Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
The influence of the EU on Britain.
Comments
-
In fact I’ve not been in Paris since January.Fiiish said:
The Italian PM, like in our country, has always been appointed you numpty.Southbank said:
Berlusconi was forced out because of EU pressure and no PM has been elected since, all appointed (not by the EU of course)Stig said:
@Southbank, in all the excitement you seem to have missed my request for some background. I just wanted to check that that was deliberate and not accidental.Stig said:
Would you be so kind as to explain this statement please, I don't know what you are referring to.Southbank said:
Ask the Greeks, Poles,Hungarians and the Italians how sovereign they are. Italy has not had an elected Prime Minister since the last one was effectively deposed by the EU in 2011.Fiiish said:
China is an autocratic police state that is incredibly intrusive into the lives of its citizens.Southbank said:
By people are 'seemingly voting against their own interests' it is meant economic interests only. Fortunately we have a political system which gives people something more than money-a vote and thereby a political stake in their society.NornIrishAddick said:So, anyway, a few links from today's Irish Times.
Fintan O'Toole has another comment piece out today, timed to coincide with his book, of which today's piece is an extract (some writing in response seem to feel that he shouldn't be allowed do such a thing, but if that was the case we should do away with things like syndication too).
As ever, it's well-written and scathing, I'm particularly intrigued by the reference to sado-populism (a notion which does seem to make sense of people seemingly voting against what one would imagine would be their interests in elections across the World).
In other news, preparations for a failure to get Parliamentary approval of the Agreement have been ramped up, and the possibility of the PM not achieving her aim seems high, leading to dangerous levels of uncertainty. Pat Leahy's article is interesting, in part, because it refers to the Statute of Westminster, a decision in which, yet again, Ireland loomed large and where the UK's influence in international politics was diminished (albeit slightly, with powers being lost by Westminster to the likes of Canada, IFS et al).
China is an increasingly successful economy. The people who run it have a lot in common with the EU bureaucracy. They too are narrow technical managerialists who say the economy is more important than democracy.
I do not share that view and neither do many other Brexit voters. Democracy is the only way that most people have any control at all over economic policies, through their ability to vote for Governments to do their will.
Apparently there are Remainers who would rather go down the Chinese route.
The EU is a collection of countries working together across economic and legal spheres, where each country remains fully sovereign, and 99% of the citizens living in the EU will never have any meaningful interaction with the EU-level authorities as all of their interactions will be at most at a national level.
I am a Remain voter, I have a far better understanding of our relationship with the EU than you will ever have and I can say without a doubt my democratic rights are in no way lessened by our EU membership.
You are entirely within your rights to be in favour of a federal Europe, but you cannot pretend that national sovereignty can exist alongside it, it is one or the other.
And other lies we need to address:
1) there is no EU army
2) Macron certainly wouldn't be leading it if he was
3) and shooters have not been "taking out" fuel protestors in France
Seriously, where are you getting all this fake news from? Is there some kind of Beano for BNP types with all this nonsense in it?
7 -
Southbank said:
But Ireland has said it will not do it, so who will-or are you saying the Irish have no sovereignty in this context?NornIrishAddick said:
If the UK cannot come up with a formulation that meets its stated intention, it's going to come from the, entirely reasonable, need for the UK and EU (which means Ireland) to protect their citizens by not allowing Uncle Tom Cobbley and all unfettered access. Because, as has been mentioned a few times, under WTO rules, in the absence of a trade agreement, an open border for one country's goods is an open border for all.Southbank said:
If Britain will not erect a hard border and neither will the Irish, as both have said-will Macron send his Euro army in to build it (when they have stopped taking out protesters in Paris).seth plum said:
My bit because quoting seems to have gone wrong.Southbank said:
You should struggle for what you think is right of course.Cordoban Addick said:Southbank said:
The right to vote was not given to us. People like the Chartists and suffragettes struggled and sometimes died for it. For people these days to dismiss its importance and to say we get more 'rights' at the whim of the EU bureaucrats is tragic.
So I assume you are OK with Remainers continuing the struggle, despite many setbacks, to have a second referendum on EU membership?
I would also assume that you are therefore in agreement with members of parliament from all sides wanting a meaningful vote on any deal that is made?
But having a second referendum before the first one is enacted is profoundly undemocratic.
Can you imagine had the Referendum gone the other way and a Tory PM announced we were leaving anyway, how profoundly undemocratic that would have been and how shocked you and others would have been? Imagine that and then you will know how we Leavers feel.
Isn't the current problem that the result of the first referendum actually can't be enacted in practical terms? That is one of the reasons there is a campaign for another vote, a campaign incidentally I am not keen on at all.
Theresa May and others have described an impasse. Very soon attempts to resolve that impasse will fall by the wayside one by one because the practical results of brexit (if control of the borders is one) conflict with the Good Friday Agreement.
Leaving consciously or unconsciously on WTO terms will also conflict with the Good Friday Agreement.
So the 'democratic' vote of 17.4 million people is effectively just as much a vote to break the GFA as it is to leave the EU.
The Good Friday Agreement was ratified by a 'democratic' referendum in the UK.
Seriously, where is it going to come from?
The U.K. will not be able to trade under WTO rules unless they apply the same “no border” policy to every WTO member not just the ROI. Think about it for a moment and you will see that much of the nonsense being spouted about the Irish border being a no issue is well.......nonsense.3 -
My bit because quoting seems to have gone wrong.Southbank said:
You should struggle for what you think is right of course.seth plum said:Southbank said:
The right to vote was not given to us. People like the Chartists and suffragettes struggled and sometimes died for it. For people these days to dismiss its importance and to say we get more 'rights' at the whim of the EU bureaucrats is tragic.Cordoban Addick said:
So I assume you are OK with Remainers continuing the struggle, despite many setbacks, to have a second referendum on EU membership?
I would also assume that you are therefore in agreement with members of parliament from all sides wanting a meaningful vote on any deal that is made?
But having a second referendum before the first one is enacted is profoundly undemocratic.
Can you imagine had the Referendum gone the other way and a Tory PM announced we were leaving anyway, how profoundly undemocratic that would have been and how shocked you and others would have been? Imagine that and then you will know how we Leavers feel.
Isn't the current problem that the result of the first referendum actually can't be enacted in practical terms? That is one of the reasons there is a campaign for another vote, a campaign incidentally I am not keen on at all.
Theresa May and others have described an impasse. Very soon attempts to resolve that impasse will fall by the wayside one by one because the practical results of brexit (if control of the borders is one) conflict with the Good Friday Agreement.
Leaving consciously or unconsciously on WTO terms will also conflict with the Good Friday Agreement.
So the 'democratic' vote of 17.4 million people is effectively just as much a vote to break the GFA as it is to leave the EU.
The Good Friday Agreement was ratified by a 'democratic' referendum in the UK.
If Britain will not erect a hard border and neither will the Irish, as both have said-will Macron send his Euro army in to build it (when they have stopped taking out protesters in Paris).
Seriously, where is it going to come from?
MY BIT
I have heard this line of argument before. Leave to regain control of the borders by not having control of the borders.
If I am right you are now arguing for no brexit at all, which given your comments about 'democracy' and not disrespecting the referendum vote yesterday, looks like you have had a complete change of heart about brexit overnight and you now favour remain.
Good for you to become a remainer.0 -
If Britain will not erect a hard border and neither will the Irish, as both have said-will Macron send his Euro army in to build it (when they have stopped taking out protesters in Paris).seth plum said:
My bit because quoting seems to have gone wrong.Southbank said:
You should struggle for what you think is right of course.seth plum said:Southbank said:
The right to vote was not given to us. People like the Chartists and suffragettes struggled and sometimes died for it. For people these days to dismiss its importance and to say we get more 'rights' at the whim of the EU bureaucrats is tragic.Cordoban Addick said:
So I assume you are OK with Remainers continuing the struggle, despite many setbacks, to have a second referendum on EU membership?
