England Cricket 2017
Comments
-
162-30
-
Amla lbw Ali 83
163-40 -
bolloxbolder said:
Please someone get Amla out!!!
Your wish is Ali's commandbolloxbolder said:Please someone get Amla out!!!
2 -
He always had it under control0
-
173-5 Cocks out1
-
De Kock goes, the end is nigh0
-
Thank f for that.ross1 said:bolloxbolder said:Please someone get Amla out!!!
Your wish is Ali's commandbolloxbolder said:Please someone get Amla out!!!
0 -
173-6 De Bruyn0
-
I hope so, there's a lot of rain forecast tomorrow.killerandflash said:De Kock goes, the end is nigh
0 -
At this rate, it'll be all over by tea!0
- Sponsored links:
-
The man's a monster!0
-
Graeme Smith
Ex-South Africa captain on BBC Test Match Special
Posted at
16:32
De Kock was itching. Just leave that shot in the locker as a left hander.2 -
182-6 Tea0
-
183-7 Du Plessis1
-
-
195-80
-
202-90
-
England win by 177 runs0
-
Ali 5-69.0
-
England should move bairstow up to 5 and give someone like duckett a go at 7 to help blood them in0
- Sponsored links:
-
When Woakes is fit you could move Stokes, Bairstow and Ali all up once space, slot Woakes in at 8 and the batting would be no weaker than it is now and have 6 bowlers, then it's just finding an opener to face the Aussies0
-
I watched the highlights on C5 earlier - they went to the adverts after the SA 9th wicket went down & came back to show the 10th a ball later........wtf ????? who was editing that ???? totally spoilt the "atmosphere" of Mo taking 2 in 2 & winning the Test !!!! Total planks & the sooner The beeb or C4 get the rights to the highlights the better.0
-
This what I will would do as well. However the selectors won't. They will stick with the same team, maybe even Balance coming in. Whoever plays should get loads of runs as Windes sides is very poor and then be selected for Australia, I suspect Stoneham and Foakes will have to wait until 2018.The_President said:I think what will happen is that Stoneman will play in Windies series, and maybe Foakes will come in to keep wicket, allowing Bairstow to bat at 5.
1 -
well they had to show the break somewhere, and it's not as if there was fever pitch excitement around the Saffers slipping to an expected defeat once Amla was out...golfaddick said:I watched the highlights on C5 earlier - they went to the adverts after the SA 9th wicket went down & came back to show the 10th a ball later........wtf ????? who was editing that ???? totally spoilt the "atmosphere" of Mo taking 2 in 2 & winning the Test !!!! Total planks & the sooner The beeb or C4 get the rights to the highlights the better.
0 -
Bizarre not to try Stoneman in this series, as facing the saffer bowling attack would have been a real test of of Test credentials. Whoever comes in against the Windies will get far easier runs which will be no guideline to coping with the Australian attack at the Waca1
-
I'm not gonna complain as they are key to Surrey staying up this season.redman said:
This what I will would do as well. However the selectors won't. They will stick with the same team, maybe even Balance coming in. Whoever plays should get loads of runs as Windes sides is very poor and then be selected for Australia, I suspect Stoneham and Foakes will have to wait until 2018.The_President said:I think what will happen is that Stoneman will play in Windies series, and maybe Foakes will come in to keep wicket, allowing Bairstow to bat at 5.
0 -
In that case can we call up Burns as wellcantersaddick said:
I'm not gonna complain as they are key to Surrey staying up this season.redman said:
This what I will would do as well. However the selectors won't. They will stick with the same team, maybe even Balance coming in. Whoever plays should get loads of runs as Windes sides is very poor and then be selected for Australia, I suspect Stoneham and Foakes will have to wait until 2018.The_President said:I think what will happen is that Stoneman will play in Windies series, and maybe Foakes will come in to keep wicket, allowing Bairstow to bat at 5.
1 -
-
No 2 spinnerCallumcafc said:
In an interview yesterday, he was still suggesting that there could be matches in which we picked 2 spinners, and he would be No 2 spinner. To make Moeen No 2 spinner, he'd have to be one hell of a player!1 -
Not Liam Dawson I take itkillerandflash said:
No 2 spinnerCallumcafc said:
In an interview yesterday, he was still suggesting that there could be matches in which we picked 2 spinners, and he would be No 2 spinner. To make Moeen No 2 spinner, he'd have to be one hell of a player!0