Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Summer Transfer Rumours - Deadline Day p446

1959698100101492

Comments

  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,290
    Might be complete bollocks but I have heard that we did actually have an offer in for Stockton. It was higher than Burtons but only slightly, and there was another L1 club with a similar bid to us but he chose Burton as the location worked better for him. I’m assuming guaranteed game time might have been a factor also but geography was the reason given

    If true, I don’t think it means much as I doubt he was a top target. When we have Leaburn and could be in for May it wouldn’t make much sense to spend too much on another striker when there are other areas of the team that need upgrading 
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,360
    If we can't get a fee for Kirk. Keep him and make him work to get in the squad. Simples.
  • BR7_addick
    BR7_addick Posts: 10,212
    Kirk can go, bang average league one player at best.  I’d love to mark him as a full back wouldn’t even need tape to hold your socks up.  
  • RC_CAFC
    RC_CAFC Posts: 1,757
    Dazzler21 said:
    If we can't get a fee for Kirk. Keep him and make him work to get in the squad. Simples.
    I’d rather watch Woolacott be given a chance at left wing than watch him run away from another challenge and shout at his team mates because they didn’t pass to him. He doesn’t have the mentality needed for a team willing to give everything for the cause. The minimum I expect Holden to demand.
  • PopIcon
    PopIcon Posts: 5,970
    NabySarr said:
    Might be complete bollocks but I have heard that we did actually have an offer in for Stockton. It was higher than Burtons but only slightly, and there was another L1 club with a similar bid to us but he chose Burton as the location worked better for him. I’m assuming guaranteed game time might have been a factor also but geography was the reason given

    If true, I don’t think it means much as I doubt he was a top target. When we have Leaburn and could be in for May it wouldn’t make much sense to spend too much on another striker when there are other areas of the team that need upgrading 
    Stockton was out of contract.
  • cfgs said:
    Scoham said:
    seth plum said:
    Don’t like the Burstow talk, it puts in my mind loaning him opens the way for Leaburn to leave.
    I think Leaburn offers more.
    You’d find it hard to find anyone who disagrees. No chance Burstow would have made the impact Leaburn did last season if he played the same amount.
    Plus it also slows Miles's development, having a loanee ahead of him.
    I dont think they would i think they would play Burstow wide in that type of role rashford plays
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,469
    I have never been in the know on players so this is a first for me. I heard today that Charlie Kirk wants to stay at Charlton as he is desperate to prove himself. The source is about as good as it gets.
    Desperate to stay on the wages he is currently on, it reads like. 
  • eastterrace6168
    eastterrace6168 Posts: 22,582
    edited June 2023
    MarcusH26 said:
    Waiting for Ronnie to confirm don't forget...🙄
    I did say don’t think RC connections at Charlton are what they were that’s twice he backtracked within a few days .. after printing a story 

    Think we can take that as a confirmation...
  • bertpalmer
    bertpalmer Posts: 1,774
    NabySarr said:
    Might be complete bollocks but I have heard that we did actually have an offer in for Stockton. It was higher than Burtons but only slightly, and there was another L1 club with a similar bid to us but he chose Burton as the location worked better for him. I’m assuming guaranteed game time might have been a factor also but geography was the reason given

    If true, I don’t think it means much as I doubt he was a top target. When we have Leaburn and could be in for May it wouldn’t make much sense to spend too much on another striker when there are other areas of the team that need upgrading 
    we only want players with ambition for the club as well as themselves and to grow with us just like Miles should
  • Sponsored links:



  • Foxycafc
    Foxycafc Posts: 1,214


    Ackers asking me whether he has good recruiting skills was not on my Summer transfer bingo list 
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,279
    Akinola could come up to me in a newsagents and say "Hi I'm Tim Akinola" and my response would be "who the fuck is that?"

    I know it's Accers so it's bullshit anyway, but he's plumbing new depths of nonsense
  • thenewbie
    thenewbie Posts: 11,001
    cabbles said:
    Bit cringe that comment from Holden re; the packed valley and the player ‘already sold’.  As much I think Holden is down to earth, and could be a decent manager for us, there’s something about him that gives me the sense he’s worked us out as a fanbase and very good at telling us what we want to hear.

    It’s no one thing in particular, the odd comment here and there, the visits to the Oak etc.  for me, although he’s come into a shambles of a club, the jury is very much still out and he needs to prove himself before all the love ins etc.  you’ve got to remember his career had stalled before us and I don’t think he was in high demand 
    I like him and hope he does well but we know from interviews that he's done that he's a very articulate and intelligent guy who knows the importance of language and words. That's not at all a bad thing but I do agree that he's definitely playing the game (probably out of necessity though) and you don't want to treat his word as gospel truth.

