Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton TV with EFL involvement.

I used to love Charlton TV when Charlton produced it.

The pre match discussion with Curbs and Brownie was great.

Now EFL are running it,it’s a pale comparison.

The sound last Saturday kept cutting out.

It’s nowhere as good.
«1

Comments

  • I dont see what the difference is, and why CharltonTV had to end to be honest.

    The Saturday 3pm coverage was only ever supposed to be for home supporters (Pre-3pm), and then International Supporter (3pm-Onwards) regardless - The way the coverage continues now, its no different with CharltonTV still doing pre-match interviews, a bit of chat between the commentators, and then the game... Its just the studio coverage thats now missing.

    Of course the biggest difference is there might be a few less 3pm KO's, but then for those... Just do without the studio to keep Sky happy no?
  • Yeah... I caught the Pompey coverage for that friendly and they had a set up akin to what we had before 

    It seems Charlton TV showed other clubs how to step up their offering.... but has now been cut while others offer the great product/service 

    Is a bit sad

    I'm looking forward to seeing what can be done with the monthly review show with Minto/Brown/Curbs 
  • The way it was explained why the studio sections were being dropped, you'd have thought we would be on Sky every week, when we now won't be on Sky for 3 months! 

    The cost of the studio section was minimal in the bigger picture, a strange decision to drop it, and one which I wonder if they will reverse, seeing that other clubs are still continuing with fuller coverage.
  • Come on guys. The club are losing £7m a year.

    The cost to hire Curbs, Brownie, Minto & Charlotte to host two games a week is probably the equivalent of Kaheim Dixon’s weekly wage.

    What would you rather the club spent money on? (the priority has to be to get out of this pub league asap).
    It is a bit murky.
    As far as I can tell the match commentators Terry Smith and Greg Stubley do it for nothing except necessary expenses, but Curbishley, Brown and Minto get or got paid? How much?
    Charlotte Richardson is an actual journalist who does it for a living (I have heard her on Times Radio amongst other things).
    God knows how Richard Cawley or Louis Mendez earn a living talking about Charlton and anyway Charlton Live is free online, but Charlton TV requires us to pay a subscription.
    Sweet guys though they are, the Minto/Brown/Curbishley gets a bit the same after a while, and sometimes rather self indulgent. Couldn’t they at least switch seats from time to time? Or whilst talking play a live game of Jenga, or each read us a poem, or something to make the ‘punditry’ a little bit different.
    I think Terry Smith and Greg Stubley should each be paid £250 on top of expenses for each game they cover, and the technology should be checked well in time not at the last minute. They could use the subscriptions paid in by fans to do so.
  • Sponsored links:


  • UK based supporters are not going to pay £10 for the ‘chat’ in addition to any fees to Sky when we are broadcast. That’s the issue as i see it. 

    Overseas supporters are insufficient in number for their fees to offset the costs I assume. 


  • UK based supporters are not going to pay £10 for the ‘chat’ in addition to any fees to Sky when we are broadcast. That’s the issue as i see it. 

    Overseas supporters are insufficient in number for their fees to offset the costs I assume. 


    But that was no different to the situation before this season... No?

    Hell they even put the Studio chat pre-game on YouTube, so you didnt even need to pay for that.

    By right the only fees they were only ever making were from Overseas fans.
  • UK based supporters are not going to pay £10 for the ‘chat’ in addition to any fees to Sky when we are broadcast. That’s the issue as i see it. 

    Overseas supporters are insufficient in number for their fees to offset the costs I assume. 


    No Sky games for another 3 months though. We're not a Championship side, on all the time.
  • edited August 20
    UK based supporters are not going to pay £10 for the ‘chat’ in addition to any fees to Sky when we are broadcast. That’s the issue as i see it. 

    Overseas supporters are insufficient in number for their fees to offset the costs I assume. 


    No Sky games for another 3 months though. We're not a Championship side, on all the time.
    Bristol Rovers and Barnsley games in October will be on Sky

    Same with the EFL Trophy games, but they're all the exception as they're evening matches.
  • UK based supporters are not going to pay £10 for the ‘chat’ in addition to any fees to Sky when we are broadcast. That’s the issue as i see it. 

    Overseas supporters are insufficient in number for their fees to offset the costs I assume. 


