Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Ivan Toney
Comments
-
Also not allowed to go to the USABR7_addick said:
He’s probably the finest example there is.Croydon said:Not sure Ronaldo is an example I'd be using.
https://www.givemesport.com/1567721-cristiano-ronaldo-21-things-hes-done-off-the-pitch-that-proves-hes-an-incredible-guy?amp3 -
Whilst that would certainly explain things i'm not quite sure what the point is in whoever is involved intimidating some guy to take the video down when everyone has already seen it.LS22Charlton said:
From what I’ve seen on the matter0 -
We should have signed him from Peterborough!0
-
Never would have got him under Roland. In hindsight we should have sold Taylor to Brentford and signed Toney.Valleysarr said:We should have signed him from Peterborough!
1 -
Is that an inflatable rubber doll beside him?Callumcafc said:Video of him on holiday...... not sure the fans will be liking this too much.
0 -
Each to their own but that’s not for me. Probably a category on Pornhub for two washed up past it footballers nowadays tbf.Mendonca In Asdas said:Any chance we can get get Gunter and Watson to do a video?1 -
Brentford and England striker Ivan Toney has been charged by the Football Association with more than 200 alleged breaches of betting rules.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/63653384
3 -
I wonder if they had foresight of this when picking the squadclive said:Brentford and England striker Ivan Toney has been charged by the Football Association with more than 200 alleged breaches of betting rules.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/636533841 -
I wonder if someone at the FA put £100 on Toney not being in the world cup squadDazzler21 said:
I wonder if they had foresight of this when picking the squadclive said:Brentford and England striker Ivan Toney has been charged by the Football Association with more than 200 alleged breaches of betting rules.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/63653384
24 -
Definitely- It was open knowledge he was being investigated the week before the announcement. Think mentioned on here.Dazzler21 said:
I wonder if they had foresight of this when picking the squadclive said:Brentford and England striker Ivan Toney has been charged by the Football Association with more than 200 alleged breaches of betting rules.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/636533843 -
Sponsored links:
-
Dazzler21 said:
I wonder if they had foresight of this when picking the squadclive said:Brentford and England striker Ivan Toney has been charged by the Football Association with more than 200 alleged breaches of betting rules.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/63653384I’d bet on it.3 -
Waiting for his new video to come out where he says “Fuck BetFred” 😉clive said:Brentford and England striker Ivan Toney has been charged by the Football Association with more than 200 alleged breaches of betting rules.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/6365338420 -
Could be as much as a 2 year ban for him.1
-
My mate who’s ITK reckons loads of footballers are at it but Toney was unlucky enough to be caught.0
-
They all know you can’t do it, so got no sympathy for him at all3
-
So was he simply betting (although not permitted)?
Hopefully, nothing like match fixing?0 -
It’s a short career and they don’t get paid much, so you can’t blame him for trying to earn a few extra quid.16
-
Yeah betting.Covered End said:So was he simply betting (although not permitted)?
Hopefully, nothing like match fixing?0 -
Apparently he bet that in 2022 Ivan Toney would get 12+ goals, 8+ assists and 1+ videos insulting his employer. That’s why they call him the Brentford Nostradamus.5
-
He should just say it was a 232 team acca. A one off occurrence and it’ll never happen again.3
-
Sponsored links:
-
Did he have a few quid on the only goal for Scunthorpe against us back in April 2018?
0 -
Gone are the days when players were easily identified in bookies gambling their life away or by their distinctive voice on the phone. Instead the integrity departments at bookmakers recognise who is behind the bets even if the accounts in question aren't in the player's name by way of betting patterns, accounts linked to each other, IP addresses etc etc. The FA can demand phone records and itemised bank statements showing monies being transferred in and out that will link the footballer to the person placing the bets and because of the telephone numbers that some footballers bet in, those transactions do tend to stand out especially when they are so regular in nature.
I very much doubt that Toney was so stupid to bet on games he was involved in but the rules cover any football match or competition, wherever it is played in the world. You cannot bet on any global football market at any level, even on aspects that aren't related to matches for example the next manager of a club. What makes the whole situation so ridiculous is that he is permitted to bet on any other sport without punishment and the fact that the FA have 232 instances of him betting on football suggests that he must have been doing so too. But those other sports weren't enough.
As I mentioned a few days ago on the England squad thread, it might well have cost him a World Cup place but, given these are historic bets, I doubt that Toney thought he would get that close when placing them. He might have been the unlucky one and that others are doing it too. I wouldn't mind betting, though, that some of those will now think twice about carrying on especially if the FA ends up throwing the book at him by way of a lengthy ban.1 -
I've always thought this is quite crazy.Addick Addict said:Gone are the days when players were easily identified in bookies gambling their life away or by their distinctive voice on the phone. Instead the integrity departments at bookmakers recognise who is behind the bets even if the accounts in question aren't in the player's name by way of betting patterns, accounts linked to each other, IP addresses etc etc. The FA can demand phone records and itemised bank statements showing monies being transferred in and out that will link the footballer to the person placing the bets and because of the telephone numbers that some footballers bet in, those transactions do tend to stand out especially when they are so regular in nature.