I would also assume that you are therefore in agreement with members of parliament from all sides wanting a meaningful vote on any deal that is made?
But having a second referendum before the first one is enacted is profoundly undemocratic.
Can you imagine had the Referendum gone the other way and a Tory PM announced we were leaving anyway, how profoundly undemocratic that would have been and how shocked you and others would have been? Imagine that and then you will know how we Leavers feel.
Isn't the current problem that the result of the first referendum actually can't be enacted in practical terms? That is one of the reasons there is a campaign for another vote, a campaign incidentally I am not keen on at all.
Theresa May and others have described an impasse. Very soon attempts to resolve that impasse will fall by the wayside one by one because the practical results of brexit (if control of the borders is one) conflict with the Good Friday Agreement.
Leaving consciously or unconsciously on WTO terms will also conflict with the Good Friday Agreement.
So the 'democratic' vote of 17.4 million people is effectively just as much a vote to break the GFA as it is to leave the EU.
The Good Friday Agreement was ratified by a 'democratic' referendum in the UK.
Seriously, where is it going to come from?
I have heard this line of argument before. Leave to regain control of the borders by not having control of the borders.
If I am right you are now arguing for no brexit at all, which given your comments about 'democracy' and not disrespecting the referendum vote yesterday, looks like you have had a complete change of heart about brexit overnight and you now favour remain.
Good for you to become a remainer.
It's amazing how Brexiters continue to shirk every responsibility that comes their way.
"It's up to the Remainers to get on with implementing the referendum result."
"It's up to Ireland to implement a border."
"It's up to the EU to come up with a deal that will work for Britain."
One would get the impression not a single Brexiter actually had any kind of clue on how to actually enact Brexit if Leave won in 2016.0 -
I singled out one aspect of 'democracy', votes for women to quite deliberately point out the inconsistencies of what people call 'democracy'. In this particular instance the notion that the EU referendum was so democratic those remainers are therefore anti democratic people.Henry Irving said:
I think you'll find democracy has not been as consistent in many of those countries as it has been in the UK.seth plum said:
The UK has lagged behind many EU countries in having equal voting rights for men and women in National Elections.Southbank said:
Every insult makes me more convinced and determined. It makes me more determined to stick up for the 17.4 million who are being slowly screwed over by people working against democracy.
The EU countries that were more 'democratic' before the UK became 'democratic' are:
Latvia.
Finland.
Denmark.
Estonia.
Lithuania.
Austria.
Germany.
Hungary.
Poland.
Sweden.
Luxembourg.
Holland.
Czech Republic and Slovakia. (At the time they introduced equal voting rights they were one country.)
Republic of Ireland (initially as the Irish Free State. (This particular aspect of 'democracy' was introduced there immediately rule from Westminster stopped.)
So those who may or may not be working towards remain, are working to maintain alliance with countries that have more enlightened democratic histories than the UK.
In terms of democratic representation for 50% of the population 15 of the current 28 EU nations got there way before the UK.
Your position could be argued that the 17.4 million brexit voters are the ones working against democracy.
Are you prepared to argue otherwise?
The EU vote was a staging post of a kind of democracy, as there have been similar events in history and the UK, the vote was not the paradigm version. It is right in my view that the use of the word democracy and Democrat in that context should be open to challenge.0 -
I have heard this line of argument before. Leave to regain control of the borders by not having control of the borders.Fiiish said:
If Britain will not erect a hard border and neither will the Irish, as both have said-will Macron send his Euro army in to build it (when they have stopped taking out protesters in Paris).seth plum said:
My bit because quoting seems to have gone wrong.Southbank said:
You should struggle for what you think is right of course.seth plum said:Southbank said:
The right to vote was not given to us. People like the Chartists and suffragettes struggled and sometimes died for it. For people these days to dismiss its importance and to say we get more 'rights' at the whim of the EU bureaucrats is tragic.Cordoban Addick said:
So I assume you are OK with Remainers continuing the struggle, despite many setbacks, to have a second referendum on EU membership?
I would also assume that you are therefore in agreement with members of parliament from all sides wanting a meaningful vote on any deal that is made?
But having a second referendum before the first one is enacted is profoundly undemocratic.
Can you imagine had the Referendum gone the other way and a Tory PM announced we were leaving anyway, how profoundly undemocratic that would have been and how shocked you and others would have been? Imagine that and then you will know how we Leavers feel.
Isn't the current problem that the result of the first referendum actually can't be enacted in practical terms? That is one of the reasons there is a campaign for another vote, a campaign incidentally I am not keen on at all.
Theresa May and others have described an impasse. Very soon attempts to resolve that impasse will fall by the wayside one by one because the practical results of brexit (if control of the borders is one) conflict with the Good Friday Agreement.
Leaving consciously or unconsciously on WTO terms will also conflict with the Good Friday Agreement.
So the 'democratic' vote of 17.4 million people is effectively just as much a vote to break the GFA as it is to leave the EU.
The Good Friday Agreement was ratified by a 'democratic' referendum in the UK.
Seriously, where is it going to come from?
If I am right you are now arguing for no brexit at all, which given your comments about 'democracy' and not disrespecting the referendum vote yesterday, looks like you have had a complete change of heart about brexit overnight and you now favour remain.
Good for you to become a remainer.
It's amazing how Brexiters continue to shirk every responsibility that comes their way.
"It's up to the Remainers to get on with implementing the referendum result."
"It's up to Ireland to implement a border."
"It's up to the EU to come up with a deal that will work for Britain."
One would get the impression not a single Brexiter actually had any kind of clue on how to actually enact Brexit if Leave won in 2016.
Why would they? It was a protest vote and Cameron was stupid enough to set it out as such. Net immigration from the EU was negative earlier this year and yet the Home Secretary still banging on about immigration on the radio this morning. But no actual paper released.
This Government is absolutely clueless and out of control, driven by a Leave agenda by its backers and activists.
One thing though... it was always going to be the EU setting up the Brexit deal once the UK indicated preferences. Now we are here, another vote appears the next step.1 -
Thank you.Southbank said:
Berlusconi was forced out because of EU pressure and no PM has been an elected politician since, all appointed (not by the EU of course)Stig said:
@Southbank, in all the excitement you seem to have missed my request for some background. I just wanted to check that that was deliberate and not accidental.Stig said:
Would you be so kind as to explain this statement please, I don't know what you are referring to.Southbank said:
Ask the Greeks, Poles,Hungarians and the Italians how sovereign they are. Italy has not had an elected Prime Minister since the last one was effectively deposed by the EU in 2011.Fiiish said:
China is an autocratic police state that is incredibly intrusive into the lives of its citizens.Southbank said:
By people are 'seemingly voting against their own interests' it is meant economic interests only. Fortunately we have a political system which gives people something more than money-a vote and thereby a political stake in their society.NornIrishAddick said:So, anyway, a few links from today's Irish Times.
Fintan O'Toole has another comment piece out today, timed to coincide with his book, of which today's piece is an extract (some writing in response seem to feel that he shouldn't be allowed do such a thing, but if that was the case we should do away with things like syndication too).
As ever, it's well-written and scathing, I'm particularly intrigued by the reference to sado-populism (a notion which does seem to make sense of people seemingly voting against what one would imagine would be their interests in elections across the World).
In other news, preparations for a failure to get Parliamentary approval of the Agreement have been ramped up, and the possibility of the PM not achieving her aim seems high, leading to dangerous levels of uncertainty. Pat Leahy's article is interesting, in part, because it refers to the Statute of Westminster, a decision in which, yet again, Ireland loomed large and where the UK's influence in international politics was diminished (albeit slightly, with powers being lost by Westminster to the likes of Canada, IFS et al).
China is an increasingly successful economy. The people who run it have a lot in common with the EU bureaucracy. They too are narrow technical managerialists who say the economy is more important than democracy.
I do not share that view and neither do many other Brexit voters. Democracy is the only way that most people have any control at all over economic policies, through their ability to vote for Governments to do their will.
