Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Person Jumps (Falls) 7620 metres

2»

Comments

  • Leuth said:

    It was a white man, and I think the title should reflect this

    He may not identify as white.
    Does he identify as a Man then?
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,338

    Leuth said:

    It was a white man, and I think the title should reflect this

    Now now, i have followed all suggestions but the PC brigade would jump all over me if I followed yours haha
    Or fall
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,338
    Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.
  • JWADDICK
    JWADDICK Posts: 846
    edited August 2018
    Chizz said:

    Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.

    Good point Chizz. Perhaps it should read something like "Non gender specific, warm blooded life form falls 25,000 feet (7,620m)." Just to cover all bases.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,338
    JWADDICK said:

    Chizz said:

    Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.

    Good point Chizz. Perhaps it should read something like "Non gender specific, warm blooded life form falls 25,000 feet (7,620m)." Just to cover all bases.
    No. That wouldn't reflect the person's intent, which is the point of the story. Many people have fallen that far, few have survived, even fewer have done so deliberately.

    I suggest "Human falls from great height, deliberately".

    @paulie8290 can you see to it, please?
  • JWADDICK
    JWADDICK Posts: 846
    Chizz said:

    JWADDICK said:

    Chizz said:

    Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.

    Good point Chizz. Perhaps it should read something like "Non gender specific, warm blooded life form falls 25,000 feet (7,620m)." Just to cover all bases.
    No. That wouldn't reflect the person's intent, which is the point of the story. Many people have fallen that far, few have survived, even fewer have done so deliberately.

    I suggest "Human falls from great height, deliberately".

    @paulie8290 can you see to it, please?
    But that ignores the Health and Safety issues and may encourage youngsters to try it. How about " Human found in net close to the ground" ?
  • Big_Bad_World
    Big_Bad_World Posts: 5,859

    Leuth said:

    It was a white man, and I think the title should reflect this

    He may not identify as white.
    Does he identify as a Man then?
    Excellent point, well made.
  • paulie8290
    paulie8290 Posts: 23,344
    JWADDICK said:

    Chizz said:

    JWADDICK said:

    Chizz said:

    Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.

    Good point Chizz. Perhaps it should read something like "Non gender specific, warm blooded life form falls 25,000 feet (7,620m)." Just to cover all bases.
    No. That wouldn't reflect the person's intent, which is the point of the story. Many people have fallen that far, few have survived, even fewer have done so deliberately.

    I suggest "Human falls from great height, deliberately".

    @paulie8290 can you see to it, please?
    But that ignores the Health and Safety issues and may encourage youngsters to try it. How about " Human found in net close to the ground" ?
    Can you be sure they identify as a human
  • JWADDICK
    JWADDICK Posts: 846

    JWADDICK said:

    Chizz said:

    JWADDICK said:

    Chizz said:

    Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.

    Good point Chizz. Perhaps it should read something like "Non gender specific, warm blooded life form falls 25,000 feet (7,620m)." Just to cover all bases.
    No. That wouldn't reflect the person's intent, which is the point of the story. Many people have fallen that far, few have survived, even fewer have done so deliberately.

    I suggest "Human falls from great height, deliberately".

    @paulie8290 can you see to it, please?
    But that ignores the Health and Safety issues and may encourage youngsters to try it. How about " Human found in net close to the ground" ?
    Can you be sure they identify as a human
    Now your just being silly Paulie.
  • Big_Bad_World
    Big_Bad_World Posts: 5,859
    edited August 2018

    JWADDICK said:

    Chizz said:

    JWADDICK said:

    Chizz said:

    Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.

    Good point Chizz. Perhaps it should read something like "Non gender specific, warm blooded life form falls 25,000 feet (7,620m)." Just to cover all bases.
    No. That wouldn't reflect the person's intent, which is the point of the story. Many people have fallen that far, few have survived, even fewer have done so deliberately.

    I suggest "Human falls from great height, deliberately".

    @paulie8290 can you see to it, please?
    But that ignores the Health and Safety issues and may encourage youngsters to try it. How about " Human found in net close to the ground" ?
    Can you be sure they identify as a human
    Huperson, please, and less of the toxic masculinity and patriarchal definitions.

    Thanks.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,338
    "Net manufacturers pleased with product test".
  • Big_Bad_World
    Big_Bad_World Posts: 5,859
    Chizz said:

    "Net manufacturers pleased with product test".

    I'm not sure you'll ever understand just how much that word has angered me.

  • PopIcon
    PopIcon Posts: 5,970
    Mental.
  • johnnybev1987
    johnnybev1987 Posts: 11,412

    Leuth said:

    It was a white man, and I think the title should reflect this

    He may not identify as white.
    Or as a man
  • Greenie
    Greenie Posts: 9,172

    Greenie said:

    Anymore suggestions

    It should be in metres until we leave the EU.
    Sorted
    Brilliant, you walk the extra mile or 1.60934Kms for the CL forum members @paulie8290
  • paulie8290
    paulie8290 Posts: 23,344
    Greenie said:

    Greenie said:

    Anymore suggestions

    It should be in metres until we leave the EU.
    Sorted
    Brilliant, you walk the extra mile or 1.60934Kms for the CL forum members @paulie8290
    Do I get my bonus now??
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Chizz said:

    Is the person's gender relevant in this case Paulie? You wouldn't lose any accuracy if you referred to the person as a "person", rather than making an assumption as to their gender.

    Yes it is, if it was a woman, it woulda gone all wrong when she turned to reverse into the safety net.