Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)
Comments
-
Blast from the pastRodneyCharltonTrotta said:
Nim Nimer, someone took the keys to his bimma. That's why he's getting a cab.Taxi_Lad said:
Afraid not. Although I have a booking for Monday to pickup from Heathrow. Some foreign chap called Nimer!!! 😉carly burn said:1 -
You say that like it's a good thing?Stu_of_Kunming said:
Whilst trolling is still an issue here, to use almost any form of social media one must have attached their ID card to the account, it's not displayed publicly but it certainly makes things a lot easier for the authorities.JamesSeed said:
Just wondered if there would be so much trolling (especially elsewhere) if people had to put their real names to it?Henry Irving said:
It's not IMHO that it's needed but for some it's desired.JamesSeed said:
Dear AFKA,AFKABartram said:Prague - Would you please STOP attempting to reveal individuals personal names against their user names. That’s twice now in recent weeks. It’s not on.
If you want to reveal your personal details to others that’s entirely up to you. By please respect everyone else’s right to anonymity should they wish.
Same for Soundas and for everyone else.
I've never really understood why anonymity is needed. I'm sure there's a good reason, I've just never stumbled upon it.
Given the abuse some get from elsewhere I can see why.
Plus we're not all as vain as @bobmonro to use our real names 😁0 -
Nobody except the club itself would attend a “press conference” for this on a Monday evening, which the PR guy would know very well.
1 -
Yesterday, I'm certain that's his official insta account looking at his posting historyRudders22 said:
Btw. What date is that?FANnotCUSTOMER said:
is this confirmation the Belgium has gone? 0 -
...and there it is.Stu_of_Kunming said:
Whilst trolling is still an issue here, to use almost any form of social media one must have attached their ID card to the account, it's not displayed publicly but it certainly makes things a lot easier for the authorities.JamesSeed said:
Just wondered if there would be so much trolling (especially elsewhere) if people had to put their real names to it?Henry Irving said:
It's not IMHO that it's needed but for some it's desired.JamesSeed said:
Dear AFKA,AFKABartram said:Prague - Would you please STOP attempting to reveal individuals personal names against their user names. That’s twice now in recent weeks. It’s not on.
If you want to reveal your personal details to others that’s entirely up to you. By please respect everyone else’s right to anonymity should they wish.
Same for Soundas and for everyone else.
I've never really understood why anonymity is needed. I'm sure there's a good reason, I've just never stumbled upon it.
Given the abuse some get from elsewhere I can see why.
Plus we're not all as vain as @bobmonro to use our real names 😁0 -
Not true.Airman Brown said:Nobody except the club itself would attend a “press conference” for this on a Monday evening, which the PR guy would know very well.
I'd go
3 -
He is a man of the people, he´ll be using Ryanair.ShootersHillGuru said:Just an observation but wouldn’t someone like Tahnoon Nimer fly by private jet ?2 -
Could we ask Boris for a second opinion?Ferryman said:veracitynoun- conformity to facts; accuracy."officials expressed doubts concerning the veracity of the story"Similar:truthfulnesstruthaccuracyaccuratenesscorrectnessexactnessprecisionprecisenessrealismauthenticityfaithfulnessfidelityreputabilityhonestysinceritytrustworthinessreliabilitydependabilityscrupulousnessethicsmoralityrighteousnessvirtuousnessdecencygoodnessprobityOpposite:falsity
- habitual truthfulness."voters should be concerned about his veracity and character"
Translations and more definitions4 days ago · veracity definition: the quality of being true, honest, or accurate: . Learn more .PEOPLE ALSO ASK
What is an example of veracWeb results
Veracity definition is - conformity with truth or fact : accuracy. How to use veracity in a sentence. Did You Know?noun, plural ve·rac·i·ties for 4. habitual observance of truth in speech or statement; truthfulness: He was not noted for his veracity. conformity to truth or fact; accuracy: to question the veracity of his account. correctness or accuracy, as of the senses or of a scientific instrument. something veracious; a truth.Veracity definition: Veracity is the quality of being true or the habit of telling the truth. | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and examples.Define veracity (noun) and get synonyms. What is veracity (noun)? veracity (noun) meaning, pronunciation and more by Macmillan Dictionary.veracity definition: The definition of veracity is truthfulness or accuracy. (noun) An example of veracity is the historical correctness of a biography; the veracity of ...Veracity sounds like some kind of disease you don't want to catch, but in fact, it means truthfulness. If you question the veracity of a statement or story, you ...EtymologyEdit. From Middle French véracité, from Old French veracitie, from Medieval Latin vērācitās (“ truthfulness”), from Latin vērāx (“truthful, speaking truth”), ...Definition of veracity noun in Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Meaning, pronunciation, picture, example sentences, grammar, usage notes, synonyms and ...https://www.definitions.net › veracityctiveracityveveveracityct
0 -
ElfsborgAddick said:
He is a man of the people, he´ll be buying Ryanair.ShootersHillGuru said:Just an observation but wouldn’t someone like Tahnoon Nimer fly by private jet ?
