addicks said:Anyway, good on the 'plucky' billionaire state-owned club run with blood money.
Because Arsenal have always been saints.
Quite impressive given they're the one team currently in the top flight, who haven't won promotion to it.
Err. Slightly different.1 -
If it screwed over Arsenal what's not to like? Happy days9
-
Is my comment slightly different?Athletico Charlton said:ForeverAddickted said:
How Arsenal were voted into the top flight over Tottenham in 1919 | Football News | Sky SportsSELR_addicks said:Anyway, good on the 'plucky' billionaire state-owned club run with blood money.
Because Arsenal have always been saints.
Quite impressive given they're the one team currently in the top flight, who haven't won promotion to it.
Err. Slightly different.
The always over-exaggerating poster, has already accused the Middle East of bribing referees this season.
If Arsenal fans have issue with that, and how Newcastle win games (no where have I suggested that anything in Saudi Arabia is acceptable), then they should be looking at their own history.
Or is there a time limit on when Football history can be discussed?1 -
More like where their money comes from.ForeverAddickted said:
Is my comment slightly different?Athletico Charlton said:ForeverAddickted said:
How Arsenal were voted into the top flight over Tottenham in 1919 | Football News | Sky SportsSELR_addicks said:Anyway, good on the 'plucky' billionaire state-owned club run with blood money.
Because Arsenal have always been saints.
Quite impressive given they're the one team currently in the top flight, who haven't won promotion to it.
Err. Slightly different.
The always over-exaggerating poster, has already accused the Middle East of bribing referees this season.
If Arsenal fans have issue with that, and how Newcastle win games (no where have I suggested that anything in Saudi Arabia is acceptable), then they should be looking at their own history.
Or is there a time limit on when Football history can be discussed?
But the media and people will wave them in as 'plucky' because they're not the established elite.
Thought people learned after the Chelsea 'Russia' debacle but I guess not.1 -
Shouldn't you be on gunners life or Arsenal TV right now?5
-
6 -
ForeverAddickted said:
Is my comment slightly different?Athletico Charlton said:ForeverAddickted said:
How Arsenal were voted into the top flight over Tottenham in 1919 | Football News | Sky SportsSELR_addicks said:Anyway, good on the 'plucky' billionaire state-owned club run with blood money.
Because Arsenal have always been saints.
Quite impressive given they're the one team currently in the top flight, who haven't won promotion to it.
Err. Slightly different.
The always over-exaggerating poster, has already accused the Middle East of bribing referees this season.
If Arsenal fans have issue with that, and how Newcastle win games (no where have I suggested that anything in Saudi Arabia is acceptable), then they should be looking at their own history.
Or is there a time limit on when Football history can be discussed?
I don't really know or care about the history of the poster but his/her comment was about the owners of Newcastle being the state with blood money.
Given the well publicised Saudi genocide in Yemen as well as the treatment of their own people, then I felt comparing that ownership with Arsenal owners in 1919 bribing some people to be in the top league was somewhat different, yes.
You are an excellent poster on here and certainly better than that.
1 - Sponsored links:
-
The ball was likely not out: with no definitive angle, it’s not enough to overturn the on field decision.
The “foul” was not a foul unless we’re making football a non contact sport.
The offside was the most confusing part of the check - the video I’ve seen doesn’t seem to ever provide a clear angle. But this is the one part of the process that’s meant to be black and white - if they’ve drawn the lines and said it’s onside, it must be onside.
Arteta’s post match interview is embarrassing for him and for the club he represents.6 -
Watching MOTD.
How the hell has Havertz not been sent off?
Thats all. Even Keown said he got lucky.
2 -
What's really impressive is how many of those Newcastle players were there before under Steve Bruce, but have been transformed under Howe, with so much more desire and workrate.0
-
Can you be offside if the pass is played square or backwards (I don’t think so)
can you be offside if you are level or behind the passer to you ?0 -
C***eta is right getting on my tits , they were shit, now just need spurs to fuck off and we can breath again for another season2 -
Doku is some signing by City. Hadn't heard of him before he joined. Look af some of the shite Utd sign in comparison.1
-
Officials were bad all game. How did Guimaraes get away with forearming an Arsenal player in the head off the ball?JohnBoyUK said:Watching MOTD.
How the hell has Havertz not been sent off?
