Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
England Cricket Tours 2018-19 (and everything off the field during that period)
Comments
-
Brathwaite b Wood 13
237-60 -
Hetmyer will become a superstar.
Mark my words0 -
289-6 Hetmeyer 104 no.
Eng need 290 to win.0 -
Bairstow lbw Cottrell 0
1-10 -
Roy b Cottrell 2
10-20 -
This is where England can show why they will win the World Cup. We all know they can blast 350+ on a flat wicket, but can they grind out wins after being 10-2 without playing too aggressively1
-
Root c Hope b Thomas 36
63-30 -
Can't work out why Rashid only bowled 6 overs.2
-
140-3 26 overs0
-
When did the tv commentary and “analysis” on sky sports become so shit for ODI’s?
Especially baffling given how well the English lads are doing.
0 - Sponsored links:
-
Morgan c Hetmeyer b Cottrell 70
159-4.0 -
In the last match Morgan brought Rashid on too late so he was forced to bowl at the death and still not compete his overs. In this match he brought him on early and he got the big wicket of Gayle forgot to bowl him again after the 29th over.Addickted2TheReds said:Can't work out why Rashid only bowled 6 overs.
Morgan clearly rates Moeen more but the figures don't lie as to who, of the two, has been more effective :
Moeen......17-0-136-0
Rashid......15-0-102-4
0 -
Stokes c Hope b Holder 79
228-5 62 req'd from 600 -
Buttler c Hetmyer b Holder 34
233-60 -
Curran lbw Holder 0
233-70 -
Curran didn't look like lbw & it shouldn't have been. Now Holder drops a dolly from Rashid0
-
Just caught myself thinking this was a low scoring game.
It wasn't that long ago that I'd have been delighted with 250!1 -
DRS not fit for purpose again. Supposed to eliminate errors/howlers.....try telling Curran that.
Got me be a better way than "using up your reviews". Double penalty perhaps. Duran reviews knowing he is not out......if out then penalty runs added. That or the decision is taken away from the batsman......a bit like VAR. To add to that I reckon Stokes only reviewed his because he was set & didn't want to get out (see his reaction afterwards-throwing pads away & stomping off). Selfish twat.
0 -
250-7
40 needed from 30 cracking game.0 -
Going to the wire!0
- Sponsored links:
-
Rashid c Hope b Cottrell 15
260-8
30 req'd off 21.0 -
261-9
Moeen b Cottrell 120 -
Well bowled - shame you celebrate like a bellend.0
-
Plunkett c Holder b Brathwaite 2
263 All Out
WI win by 26 runs.0 -
DRS quite fit for purpose in this occasion. two umpiring decisions, one was a howler which DRS should have corrected. However because of our stupidity we used the review when Stokes obviously knew he had it. You could tell that by his reaction in the way he panickley looked looked to see whether the wicketkeeper would catch itgolfaddick said:DRS not fit for purpose again. Supposed to eliminate errors/howlers.....try telling Curran that.
Got me be a better way than "using up your reviews". Double penalty perhaps. Duran reviews knowing he is not out......if out then penalty runs added. That or the decision is taken away from the batsman......a bit like VAR. To add to that I reckon Stokes only reviewed his because he was set & didn't want to get out (see his reaction afterwards-throwing pads away & stomping off). Selfish twat.0 -
I never like to see England lose. However anybody else think this was a much more enjoyable game when there is something in the pitch for the bowlers, not much but something. Load less runs but better game!2
-
That is gonna be our World Cup semi final performance right there.2
-
makes a good case for more than one review (i.e. two) in 50/50 games, especially when one of the umpires is an inexperienced 'local'Covered End said:Curran didn't look like lbw & it shouldn't have been. Now Holder drops a dolly from RashidCovered End said:Curran didn't look like lbw & it shouldn't have been. Now Holder drops a dolly from Rashid
1 -
this game was the one that got away .. but makes for a more interesting next three games0
-
3rd ODI - start delayed rain.0
