Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Summer 2022 transfer rumours (Gilbey loan confirmed p513, a signing falls through last minute p541)

1229230232234235569

Comments

  • Starinnaddick
    Starinnaddick Posts: 4,349
    How old was Shelvey on debut? 
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,457
    How old was Shelvey on debut? 
    Also 16
  • Braziliance
    Braziliance Posts: 8,394
    edited July 2022
    Scoham said:
    Would cost a fee Bishop, 6 figure one I imagine but still, 

    feel he would suit Garners style more than Stockley, can play a bit more from what I remember and a bit more mobile 
  • Blucher
    Blucher Posts: 4,146
    I thought Bowyer was 18 but you're certainly right about Konchesky, although I don't think he really established himself until 2000/01. I recall that Parker also played against Bury early in 97/98 as a 17 year old but really entrenched himself after he came back from his Norwich loan a couple of years later.

    The other really notable youngster who became a regular from pretty well the outset was JonJo Shelvey. He really did the decent thing by signing a pro contract on his 17th birthday, despite interest from the Premier League, especially given our desperate financial position at the time. Sadly, the increasing influence of agents and that blasted  Elite Player Performance Plan sees a lot more young talented EFL players jumping ship these days, with minimal compensation for the clubs that nurtured their development.
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,715
    Colby Bishop is definitely someone we should be interested in.
    Totally agree we should be.
    But I don't believe we will spend any money this window on a transfer fee.
    It will be free transfers and loan deals so I can't see it happen. 
    I'd love to be proved wrong Tommy so get yer check book out.
    I’m surprised you think so. How come?
    I think he's trying to do things on the cheap in an attempt to break even.

    It's his money so he can do as he likes. 

    I just can't see us paying say 3 or 4 hundred grand on a player 
  • Starinnaddick
    Starinnaddick Posts: 4,349
    How old was Shelvey on debut? 
    Also 16
    Thank you
  • swordfish
    swordfish Posts: 4,236
    edited July 2022
    Although TS has paid fees in past transfer windows,  only by shelling out again now will some be convinced he doesn't lack ambition or isn't skint. 

    I'm confident that, within reason, he'd be prepared to pay out to secure a target high on the priority list, probably a striker of proven L1 standing, but until he does, the doubts will remain.
  • DubaiCAFC
    DubaiCAFC Posts: 2,463
    Blucher said:
    I thought Bowyer was 18 but you're certainly right about Konchesky, although I don't think he really established himself until 2000/01. I recall that Parker also played against Bury early in 97/98 as a 17 year old but really entrenched himself after he came back from his Norwich loan a couple of years later.

    The other really notable youngster who became a regular from pretty well the outset was JonJo Shelvey. He really did the decent thing by signing a pro contract on his 17th birthday, despite interest from the Premier League, especially given our desperate financial position at the time. Sadly, the increasing influence of agents and that blasted  Elite Player Performance Plan sees a lot more young talented EFL players jumping ship these days, with minimal compensation for the clubs that nurtured their development.
    Apart from Bowyer, they all spent quiet a bit of time out of the team or went on loan
  • swordfish said:
    Although TS has paid fees in past transfer windows,  only by shelling out again now will some be convinced he doesn't lack ambition or isn't skint. 

    I'm confident that, within reason, he'd be prepared to pay out to secure a target high on the priority list, probably a striker of proven L1 standing, but until he does, the doubts will remain.
    Think it will more likely be a winger than a striker. Don’t think anyone of value will want to play second fiddle to Stockley if we are playing 1 up top and can’t see us splashing the cash to have someone on the bench.
  • paulfox
    paulfox Posts: 2,356
    paulfox said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Redrobo said:
    Surely not 3-5-2. It consigns DJ, Kirk and CBT to the bin. 4-3-3 must be the plan, so striker-wise Stockley, Chuks, Kanu and 1 more is enough, as I assume Davison will either be sold or go on loan.