4 -
They just need to get it done soon so we can announce Zlatan as our first signing.
1 - Sponsored links:
-
Tahnoon O'NimerElfsborgAddick said:
He is a man of the people, he´ll be using Ryanair.ShootersHillGuru said:Just an observation but wouldn’t someone like Tahnoon Nimer fly by private jet ?2 -
Like I said, nobody ...Henry Irving said:
Not true.Airman Brown said:Nobody except the club itself would attend a “press conference” for this on a Monday evening, which the PR guy would know very well.
I'd go
😉49 -
There goes my chance to blag my way in as the VOTV correspondent at next week's press conference.Airman Brown said:
Like I said, nobody ...Henry Irving said:
Not true.Airman Brown said:Nobody except the club itself would attend a “press conference” for this on a Monday evening, which the PR guy would know very well.
I'd go
😉
I'll have to try being the museum or Bromley rep. No minutes on CL either.2 -
WallopAirman Brown said:
Like I said, nobody ...Henry Irving said:
Not true.Airman Brown said:Nobody except the club itself would attend a “press conference” for this on a Monday evening, which the PR guy would know very well.
I'd go
😉3 -
My browsing history seems to contain the word sheikh in it a lot
Having said thatWe should of realised who was buying us all along when the players were signing sheikh it all baby now....0 -
Can’t seem to find Tahnoon Nimer’s Twitter account anymore.
His username was ttnimer
Was there yesterday with a Charlton logo in his profile.
0 -
Wasn’t it Instagram not Twitter1
-
Doh! Sorry, it was indeed.ShootersHillGuru said:Wasn’t it Instagram not Twitter0 -
Can someone, who has a better understanding than me, answer questions?
1) who has authorised Mr Southall's access all areas pass on a match day?
2) Why would you let a football agent have private meetings with your manger and head of recruitment, where confidential contract details maybe discussed, if there was any doubt at all?
3) Is Mr Southall the dog or the tail? Has he sort funding for a "project" or has the funder employed him?
4) Lastly any idea why us? We can sort of rule out the "property play" for reason done to death, but what is our USP?
IMO if MS is the dog (as per question 2) this could be a "bumpy ride".0 -
1) I would assume RM on the say so of RD.Cafc43v3r said:Can someone, who has a better understanding than me, answer questions?
1) who has authorised Mr Southall's access all areas pass on a match day?
2) Why would you let a football agent have private meetings with your manger and head of recruitment, where confidential contract details maybe discussed, if there was any doubt at all?
3) Is Mr Southall the dog or the tail? Has he sort funding for a "project" or has the funder employed him?
4) Lastly any idea why us? We can sort of rule out the "property play" for reason done to death, but what is our USP?
IMO if MS is the dog (as per question 2) this could be a "bumpy ride".
2) former football agent as I understand it.
3) He is clearly the tail, already reported extensively that Nimer is the majority share holder of ESI
4) a Premier League ground (albeit it needs some TLC), relatively recent top flight history so a degree of international recognition and, above all I would suggest, a capital city club with a quarter of London to claim.10 - Sponsored links:
-
ESI would have had to provide proof of funds at the beginning of the negotiations some months ago.
At least, that has been the pattern before according to Lievin on the Ceiling.
Maybe Duchatelet waived his usual requirements when he heard it was Abu Dhabi dosh but it seems unlikely.
So why is there an issue with the veracity of the funding? Is it even an issue at all?
Southall seems confident and has told fans directly that the takeover is progressing as expected. To which the cynic would reply "he would, wouldn't he".
I don't think there is a dog or tail. The money and owner is Nimer. The man on the ground is Southall.
It's quite possible that it was Southall's plan and he pitched it to Nimer and got a thumbs up.
It's equally possible that Nimer wanted to get into football and asked Southall to do the leg work and front up the business.
