Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Methven, Rodwell and Scott have to go NOW.

135678

Comments

  • shirty5 said:
    Methven is the owner??
    Remind me of his percentage again


    Same as the rest of them. 5% +.
    I'll wager he owns more than the majority of them.
    5%+ of fu*k all isn't a lot .
    He doesn't.
  • Methven is the owner??
    Whose now got himself a nice salaried position too 
    Did he put any of his own money in to get  a share?
    Yes.
  • It’s all about The Valley, not personalities, but you do need people who care. The US owners have serious clout, but are they that bothered?
    It's time to find out....
  • When its said, we have the 4th highest budget in league one, is that player budget, or is the SMT included in that?
  • fenaddick said:
    It’s all about The Valley, not personalities, but you do need people who care. The US owners have serious clout, but are they that bothered?
    And do they have the right connections to make appointments? We know that CM brokered the deal so what happens if the board decide Rodwell and Scott have to go? I would imagine CM puts forward some more of his mates for the roles and it's a gamble to see if they're any more competent. 

    In reality we're a small piece of investment for the main three and so only warrant a small amount of time. That means it's unlikely they've formed many connections with "football people" so don't have others to go to for advice. I know Brener had been involved in MLS but that's a totally different prospect to L1 football
    Right now Ted Lasso would do a better job!
  • fenaddick said:
    For all his faults, the responsibility for the dreadful football on display doesn't rest with Methven, as he's not responsible for the bizarre formations, crude 1980s Wimbledon tactics and signing Nathan Jones' old boys.
    He sort of is though. NJ will have had to present the style of play he wants to make and the type of players he would bring in during his interview(s)
    Methven isn't responsible for the playing side, that's Scott and Rodwell.

    And even with the latter 2, it's not as if Jones said he was going to deliver ineffective hoofball in his interview.

    We have much better players than Crawley. But badly coached and managed. 
    Yes, but ultimately, he is responsible for hiring and managing the people responsible for the football side (Scott and Rodwell). He’s decided and I’m sure defended keeping them in post through this catastrophic reign. If I were the owners I’d be asking myself if I trusted Charlie to appoint better people.
  • When its said, we have the 4th highest budget in league one, is that player budget, or is the SMT included in that?
    Playing budget estimated by CM to be 4th, wages 5th.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Watched a podcast a few weeks ago when Charlie boy commented that it was funny/odd that supporters believe that the club belongs to them. Just clarifies exactly how they view supporters.
  • I remember Karl Pilkington talking about what superhero he would like to be in an episode and he suggested Bullshit Man. So whenever anybody says things that are BS he appears and calls it out. He would be very busy with our SMT. I have never heard so much of it and when Rodwell speaks it isn't even subtle. You don't even need a super power.
  • When its said, we have the 4th highest budget in league one, is that player budget, or is the SMT included in that?
    Playing budget estimated by CM to be 4th, wages 5th.
    I bet we’re top of the underachievers table.
  • Rob said:
    Do the US big hitters have anyone on the ground around the Valley/Sparrows Lane who could report back to them with ‘honest’ assessments of how things are going? Because I for one would have been screaming weeks ago that this just isn’t working. It’s just so obvious to see. Would anybody feel able to do that though without jeopardising their own position. 
    You’d think Gavin Carter as a fan and an investor would be the man to speak directly to the other investors. I assume he knows them, has spoken to them, met them but who knows?

    He knows one of the families at least since before the takeover happened, that's how he got involved.  He also was disappointed that Tommy Sandgaard decided to sell which says something about his judgement.


    I have wondered whether Carter knew Methven before this takeover ?
  • Sponsored links:


  • Rob said:
    Do the US big hitters have anyone on the ground around the Valley/Sparrows Lane who could report back to them with ‘honest’ assessments of how things are going? Because I for one would have been screaming weeks ago that this just isn’t working. It’s just so obvious to see. Would anybody feel able to do that though without jeopardising their own position. 
    You’d think Gavin Carter as a fan and an investor would be the man to speak directly to the other investors. I assume he knows them, has spoken to them, met them but who knows?