Apparently there are Remainers who would rather go down the Chinese route.
The EU is a collection of countries working together across economic and legal spheres, where each country remains fully sovereign, and 99% of the citizens living in the EU will never have any meaningful interaction with the EU-level authorities as all of their interactions will be at most at a national level.
I am a Remain voter, I have a far better understanding of our relationship with the EU than you will ever have and I can say without a doubt my democratic rights are in no way lessened by our EU membership.
You are entirely within your rights to be in favour of a federal Europe, but you cannot pretend that national sovereignty can exist alongside it, it is one or the other.0 -
My issue was that you described him as the "authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article", which I took to mean that he is one of those in that demographic described in the article. Patently he is not, but it is true that he talks about a group like them a lot to support his own views. Ordinary people who are not "the elite"...seriously_red said:
What was actually posted is as follows:PragueAddick said:@seriously_red
For this reason it is possible to understand the perspective contributed by @Southbank . Rather than beat him up over technical inaccuracies about the EU and it's workings let us recognise an authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article. Tens of millions of European voters have a very different outlook and they have lost faith with the centre.
I don't think, based on what @southbank has told us about his personal circumstances (a successful business owner) as well as what he writes, and how he writes, that he fits the demographic described in that article at all. There are others on here who fit it much better. Either way, everybody is free to take each other's comments as they find them and on their own merits.
At face value @Southbank is supporting the sentiments in the piece and this is consistent with his/her views expressed in the past relating to the sharp drop in % vote for centre left and centre right options across Europe. I don't think that whether Southbank sells diamonds or the big issue is really of any consequence to the actual point being discussed.Southbank said:As you say, also relevant to the UK.
I see the disaffected, marginalised and really all those who have rejected bureaucratic centrism as the possible basis for change. One of the reasons I voted for Brexit."
Just as my own background or that of my grandparents (of Belarusian descent on one side) colours my views but doesn't change the words on the page.
The point is that tens of millions of Europeans are shifting their votes away from traditional options in response to disillusion with the centrist prospectus. And that this is a real challenge for the establishment in many dimensions. Steve Bannan and the alt-right are making gains but aside from Italy they are not really on the radar just yet when it comes to the political economy - much to the disappointment of the Express and Telegraph who appear to celebrate every gain made by extremists.
It would be difficult to find true representatives of that demographic here, because by definition as Charlton fans we are all "metropolitan" but I can think of a couple of Brexit regulars on here who fit the demographic in terms of their working lives far better than Southbank does. E.g., skilled manual work or essential public services, admirable careers which are undervalued ("Forgotten") today. Thing is that especially public services, such as the Fire Brigade, have been undervalued all my adult life, and I have always tried to support policies that value them more highly. Ever since the 3 day Week. In other words, sod all politically to do with the EU or Brexit.
Anyway, back to @southbank, the authentic voice of Southbank. The thing is Southbank, mate, that (as I've written many times) I struggle to understand what motivates your trenchant, unbending stance on Brexit. So once again I ask, what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? People who pursued maybe an apprenticeship in engineering, or people who served or serve us in the essential services? They can often seem to be very angry, and might give you Likes. What will your Brexit bring them? Why will they become less angry as a result?
Come on mate, give us a straight, authentic answer...
0 -
My answer is that knowing your voice counts through your right to vote means you are a proper citizen and member of society whom the rich and powerful have to take into account.PragueAddick said:
My issue was that you described him as the "authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article", which I took to mean that he is one of those in that demographic described in the article. Patently he is not, but it is true that he talks about a group like them a lot to support his own views. Ordinary people who are not "the elite"...seriously_red said:
What was actually posted is as follows:PragueAddick said:@seriously_red
For this reason it is possible to understand the perspective contributed by @Southbank . Rather than beat him up over technical inaccuracies about the EU and it's workings let us recognise an authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article. Tens of millions of European voters have a very different outlook and they have lost faith with the centre.
I don't think, based on what @southbank has told us about his personal circumstances (a successful business owner) as well as what he writes, and how he writes, that he fits the demographic described in that article at all. There are others on here who fit it much better. Either way, everybody is free to take each other's comments as they find them and on their own merits.
At face value @Southbank is supporting the sentiments in the piece and this is consistent with his/her views expressed in the past relating to the sharp drop in % vote for centre left and centre right options across Europe. I don't think that whether Southbank sells diamonds or the big issue is really of any consequence to the actual point being discussed.Southbank said:As you say, also relevant to the UK.
I see the disaffected, marginalised and really all those who have rejected bureaucratic centrism as the possible basis for change. One of the reasons I voted for Brexit."
Just as my own background or that of my grandparents (of Belarusian descent on one side) colours my views but doesn't change the words on the page.
The point is that tens of millions of Europeans are shifting their votes away from traditional options in response to disillusion with the centrist prospectus. And that this is a real challenge for the establishment in many dimensions. Steve Bannan and the alt-right are making gains but aside from Italy they are not really on the radar just yet when it comes to the political economy - much to the disappointment of the Express and Telegraph who appear to celebrate every gain made by extremists.
It would be difficult to find true representatives of that demographic here, because by definition as Charlton fans we are all "metropolitan" but I can think of a couple of Brexit regulars on here who fit the demographic in terms of their working lives far better than Southbank does. E.g., skilled manual work or essential public services, admirable careers which are undervalued ("Forgotten") today. Thing is that especially public services, such as the Fire Brigade, have been undervalued all my adult life, and I have always tried to support policies that value them more highly. Ever since the 3 day Week. In other words, sod all politically to do with the EU or Brexit.
Anyway, back to @southbank, the authentic voice of Southbank. The thing is Southbank, mate, that (as I've written many times) I struggle to understand what motivates your trenchant, unbending stance on Brexit. So once again I ask, what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? People who pursued maybe an apprenticeship in engineering, or people who served or serve us in the essential services? They can often seem to be very angry, and might give you Likes. What will your Brexit bring them? Why will they become less angry as a result?
Come on mate, give us a straight, authentic answer...
And vice versa. If the vote is ignored we are all diminished, including Remainers.
I asked the question a few pages back what would Remainers feel like had the vote gone the other way and a Tory PM had taken us out of the EU anyway, on the basis that the vote was advisory. Ask yourself how you would have felt in that position and you may get some idea of how Leavers feel now.3 - Sponsored links:
-
I'm interested in how we could tighten up rules around freedom of movement (of labour).
The big issue as I understand it around migration (perceived or actual I'm not sure) is not benefit claimants its people being able to work here having never lived here, and not truly living here as they live in hostels etc while they work and send nearly all the money home, undercutting wages of workers from the UK. I'm not sure how that could be stopped under existing rules without change from the EU which they seem unwilling to do - surely that is the concession Cameron should have come home with?
https://www.ft.com/content/14b558c8-6585-11e7-8526-7b38dcaef614
Only us Sweden and Ireland allowed migration from Eastern Europe when those states became part of the EU possibly the root cause of Brexit.
http://theconversation.com/the-huge-political-cost-of-blairs-decision-to-allow-eastern-european-migrants-unfettered-access-to-britain-66077
1 -
This kind of circular nonsense has gotten me to the point where I want Brexit cancelled right now, just so I can see your reaction.Southbank said:
My answer is that knowing your voice counts through your right to vote means you are a proper citizen and member of society whom the rich and powerful have to take into account.PragueAddick said:
My issue was that you described him as the "authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article", which I took to mean that he is one of those in that demographic described in the article. Patently he is not, but it is true that he talks about a group like them a lot to support his own views. Ordinary people who are not "the elite"...seriously_red said:
What was actually posted is as follows:PragueAddick said:@seriously_red
For this reason it is possible to understand the perspective contributed by @Southbank . Rather than beat him up over technical inaccuracies about the EU and it's workings let us recognise an authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article. Tens of millions of European voters have a very different outlook and they have lost faith with the centre.
