Person Jumps (Falls) 7620 metres
Comments
-
Does he identify as a Man then?Big_Bad_World said:
He may not identify as white.Leuth said:It was a white man, and I think the title should reflect this
1 -
Or fallpaulie8290 said:
Now now, i have followed all suggestions but the PC brigade would jump all over me if I followed yours hahaLeuth said:It was a white man, and I think the title should reflect this
2 -
Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.3
-
Good point Chizz. Perhaps it should read something like "Non gender specific, warm blooded life form falls 25,000 feet (7,620m)." Just to cover all bases.Chizz said:Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.
2 -
No. That wouldn't reflect the person's intent, which is the point of the story. Many people have fallen that far, few have survived, even fewer have done so deliberately.JWADDICK said:
Good point Chizz. Perhaps it should read something like "Non gender specific, warm blooded life form falls 25,000 feet (7,620m)." Just to cover all bases.Chizz said:Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.
I suggest "Human falls from great height, deliberately".
@paulie8290 can you see to it, please?1 -
But that ignores the Health and Safety issues and may encourage youngsters to try it. How about " Human found in net close to the ground" ?Chizz said:
No. That wouldn't reflect the person's intent, which is the point of the story. Many people have fallen that far, few have survived, even fewer have done so deliberately.JWADDICK said:
Good point Chizz. Perhaps it should read something like "Non gender specific, warm blooded life form falls 25,000 feet (7,620m)." Just to cover all bases.Chizz said:Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.
I suggest "Human falls from great height, deliberately".
@paulie8290 can you see to it, please?3 -
Excellent point, well made.ForeverAddickted said:
Does he identify as a Man then?Big_Bad_World said:
He may not identify as white.Leuth said:It was a white man, and I think the title should reflect this
1 -
Can you be sure they identify as a humanJWADDICK said:
But that ignores the Health and Safety issues and may encourage youngsters to try it. How about " Human found in net close to the ground" ?Chizz said:
No. That wouldn't reflect the person's intent, which is the point of the story. Many people have fallen that far, few have survived, even fewer have done so deliberately.JWADDICK said:
Good point Chizz. Perhaps it should read something like "Non gender specific, warm blooded life form falls 25,000 feet (7,620m)." Just to cover all bases.Chizz said:Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.
I suggest "Human falls from great height, deliberately".
@paulie8290 can you see to it, please?0 -
Now your just being silly Paulie.paulie8290 said:
Can you be sure they identify as a humanJWADDICK said:
But that ignores the Health and Safety issues and may encourage youngsters to try it. How about " Human found in net close to the ground" ?Chizz said:
No. That wouldn't reflect the person's intent, which is the point of the story. Many people have fallen that far, few have survived, even fewer have done so deliberately.JWADDICK said:
Good point Chizz. Perhaps it should read something like "Non gender specific, warm blooded life form falls 25,000 feet (7,620m)." Just to cover all bases.Chizz said:Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.
I suggest "Human falls from great height, deliberately".
@paulie8290 can you see to it, please?2 -
Huperson, please, and less of the toxic masculinity and patriarchal definitions.paulie8290 said:
Can you be sure they identify as a humanJWADDICK said:
But that ignores the Health and Safety issues and may encourage youngsters to try it. How about " Human found in net close to the ground" ?Chizz said:
No. That wouldn't reflect the person's intent, which is the point of the story. Many people have fallen that far, few have survived, even fewer have done so deliberately.JWADDICK said:
Good point Chizz. Perhaps it should read something like "Non gender specific, warm blooded life form falls 25,000 feet (7,620m)." Just to cover all bases.Chizz said:Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.
I suggest "Human falls from great height, deliberately".
@paulie8290 can you see to it, please?
Thanks.0 - Sponsored links:
-
"Net manufacturers pleased with product test".3
-
I'm not sure you'll ever understand just how much that word has angered me.Chizz said:"Net manufacturers pleased with product test".
1 -
Mental.0
-
Or as a manBig_Bad_World said:
He may not identify as white.Leuth said:It was a white man, and I think the title should reflect this
0 -
Brilliant, you walk the extra mile or 1.60934Kms for the CL forum members @paulie8290paulie8290 said:
SortedGreenie said:
It should be in metres until we leave the EU.paulie8290 said:Anymore suggestions
0 -
Do I get my bonus now??Greenie said:
Brilliant, you walk the extra mile or 1.60934Kms for the CL forum members @paulie8290paulie8290 said:
SortedGreenie said:
It should be in metres until we leave the EU.paulie8290 said:Anymore suggestions
2 -
Yes it is, if it was a woman, it woulda gone all wrong when she turned to reverse into the safety net.Chizz said:Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.
1