Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

how many disallowed goals have we been let off so far this season

letthegoodtimesroll
letthegoodtimesroll Posts: 10,778
in General Charlton
Was today's one for offside ?
«1

Comments

  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,472
    No.

    It was a blatent an offside as you will ever see.

    If he'd left it is would have been a goal but he didn't.
  • Uboat
    Uboat Posts: 12,260
    So, yes then.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,472
    No, because it wasn't a valid goal disallowed in error so not a "let off"
  • Redvalleyeast
    Redvalleyeast Posts: 4,818
    Couldn't believe he put his foot on it,it was a goal all day long until he did that. Pure instinct. Mind you,the defending leading up to that chance was appalling!
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 29,067
    edited October 2014
    Surprised he went for it, at first wasn't sure if he touched it. Must be on a big goal bonus.
  • henrythecat
    henrythecat Posts: 479
    Henry Irving said:

    No, because it wasn't a valid goal disallowed in error so not a "let off"

    although if the fool hadn't stuck his foot out, it would have been a goal. the original strike was going in. so in those terms, it is a let off
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,472
    henrythecat said:

    Henry Irving said:

    No, because it wasn't a valid goal disallowed in error so not a "let off"

    although if the fool hadn't stuck his foot out, it would have been a goal. the original strike was going in. so in those terms, it is a let off
    Then so was his miss when Buyens gave the ball away, again.
  • superclive
    superclive Posts: 1,812
    Really? Lee clarke was convinced it was on side and went on about it for 5 mins in the presser. He owes the ref an apology if hes wrong!
  • DANTHEADDICK
    DANTHEADDICK Posts: 95
    Yes it was going straight in but he touched it with the bottom of he's foot just before it went over the line luckily for us and he was offside when he done it so no goal
  • letthegoodtimesroll
    letthegoodtimesroll Posts: 10,778
    Didn't look he touched it from where i was sitting in the upper north

  • Sponsored links:



  • DANTHEADDICK
    DANTHEADDICK Posts: 95
    letthegoodtimesroll said:

    Didn't look he touched it from where i was sitting in the upper north

    He did touch it could see it clear from where we sit lower covered end just to the right of the goal we said at the time it was a goal if he had left it
  • Justin20474
    Justin20474 Posts: 757
    Certain it was off side, like other said, if he hadn't stuck his foot our and got a touch it would have been a goal, nevermind.
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 58,138
    Didn't know he touched it. Got lucky
  • JaShea99
    JaShea99 Posts: 5,500
    He was practically on the goal line, there's no way anyone could have been playing him onside. Even if he hadn't touched it I'd say he was still interfering so it shouldn't have stood regardless.
  • Nicholas
    Nicholas Posts: 7,669
    Very lucky if that plonker would have left it it would have been 1-1 a lot sooner.
  • paulie8290
    paulie8290 Posts: 23,355
    I stand in the upper north just by that post and to me he never touched it, I think we got lucky their, if I am wrong and he did touch it, then it was offside but IMO he never touched it
  • 24 Red
    24 Red Posts: 578
    He definitely touched it. I was almost in line with it.
  • RedArmyyyyy
    RedArmyyyyy Posts: 107
    100% touched it.
  • LawrieAbrahams
    LawrieAbrahams Posts: 3,780
    paulie8290 said:

    I stand in the upper north just by that post and to me he never touched it, I think we got lucky their, if I am wrong and he did touch it, then it was offside but IMO he never touched it

    I'm in NW upper and he got a big touch on it. He was almost on the goal line and clearly offside. It was going in so pretty dumb but probably instinctive.
  • Taxi_Lad
    Taxi_Lad Posts: 3,803
    no surprise that twat clark is bleating about it being the wrong decision. the fella is a 100% fool

  • Sponsored links:



  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,292
    Nicholas said:

    Very lucky if that plonker would have left it it would have been 1-1 a lot sooner.

    I think we looked good in that game all the time we were on level terms. When we were in front we were awful, though. Perversely it might have done us a favour if they had scored earlier - we will never know though.
  • RedChaser
    RedChaser Posts: 19,900
    Taxi_Lad said:

    no surprise that twat clark is bleating about it being the wrong decision. the fella is a 100% tool

    Reads better now. :-)
  • LawrieAbrahams
    LawrieAbrahams Posts: 3,780
    edited October 2014
    Stig said:

    Nicholas said:

    Very lucky if that plonker would have left it it would have been 1-1 a lot sooner.

    I think we looked good in that game all the time we were on level terms. When we were in front we were awful, though. Perversely it might have done us a favour if they had scored earlier - we will never know though.
    Yes. I almost wish we would stop scoring first.
  • Goonerhater
    Goonerhater Posts: 12,677
    100% touched it and he knew he did
  • Clem_Snide
    Clem_Snide Posts: 11,801
    Definitely touched it. The dick celebrated like he was claiming the goal.

    I'd also like to see the build up as I'm sure the ball went out before he crossed it.
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,716
    Clem_Snide said:

    Definitely touched it. The dick celebrated like he was claiming the goal.

    I'd also like to see the build up as I'm sure the ball went out before he crossed it.

    You and me both.
  • C_Jensens_Love_Child
    C_Jensens_Love_Child Posts: 1,598
    Henry Irving said:

    No.

    It was a blatent an offside as you will ever see.

    If he'd left it is would have been a goal but he didn't.

    Sat in the posh seats and didn't realise he touched it!!!!! What a stupid F*ck!!!!
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,716
    LenGlover said:

    Clem_Snide said:

    Definitely touched it. The dick celebrated like he was claiming the goal.

    I'd also like to see the build up as I'm sure the ball went out before he crossed it.

    You and me both.
    Looked in on the replay!
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,599
    Henry Irving said:

    No.

    It was a blatent an offside as you will ever see.

    If he'd left it is would have been a goal but he didn't.

    After watching the FLS highlights, you can see that it wasn't. He was level with Henderson and Morrison was behind him to the right of the goal.

    That said, I can understand why the linesman gave him offside, given how close he was to the line. And he should have left it. So I think we've had a let off both in the sense that a player's stupidity has helped us, and in that the linesman has made the wrong call.
  • stonewallpenalty
    stonewallpenalty Posts: 3,842
    Good spot.

Categories

“Marketplace”