    It's 1 more goal scoring winger that we really need.
    I am not convinced that Kanu is ready to step up to the first team just yet.
    I am expecting a loan from a Prem club
    He's 17 & as I've said a couple of times JJ commented at the end of the season that Kanu is nowhere near ready for first team football. Mind you if Martins black box came up with Marquis until Garner vetoed that one who knows who else we are looking at. 
    He got 41 goals and continued scoring at u23 level. I don't get the whole "he's 17, he's not ready", he is clearly too good for our youth levels. We are in league 1. Rooney was playing for Everton at this point, if you're old enough, you're good enough. would like to see him given a go in pre-season, the kid clearly knows where the goal is.
    Rooney was a freak.  Kane, Shearer, Ronaldo, Henry, RVN etc etc weren't playing regularly at 17.

    It is also worth noting how quickly Rooney's body and career went downhill in his early 30's. A 17 year old is not meant to be playing that much men's football at that age, yes they may be good enough but they will likely end their career earlier.
    Explain that to James Milner, Billy Bonds and many other.
    There will always be exceptions, but if you need to go as far back as billy bonds when the game was completely different then that probably tells you something.

    For a significant portion of players, if they play too much high level mens football as a 16, 17, 18 year old they will end their careers early.
    Yes there are far more examples of careers being cut short from starting/ breaking through at a young age than not. Obvious to say but the development of the body has a big say, be it early or late. 
    Name them all to prove it.
    Ok how about fu:k off👍

  • Sponsored links:



  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,399
    paulfox said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Redrobo said:
    Surely not 3-5-2. It consigns DJ, Kirk and CBT to the bin. 4-3-3 must be the plan, so striker-wise Stockley, Chuks, Kanu and 1 more is enough, as I assume Davison will either be sold or go on loan.

    It's 1 more goal scoring winger that we really need.
    I am not convinced that Kanu is ready to step up to the first team just yet.
    I am expecting a loan from a Prem club
    He's 17 & as I've said a couple of times JJ commented at the end of the season that Kanu is nowhere near ready for first team football. Mind you if Martins black box came up with Marquis until Garner vetoed that one who knows who else we are looking at. 
    He got 41 goals and continued scoring at u23 level. I don't get the whole "he's 17, he's not ready", he is clearly too good for our youth levels. We are in league 1. Rooney was playing for Everton at this point, if you're old enough, you're good enough. would like to see him given a go in pre-season, the kid clearly knows where the goal is.
    Rooney was a freak.  Kane, Shearer, Ronaldo, Henry, RVN etc etc weren't playing regularly at 17.

    It is also worth noting how quickly Rooney's body and career went downhill in his early 30's. A 17 year old is not meant to be playing that much men's football at that age, yes they may be good enough but they will likely end their career earlier.
    Explain that to James Milner, Billy Bonds and many other.
    There will always be exceptions, but if you need to go as far back as billy bonds when the game was completely different then that probably tells you something.

    For a significant portion of players, if they play too much high level mens football as a 16, 17, 18 year old they will end their careers early.
    Yes there are far more examples of careers being cut short from starting/ breaking through at a young age than not. Obvious to say but the development of the body has a big say, be it early or late. 
    Name them all to prove it.
    Reminds me of that time you said "Find it" ...
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,053
    paulfox said:
    paulfox said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Redrobo said:
    Surely not 3-5-2. It consigns DJ, Kirk and CBT to the bin. 4-3-3 must be the plan, so striker-wise Stockley, Chuks, Kanu and 1 more is enough, as I assume Davison will either be sold or go on loan.

