Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Chuks Aneke - speculation re 2023/24 season (p60)
Comments
-
Aneke!
Aneke!
Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!1 -
Tbf this just shows we've been desperate for a proper striker that isn't Stockley for months.5
-
1/111
-
Love him3
-
Man is a goal machine. Just can't keep him fit for long enough4
-
He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.15
-
A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.Off_it said:He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.10 -
Shame about the penalty
so what is it 13/1/1? in the league at any rate.0 -
No it really isn't.Callumcafc said:
A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.Off_it said:He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
3 -
Pulled hamstring doing the tunnel jump, out for 3 months8
-
Sponsored links:
-
Not even in jest @CAFCsayer.
1 -
eaststandmike said:
No it really isn't.Callumcafc said:
A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.Off_it said:He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.
20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
22/23 - a goal every 15 mins
Why isn't it a good comparison?4 -
Let's hope Leaburn's injury isnt too serious as no way can Aneke start a game.
Real shame he's so injury prone as at this level he's a proper handful.2 -
Here’s the acid test though if Leaburn is out for an extended period of time will we ever feel confident to start Chuks in a game?If not we won’t be able to go 4-4-2, and will likely have to revert back to the 4-3-3 and hope that we are still in the game by the time we can bring Chuks on for his cameo.0
-
I may be wrong but have any of Chuks injuries been a repeat of an existing injury? I don't think they have from memory. The calf one is the first that repeated itself, but that just delayed his return.0
-
Hopefully we could stick CBT up front as a makeshift forward if needed. Because Stockley really needs someone who can run beyond.FishCostaFortune said:Here’s the acid test though if Leaburn is out for an extended period of time will we ever feel confident to start Chuks in a game?If not we won’t be able to go 4-4-2, and will likely have to revert back to the 4-3-3 and hope that we are still in the game by the time we can bring Chuks on for his cameo.0 -
Typical of you Callum, I throw in a line that should have brought an end to the conversation and you come back with stat, stat bloody stat. 😂Callumcafc said:eaststandmike said:
No it really isn't.Callumcafc said:
A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.Off_it said:He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.
20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
22/23 - a goal every 15 mins
Why isn't it a good comparison?
However you make a good case so carry on 👍🏻3 -
I’m not certain we get told the entire truth about Chuks injuries.Dazzler21 said:I may be wrong but have any of Chuks injuries been a repeat of an existing injury? I don't think they have from memory. The calf one is the first that repeated itself, but that just delayed his return.9 -
Sorry! It's the world I live in! Need to rein it in sometimes.eaststandmike said:
Typical of you Callum, I throw in a line that should have brought an end to the conversation and you come back with stat, stat bloody stat. 😂Callumcafc said:eaststandmike said:
No it really isn't.Callumcafc said:
A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.Off_it said:He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.
20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
22/23 - a goal every 15 mins
Why isn't it a good comparison?
However you make a good case so carry on 👍🏻0 -
Callumcafc said:eaststandmike said:
No it really isn't.Callumcafc said:
A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.Off_it said:He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.
20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
22/23 - a goal every 15 mins
Why isn't it a good comparison?
Not sure it is "almost three years"? That would be going back to October 2019 and since then Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
MINUTES PER GOALAddick Addict said:Callumcafc said:eaststandmike said:
No it really isn't.Callumcafc said:
A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.Off_it said:He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.
20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
22/23 - a goal every 15 mins
Why isn't it a good comparison?
Not sure it is "almost three years"? That would be going back to October 2019 during which time Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.1 -
I was having a laugh with you mate, you produce some fantastic stats so carry on the good work, don’t rein anything in.Callumcafc said:
Sorry! It's the world I live in! Need to rein it in sometimes.eaststandmike said:
Typical of you Callum, I throw in a line that should have brought an end to the conversation and you come back with stat, stat bloody stat. 😂Callumcafc said:eaststandmike said:
No it really isn't.Callumcafc said:
A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.Off_it said:He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.
20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
22/23 - a goal every 15 mins
Why isn't it a good comparison?
