Couldn't believe he put his foot on it,it was a goal all day long until he did that. Pure instinct. Mind you,the defending leading up to that chance was appalling!
Yes it was going straight in but he touched it with the bottom of he's foot just before it went over the line luckily for us and he was offside when he done it so no goal
Didn't look he touched it from where i was sitting in the upper north
He did touch it could see it clear from where we sit lower covered end just to the right of the goal we said at the time it was a goal if he had left it
He was practically on the goal line, there's no way anyone could have been playing him onside. Even if he hadn't touched it I'd say he was still interfering so it shouldn't have stood regardless.
I stand in the upper north just by that post and to me he never touched it, I think we got lucky their, if I am wrong and he did touch it, then it was offside but IMO he never touched it
I stand in the upper north just by that post and to me he never touched it, I think we got lucky their, if I am wrong and he did touch it, then it was offside but IMO he never touched it
I'm in NW upper and he got a big touch on it. He was almost on the goal line and clearly offside. It was going in so pretty dumb but probably instinctive.
Very lucky if that plonker would have left it it would have been 1-1 a lot sooner.
I think we looked good in that game all the time we were on level terms. When we were in front we were awful, though. Perversely it might have done us a favour if they had scored earlier - we will never know though.
Very lucky if that plonker would have left it it would have been 1-1 a lot sooner.
I think we looked good in that game all the time we were on level terms. When we were in front we were awful, though. Perversely it might have done us a favour if they had scored earlier - we will never know though.
If he'd left it is would have been a goal but he didn't.
After watching the FLS highlights, you can see that it wasn't. He was level with Henderson and Morrison was behind him to the right of the goal.
That said, I can understand why the linesman gave him offside, given how close he was to the line. And he should have left it. So I think we've had a let off both in the sense that a player's stupidity has helped us, and in that the linesman has made the wrong call.
Comments
It was a blatent an offside as you will ever see.
If he'd left it is would have been a goal but he didn't.
I'd also like to see the build up as I'm sure the ball went out before he crossed it.
That said, I can understand why the linesman gave him offside, given how close he was to the line. And he should have left it. So I think we've had a let off both in the sense that a player's stupidity has helped us, and in that the linesman has made the wrong call.