    It's 1 more goal scoring winger that we really need.
    I am not convinced that Kanu is ready to step up to the first team just yet.
    I am expecting a loan from a Prem club
    He's 17 & as I've said a couple of times JJ commented at the end of the season that Kanu is nowhere near ready for first team football. Mind you if Martins black box came up with Marquis until Garner vetoed that one who knows who else we are looking at. 
    He got 41 goals and continued scoring at u23 level. I don't get the whole "he's 17, he's not ready", he is clearly too good for our youth levels. We are in league 1. Rooney was playing for Everton at this point, if you're old enough, you're good enough. would like to see him given a go in pre-season, the kid clearly knows where the goal is.
    Rooney was a freak.  Kane, Shearer, Ronaldo, Henry, RVN etc etc weren't playing regularly at 17.

    It is also worth noting how quickly Rooney's body and career went downhill in his early 30's. A 17 year old is not meant to be playing that much men's football at that age, yes they may be good enough but they will likely end their career earlier.
    Explain that to James Milner, Billy Bonds and many other.
    There will always be exceptions, but if you need to go as far back as billy bonds when the game was completely different then that probably tells you something.

    For a significant portion of players, if they play too much high level mens football as a 16, 17, 18 year old they will end their careers early.
    Yes there are far more examples of careers being cut short from starting/ breaking through at a young age than not. Obvious to say but the development of the body has a big say, be it early or late. 
    Name them all to prove it.
    Ok how about fu:k off👍
    He'll start complaining soon enough when people start digging him out for trolling yet again.
    I suppose people are what they are and won't be changing now.
  • paulfox
    paulfox Posts: 2,356
    paulfox said:
    paulfox said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Redrobo said:
    Surely not 3-5-2. It consigns DJ, Kirk and CBT to the bin. 4-3-3 must be the plan, so striker-wise Stockley, Chuks, Kanu and 1 more is enough, as I assume Davison will either be sold or go on loan.

    It's 1 more goal scoring winger that we really need.
    I am not convinced that Kanu is ready to step up to the first team just yet.
    I am expecting a loan from a Prem club
    He's 17 & as I've said a couple of times JJ commented at the end of the season that Kanu is nowhere near ready for first team football. Mind you if Martins black box came up with Marquis until Garner vetoed that one who knows who else we are looking at. 
    He got 41 goals and continued scoring at u23 level. I don't get the whole "he's 17, he's not ready", he is clearly too good for our youth levels. We are in league 1. Rooney was playing for Everton at this point, if you're old enough, you're good enough. would like to see him given a go in pre-season, the kid clearly knows where the goal is.
    Rooney was a freak.  Kane, Shearer, Ronaldo, Henry, RVN etc etc weren't playing regularly at 17.

    It is also worth noting how quickly Rooney's body and career went downhill in his early 30's. A 17 year old is not meant to be playing that much men's football at that age, yes they may be good enough but they will likely end their career earlier.
    Explain that to James Milner, Billy Bonds and many other.
    There will always be exceptions, but if you need to go as far back as billy bonds when the game was completely different then that probably tells you something.

    For a significant portion of players, if they play too much high level mens football as a 16, 17, 18 year old they will end their careers early.
    Yes there are far more examples of careers being cut short from starting/ breaking through at a young age than not. Obvious to say but the development of the body has a big say, be it early or late. 
    Name them all to prove it.
    Ok how about fu:k off👍
    He'll start complaining soon enough when people start digging him out for trolling yet again.
    I suppose people are what they are and won't be changing now.
    Yes, sorry probably a bit over the top, but he along with uboat seem to have a thing for me, now they just get on my tits😂😂😜
  • eastterrace6168
    eastterrace6168 Posts: 22,778
    edited July 2022
    paulfox said:
    paulfox said:
    paulfox said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Redrobo said:
    Surely not 3-5-2. It consigns DJ, Kirk and CBT to the bin. 4-3-3 must be the plan, so striker-wise Stockley, Chuks, Kanu and 1 more is enough, as I assume Davison will either be sold or go on loan.