I don't think, based on what @southbank has told us about his personal circumstances (a successful business owner) as well as what he writes, and how he writes, that he fits the demographic described in that article at all. There are others on here who fit it much better. Either way, everybody is free to take each other's comments as they find them and on their own merits.
At face value @Southbank is supporting the sentiments in the piece and this is consistent with his/her views expressed in the past relating to the sharp drop in % vote for centre left and centre right options across Europe. I don't think that whether Southbank sells diamonds or the big issue is really of any consequence to the actual point being discussed.Southbank said:As you say, also relevant to the UK.
I see the disaffected, marginalised and really all those who have rejected bureaucratic centrism as the possible basis for change. One of the reasons I voted for Brexit."
Just as my own background or that of my grandparents (of Belarusian descent on one side) colours my views but doesn't change the words on the page.
The point is that tens of millions of Europeans are shifting their votes away from traditional options in response to disillusion with the centrist prospectus. And that this is a real challenge for the establishment in many dimensions. Steve Bannan and the alt-right are making gains but aside from Italy they are not really on the radar just yet when it comes to the political economy - much to the disappointment of the Express and Telegraph who appear to celebrate every gain made by extremists.
It would be difficult to find true representatives of that demographic here, because by definition as Charlton fans we are all "metropolitan" but I can think of a couple of Brexit regulars on here who fit the demographic in terms of their working lives far better than Southbank does. E.g., skilled manual work or essential public services, admirable careers which are undervalued ("Forgotten") today. Thing is that especially public services, such as the Fire Brigade, have been undervalued all my adult life, and I have always tried to support policies that value them more highly. Ever since the 3 day Week. In other words, sod all politically to do with the EU or Brexit.
Anyway, back to @southbank, the authentic voice of Southbank. The thing is Southbank, mate, that (as I've written many times) I struggle to understand what motivates your trenchant, unbending stance on Brexit. So once again I ask, what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? People who pursued maybe an apprenticeship in engineering, or people who served or serve us in the essential services? They can often seem to be very angry, and might give you Likes. What will your Brexit bring them? Why will they become less angry as a result?
Come on mate, give us a straight, authentic answer...
And vice versa. If the vote is ignored we are all diminished, including Remainers.
I asked the question a few pages back what would Remainers feel like had the vote gone the other way and a Tory PM had taken us out of the EU anyway, on the basis that the vote was advisory. Ask yourself how you would have felt in that position and you may get some idea of how Leavers feel now.3 -
But it's not an answer to my question! Again, with emphasis "what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? " Why cannot you answer the question in terms that politicians use to explain their high minded calling to the career : "to improve the lives of ordinary people". How will Brexit do that???????????Southbank said:
My answer is that knowing your voice counts through your right to vote means you are a proper citizen and member of society whom the rich and powerful have to take into account.PragueAddick said:
My issue was that you described him as the "authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article", which I took to mean that he is one of those in that demographic described in the article. Patently he is not, but it is true that he talks about a group like them a lot to support his own views. Ordinary people who are not "the elite"...seriously_red said:
What was actually posted is as follows:PragueAddick said:@seriously_red
For this reason it is possible to understand the perspective contributed by @Southbank . Rather than beat him up over technical inaccuracies about the EU and it's workings let us recognise an authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article. Tens of millions of European voters have a very different outlook and they have lost faith with the centre.
I don't think, based on what @southbank has told us about his personal circumstances (a successful business owner) as well as what he writes, and how he writes, that he fits the demographic described in that article at all. There are others on here who fit it much better. Either way, everybody is free to take each other's comments as they find them and on their own merits.
At face value @Southbank is supporting the sentiments in the piece and this is consistent with his/her views expressed in the past relating to the sharp drop in % vote for centre left and centre right options across Europe. I don't think that whether Southbank sells diamonds or the big issue is really of any consequence to the actual point being discussed.Southbank said:As you say, also relevant to the UK.
I see the disaffected, marginalised and really all those who have rejected bureaucratic centrism as the possible basis for change. One of the reasons I voted for Brexit."
Just as my own background or that of my grandparents (of Belarusian descent on one side) colours my views but doesn't change the words on the page.
The point is that tens of millions of Europeans are shifting their votes away from traditional options in response to disillusion with the centrist prospectus. And that this is a real challenge for the establishment in many dimensions. Steve Bannan and the alt-right are making gains but aside from Italy they are not really on the radar just yet when it comes to the political economy - much to the disappointment of the Express and Telegraph who appear to celebrate every gain made by extremists.
It would be difficult to find true representatives of that demographic here, because by definition as Charlton fans we are all "metropolitan" but I can think of a couple of Brexit regulars on here who fit the demographic in terms of their working lives far better than Southbank does. E.g., skilled manual work or essential public services, admirable careers which are undervalued ("Forgotten") today. Thing is that especially public services, such as the Fire Brigade, have been undervalued all my adult life, and I have always tried to support policies that value them more highly. Ever since the 3 day Week. In other words, sod all politically to do with the EU or Brexit.
Anyway, back to @southbank, the authentic voice of Southbank. The thing is Southbank, mate, that (as I've written many times) I struggle to understand what motivates your trenchant, unbending stance on Brexit. So once again I ask, what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? People who pursued maybe an apprenticeship in engineering, or people who served or serve us in the essential services? They can often seem to be very angry, and might give you Likes. What will your Brexit bring them? Why will they become less angry as a result?
Come on mate, give us a straight, authentic answer...
And vice versa. If the vote is ignored we are all diminished, including Remainers.
I asked the question a few pages back what would Remainers feel like had the vote gone the other way and a Tory PM had taken us out of the EU anyway, on the basis that the vote was advisory. Ask yourself how you would have felt in that position and you may get some idea of how Leavers feel now.
All through the 80s I voted against Thatcher. I didn't get the governments I wanted. But I still believe that my vote counted. Just as it did in 2017, when I had to be economical with the truth in order that through your right to vote means you are a proper citizen and member of society whom the rich and powerful have to take into account. Again fuck all to do with whether the UK is a member of the EU. The rich and powerful have always disproporionately run the UK, and of course many of them are now looking to Brexit to help them further cement their hold.4 -
Oh, and, democracy is a total sham, Brexit is a fantasy, and the rich and powerful don't give a fuck unless they're getting richer and more powerful0
-
Southbank - I, like many others, am really struggling to see your logic for your reasoning for wanting Brexit. If it is solely as an exercise in democracy then what is the problem with giving the public a chance to ratify or reject the deal? An informed public, able to pass or deny something which will have a huge impact on them seems like a very good example of democracy, much more so than a vote which took place with unclear explanations as to its ramifications.3
-
The British people have already as one made up their minds. Any future mind-making is sinister globalism. Soros has us all on strings! Aaaagh!CharltonMadrid said:Southbank - I, like many others, am really struggling to see your logic for your reasoning for wanting Brexit. If it is solely as an exercise in democracy then what is the problem with giving the public a chance to ratify or reject the deal? An informed public, able to pass or deny something which will have a huge impact on them seems like a very good example of democracy, much more so than a vote which took place with unclear explanations as to its ramifications.
2 -
The vote hasn't been ignored now. It has dominated the UK agenda for the last 3 years, to the detriment of nearly every other area of governance, and has caused the largest schism of public feeling in modern British history.