However you make a good case so carry on 👍🏻2 -
Everyone on the team seemed to get a lift when he came on1
-
Please don't shout Dazzer. The point I am making is that if we are going back three years for goals per minute then we have to include 2019-20 albeit from October onwards. Aneke didn't score a single goal from October onwards that season. Ignoring the first 9 games, he played for 431 minutes with zero goals.Dazzler21 said:
MINUTES PER GOALAddick Addict said:Callumcafc said:eaststandmike said:
No it really isn't.Callumcafc said:
A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.Off_it said:He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.
20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
22/23 - a goal every 15 mins
Why isn't it a good comparison?
Not sure it is "almost three years"? That would be going back to October 2019 during which time Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.
0 -
League above. Covered by the "Third Tier" part of the comment.Addick Addict said:
Please don't shout Dazzer. The point I am making is that if we are going back three years for goals per minute then we have to include 2019-20 albeit from October onwards. Aneke didn't score a single goal from October onwards that season. Ignoring the first 9 games, he played for 431 minutes with zero goals.Dazzler21 said:
MINUTES PER GOALAddick Addict said:Callumcafc said:eaststandmike said:
No it really isn't.Callumcafc said:
A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.Off_it said:He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.
20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
22/23 - a goal every 15 mins
Why isn't it a good comparison?
Not sure it is "almost three years"? That would be going back to October 2019 during which time Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.1 -
Then it's not three years is it? You can't have it both ways unless we are calling this one game "a year"Dazzler21 said:
League above. Covered by the "Third Tier" part of the comment.Addick Addict said:
Please don't shout Dazzer. The point I am making is that if we are going back three years for goals per minute then we have to include 2019-20 albeit from October onwards. Aneke didn't score a single goal from October onwards that season. Ignoring the first 9 games, he played for 431 minutes with zero goals.Dazzler21 said:
MINUTES PER GOALAddick Addict said:Callumcafc said:eaststandmike said:
No it really isn't.Callumcafc said:
A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.Off_it said:He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.
20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
22/23 - a goal every 15 mins
Why isn't it a good comparison?
Not sure it is "almost three years"? That would be going back to October 2019 during which time Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.0 -
No he hasn'tAddick Addict said:Callumcafc said:eaststandmike said:
No it really isn't.Callumcafc said:
A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.Off_it said:He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.
20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
22/23 - a goal every 15 mins
Why isn't it a good comparison?
Not sure it is "almost three years"? That would be going back to October 2019 and since then Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.0 -
"Almost three years"Addick Addict said:
Then it's not three years is it? You can't have it both ways unless we are calling this one game "a year"Dazzler21 said:
League above. Covered by the "Third Tier" part of the comment.Addick Addict said:
Please don't shout Dazzer. The point I am making is that if we are going back three years for goals per minute then we have to include 2019-20 albeit from October onwards. Aneke didn't score a single goal from October onwards that season. Ignoring the first 9 games, he played for 431 minutes with zero goals.Dazzler21 said:
MINUTES PER GOALAddick Addict said:Callumcafc said:eaststandmike said:
No it really isn't.Callumcafc said:
A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.Off_it said:He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.
20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
22/23 - a goal every 15 mins
Why isn't it a good comparison?
Not sure it is "almost three years"? That would be going back to October 2019 during which time Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.
Fuck it why am I arguing it's not even my stat or comment.
🤣4 -
Pendant. :-)Addick Addict said:
Then it's not three years is it? You can't have it both ways unless we are calling this one game "a year"Dazzler21 said:
League above. Covered by the "Third Tier" part of the comment.Addick Addict said:
Please don't shout Dazzer. The point I am making is that if we are going back three years for goals per minute then we have to include 2019-20 albeit from October onwards. Aneke didn't score a single goal from October onwards that season. Ignoring the first 9 games, he played for 431 minutes with zero goals.Dazzler21 said:
MINUTES PER GOALAddick Addict said:Callumcafc said:eaststandmike said:
No it really isn't.Callumcafc said:
A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.Off_it said:He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.
20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
22/23 - a goal every 15 mins
Why isn't it a good comparison?
Not sure it is "almost three years"? That would be going back to October 2019 during which time Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.
Call it two years if you want, I only said almost three because 20-21 started in 2020 and 22-23 will end in 2023.1 -
lads, lads, come on .... we won.0
This discussion has been closed.