    It's 1 more goal scoring winger that we really need.
    I am not convinced that Kanu is ready to step up to the first team just yet.
    I am expecting a loan from a Prem club
    He's 17 & as I've said a couple of times JJ commented at the end of the season that Kanu is nowhere near ready for first team football. Mind you if Martins black box came up with Marquis until Garner vetoed that one who knows who else we are looking at. 
    He got 41 goals and continued scoring at u23 level. I don't get the whole "he's 17, he's not ready", he is clearly too good for our youth levels. We are in league 1. Rooney was playing for Everton at this point, if you're old enough, you're good enough. would like to see him given a go in pre-season, the kid clearly knows where the goal is.
    Rooney was a freak.  Kane, Shearer, Ronaldo, Henry, RVN etc etc weren't playing regularly at 17.

    It is also worth noting how quickly Rooney's body and career went downhill in his early 30's. A 17 year old is not meant to be playing that much men's football at that age, yes they may be good enough but they will likely end their career earlier.
    Explain that to James Milner, Billy Bonds and many other.
    There will always be exceptions, but if you need to go as far back as billy bonds when the game was completely different then that probably tells you something.

    For a significant portion of players, if they play too much high level mens football as a 16, 17, 18 year old they will end their careers early.
    Yes there are far more examples of careers being cut short from starting/ breaking through at a young age than not. Obvious to say but the development of the body has a big say, be it early or late. 
    Name them all to prove it.
    Ok how about fu:k off👍
    He'll start complaining soon enough when people start digging him out for trolling yet again.
    I suppose people are what they are and won't be changing now.
    Yes, sorry probably a bit over the top, but he along with uboat seem to have a thing for me, now they just get on my tits😂😂😜


    Sorry, thought i'd lighten the atmos a bit... B)
  • paulfox
    paulfox Posts: 2,356
    paulfox said:
    paulfox said:
    paulfox said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Redrobo said:
    Surely not 3-5-2. It consigns DJ, Kirk and CBT to the bin. 4-3-3 must be the plan, so striker-wise Stockley, Chuks, Kanu and 1 more is enough, as I assume Davison will either be sold or go on loan.

    It's 1 more goal scoring winger that we really need.
    I am not convinced that Kanu is ready to step up to the first team just yet.
    I am expecting a loan from a Prem club
    He's 17 & as I've said a couple of times JJ commented at the end of the season that Kanu is nowhere near ready for first team football. Mind you if Martins black box came up with Marquis until Garner vetoed that one who knows who else we are looking at. 
    He got 41 goals and continued scoring at u23 level. I don't get the whole "he's 17, he's not ready", he is clearly too good for our youth levels. We are in league 1. Rooney was playing for Everton at this point, if you're old enough, you're good enough. would like to see him given a go in pre-season, the kid clearly knows where the goal is.
    Rooney was a freak.  Kane, Shearer, Ronaldo, Henry, RVN etc etc weren't playing regularly at 17.

    It is also worth noting how quickly Rooney's body and career went downhill in his early 30's. A 17 year old is not meant to be playing that much men's football at that age, yes they may be good enough but they will likely end their career earlier.
    Explain that to James Milner, Billy Bonds and many other.
    There will always be exceptions, but if you need to go as far back as billy bonds when the game was completely different then that probably tells you something.

    For a significant portion of players, if they play too much high level mens football as a 16, 17, 18 year old they will end their careers early.
    Yes there are far more examples of careers being cut short from starting/ breaking through at a young age than not. Obvious to say but the development of the body has a big say, be it early or late. 
    Name them all to prove it.
    Ok how about fu:k off👍
    He'll start complaining soon enough when people start digging him out for trolling yet again.
    I suppose people are what they are and won't be changing now.
    Yes, sorry probably a bit over the top, but he along with uboat seem to have a thing for me, now they just get on my tits😂😂😜


    Sorry, thought i'd lighten the atmos... B)
    Lol, would be a disappointment my tits aren’t that big!!!!, do love a Kenneth gif though, always room for that!!.👍😂
  • sillav nitram
    sillav nitram Posts: 10,170
    paulfox said:
    paulfox said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Redrobo said:
    Surely not 3-5-2. It consigns DJ, Kirk and CBT to the bin. 4-3-3 must be the plan, so striker-wise Stockley, Chuks, Kanu and 1 more is enough, as I assume Davison will either be sold or go on loan.

