Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Reading deducted 3 points

13

Comments

  • There’s two more home games before we get there, wonder if we are the game that’s put behind closed doors 
  • thenewbie said:
    JaShea99 said:
    I think some people misunderstand ‘fit and proper’ to mean ‘has good morals’ or ‘has the best interests of the club’ (maybe understandably so). It’s mainly a financial test.
    "Fit and proper" more or less translates to "has access to enough money."  By which standard Dai Yongge passed then and actually probably still would. As far as I can tell he does still have the funds to run the club, he just doesn't want to.
    Yeah…that was my point. I was referring to the suggestion he should have failed the test because of mismanagement.
  • The EFL tests and processes have become much more robust - partly as a result of wrong’uns like Southall. That’s all too late for Reading though so we end up in the conundrum of clubs and therefore fans getting punished / sanctioned by the league (ie the other clubs) because of their misfortune to have bad owners. 

    It’s all stuff which the upcoming legislation and the independent regulator should address. But there’s no clarity re how it works for legacy situations like this. 
  • The EFL tests and processes have become much more robust - partly as a result of wrong’uns like Southall. That’s all too late for Reading though so we end up in the conundrum of clubs and therefore fans getting punished / sanctioned by the league (ie the other clubs) because of their misfortune to have bad owners. 

    It’s all stuff which the upcoming legislation and the independent regulator should address. But there’s no clarity re how it works for legacy situations like this. 
    But when’s the upcoming legislation actually going to be coming? We’re still waiting for the Renters Reform Bill to become law…
  • Rothko said:
    There’s two more home games before we get there, wonder if we are the game that’s put behind closed doors 

    If it's behind closed doors, would it be available on Charlton TV!
  • thenewbie said:
    JaShea99 said:
    I think some people misunderstand ‘fit and proper’ to mean ‘has good morals’ or ‘has the best interests of the club’ (maybe understandably so). It’s mainly a financial test.
    "Fit and proper" more or less translates to "has access to enough money."  By which standard Dai Yongge passed then and actually probably still would. As far as I can tell he does still have the funds to run the club, he just doesn't want to.
    From what i understand there was a big push as everyone knows a few years back from Xi Jingpin to get China into football. The Chinese super league exploded, tons of money was invested and they had grand plans to become a world superpower. As a result of this some of the wealthiest Chinese were encouraged to buy European clubs. 

    However years later Xi Jingpin lost interest, China's strict zero covid policy ruined things financially for a lot of clubs, some of the clubs went bust when sponsors subsequently pulled out, most of the top players left and the Reading owner also seemingly lost interest around this time.
  • The EFL tests and processes have become much more robust - partly as a result of wrong’uns like Southall. That’s all too late for Reading though so we end up in the conundrum of clubs and therefore fans getting punished / sanctioned by the league (ie the other clubs) because of their misfortune to have bad owners. 

    It’s all stuff which the upcoming legislation and the independent regulator should address. But there’s no clarity re how it works for legacy situations like this. 
    Regardless of how robust the tests are, Yongge would still probably pass them even today. He came into football with no previous track record (like Southall) and as a very wealthy Chinese businessman prepared to invest a lot of money (which he has actually done).

    The EFL have no way of knowing whether an owner is going to lose interest 6-7 years down the line. Is he 'clean' in terms of previous misdemeanours, does he have proof of funds to buy the club, can he deposit funds to run the club for 2 years. If it's a yes to all of those, how can they reject someone?
  • What I don't get with the whole Dai Yongge thing is that Reading wasn't the only club he'd tried to buy , he tried to buy Hull City first from the Allams and then ran into issues surrounding the Premier Leagues tests. Then he's allowed to buy Reading because the EFL don't find any issues. 

    Came in, spent big money to try and get them promoted (£7m on George Puscas a Romanian striker from Inter was probably the big one) and now has just lost complete interest in even doing the basics. 

    I wouldn't be overly surprised if our game there on the 10th Feb is behind closed doors. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Rothko said:
    There’s two more home games before we get there, wonder if we are the game that’s put behind closed doors 
    It'll save 1500 loyal fans missing a defeat.
  • From today's Mirror



  • EFL Statement: Mr Dai Yongge

    As Reading FC supporters are only too aware, it has in recent months become increasingly clear that Mr Dai Yongge is no longer in a position - or does not have the motivation - to support the Club financially as he did following the change of control in 2017.     