    He knows one of the families at least since before the takeover happened, that's how he got involved.  He also was disappointed that Tommy Sandgaard decided to sell which says something about his judgement.


    I have wondered whether Carter knew Methven before this takeover ?
    From what was said at Bromley Addicks, no he didn't.
  • Watched a podcast a few weeks ago when Charlie boy commented that it was funny/odd that supporters believe that the club belongs to them. Just clarifies exactly how they view supporters.
    Same as what squirrel face said.
  • Watched a podcast a few weeks ago when Charlie boy commented that it was funny/odd that supporters believe that the club belongs to them. Just clarifies exactly how they view supporters.
    What did he actually say? Fucking moron if he said that
  • bobmunro said:
    seth plum said:
    OK.
    If it isn’t Methven (the football isn’t down to me) responsible for the disintegration and joylessness of our club, who was the exact person who told Brian Cole to lead the Kevin Nolan tribute in the way it happened?
    I believe that particular non football buck stops with Methven, and if I am right it reveals him to be an utter see you next Tuesday.
    If not Methven then who?
    I’ve always said that the title “CEO” in a pro football club is a joke, and largely adopted by charlatans, because a CEO in a proper company is ultimately responsible for delivery of the P&L account. That can’t really happen in most clubs since they rely on the owners to fund it. It doesnt stop modern football “CEOs” arguing for and getting huge salaries because they have “benchmarked” themselves against real CEOs. That’s also why you get £2m p.a. for running the shitshow, literally, that is Thames Water.

    Anyway, Methven is “CEO” despite initally saying that he wouldn’t be, because he learnt at Sunderland that he’s not very good at it. That’s on record. On an issue that causes serious reputational damage, the buck stops with the CEO, regardless of whether they were involved in the decision. 

    Unfortunately if there’s one thing PR people are good at, it is wriggling out of any accountability for anything. Thats why advertising people hate them, despite the rest of the public assuming they are one and the same.

    Agreed. The best set-up at a football club is the owner as the Chairman with a COO running the commercial side and a DoF running the playing side.
    Very sensible … so won’t happy at Charlton at the moment 
  • Watched a podcast a few weeks ago when Charlie boy commented that it was funny/odd that supporters believe that the club belongs to them. Just clarifies exactly how they view supporters.
    What did he actually say? Fucking moron if he said that
    I'd never formed an actual opinion of Charlie boy except to think he's a bit of a creep ...

    But I've now discovered the final straw.

    The Chuckle Brothers can exit stage left, hand in hand as soon as they like.

    Good riddance to bad rubbish as my old Nan would say.  
  • To which the proper response is, without the fans you don’t have a business. Particularly when you don’t own the assets either.
    Airman - I never really understand your obsession with owning The Valley. If I was running the club ( and I’m pretty sure I’d be better than this lot) it would be very low down my list of priorities 
    It’s dead money - no sensible business person would buy it. 
  • To which the proper response is, without the fans you don’t have a business. Particularly when you don’t own the assets either.
    Airman - I never really understand your obsession with owning The Valley. If I was running the club ( and I’m pretty sure I’d be better than this lot) it would be very low down my list of priorities 
    It’s dead money - no sensible business person would buy it. 
    Owners won't pump serious money into the squad, as there's little to zero chance of selling the Club for a large profit without such a key asset. They're simply supplementing costs and losing money until they may tire of such a "Project". That's the logic behind the obsession, I believe. 
  • mendonca said:
    To which the proper response is, without the fans you don’t have a business. Particularly when you don’t own the assets either.
    Airman - I never really understand your obsession with owning The Valley. If I was running the club ( and I’m pretty sure I’d be better than this lot) it would be very low down my list of priorities 
    It’s dead money - no sensible business person would buy it. 
    Owners won't pump serious money into the squad, as there's little to zero chance of selling the Club for a large profit without such a key asset. They're simply supplementing costs and losing money until they may tire of such a "Project". That's the logic behind the obsession, I believe. 
    The money isn’t in a physical asset , that will always be valued as a property asset with little or no chance of development. The only money to be made in football ( if there is any at all !) is the TV money if you get promoted to the Premier League 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!