    But that was no different to the situation before this season... No?

    Hell they even put the Studio chat pre-game on YouTube, so you didnt even need to pay for that.

    By right the only fees they were only ever making were from Overseas fans.
    No. It is different. Before I could pay £10 for a non 3pm game and also get the ‘chat’ before during and after. 

    Yes free before the game but not half time or after as I recall. 

    People won’t now pay Sky and Charlton for the game surely. 
  • UK based supporters are not going to pay £10 for the ‘chat’ in addition to any fees to Sky when we are broadcast. That’s the issue as i see it. 

    Overseas supporters are insufficient in number for their fees to offset the costs I assume. 


    No Sky games for another 3 months though. We're not a Championship side, on all the time.
    But the club no longer have the right to broadcast non 3pm games within the UK as they did before. That’s the difference. 

    Only non UK supporters can get that by paying the club and not Sky. That’s the change. 
  • edited August 20
    Come on guys. The club are losing £7m a year.

    The cost to hire Curbs, Brownie, Minto & Charlotte to host two games a week is probably the equivalent of Kaheim Dixon’s weekly wage.

    What would you rather the club spent money on? (the priority has to be to get out of this pub league asap).
    Well you could use that line of argument about the women's team.
    Forgetting that £750,000 of the cost of the pitch upgrade is down to the women's team.

    Plus the additional money coming from the Women's Professional Leagues Limited (WPLL).

    I imagine there would be costs of using Sky coverage in the preview in addition to the studio people.
  • edited August 20
    UK based supporters are not going to pay £10 for the ‘chat’ in addition to any fees to Sky when we are broadcast. That’s the issue as i see it. 

    Overseas supporters are insufficient in number for their fees to offset the costs I assume. 


    But that was no different to the situation before this season... No?

    Hell they even put the Studio chat pre-game on YouTube, so you didnt even need to pay for that.

    By right the only fees they were only ever making were from Overseas fans.
    No. It is different. Before I could pay £10 for a non 3pm game and also get the ‘chat’ before during and after. 

    Yes free before the game but not half time or after as I recall. 

    People won’t now pay Sky and Charlton for the game surely. 
    I was more focusing on just the 3pm games with my reply.

    Either way though I mean there have only really been a handful of non-3pm games across the season in comparison, about ten at most, 15-games at the extreme which has never made CharltonTV truly beneficial for UK supporters.
  • Sponsored links:


  • clive said:
    I was speaking to Paul Elliott on the way back from Wigan. The money that Sky were offering was too good to turn down especially considering so many fans were streaming the game illegally (my comment on the streams). So the club were obviously losing money each game they paid for the 3 presenters. Now the club profits no matter someone streams it on their stick or paying for Sky Sports.

    As much as I enjoyed the prematch chats. I'd rather have them with other Charlton fans down the boozer.
    Don’t take that experience for granted. Some of us aren’t lucky enough to be able to have it.

    In fact, closing off the pre match shows for us international fans is like they’ve closed down the boozer with no alternatives offered.
     It's nothing to do with luck, if people choose to move abroad & desert the club, hard luck.

    Harsh, but it did make me chuckle 
  • clive said:
    I was speaking to Paul Elliott on the way back from Wigan. The money that Sky were offering was too good to turn down especially considering so many fans were streaming the game illegally (my comment on the streams). So the club were obviously losing money each game they paid for the 3 presenters. Now the club profits no matter someone streams it on their stick or paying for Sky Sports.

    As much as I enjoyed the prematch chats. I'd rather have them with other Charlton fans down the boozer.
    Don’t take that experience for granted. Some of us aren’t lucky enough to be able to have it.

    In fact, closing off the pre match shows for us international fans is like they’ve closed down the boozer with no alternatives offered.
     It's nothing to do with luck, if people choose to move abroad & desert the club, hard luck.

    Nice comment !!

    So people that get up in the middle of the night to watch games on Charlton TV, or those (like me) that drive 6 hours each way so 12 hours in total (if Im lucky with the traffic) to get to the Valley are not proper supporters ?
  • Well you can’t say you was not warned and as it stands it’s not going to change anytime soon

    https://www.charltonafc.com/news/update-charltontv#:~:text=The%20club%20can%20now%20confirm,cup%20fixtures%20in%20the%20UK.


Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!