    In November 2023, the EFL called for the disqualification of Mr Dai following the failure to fund the deposit account to cover player and staff salaries following repeated breaches of EFL Regulations. This was ultimately rejected by an Independent Disciplinary Commission and a financial sanction was imposed instead.   

    The EFL has now received confirmation that Mr Dai did not meet last Friday’s latest deadline to fund the deposit account as ordered, meaning he has been in default for nearly four months.  As a result – and as per the terms of the 15 December decision - a further £50,000 fine has now been imposed, taking the total to £80,000.   

    His continued failings mean that once again the Club's hardworking staff have no reassurance as to payment of wages and demonstrates a clear disregard for his obligations as a director of the Club.   

    In respect of this issue, the League will now consider all available options it has under the Regulations and will have no hesitation in bringing further charges against Mr Dai.  

    In the meantime, and for the sake of the future of Reading FC, its staff, supporters, and local community we urge Mr Dai either to fund the Club adequately or to make immediate arrangements to sell his majority shareholding to appropriate new owners so everyone can move forward with renewed optimism.   

     For our part, we will work with Mr Dai, his team, and the Club plus any potential purchaser to navigate and meet the requirements of the Regulations as quickly as is physically possible and bring an end to this difficult period for all parties.   

     What followed the events at the end of last week were the unfortunate scenes on Saturday afternoon that led to the abandonment of the fixture versus Port Vale, and further demonstrated the impact the current situation is having on everyone associated with the Club.   

    However, entering the field of play is a criminal offence and puts the safety of all participants at risk.  The EFL Board will discuss events at Saturday’s match during its meeting later this week as it has a responsibility to the League’s member clubs and the competition to ensure all 72 Clubs meet the requirements of the rules as previously agreed by EFL Clubs.   

    Finally, the League has been in regular dialogue with the Supporters Trust at Reading (STAR) in recent months and has always made – and will continue to do so – itself available to recognised supporters’ groups to discuss challenging situations and, regarding current matters involving Reading, has arranged to meet with representatives of a number of groups in the next 24 hours. 

    https://www.efl.com/news/2024/january/15/efl-statement--mr-dai-yongge/

  • clive said:
    Up to £8,000 has been raised for a statue at Port Vale FC, after Reading supporters started donating to apologise for the abandonment of Saturday's game.

    A total of £100,000 is needed for a statue of former long-serving Vale manager John Rudge.


    I love this, 88k+

    https://www.gofundme.com/f/john-rudge-statue-fund
  • "potential investors are being put off by those meant to be facilitating the sale"
    Anyone else getting a strange sense of deja vu here?
  • https://www.efl.com/news/2024/january/23/efl-statement--reading-fc/

    Suspended 3 point deduction. The game will be replayed on the 20th February
  • Come on Reading fans save Charlton!

  • Sponsored links:


  • So, can a number of our fans dress up in blue & invade the pitch when we play them next month 😉. 
  • So, can a number of our fans dress up in blue & invade the pitch when we play them next month 😉. 

    I know in jest, but we need to win fair
  • We should deffo back whatever form of protests Reading do but we have some proper lame support who can never see the bigger picture .

    Some supporters can never see bigger picture.

    But we do have some good fans with a general good understanding of other clubs predicaments.

    Just make sure the team get our full backing this coming Saturday.
  • Their latest takeover has fallen through... Sounds like their current owner continues to be a right Roland

    https://x.com/SellBeforeWeDai/status/1836315391720616356
  • We know from our own experience how complex these things can be.
  • Valley11 said:
    I feel sorry for them but if that really is them back to stage one of a takeover then some low ball offers for Tyler Bindon, Lewis Wing and Michael Stickland should be considered.  They wouldn't be able to play until Jan of course and so probably wouldn't accept a move themselves but you can only ask. 
    Really not a fan of these kind of posts. I'd prefer we left them well alone. When we were going through hell under Roland and co there were other clubs posting the same about our players and it's shite fan solidarity.
    Let's hope they get out of the mess they're in asap and avoid a feeding frenzy on the carcass of their club.
    This, would find it completely classless if we went down that route 
  • We did it Ipswich, in what feels like a lifetime ago, when we got first Hermann and then Matt Holland.  Hermann was even purchased after transfer deadline day and so couldn't play a competitive game until the following season. Not saying I agree with it, just that we have precedent for it.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!