Without wishing to be pedantic, oh ok! With every intention of being pedantic, he didn't actually jump 25,000 feet did he? It would be more correct to say that he fell 25,000 feet into a net.
A man who can jump 25,000 feet either in a long jump or high jump way would be something to see.
Without wishing to be pedantic, oh ok! With every intention of being pedantic, he didn't actually jump 25,000 feet did he? It would be more correct to say that he fell 25,000 feet into a net.
A man who can jump 25,000 feet either in a long jump or high jump way would be something to see.
I guess falling into a trampoline from 25,000 might then see them jump 25,000 feet over and over again if they're rather unlucky
I think there should be a notification of the content of the OP so that people can make an informed choice. Contains risk taking behaviour, risk to life, Americans, strong bloody violence, strong language and sex references
Comments
2016 25,000 ft into a net
https://youtu.be/6qF_fzEI4wU
2014 25,000 through a roof, onto a trampoline
https://youtu.be/RbIivGvflkk
2012 out of a helicopter, onto some cardboard boxes
https://youtu.be/c2yDAiwfsrA
2011 no parachute, but a can of red bull
https://youtu.be/AA0XXgxSp84
That one is fake (pretty obvious). Was an ad for a trampoline park.
The name of the skydiver gives it away.
A man who can jump 25,000 feet either in a long jump or high jump way would be something to see.
Not that I really care you understand, I'm just bored at work and pissed off with this bloody takeover!
Jesus lol
Contains risk taking behaviour, risk to life, Americans, strong bloody violence, strong language and sex references