What we had in 2016 was a simple In Out advisory referendum. There was absolutely zero guarantee of what form any Brexit would take, what timeframe it should take place in and what our future relationship with the EU would be. Now we have a lot more information from these perspectives and as suggested by the the Brexit side we should have a second referendum to decide whether we want to leave the EU now a deal has been put forward. We have, in every sense of the word, implemented the only logical way an advisory non-binding referendum could be implemented - by exploring the options as mandated by the referendum. Now the options are clear to see, should we proceed or should we have a rethink? There is absolutely nothing wrong with having a second and final opportunity to confirm this is what we, as a country, want to do.1 -
It really is time that politicians had the courage to argue the case for the necessity of migration from the point of view of enlightened self interest - as starkly set out in the Financial Times article below:seriously_red said:
And this is why May has to go. Windrush, hostile environment etc. And now it is crystal clear that May's objection to a minimum risk Norway option is freedom of movement. Many of us know that the UK could tighten up on controls as many other EU nations do. She is not only doing the bidding of her activists but she clearly believes in this agenda which is extremely damaging to the fabric of our society as well as to GDP. This since EU citizens earn more than the average, hold scarce skills and were educated abroad and may well retire abroad, i.e., they will make far less use of services.Red_in_SE8 said:Let’s be honest about what’s really driving Brexit: bigotry
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/dec/02/honest-brexit-bigotry-ugly-chapter-history?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard
In short it looks impossible to prosecute either a Norway option, a People's Vote or a No Brexit option whilst May remains in office. Therefore one possibility is that we tip precariously towards no deal, once the WA is defeated. And that this is then followed by a rethink. One can speculate more but probably more productive to wait until the glorious 12th to see how things are landing.
'By 2050, the proportion of the UK population aged 65 and over is projected to reach nearly a quarter at 24 per cent, up from 17 per cent in 2012, according to the ONS.
Strikingly, the fastest increases will be among the “oldest old”, with the proportion aged 85 and over forecast to treble from 2 per cent to 6 per cent.
Academics say these rapidly evolving demographic changes will affect everyone in society, regardless of age.
“At worst, not only could it imply rising poverty, poor health and the erosion of social care for those in old age over the coming decades, but also lower standards of living for all of us, as ageing acts as a drag on economic growth and the future delivery of public services,” says David Sinclair, director of the International Longevity Centre UK, a think-tank.
One of the main worries is that as the proportion reaching retirement age grows, the number of working age people will shrink as birth rates decline.
This is a concern because UK state pension payments are funded through taxation and national insurance contributions from those of working age.
The number of working age people to every pensioner, or the “old age support ratio”, is forecast to fall to 2.9 by 2050, from 3.3 in the mid-1970s to 2006.
“Tax revenue from those in work may fail to keep up with demand for social security and healthcare from an increasingly large proportion of people aged over 65 and out of work and who have poor health,” adds Mr Sinclair'.
https://www.ft.com/content/fda8675a-e82d-11e4-894a-00144feab7de2 -
It's unquestionably a tricky issue, multi-faceted and no easy answers. As such I would mention:razil said:I'm interested in how we could tighten up rules around freedom of movement (of labour).
The big issue as I understand it around migration (perceived or actual I'm not sure) is not benefit claimants its people being able to work here having never lived here, and not truly living here as they live in hostels etc while they work and send nearly all the money home, undercutting wages of workers from the UK. I'm not sure how that could be stopped under existing rules without change from the EU which they seem unwilling to do - surely that is the concession Cameron should have come home with?
https://www.ft.com/content/14b558c8-6585-11e7-8526-7b38dcaef614
Only us Sweden and Ireland allowed migration from Eastern Europe when those states became part of the EU possibly the root cause of Brexit.
http://theconversation.com/the-huge-political-cost-of-blairs-decision-to-allow-eastern-european-migrants-unfettered-access-to-britain-66077
- other EU countries simply didn't have the problem with intra-EU migration, so they didn't feel any pressure to change it. So WHY did so many people from the accession countries choose the UK rather than France, Germany, Netherlands, etc? I mean in the latter two cases, both the economy and the wage levels were just as strong if not stronger.
- if the immigrants undercut the domestic labour force, one issue is that employers are breaking the law. That needed and needs to stop. Of course we have some very dodgy legal employment as a result of our push for "labour market flexibility", a sovereign UK choice, which the Germans and others have not felt inclined to copy
- The second article you link is sober and presents the key stats well. Generally I think it's agreed that Blair was too hasty in opening the gates fully; I think though that the real problem came with the later wave from RO/BG, the gap in living standards between those countries and the UK was much wider than with the 2004 lot.
- there is an issue with benefit claimants, and a lot of them are Roma, who have come in mainly from SK, RO and BG. We had the freedom to tighten up the regulations which would have discouraged them, and failed to use it. The Poles in particular never understood why not.
1 -
If you count material benefits as being about money, then the answer is who knows? as economic forecasts are not worth the paper they are written on, generally speaking, and the future of the economy will depend on many unpredictable factors.PragueAddick said:
But it's not an answer to my question! Again, with emphasis "what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? " Why cannot you answer the question in terms that politicians use to explain their high minded calling to the career : "to improve the lives of ordinary people". How will Brexit do that???????????Southbank said:
My answer is that knowing your voice counts through your right to vote means you are a proper citizen and member of society whom the rich and powerful have to take into account.PragueAddick said:
My issue was that you described him as the "authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article", which I took to mean that he is one of those in that demographic described in the article. Patently he is not, but it is true that he talks about a group like them a lot to support his own views. Ordinary people who are not "the elite"...seriously_red said:
What was actually posted is as follows:PragueAddick said:@seriously_red
For this reason it is possible to understand the perspective contributed by @Southbank . Rather than beat him up over technical inaccuracies about the EU and it's workings let us recognise an authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article. Tens of millions of European voters have a very different outlook and they have lost faith with the centre.
I don't think, based on what @southbank has told us about his personal circumstances (a successful business owner) as well as what he writes, and how he writes, that he fits the demographic described in that article at all. There are others on here who fit it much better. Either way, everybody is free to take each other's comments as they find them and on their own merits.
At face value @Southbank is supporting the sentiments in the piece and this is consistent with his/her views expressed in the past relating to the sharp drop in % vote for centre left and centre right options across Europe. I don't think that whether Southbank sells diamonds or the big issue is really of any consequence to the actual point being discussed.Southbank said:As you say, also relevant to the UK.
I see the disaffected, marginalised and really all those who have rejected bureaucratic centrism as the possible basis for change. One of the reasons I voted for Brexit."
Just as my own background or that of my grandparents (of Belarusian descent on one side) colours my views but doesn't change the words on the page.
The point is that tens of millions of Europeans are shifting their votes away from traditional options in response to disillusion with the centrist prospectus. And that this is a real challenge for the establishment in many dimensions. Steve Bannan and the alt-right are making gains but aside from Italy they are not really on the radar just yet when it comes to the political economy - much to the disappointment of the Express and Telegraph who appear to celebrate every gain made by extremists.
It would be difficult to find true representatives of that demographic here, because by definition as Charlton fans we are all "metropolitan" but I can think of a couple of Brexit regulars on here who fit the demographic in terms of their working lives far better than Southbank does. E.g., skilled manual work or essential public services, admirable careers which are undervalued ("Forgotten") today. Thing is that especially public services, such as the Fire Brigade, have been undervalued all my adult life, and I have always tried to support policies that value them more highly. Ever since the 3 day Week. In other words, sod all politically to do with the EU or Brexit.
Anyway, back to @southbank, the authentic voice of Southbank. The thing is Southbank, mate, that (as I've written many times) I struggle to understand what motivates your trenchant, unbending stance on Brexit. So once again I ask, what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? People who pursued maybe an apprenticeship in engineering, or people who served or serve us in the essential services? They can often seem to be very angry, and might give you Likes. What will your Brexit bring them? Why will they become less angry as a result?
Come on mate, give us a straight, authentic answer...
And vice versa. If the vote is ignored we are all diminished, including Remainers.
I asked the question a few pages back what would Remainers feel like had the vote gone the other way and a Tory PM had taken us out of the EU anyway, on the basis that the vote was advisory. Ask yourself how you would have felt in that position and you may get some idea of how Leavers feel now.
All through the 80s I voted against Thatcher. I didn't get the governments I wanted. But I still believe that my vote counted. Just as it did in 2017, when I had to be economical with the truth in order that through your right to vote means you are a proper citizen and member of society whom the rich and powerful have to take into account. Again fuck all to do with whether the UK is a member of the EU. The rich and powerful have always disproporionately run the UK, and of course many of them are now looking to Brexit to help them further cement their hold.
