Carl Jenkinson - 12 million quid!

http://www.westhamonline.net/forum_flat.php?7728422||mc=w||
Comments
-
Unfortunately you're dreaming, Mendonca.
Jenkinson was out of contract when Arsenal signed him - so no registration transfer fee was payable.
What we got was £1mill or so, young player development fee, as he was under 23.
Never heard of a sell-on clause with that.
0 -
I believe we negotiated a sell on clause with West Ham for Poyet - so it is possible. I could be wrong there though.Oggy Red said:Unfortunately you're dreaming, Mendonca.
Jenkinson was out of contract when Arsenal signed him - so no registration transfer fee was payable.
What we got was £1mill or so, young player development fee, as he was under 23.
Never heard of a sell-on clause with that.0 -
is that not how Bournemouth got money from LallanaOggy Red said:Unfortunately you're dreaming, Mendonca.
Jenkinson was out of contract when Arsenal signed him - so no registration transfer fee was payable.
What we got was £1mill or so, young player development fee, as he was under 23.
Never heard of a sell-on clause with that.0 -
I blame Katrien and Roland1
-
Mendonca In Asdas said:
Did we include any sell ons when we sold him to Arsenal, if so could help Roland's pocket.
http://www.westhamonline.net/forum_flat.php?7728422||mc=w||0 -
I doubt a sell on fee was sought.
A few months prior to him going to arsenal, we'd deemed him Eastbourne borough level.0 -
It was a straightforward transfer I think.If there was no sell on clause the sellers must have been total idiots.0
-
I still think Chris Solly is the better player. I'm not joking.11
-
We seem to have that effect on most playerspaulbaconsarnie said:I doubt a sell on fee was sought.
A few months prior to him going to arsenal, we'd deemed him Eastbourne borough level.0 -
Should have gone for loan on clause.bobmunro said:
I believe we negotiated a sell on clause with West Ham for Poyet - so it is possible. I could be wrong there though.Oggy Red said:Unfortunately you're dreaming, Mendonca.
Jenkinson was out of contract when Arsenal signed him - so no registration transfer fee was payable.
What we got was £1mill or so, young player development fee, as he was under 23.
Never heard of a sell-on clause with that.3 - Sponsored links:
-
Most people on this board didn't rate him at the time...Southbank said:It was a straightforward transfer I think.If there was no sell on clause the sellers must have been total idiots.
0 -
It was 4 years ago when he was 18killerandflash said:
Most people on this board didn't rate him at the time...Southbank said:It was a straightforward transfer I think.If there was no sell on clause the sellers must have been total idiots.
0 -
Solly's problem (and our benefit) is that he's not tall enough (So teams dont want to give him a chance) not to mention his knees, if he was as tall as Jenkinson and was injury free then he'd be England's Right Back in my opinionThe Red Robin said:I still think Chris Solly is the better player. I'm not joking.
5 -
I rate him, and the move to West Ham has seen him really push on and develop. But 12m? crazy price.1
-
I know where you're coming from. Solly is more accomplished. Sadly, with the injury problem, I'm not so sure he will reach the level he deserves to. Bit like RIchard Rufus. Obviously want him to stay at Charlton, but I'd certainly not begrudge him a premiership move.The Red Robin said:I still think Chris Solly is the better player. I'm not joking.
1 -
I'd have agreed before he got this knee issue. Jenkinson is better going forward, no doubtThe Red Robin said:I still think Chris Solly is the better player. I'm not joking.
2 -
Totally agree. Before Hodgson finally picked Clyne England were desperate for a decent right back. Solly would have been a shoe-in were not for his injury problems.ForeverAddickted said:
Solly's problem (and our benefit) is that he's not tall enough (So teams dont want to give him a chance) not to mention his knees, if he was as tall as Jenkinson and was injury free then he'd be England's Right Back in my opinionThe Red Robin said:I still think Chris Solly is the better player. I'm not joking.
And for this reason. We're very lucky to still have him. I wouldn't begrudge him the move he deserves whatsoever.ricky_otto said:
I know where you're coming from. Solly is more accomplished. Sadly, with the injury problem, I'm not so sure he will reach the level he deserves to. Bit like RIchard Rufus. Obviously want him to stay at Charlton, but I'd certainly not begrudge him a premiership move.The Red Robin said:I still think Chris Solly is the better player. I'm not joking.