We don't know and to me, if the deals goes through, it doesn't really matter too much. It would be interesting to know but does it matter who asked who to dance first.
I still think there are lots of complications with TN and JH having a finger in so many pies and MS being a former agent. I don't see a problem but then I know none of the details.
As to why would the current regime allow MS to walk around like he already owns the club, maybe they think he does. Then again they are proven incompetents so who knows. It takes some pressure off the regime for a while but I don't think this is made up or a conspiracy. It's real but so where the Aussies and other buyers.
WIOTOS
6 -
I'm sure if Duchatelet thinks he is getting £50m from ESI he'd quite happily have allowed Matt Southall to play on Friday night if he'd been asked.Henry Irving said:ESI would have had to provide proof of funds at the beginning of the negotiations some months ago.
At least, that has been the pattern before according to Lievin on the Ceiling.
Maybe Duchatelet waived his usual requirements when he heard it was Abu Dhabi dosh but it seems unlikely.
So why is there an issue with the veracity of the funding? Is it even an issue at all?
Southall seems confident and has told fans directly that the takeover is progressing as expected. To which the cynic would reply "he would, wouldn't he".
I don't think there is a dog or tail. The money and owner is Nimer. The man on the ground is Southall.
It's quite possible that it was Southall's plan and he pitched it to Nimer and got a thumbs up.
It's equally possible that Nimer wanted to get into football and asked Southall to do the leg work and front up the business.
We don't know and to me, if the deals goes through, it doesn't really matter too much. It would be interesting to know but does it made who asked who to dance first.
I still think there are lots of complications with TN and JH having a finger in so many pies and MS being a former agent. I don't see a problem but then I know none of the details.
As to why would the current regime allow MS to walk around like he already owns the club, maybe they think he does. Then again they are proven incompetents so who knows. It takes some pressure off the regime for a while but I don't think this is made up or a conspiracy. It's real but so where the Aussies and other buyers.
WIOTOS
31 -
Me as well then.. (see earlier post :P)Airman Brown said:
Like I said, nobody ...Henry Irving said:
Not true.Airman Brown said:Nobody except the club itself would attend a “press conference” for this on a Monday evening, which the PR guy would know very well.
I'd go
😉0 -
Sure you could get any number of fans along but that's not really the point of a press conference...razil said:
Me as well then.. (see earlier post :P)Airman Brown said:
Like I said, nobody ...Henry Irving said:
Not true.Airman Brown said:Nobody except the club itself would attend a “press conference” for this on a Monday evening, which the PR guy would know very well.
I'd go
😉0 -
Call it a Fan Forum then...?!Airman Brown said:
Sure you could get any number of fans along but that's not really the point of a press conference...razil said:
Me as well then.. (see earlier post :P)Airman Brown said:
Like I said, nobody ...Henry Irving said:
Not true.Airman Brown said:Nobody except the club itself would attend a “press conference” for this on a Monday evening, which the PR guy would know very well.
I'd go
😉1 -
I’m all for it being called FF. I’m on the list 👍0
-
Wrong thread0
-
Well if it's called an FF, I'm free !ShootersHillGuru said:I’m all for it being called FF. I’m on the list 👍2 -
The key issue for new owners, apart from injuries which they can't influence, is the number of players out of contract in June. I suspect that Southall's view on the current squad may be "strange".0
-
You're certainly right about it's primary reason, however it well for the secondary too, its possible to have one without the other.Henry Irving said:
Somehow I think the reason for that isn't to stop trolling on Football sites but limit criticism of a repressive stateStu_of_Kunming said:
Whilst trolling is still an issue here, to use almost any form of social media one must have attached their ID card to the account, it's not displayed publicly but it certainly makes things a lot easier for the authorities.JamesSeed said:
Just wondered if there would be so much trolling (especially elsewhere) if people had to put their real names to it?Henry Irving said:
It's not IMHO that it's needed but for some it's desired.JamesSeed said:
Dear AFKA,AFKABartram said:Prague - Would you please STOP attempting to reveal individuals personal names against their user names. That’s twice now in recent weeks. It’s not on.
If you want to reveal your personal details to others that’s entirely up to you. By please respect everyone else’s right to anonymity should they wish.
Same for Soundas and for everyone else.
I've never really understood why anonymity is needed. I'm sure there's a good reason, I've just never stumbled upon it.
Given the abuse some get from elsewhere I can see why.
Plus we're not all as vain as @bobmonro to use our real names 😁1
This discussion has been closed.