But do you really only measure value in monetary terms?
I believe that real change only comes through democratic involvement. It was brilliant that 3 million people voted in the referendum that nobody expected. It meant they were engaged often for the first time in democratic politics. Their instincts were to challenge the fear mongering and disdain of the Remain camp, something I heartily agree with.
1 - Sponsored links:
-
No, I really do not like the protectionist EU, a stinking mass of corporate corruption, anti-democratic and oblivious to local sovereignty. I believe the nation state is the main protector of my democratic rights.CharltonMadrid said:Southbank - I, like many others, am really struggling to see your logic for your reasoning for wanting Brexit. If it is solely as an exercise in democracy then what is the problem with giving the public a chance to ratify or reject the deal? An informed public, able to pass or deny something which will have a huge impact on them seems like a very good example of democracy, much more so than a vote which took place with unclear explanations as to its ramifications.
7 -
Southbank said:
If you count material benefits as being about money, then the answer is who knows? as economic forecasts are not worth the paper they are written on, generally speaking, and the future of the economy will depend on many unpredictable factors.
But do you really only measure value in monetary terms?
I believe that real change only comes through democratic involvement. It was brilliant that 3 million people voted in the referendum that nobody expected. It meant they were engaged often for the first time in democratic politics. Their instincts were to challenge the fear mongering and disdain of the Remain camp, something I heartily agree with.
The thought process that led to the total and utter nonsense that is these two posts is so dense that light actually bends around them.Southbank said:
No, I really do not like the protectionist EU, a stinking mass of corporate corruption, anti-democratic and oblivious to local sovereignty. I believe the nation state is the main protector of my democratic rights.CharltonMadrid said:Southbank - I, like many others, am really struggling to see your logic for your reasoning for wanting Brexit. If it is solely as an exercise in democracy then what is the problem with giving the public a chance to ratify or reject the deal? An informed public, able to pass or deny something which will have a huge impact on them seems like a very good example of democracy, much more so than a vote which took place with unclear explanations as to its ramifications.
3 -
It is becoming seriously fucking weird that you will not answer the question. Policies are supposed to make the lives of ordinary people better. As policies go, they don't come bigger than Brexit. "Money", i might remind you, is required to address all the concerns that most people said were more important to them than Brexit. Such as the NHS, and increasingly, elderly care. Such as the state of the railways and other infrastructure. Such as the shortage of affordable housing. As far as I know, the "forgotten" are seriously bothered by such things. Will Brexit address these issues? If so, how exactly?Southbank said:
If you count material benefits as being about money, then the answer is who knows? as economic forecasts are not worth the paper they are written on, generally speaking, and the future of the economy will depend on many unpredictable factors.PragueAddick said:
But it's not an answer to my question! Again, with emphasis "what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? " Why cannot you answer the question in terms that politicians use to explain their high minded calling to the career : "to improve the lives of ordinary people". How will Brexit do that???????????Southbank said:
My answer is that knowing your voice counts through your right to vote means you are a proper citizen and member of society whom the rich and powerful have to take into account.PragueAddick said:
My issue was that you described him as the "authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article", which I took to mean that he is one of those in that demographic described in the article. Patently he is not, but it is true that he talks about a group like them a lot to support his own views. Ordinary people who are not "the elite"...seriously_red said:
What was actually posted is as follows:PragueAddick said:@seriously_red
For this reason it is possible to understand the perspective contributed by @Southbank . Rather than beat him up over technical inaccuracies about the EU and it's workings let us recognise an authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article. Tens of millions of European voters have a very different outlook and they have lost faith with the centre.
I don't think, based on what @southbank has told us about his personal circumstances (a successful business owner) as well as what he writes, and how he writes, that he fits the demographic described in that article at all. There are others on here who fit it much better. Either way, everybody is free to take each other's comments as they find them and on their own merits.
At face value @Southbank is supporting the sentiments in the piece and this is consistent with his/her views expressed in the past relating to the sharp drop in % vote for centre left and centre right options across Europe. I don't think that whether Southbank sells diamonds or the big issue is really of any consequence to the actual point being discussed.Southbank said:As you say, also relevant to the UK.
I see the disaffected, marginalised and really all those who have rejected bureaucratic centrism as the possible basis for change. One of the reasons I voted for Brexit."
Just as my own background or that of my grandparents (of Belarusian descent on one side) colours my views but doesn't change the words on the page.
The point is that tens of millions of Europeans are shifting their votes away from traditional options in response to disillusion with the centrist prospectus. And that this is a real challenge for the establishment in many dimensions. Steve Bannan and the alt-right are making gains but aside from Italy they are not really on the radar just yet when it comes to the political economy - much to the disappointment of the Express and Telegraph who appear to celebrate every gain made by extremists.
It would be difficult to find true representatives of that demographic here, because by definition as Charlton fans we are all "metropolitan" but I can think of a couple of Brexit regulars on here who fit the demographic in terms of their working lives far better than Southbank does. E.g., skilled manual work or essential public services, admirable careers which are undervalued ("Forgotten") today. Thing is that especially public services, such as the Fire Brigade, have been undervalued all my adult life, and I have always tried to support policies that value them more highly. Ever since the 3 day Week. In other words, sod all politically to do with the EU or Brexit.
Anyway, back to @southbank, the authentic voice of Southbank. The thing is Southbank, mate, that (as I've written many times) I struggle to understand what motivates your trenchant, unbending stance on Brexit. So once again I ask, what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? People who pursued maybe an apprenticeship in engineering, or people who served or serve us in the essential services? They can often seem to be very angry, and might give you Likes. What will your Brexit bring them? Why will they become less angry as a result?
Come on mate, give us a straight, authentic answer...
And vice versa. If the vote is ignored we are all diminished, including Remainers.
I asked the question a few pages back what would Remainers feel like had the vote gone the other way and a Tory PM had taken us out of the EU anyway, on the basis that the vote was advisory. Ask yourself how you would have felt in that position and you may get some idea of how Leavers feel now.
All through the 80s I voted against Thatcher. I didn't get the governments I wanted. But I still believe that my vote counted. Just as it did in 2017, when I had to be economical with the truth in order that through your right to vote means you are a proper citizen and member of society whom the rich and powerful have to take into account. Again fuck all to do with whether the UK is a member of the EU. The rich and powerful have always disproporionately run the UK, and of course many of them are now looking to Brexit to help them further cement their hold.
But do you really only measure value in monetary terms?
I believe that real change only comes through democratic involvement. It was brilliant that 3 million people voted in the referendum that nobody expected. It meant they were engaged often for the first time in democratic politics. Their instincts were to challenge the fear mongering and disdain of the Remain camp, something I heartily agree with.