I very much doubt that Toney was so stupid to bet on games he was involved in but the rules cover any football match or competition, wherever it is played in the world. You cannot bet on any global football market at any level, even on aspects that aren't related to matches for example the next manager of a club. What makes the whole situation so ridiculous is that he is permitted to bet on any other sport without punishment and the fact that the FA have 232 instances of him betting on football suggests that he must have been doing so too. But those other sports weren't enough.
As I mentioned a few days ago on the England squad thread, it might well have cost him a World Cup place but, given these are historic bets, I doubt that Toney thought he would get that close when placing them. He might have been the unlucky one and that others are doing it too. I wouldn't mind betting, though, that some of those will now think twice about carrying on especially if the FA ends up throwing the book at him by way of a lengthy ban.
If Toney wanted to bet on a random Moldovan or Latvian game, or even Welling United, it's mad that he isn't allowed.0 -
I know the onus is completely on the player but surely the bookies shouldn’t be taking the bets if it’s not right for the gambler to be doing them , you know the concerned bookies who are soooo worried about punters welfare etc but let’s be honest if he was winning he’d have been restricted to pennies and if he’s losing fire away mate1
-
I did a day at Soccer Saturday a few years back with Merson, Le Tissier, Charlie Nicholas and Jeff Stelling etc
surely they are as “in the loop” as most in the game but they were talking quite freely about the bets they had put on individually as well as an acca they all contributed to.
pretty sure others are at it too
0 -
The cynic in me suggests he was winning and a losing bookie has flagged his account to the authorities.oohaahmortimer said:I know the onus is completely on the player but surely the bookies shouldn’t be taking the bets if it’s not right for the gambler to be doing them , you know the concerned bookies who are soooo worried about punters welfare etc but let’s be honest if he was winning he’d have been restricted to pennies and if he’s losing fire away mate
@bobmunro how would something like this get noticed? As i'm assuming he isn't stupid enough to have an account in his own name.0 -
shirty5 said:Did he have a few quid on the only goal for Scunthorpe against us back in April 2018?

The fella in the shades is gonna be gutted when he realises he's dropped his ice cream.
25 -
I've just opened an account in the name of williezaha11 in the hope of getting a two year banChris_from_Sidcup said:
The cynic in me suggests he was winning and a losing bookie has flagged his account to the authorities.oohaahmortimer said:I know the onus is completely on the player but surely the bookies shouldn’t be taking the bets if it’s not right for the gambler to be doing them , you know the concerned bookies who are soooo worried about punters welfare etc but let’s be honest if he was winning he’d have been restricted to pennies and if he’s losing fire away mate
@bobmunro how would something like this get noticed? As i'm assuming he isn't stupid enough to have an account in his own name.27 -
Chris_from_Sidcup said:
The cynic in me suggests he was winning and a losing bookie has flagged his account to the authorities.oohaahmortimer said:I know the onus is completely on the player but surely the bookies shouldn’t be taking the bets if it’s not right for the gambler to be doing them , you know the concerned bookies who are soooo worried about punters welfare etc but let’s be honest if he was winning he’d have been restricted to pennies and if he’s losing fire away mate
@bobmunro how would something like this get noticed? As i'm assuming he isn't stupid enough to have an account in his own name.We have footballers with accounts - it would be surprising if we didn't bearing in mind the number of accounts we have. But they are set to non-football betting only.As AA said above, we have systems that can identify patterns should a third party account be used and we report to the authorities our concerns. No bookmaker should knowingly take football bets from footballers - we certainly don't, especially as we own a professional football club!6 -
Football circles are small and Toney as an example has played at a number of levels and will have met/ played with/ against/ been mates with players at all those levels. Some of whom will have dropped down and been playing for/against your example of welling. Others (see Adam Matthews as an example) will go off and play in obscure foreign leagues. Even if its nothing as malicious as match fixing, theoretically a player could catch up with an old mate playing at any level of football and he could mention that they have a load of players out for their match and are gonna struggle....Chris_from_Sidcup said:
I've always thought this is quite crazy.Addick Addict said:Gone are the days when players were easily identified in bookies gambling their life away or by their distinctive voice on the phone. Instead the integrity departments at bookmakers recognise who is behind the bets even if the accounts in question aren't in the player's name by way of betting patterns, accounts linked to each other, IP addresses etc etc. The FA can demand phone records and itemised bank statements showing monies being transferred in and out that will link the footballer to the person placing the bets and because of the telephone numbers that some footballers bet in, those transactions do tend to stand out especially when they are so regular in nature.
I very much doubt that Toney was so stupid to bet on games he was involved in but the rules cover any football match or competition, wherever it is played in the world. You cannot bet on any global football market at any level, even on aspects that aren't related to matches for example the next manager of a club. What makes the whole situation so ridiculous is that he is permitted to bet on any other sport without punishment and the fact that the FA have 232 instances of him betting on football suggests that he must have been doing so too. But those other sports weren't enough.
As I mentioned a few days ago on the England squad thread, it might well have cost him a World Cup place but, given these are historic bets, I doubt that Toney thought he would get that close when placing them. He might have been the unlucky one and that others are doing it too. I wouldn't mind betting, though, that some of those will now think twice about carrying on especially if the FA ends up throwing the book at him by way of a lengthy ban.
If Toney wanted to bet on a random Moldovan or Latvian game, or even Welling United, it's mad that he isn't allowed.2










