Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket 2025

1…108109111113114…118

Comments

  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    Dean bowls yet another

    England require 70 from 50 overs. Might be a struggle. 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    Jones with 40* (50) and Beaumont with 21* (35) see England chase down the total required with 10 wickets and 35.5 overs to spare. That will do our NRR the world of good.  
  • Todds_right_hook
    Todds_right_hook Posts: 10,892
    Zulu said:
    'Experienced option to win an Ashes test' - nah that isnt Olly Stone - bit like saying lets bring on Kelman to help us score some goals.
    Kelman helped us score a goal on Tuesday….just saying 
  • Zulu
    Zulu Posts: 134
    Brilliant interview with Keysey...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiS-5qRYCAM
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 11,389
    In their second WC game England Women have bowled Bangladesh out for 178
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,385
    fenaddick said:
    In their second WC game England Women have bowled Bangladesh out for 178
    In an extremely club 3s style twist, Bangladesh's clear best player turned out to be hiding down at 9
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    Leuth said:
    fenaddick said:
    In their second WC game England Women have bowled Bangladesh out for 178
    In an extremely club 3s style twist, Bangladesh's clear best player turned out to be hiding down at 9
    She batted superbly but then made a pretty brainless decision to take a single and allow their number 11 take the strike - who promptly batted like a club 3s tailender in trying to smash a ball for six rather than getting the number 9 back on strike. 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    We aren't playing Marufa very well - her inswing has resulted in two LBWs and a third one given but reversed on review. She can also move the ball the other way.  
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,348
    Absolutely ridiculous third-umpiring. Twice a review has been considered "inconclusive", but the decision has been overturned. 

    Surely if it's inconclusive, the on-field umpire's decision should stand. 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    Spot of bother now at 69-4

  • Sponsored links:



  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    £1,642,126.09 matched at 1.01 on England on Betfair. If I had in excess of £800,000 to win £8,000 I might be sweating a bit at 91-5. 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    103-6

    Amateur hour from Capsey. Opts to review an LBW when it was hitting all three but, fortunately, for England she was out of time to do so anyway. 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    Some serious technical issues with our batters - four out LBW playing round straight ones with the head falling over and nowhere near in line with the ball. 

    Up to Knight now to see the ship home but wouldn't want to get to the stage where we have to rely on Smith or Bell at the other end. 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    Addick Addict said:
    £1,642,126.09 matched at 1.01 on England on Betfair. If I had in excess of £800,000 to win £8,000 I might be sweating a bit at 91-5. 
    England 1.79 currently
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,715
    All down to Heather Knight. 
    If she stays in England win
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    50* for Knight
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 11,389
    Would appreciate it if they could score more than 3 an over, going to get very tense otherwise
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    England win by 4 wickets thanks to 79* from Knight
  • PrincessFiona
    PrincessFiona Posts: 5,483
    Chizz said:
    Absolutely ridiculous third-umpiring. Twice a review has been considered "inconclusive", but the decision has been overturned. 

    Surely if it's inconclusive, the on-field umpire's decision should stand. 
    I thought that too
  • billysboots
    billysboots Posts: 1,596
    Addick Addict said:
    £1,642,126.09 matched at 1.01 on England on Betfair. If I had in excess of £800,000 to win £8,000 I might be sweating a bit at 91-5. 
    Enjoy your £8k 😂😂

  • Sponsored links:



  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 11,389
    Looks like Cummins is going to miss most, if not all, of the ashes 
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 22,982
    Shame Boland is good too, would be more of a loss otherwise.
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 11,389
    North Lower Neil said:
    Shame Boland is good too, would be more of a loss otherwise.
    Main benefit to my eyes is that it weakens their batting, Lyon will be their 9 and Josh Tongue loves mopping up the tail
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,956
    Boland is very good, especially in helpful conditions, but he's no Cummins who's an all time great. 309 wickets at 22, in all conditions. 

    Their captain too.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    Australia Women in big trouble against Pakistan at 59-4 and really struggling to play the spinners 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    billysboots said:
    Addick Addict said:
    £1,642,126.09 matched at 1.01 on England on Betfair. If I had in excess of £800,000 to win £8,000 I might be sweating a bit at 91-5. 
    Enjoy your £8k 😂😂
    At 1.01 I'm far more likely to be a layer than a backer but only if there is a trading opportunity in doing so. Backing at 1.01 is more for courtsiders at tennis matches or those at racecourse tracks. 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    Addick Addict said:
    Australia Women in big trouble against Pakistan at 59-4 and really struggling to play the spinners 
    60-5 now
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    £1,460,501.33 matched at 1.02 on Australia before the game started. Matched in-play at 1.38.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    75-6 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,883
    76-7 and they still have almost 29 overs to go.

    Beth Mooney, on 33* (38) must be spitting feathers at the ineptitude of her partners in playing what is slow spin on an even slower wicket.  

Categories

“Marketplace”