Are you seriously telling us that the only important benefit of Brexit will be that in
10 years time the average retired fireman, or dockyard fitter, or Army sergeant, or NHS radiologist can say, " there was a referendum, and I took part in it"
IS THAT REALLY ALL YOU'VE GOT?13 -
So basically there's no benefit to Brexit except as a lifestyle accessory for people who like to throw around nonsense words like 'sovereignty' and 'the country's full'. Sure you're insecure about your weight and your cock doesn't work and you're surrounded by fictional vegans and your mate swears he heard about some Poles working for tuppence an hour, and the way you offset this is to say I Am Brexit and vote for the sky fucking falling in so everyone's just as fucked as each other. It's almost elegant, really, and I don't actually blame any of you who voted for it, because democracy really is a sham and what better way to say this than to vote for unrestrained Tory imperialism, deeper tax evasion, hedge fund chickens coming home to roost as man of the sodding people Jacob Rees-Mogg doubles his millions? It's defiant and humorous in the grand British tradition and I know you're mostly all sticking with your original decision because fuck everyone, right? Fuck everyone. But of course, because democracy is a sham, you can't exactly complain if and when the whole show gets cancelled by the same noble British politicians whose sovereignty you so gallantly stood in defence of. Because that's the final act of the joke - Brexit or no Brexit, you have no fucking say in anything. And even after all this blows over and UKIP can't get it up and Boris fucks off to America and the gangs of aging hooligans looking for one last nationwide stramash disperse, you'll still bend the knee before a rich man with ideas that suit rich men, because you're British, and that's what British people do. I could be a rich man, you say, or I could have been a rich man, and really, what's the difference?5
-
And who are these 3 million people he refers to? And how does Southbank know how they all voted?PragueAddick said:
It is becoming seriously fucking weird that you will not answer the question. Policies are supposed to make the lives of ordinary people better. As policies go, they don't come bigger than Brexit. "Money", i might remind you, is required to address all the concerns that most people said were more important to them than Brexit. Such as the NHS, and increasingly, elderly care. Such as the state of the railways and other infrastructure. Such as the shortage of affordable housing. As far as I know, the "forgotten" are seriously bothered by such things. Will Brexit address these issues? If so, how exactly?Southbank said:
If you count material benefits as being about money, then the answer is who knows? as economic forecasts are not worth the paper they are written on, generally speaking, and the future of the economy will depend on many unpredictable factors.PragueAddick said:
But it's not an answer to my question! Again, with emphasis "what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? " Why cannot you answer the question in terms that politicians use to explain their high minded calling to the career : "to improve the lives of ordinary people". How will Brexit do that???????????Southbank said:
My answer is that knowing your voice counts through your right to vote means you are a proper citizen and member of society whom the rich and powerful have to take into account.PragueAddick said:
My issue was that you described him as the "authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article", which I took to mean that he is one of those in that demographic described in the article. Patently he is not, but it is true that he talks about a group like them a lot to support his own views. Ordinary people who are not "the elite"...seriously_red said:
What was actually posted is as follows:PragueAddick said:@seriously_red
For this reason it is possible to understand the perspective contributed by @Southbank . Rather than beat him up over technical inaccuracies about the EU and it's workings let us recognise an authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article. Tens of millions of European voters have a very different outlook and they have lost faith with the centre.
I don't think, based on what @southbank has told us about his personal circumstances (a successful business owner) as well as what he writes, and how he writes, that he fits the demographic described in that article at all. There are others on here who fit it much better. Either way, everybody is free to take each other's comments as they find them and on their own merits.
At face value @Southbank is supporting the sentiments in the piece and this is consistent with his/her views expressed in the past relating to the sharp drop in % vote for centre left and centre right options across Europe. I don't think that whether Southbank sells diamonds or the big issue is really of any consequence to the actual point being discussed.Southbank said:As you say, also relevant to the UK.
I see the disaffected, marginalised and really all those who have rejected bureaucratic centrism as the possible basis for change. One of the reasons I voted for Brexit."
Just as my own background or that of my grandparents (of Belarusian descent on one side) colours my views but doesn't change the words on the page.
The point is that tens of millions of Europeans are shifting their votes away from traditional options in response to disillusion with the centrist prospectus. And that this is a real challenge for the establishment in many dimensions. Steve Bannan and the alt-right are making gains but aside from Italy they are not really on the radar just yet when it comes to the political economy - much to the disappointment of the Express and Telegraph who appear to celebrate every gain made by extremists.
It would be difficult to find true representatives of that demographic here, because by definition as Charlton fans we are all "metropolitan" but I can think of a couple of Brexit regulars on here who fit the demographic in terms of their working lives far better than Southbank does. E.g., skilled manual work or essential public services, admirable careers which are undervalued ("Forgotten") today. Thing is that especially public services, such as the Fire Brigade, have been undervalued all my adult life, and I have always tried to support policies that value them more highly. Ever since the 3 day Week. In other words, sod all politically to do with the EU or Brexit.
Anyway, back to @southbank, the authentic voice of Southbank. The thing is Southbank, mate, that (as I've written many times) I struggle to understand what motivates your trenchant, unbending stance on Brexit. So once again I ask, what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? People who pursued maybe an apprenticeship in engineering, or people who served or serve us in the essential services? They can often seem to be very angry, and might give you Likes. What will your Brexit bring them? Why will they become less angry as a result?
Come on mate, give us a straight, authentic answer...
And vice versa. If the vote is ignored we are all diminished, including Remainers.
I asked the question a few pages back what would Remainers feel like had the vote gone the other way and a Tory PM had taken us out of the EU anyway, on the basis that the vote was advisory. Ask yourself how you would have felt in that position and you may get some idea of how Leavers feel now.
All through the 80s I voted against Thatcher. I didn't get the governments I wanted. But I still believe that my vote counted. Just as it did in 2017, when I had to be economical with the truth in order that through your right to vote means you are a proper citizen and member of society whom the rich and powerful have to take into account. Again fuck all to do with whether the UK is a member of the EU. The rich and powerful have always disproporionately run the UK, and of course many of them are now looking to Brexit to help them further cement their hold.
But do you really only measure value in monetary terms?
I believe that real change only comes through democratic involvement. It was brilliant that 3 million people voted in the referendum that nobody expected. It meant they were engaged often for the first time in democratic politics. Their instincts were to challenge the fear mongering and disdain of the Remain camp, something I heartily agree with.
Are you seriously telling us that the only important benefit of Brexit will be that in
10 years time the average retired fireman, or dockyard fitter, or Army sergeant, or NHS radiologist can say, " there was a referendum, and I took part in it"
IS THAT REALLY ALL YOU'VE GOT?0 -
Oh perleeeese.Southbank said:
If you count material benefits as being about money, then the answer is who knows? as economic forecasts are not worth the paper they are written on, generally speaking, and the future of the economy will depend on many unpredictable factors.PragueAddick said:
But it's not an answer to my question! Again, with emphasis "what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? " Why cannot you answer the question in terms that politicians use to explain their high minded calling to the career : "to improve the lives of ordinary people". How will Brexit do that???????????Southbank said:
My answer is that knowing your voice counts through your right to vote means you are a proper citizen and member of society whom the rich and powerful have to take into account.PragueAddick said:
My issue was that you described him as the "authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article", which I took to mean that he is one of those in that demographic described in the article. Patently he is not, but it is true that he talks about a group like them a lot to support his own views. Ordinary people who are not "the elite"...seriously_red said:
What was actually posted is as follows:PragueAddick said:@seriously_red
For this reason it is possible to understand the perspective contributed by @Southbank . Rather than beat him up over technical inaccuracies about the EU and it's workings let us recognise an authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article. Tens of millions of European voters have a very different outlook and they have lost faith with the centre.
I don't think, based on what @southbank has told us about his personal circumstances (a successful business owner) as well as what he writes, and how he writes, that he fits the demographic described in that article at all. There are others on here who fit it much better. Either way, everybody is free to take each other's comments as they find them and on their own merits.
At face value @Southbank is supporting the sentiments in the piece and this is consistent with his/her views expressed in the past relating to the sharp drop in % vote for centre left and centre right options across Europe. I don't think that whether Southbank sells diamonds or the big issue is really of any consequence to the actual point being discussed.Southbank said:As you say, also relevant to the UK.
I see the disaffected, marginalised and really all those who have rejected bureaucratic centrism as the possible basis for change. One of the reasons I voted for Brexit."
Just as my own background or that of my grandparents (of Belarusian descent on one side) colours my views but doesn't change the words on the page.
The point is that tens of millions of Europeans are shifting their votes away from traditional options in response to disillusion with the centrist prospectus. And that this is a real challenge for the establishment in many dimensions. Steve Bannan and the alt-right are making gains but aside from Italy they are not really on the radar just yet when it comes to the political economy - much to the disappointment of the Express and Telegraph who appear to celebrate every gain made by extremists.
It would be difficult to find true representatives of that demographic here, because by definition as Charlton fans we are all "metropolitan" but I can think of a couple of Brexit regulars on here who fit the demographic in terms of their working lives far better than Southbank does. E.g., skilled manual work or essential public services, admirable careers which are undervalued ("Forgotten") today. Thing is that especially public services, such as the Fire Brigade, have been undervalued all my adult life, and I have always tried to support policies that value them more highly. Ever since the 3 day Week. In other words, sod all politically to do with the EU or Brexit.
