Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket Tours 2018-19 (and everything off the field during that period)

1…6566687071…74

Comments

  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    edited February 2019
    Brathwaite b Wood 13
    237-6
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,736
    Hetmyer will become a superstar. 
    Mark my words 
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    289-6    Hetmeyer 104 no.
    Eng need 290 to win. 
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    Bairstow lbw Cottrell 0

    1-1
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    Roy b Cottrell 2

    10-2
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    This is where England can show why they will win the World Cup. We all know they can blast 350+ on a flat wicket, but can they grind out wins after being 10-2 without playing too aggressively 
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    Root c Hope b Thomas 36
    63-3
  • Addickted2TheReds
    Addickted2TheReds Posts: 7,759
    Can't work out why Rashid only bowled 6 overs.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    140-3      26 overs
  • andyg90
    andyg90 Posts: 505
    When did the tv commentary and “analysis” on sky sports become so shit for ODI’s? 
    Especially baffling given how well the English lads are doing. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    edited February 2019
    Morgan c Hetmeyer b Cottrell 70
    159-4.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,924
    Addickted2TheReds said:
    Can't work out why Rashid only bowled 6 overs.
    In the last match Morgan brought Rashid on too late so he was forced to bowl at the death and still not compete his overs. In this match he brought him on early and he got the big wicket of Gayle forgot to bowl him again after the 29th over.

    Morgan clearly rates Moeen more but the figures don't lie as to who, of the two, has been more effective :

    Moeen......17-0-136-0
    Rashid......15-0-102-4

  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    Stokes c Hope b Holder 79

    228-5       62 req'd from 60
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    Buttler c Hetmyer b Holder 34

    233-6
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    Curran lbw Holder 0

    233-7
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    Curran didn't look like lbw & it shouldn't have been. Now Holder drops a dolly from Rashid
  • Addickted2TheReds
    Addickted2TheReds Posts: 7,759
    Just caught myself thinking this was a low scoring game.

    It wasn't that long ago that I'd have been delighted with 250! 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,786
    DRS not fit for purpose again. Supposed to eliminate errors/howlers.....try telling Curran that. 

    Got me be a better way than "using up your reviews". Double penalty perhaps. Duran reviews knowing he is not out......if out then penalty runs added. That or the decision is taken away from the batsman......a bit like VAR. To add to that I reckon Stokes only reviewed his because he was set & didn't want to get out (see his reaction afterwards-throwing pads away & stomping off). Selfish twat. 

  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    250-7

    40 needed from 30   cracking game.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,858
    Going to the wire!

  • Sponsored links:



  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    Rashid c Hope b Cottrell 15

    260-8

    30 req'd off 21.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    261-9

    Moeen b Cottrell 12
  • Addickted2TheReds
    Addickted2TheReds Posts: 7,759
    Well bowled - shame you celebrate like a bellend.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    edited February 2019
    Plunkett c Holder b Brathwaite 2

    263 All Out

    WI win by 26 runs.
  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,296
    golfaddick said:
    DRS not fit for purpose again. Supposed to eliminate errors/howlers.....try telling Curran that. 

    Got me be a better way than "using up your reviews". Double penalty perhaps. Duran reviews knowing he is not out......if out then penalty runs added. That or the decision is taken away from the batsman......a bit like VAR. To add to that I reckon Stokes only reviewed his because he was set & didn't want to get out (see his reaction afterwards-throwing pads away & stomping off). Selfish twat. 

    DRS quite fit for purpose in this occasion. two umpiring decisions, one was a howler which DRS should have corrected. However because of our stupidity we used the review when Stokes obviously knew he had it. You could tell that by his reaction in the way he panickley looked looked to see whether the wicketkeeper would catch it
  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,296
    I never like to see England lose. However anybody else think this was a much more enjoyable game when there is something in the pitch for the bowlers, not much but something. Load less runs but better game! 
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,922
    That is gonna be our  World Cup semi final performance right there. 
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,387
    Covered End said:
    Curran didn't look like lbw & it shouldn't have been. Now Holder drops a dolly from Rashid
    Covered End said:
    Curran didn't look like lbw & it shouldn't have been. Now Holder drops a dolly from Rashid

    makes a good case for more than one review (i.e. two) in 50/50 games, especially when one of the umpires is an inexperienced 'local'
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,387
    this game was the one that got away .. but makes for a more interesting next three games
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,080
    3rd ODI - start delayed rain.

Categories

“Marketplace”