    It's 1 more goal scoring winger that we really need.
    I am not convinced that Kanu is ready to step up to the first team just yet.
    I am expecting a loan from a Prem club
    He's 17 & as I've said a couple of times JJ commented at the end of the season that Kanu is nowhere near ready for first team football. Mind you if Martins black box came up with Marquis until Garner vetoed that one who knows who else we are looking at. 
    He got 41 goals and continued scoring at u23 level. I don't get the whole "he's 17, he's not ready", he is clearly too good for our youth levels. We are in league 1. Rooney was playing for Everton at this point, if you're old enough, you're good enough. would like to see him given a go in pre-season, the kid clearly knows where the goal is.
    Rooney was a freak.  Kane, Shearer, Ronaldo, Henry, RVN etc etc weren't playing regularly at 17.

    It is also worth noting how quickly Rooney's body and career went downhill in his early 30's. A 17 year old is not meant to be playing that much men's football at that age, yes they may be good enough but they will likely end their career earlier.
    Explain that to James Milner, Billy Bonds and many other.
    There will always be exceptions, but if you need to go as far back as billy bonds when the game was completely different then that probably tells you something.

    For a significant portion of players, if they play too much high level mens football as a 16, 17, 18 year old they will end their careers early.
    Yes there are far more examples of careers being cut short from starting/ breaking through at a young age than not. Obvious to say but the development of the body has a big say, be it early or late. 
    Name them all to prove it.
    Ok how about fu:k off👍
    https://youtu.be/dJmg-879j5o
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,381
    paulfox said:
    paulfox said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Redrobo said:
    Surely not 3-5-2. It consigns DJ, Kirk and CBT to the bin. 4-3-3 must be the plan, so striker-wise Stockley, Chuks, Kanu and 1 more is enough, as I assume Davison will either be sold or go on loan.

    It's 1 more goal scoring winger that we really need.
    I am not convinced that Kanu is ready to step up to the first team just yet.
    I am expecting a loan from a Prem club
    He's 17 & as I've said a couple of times JJ commented at the end of the season that Kanu is nowhere near ready for first team football. Mind you if Martins black box came up with Marquis until Garner vetoed that one who knows who else we are looking at. 
    He got 41 goals and continued scoring at u23 level. I don't get the whole "he's 17, he's not ready", he is clearly too good for our youth levels. We are in league 1. Rooney was playing for Everton at this point, if you're old enough, you're good enough. would like to see him given a go in pre-season, the kid clearly knows where the goal is.
    Rooney was a freak.  Kane, Shearer, Ronaldo, Henry, RVN etc etc weren't playing regularly at 17.

    It is also worth noting how quickly Rooney's body and career went downhill in his early 30's. A 17 year old is not meant to be playing that much men's football at that age, yes they may be good enough but they will likely end their career earlier.
    Explain that to James Milner, Billy Bonds and many other.
    There will always be exceptions, but if you need to go as far back as billy bonds when the game was completely different then that probably tells you something.

    For a significant portion of players, if they play too much high level mens football as a 16, 17, 18 year old they will end their careers early.
    Yes there are far more examples of careers being cut short from starting/ breaking through at a young age than not. Obvious to say but the development of the body has a big say, be it early or late. 
    Name them all to prove it.
    Ok how about fu:k off👍
    https://youtu.be/dJmg-879j5o
    Absolute belter that one.  Happier days!