Anyway, back to @southbank, the authentic voice of Southbank. The thing is Southbank, mate, that (as I've written many times) I struggle to understand what motivates your trenchant, unbending stance on Brexit. So once again I ask, what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? People who pursued maybe an apprenticeship in engineering, or people who served or serve us in the essential services? They can often seem to be very angry, and might give you Likes. What will your Brexit bring them? Why will they become less angry as a result?
Come on mate, give us a straight, authentic answer...
And vice versa. If the vote is ignored we are all diminished, including Remainers.
I asked the question a few pages back what would Remainers feel like had the vote gone the other way and a Tory PM had taken us out of the EU anyway, on the basis that the vote was advisory. Ask yourself how you would have felt in that position and you may get some idea of how Leavers feel now.
All through the 80s I voted against Thatcher. I didn't get the governments I wanted. But I still believe that my vote counted. Just as it did in 2017, when I had to be economical with the truth in order that through your right to vote means you are a proper citizen and member of society whom the rich and powerful have to take into account. Again fuck all to do with whether the UK is a member of the EU. The rich and powerful have always disproporionately run the UK, and of course many of them are now looking to Brexit to help them further cement their hold.
But do you really only measure value in monetary terms?
I believe that real change only comes through democratic involvement. It was brilliant that 3 million people voted in the referendum that nobody expected. It meant they were engaged often for the first time in democratic politics. Their instincts were to challenge the fear mongering and disdain of the Remain camp, something I heartily agree with.
0 -
Prague, you cannot accept my answer because you do not believe in national sovereignty, whereas most Leave voters do, as in control over laws, borders and money. It is a fundamental difference which there can be little or no compromise on, as we can see all the time by the ferocity of feelings over it.3 -
"Fearmongering and disdain" from a man who says the EU is an anti-democratic police state, that the EU installs the Italian PM, and that Macron has assembled an EU army and has ordered them to fire upon protestors in Paris.ShootersHillGuru said:
Oh perleeeese.Southbank said:
If you count material benefits as being about money, then the answer is who knows? as economic forecasts are not worth the paper they are written on, generally speaking, and the future of the economy will depend on many unpredictable factors.PragueAddick said:
But it's not an answer to my question! Again, with emphasis "what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? " Why cannot you answer the question in terms that politicians use to explain their high minded calling to the career : "to improve the lives of ordinary people". How will Brexit do that???????????Southbank said:
My answer is that knowing your voice counts through your right to vote means you are a proper citizen and member of society whom the rich and powerful have to take into account.PragueAddick said:
My issue was that you described him as the "authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article", which I took to mean that he is one of those in that demographic described in the article. Patently he is not, but it is true that he talks about a group like them a lot to support his own views. Ordinary people who are not "the elite"...seriously_red said:
What was actually posted is as follows:PragueAddick said:@seriously_red
For this reason it is possible to understand the perspective contributed by @Southbank . Rather than beat him up over technical inaccuracies about the EU and it's workings let us recognise an authentic voice which is true to the sentiments expressed in the article. Tens of millions of European voters have a very different outlook and they have lost faith with the centre.
I don't think, based on what @southbank has told us about his personal circumstances (a successful business owner) as well as what he writes, and how he writes, that he fits the demographic described in that article at all. There are others on here who fit it much better. Either way, everybody is free to take each other's comments as they find them and on their own merits.
At face value @Southbank is supporting the sentiments in the piece and this is consistent with his/her views expressed in the past relating to the sharp drop in % vote for centre left and centre right options across Europe. I don't think that whether Southbank sells diamonds or the big issue is really of any consequence to the actual point being discussed.Southbank said:As you say, also relevant to the UK.
I see the disaffected, marginalised and really all those who have rejected bureaucratic centrism as the possible basis for change. One of the reasons I voted for Brexit."
Just as my own background or that of my grandparents (of Belarusian descent on one side) colours my views but doesn't change the words on the page.
The point is that tens of millions of Europeans are shifting their votes away from traditional options in response to disillusion with the centrist prospectus. And that this is a real challenge for the establishment in many dimensions. Steve Bannan and the alt-right are making gains but aside from Italy they are not really on the radar just yet when it comes to the political economy - much to the disappointment of the Express and Telegraph who appear to celebrate every gain made by extremists.
It would be difficult to find true representatives of that demographic here, because by definition as Charlton fans we are all "metropolitan" but I can think of a couple of Brexit regulars on here who fit the demographic in terms of their working lives far better than Southbank does. E.g., skilled manual work or essential public services, admirable careers which are undervalued ("Forgotten") today. Thing is that especially public services, such as the Fire Brigade, have been undervalued all my adult life, and I have always tried to support policies that value them more highly. Ever since the 3 day Week. In other words, sod all politically to do with the EU or Brexit.
Anyway, back to @southbank, the authentic voice of Southbank. The thing is Southbank, mate, that (as I've written many times) I struggle to understand what motivates your trenchant, unbending stance on Brexit. So once again I ask, what material benefit do you expect Brexit (your version of Brexit) to bring to the lives of, firstly yourself and your family, and secondly the lives of the "forgotten" who might be lurking in this thread? People who pursued maybe an apprenticeship in engineering, or people who served or serve us in the essential services? They can often seem to be very angry, and might give you Likes. What will your Brexit bring them? Why will they become less angry as a result?
Come on mate, give us a straight, authentic answer...
And vice versa. If the vote is ignored we are all diminished, including Remainers.
I asked the question a few pages back what would Remainers feel like had the vote gone the other way and a Tory PM had taken us out of the EU anyway, on the basis that the vote was advisory. Ask yourself how you would have felt in that position and you may get some idea of how Leavers feel now.
All through the 80s I voted against Thatcher. I didn't get the governments I wanted. But I still believe that my vote counted. Just as it did in 2017, when I had to be economical with the truth in order that through your right to vote means you are a proper citizen and member of society whom the rich and powerful have to take into account. Again fuck all to do with whether the UK is a member of the EU. The rich and powerful have always disproporionately run the UK, and of course many of them are now looking to Brexit to help them further cement their hold.
But do you really only measure value in monetary terms?
I believe that real change only comes through democratic involvement. It was brilliant that 3 million people voted in the referendum that nobody expected. It meant they were engaged often for the first time in democratic politics. Their instincts were to challenge the fear mongering and disdain of the Remain camp, something I heartily agree with.0 -
Laws ......Name three that are imposed on us you don’t like ?Southbank said:
Prague, you cannot accept my answer because you do not believe in national sovereignty, whereas most Leave voters do, as in control over laws, borders and money. It is a fundamental difference which there can be little or no compromise on, as we can see all the time by the ferocity of feelings over it.
Borders....... it’s a fact that we need immigration for our economy to survive. Laws in place already to address people coming here and not paying their way. Our successive governments have just chose to ignore them
Money........ UK is not in the Euro so please explain this one too
Of course you can’t.
1 -
I think it would be interesting for you to actually live in another EU country to see how they cope with the EU being 'oblivious to local sovereignty'. It is impressive in a way that you keep going with this idea irrespective of others pointing out how silly it is, but to be honest its a very strange argument and comes across as just something that people repeat from tabloids.Southbank said:
No, I really do not like the protectionist EU, a stinking mass of corporate corruption, anti-democratic and oblivious to local sovereignty. I believe the nation state is the main protector of my democratic rights.CharltonMadrid said:Southbank - I, like many others, am really struggling to see your logic for your reasoning for wanting Brexit. If it is solely as an exercise in democracy then what is the problem with giving the public a chance to ratify or reject the deal? An informed public, able to pass or deny something which will have a huge impact on them seems like a very good example of democracy, much more so than a vote which took place with unclear explanations as to its ramifications.
1
This discussion has been closed.