1 -
When Arsenal bought him, the general consensus was why, and most people here thought £1m was a decent fee for himNorfolk_Addick said:
It was 4 years ago when he was 18killerandflash said:
Most people on this board didn't rate him at the time...Southbank said:It was a straightforward transfer I think.If there was no sell on clause the sellers must have been total idiots.
0 -
Not forgetting he only actually played about 7 games, so that fee probably was good at the time.killerandflash said:
When Arsenal bought him, the general consensus was why, and most people here thought £1m was a decent fee for himNorfolk_Addick said:
It was 4 years ago when he was 18killerandflash said:
Most people on this board didn't rate him at the time...Southbank said:It was a straightforward transfer I think.If there was no sell on clause the sellers must have been total idiots.
More fed up we only got 1.6m (? May have been 1.9) for Shelvey.4 -
12 Mil for Jenkinson ?.
The world has finally gone mad.2 - Sponsored links:
-
Thing in Shelvey's career has very much stalled whilst Jenkinson going to West Ham has seen his flourish a bit, wouldnt be surprised if Carl and Clyne were England's first choice in that department soonricky_otto said:
Not forgetting he only actually played about 7 games, so that fee probably was good at the time.killerandflash said:
When Arsenal bought him, the general consensus was why, and most people here thought £1m was a decent fee for himNorfolk_Addick said:
It was 4 years ago when he was 18killerandflash said:
Most people on this board didn't rate him at the time...Southbank said:It was a straightforward transfer I think.If there was no sell on clause the sellers must have been total idiots.
More fed up we only got 1.6m (? May have been 1.9) for Shelvey.2 -
No. Great player.Bedsaddick said:12 Mil for Jenkinson ?.
The world has finally gone mad.
What would be stupid is for Arsenal to sell him. He is going to be one of the best so they should keep him on the books.
5 -
this £12 Million is just Arsenals valuation not what West Ham will pay, arsenal probably only done that to put west ham off and if west ham are stupid enough to pay it then arsenal are laughing0
-
ForeverAddickted said:
Solly's problem (and our benefit) is that he's not tall enough (So teams dont want to give him a chance) not to mention his knees, if he was as tall as Jenkinson and was injury free then he'd be England's Right Back in my opinionThe Red Robin said:I still think Chris Solly is the better player. I'm not joking.
I didn't realise height was such a big factor. I can see it being an advantage but some of the best full backs I've seen are small. This is coming from a man who is 5ft 7 though.1 -
I dont feel height is an issue either but your forever hearing of clubs who have released kids cos they're too small etc... we did it with that lad now at Peterborough from Dulwich whilst the same happened to Luke Shaw and Tyrone MingsAddick in SW16 said:ForeverAddickted said:
Solly's problem (and our benefit) is that he's not tall enough (So teams dont want to give him a chance) not to mention his knees, if he was as tall as Jenkinson and was injury free then he'd be England's Right Back in my opinionThe Red Robin said:I still think Chris Solly is the better player. I'm not joking.
I didn't realise height was such a big factor. I can see it being an advantage but some of the best full backs I've seen are small. This is coming from a man who is 5ft 7 though.0 -
Adrian Durham's over inflated his value banging on about him on TalkSport all the time.
I remember him doing an interview with him about a year ago. Durham kept saying next England RB. Then they had a debate about it around a month ago. Of course he didn't even mention him. More opinionated tripe from Durham. I tweeted Durham to remind him of said interview, no response.0 -
The Jenkinson fee was £1.5m, plus £250k in add-ons, plus a 15% sell-on (over and above).
This is what funded the team building in 2012. I was sceptical about that in part because I originally believed the fee was less, but this is reliable.5 -
If there was a sell on clause I'd be shocked if the spivs didn't cash it in before they swanned off.Airman Brown said:The Jenkinson fee was £1.5m, plus £250k in add-ons, plus a 15% sell-on.
1 -
So 15% of £12M = £1.8M!
Papa Smurf laughing all the way to the bank (as long as he can persuade those 'Appy 'Ammers to shell out...)1 -
So say Arsenal do sell him for 12m, we would get roughly 1.5m of the 10.5m profit?Airman Brown said:The Jenkinson fee was £1.5m, plus £250k in add-ons, plus a 15% sell-on (over and above).
This is what funded the team building in 2012. I was sceptical about that in part because I originally believed the fee was less, but this is reliable.0