Thats all. Even Keown said he got lucky.2 -
He's only 21 and cost 55m. So about 30m less than Antony and Mudryk, and also less than Havertz and Mount. But everyone will say City only win because they spend loads. No, they just spend well.AllHailTheHen said:Doku is some signing by City. Hadn't heard of him before he joined. Look af some of the shite Utd sign in comparison.7 -
They spend 'well' because they've thrown money elsewhere to make transfers easier for them in the long run.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
He's only 21 and cost 55m. So about 30m less than Antony and Mudryk, and also less than Havertz and Mount. But everyone will say City only win because they spend loads. No, they just spend well.AllHailTheHen said:Doku is some signing by City. Hadn't heard of him before he joined. Look af some of the shite Utd sign in comparison.
It's part of being another state-owned club with billions of pounds.
They also spent 200m this summer on essentially 4 players.4 - Sponsored links:
-
Chris_from_Sidcup said:
He's only 21 and cost 55m. So about 30m less than Antony and Mudryk, and also less than Havertz and Mount. But everyone will say City only win because they spend loads. No, they just spend well.AllHailTheHen said:Doku is some signing by City. Hadn't heard of him before he joined. Look af some of the shite Utd sign in comparison.
City make very sensible signings , can't think of many absolute duds they've have made in recent seasons - bar possibly the Kalvin Phillips move not working.
Says a lot about the form they are in when they aren't even starting £80m worth of CB in Josko Gvardiol yesterday.1 -
Was a naughty one that one but how about the elbow to the back of Jorginho's neck that VAR also looked at too? Definitely seemed there was some evening up in the dodgy decisions going on.JohnBoyUK said:Watching MOTD.
How the hell has Havertz not been sent off?
Thats all. Even Keown said he got lucky.0 -
You appear to have conveniently forgotten the players they have sold or have left on frees? In terms of salaries, they've got off the books in the last two seasons the likes of Sterling, Gundogan, Mendy, Jesus, Zinchenko, Mahrez, Palmer, Trafford, Porro, Lavia, Itakura etc etcSELR_addicks said:
They spend 'well' because they've thrown money elsewhere to make transfers easier for them in the long run.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
He's only 21 and cost 55m. So about 30m less than Antony and Mudryk, and also less than Havertz and Mount. But everyone will say City only win because they spend loads. No, they just spend well.AllHailTheHen said:Doku is some signing by City. Hadn't heard of him before he joined. Look af some of the shite Utd sign in comparison.
It's part of being another state-owned club with billions of pounds.
They also spent 200m this summer on essentially 4 players.
Spend £288m. Sales £252m. Net spend £36m. Man United's net spend in the same period is over £300m!!!4 -
Stupid tackle by Havertz, but a red? Not for me.
Think Bruno should have been sent off, but there was nothing wrong with the goal. I dislike Arteta more and more each week0 -
I thought that on a first watch, thought he missed with this first leg, and just caught with his trailing leg. But on watching it again (you know, like a VAR guy), he caught him a bit with the first leg too.cafcsinger said:Stupid tackle by Havertz, but a red? Not for me.
Think Bruno should have been sent off, but there was nothing wrong with the goal. I dislike Arteta more and more each week
Shouldn't be let off because he only grazed the guy, was just luck.
0 -
Played at Euro 2020 & World Cup 2022 for Belgium. Remember him standing out for Belgium because he had everything they lacked as a team.AllHailTheHen said:Doku is some signing by City. Hadn't heard of him before he joined. Look af some of the shite Utd sign in comparison.0 -
AllHailTheHen said:Doku is some signing by City. Hadn't heard of him before he joined. Look af some of the shite Utd sign in comparison.
0 -
Surprised the Sheffield Utd penalty hadn’t been mentioned. What is the point of VAR if they can’t see that isn’t a foul and therefore not a penalty.0
-
It's only Wolves that have been robbed (again) so it doesn't make the headlines.LargeAddick said:Surprised the Sheffield Utd penalty hadn’t been mentioned. What is the point of VAR if they can’t see that isn’t a foul and therefore not a penalty.2 -
Now Gary O'Neil is a manager has every right to feel aggrieved with VAR and officiating this season.LargeAddick said:Surprised the Sheffield Utd penalty hadn’t been mentioned. What is the point of VAR if they can’t see that isn’t a foul and therefore not a penalty.3