  • Sponsored links:



  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,638
    is Joe a loan?
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,715
    edited July 2022
  • thenewbie
    thenewbie Posts: 11,016


    paulfox said:
    paulfox said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Redrobo said:
    Surely not 3-5-2. It consigns DJ, Kirk and CBT to the bin. 4-3-3 must be the plan, so striker-wise Stockley, Chuks, Kanu and 1 more is enough, as I assume Davison will either be sold or go on loan.

    It's 1 more goal scoring winger that we really need.
    I am not convinced that Kanu is ready to step up to the first team just yet.
    I am expecting a loan from a Prem club
    He's 17 & as I've said a couple of times JJ commented at the end of the season that Kanu is nowhere near ready for first team football. Mind you if Martins black box came up with Marquis until Garner vetoed that one who knows who else we are looking at. 
    He got 41 goals and continued scoring at u23 level. I don't get the whole "he's 17, he's not ready", he is clearly too good for our youth levels. We are in league 1. Rooney was playing for Everton at this point, if you're old enough, you're good enough. would like to see him given a go in pre-season, the kid clearly knows where the goal is.
    Rooney was a freak.  Kane, Shearer, Ronaldo, Henry, RVN etc etc weren't playing regularly at 17.

    It is also worth noting how quickly Rooney's body and career went downhill in his early 30's. A 17 year old is not meant to be playing that much men's football at that age, yes they may be good enough but they will likely end their career earlier.
    Explain that to James Milner, Billy Bonds and many other.
    There will always be exceptions, but if you need to go as far back as billy bonds when the game was completely different then that probably tells you something.

    For a significant portion of players, if they play too much high level mens football as a 16, 17, 18 year old they will end their careers early.
    Yes there are far more examples of careers being cut short from starting/ breaking through at a young age than not. Obvious to say but the development of the body has a big say, be it early or late. 
    Name them all to prove it.
    Ok how about fu:k off👍
    Thought so. You can't 🙃
    Well fairs fair. You had better write every single player who played senior football at 17 and still played 20+ games in a season professionally at 36. Then we can see which there are more of.
  • FAVADDICK
    FAVADDICK Posts: 584
    I wonder if there is many on trial with us, just there hasn't been much social media from the club this week regarding pictures of training!!!
  • Gary Poole
    Gary Poole Posts: 1,874
    This right winger available soon





    Sorry Admin, delete away
    Well we did sign Thatcher once. And stranger still played thatcher on the left wing.
  • msomerton
    msomerton Posts: 2,988
    paulfox said:
    Colby Bishop is definitely someone we should be interested in.
    Totally agree we should be.
    But I don't believe we will spend any money this window on a transfer fee.
    It will be free transfers and loan deals so I can't see it happen. 
    I'd love to be proved wrong Tommy so get yer check book out.
    Do you think Tommy can resist not having a bit of a show off signing? I’m hoping people are right with there assumption it’s all about him and he can’t help splashing out on someone once he’s got his freebies. 
    not a chance.
  • RC_CAFC
    RC_CAFC Posts: 1,761
    msomerton said:
    paulfox said:
    Colby Bishop is definitely someone we should be interested in.
    Totally agree we should be.
    But I don't believe we will spend any money this window on a transfer fee.
    It will be free transfers and loan deals so I can't see it happen. 
    I'd love to be proved wrong Tommy so get yer check book out.
    Do you think Tommy can resist not having a bit of a show off signing? I’m hoping people are right with there assumption it’s all about him and he can’t help splashing out on someone once he’s got his freebies. 
    not a chance.
    Hasn’t been a transfer window yet I don’t believe where TS hasn’t paid a fee for a player but let’s not that fact spoil a good opportunity to put him down.
  • cabbles
    cabbles Posts: 15,261
    If we aren’t going to be paying any fees in this window (and I can understand TS’ reluctance to plough more money in), then I struggle to see where we’re going to find the additional quality we need.  Some of you may know the loan/free transfer market better than I do, but can we get the quality needed from it?