    Same as Storrie for that matter, another old football head who is pretty adept at saying jusy enough and in just the right way to be "economic with the truth" but not an outright liar.
  • Southbank
    Southbank Posts: 5,254
    nagAddick said:
    I have never been in the know on players so this is a first for me. I heard today that Charlie Kirk wants to stay at Charlton as he is desperate to prove himself. The source is about as good as it gets.
    This season really is make or break for him here.
    He was broke when he arrived and nothing changed. Get rid.
  • Southbank
    Southbank Posts: 5,254
    thenewbie said:
    cabbles said:
    Bit cringe that comment from Holden re; the packed valley and the player ‘already sold’.  As much I think Holden is down to earth, and could be a decent manager for us, there’s something about him that gives me the sense he’s worked us out as a fanbase and very good at telling us what we want to hear.

    It’s no one thing in particular, the odd comment here and there, the visits to the Oak etc.  for me, although he’s come into a shambles of a club, the jury is very much still out and he needs to prove himself before all the love ins etc.  you’ve got to remember his career had stalled before us and I don’t think he was in high demand 
    I like him and hope he does well but we know from interviews that he's done that he's a very articulate and intelligent guy who knows the importance of language and words. That's not at all a bad thing but I do agree that he's definitely playing the game (probably out of necessity though) and you don't want to treat his word as gospel truth.

    Same as Storrie for that matter, another old football head who is pretty adept at saying jusy enough and in just the right way to be "economic with the truth" but not an outright liar.
    Holden and Storrie are trying to give us a reason to believe when there is nothing yet to believe in. Fair play to them, what else can they do in their positions.
    But we are the fools if we go along with the bullshit.
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,382
    cabbles said:
    Bit cringe that comment from Holden re; the packed valley and the player ‘already sold’.  As much I think Holden is down to earth, and could be a decent manager for us, there’s something about him that gives me the sense he’s worked us out as a fanbase and very good at telling us what we want to hear.

    It’s no one thing in particular, the odd comment here and there, the visits to the Oak etc.  for me, although he’s come into a shambles of a club, the jury is very much still out and he needs to prove himself before all the love ins etc.  you’ve got to remember his career had stalled before us and I don’t think he was in high demand 
    People who understand football and football fans is a step up from what we’ve had for most of the last decade or so. But yes, plenty more for him to prove.
  • raytreacy69
    raytreacy69 Posts: 955
    Curbs used to do the ‘hard sell ‘ when trying to sign new players
    IMO nothing wrong with what Dean is doing.I like the guy and let’s see what he can do with hopefully a full preseason of new recruits.Hopefully we get the takeover done soon and the new players follow quickly.
    Keep the Faith 



  • sillav nitram
    sillav nitram Posts: 10,169
    cabbles said:
    Bit cringe that comment from Holden re; the packed valley and the player ‘already sold’.  As much I think Holden is down to earth, and could be a decent manager for us, there’s something about him that gives me the sense he’s worked us out as a fanbase and very good at telling us what we want to hear.

    It’s no one thing in particular, the odd comment here and there, the visits to the Oak etc.  for me, although he’s come into a shambles of a club, the jury is very much still out and he needs to prove himself before all the love ins etc.  you’ve got to remember his career had stalled before us and I don’t think he was in high demand 

    Isn’t that true of every club owner, manager, club media etc etc. it’s called PR.

    It’s what they do to get fans onside, don’t think it’s specific to just Holden.
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,986
    Foxycafc said:


    Ackers asking me whether he has good recruiting skills was not on my Summer transfer bingo list 
    Yeah fantastic job John
  • Sponsored links:



  • CAFCOlly
    CAFCOlly Posts: 523
    Undeniably Kirk has looked sh*te for us. However, he clearly needs an overlapping, natural left back/full back to play with him. When was the last time we had one of those? 

    We have this knack of signing players and not playing to their strengths. We haven't seen first hand what Kirk's strengths are, or indeed if he has any, but it feels as though we (as in the club - not us fans) have not even tried to find out. 

    I won't hold my breath but if he wants to stay, Holden is happy for him to stay, and we sign a natural overlapping full back to play with him, who knows?
  • nagAddick
    nagAddick Posts: 269
    If we were to sign Edun then he certainly fits the profile for the kind of LB to help get the best out of Kirk.
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,290
    CH4RLTON said:
    I am. the only one who really wouldn’t want Burstow back , I was never really that impressed and suprised he went Chelsea and was really poor when he came back loan the first time around 
    A year with Chelsea could have made him a lot better. Especially as he didn’t come from an academy background so was very raw when he was with us. He had pace and could finish, if they’ve made him stronger and better technically then he’d be a very good player
  • cabbles
    cabbles Posts: 15,256
    cabbles said:
    Bit cringe that comment from Holden re; the packed valley and the player ‘already sold’.  As much I think Holden is down to earth, and could be a decent manager for us, there’s something about him that gives me the sense he’s worked us out as a fanbase and very good at telling us what we want to hear.

    It’s no one thing in particular, the odd comment here and there, the visits to the Oak etc.  for me, although he’s come into a shambles of a club, the jury is very much still out and he needs to prove himself before all the love ins etc.  you’ve got to remember his career had stalled before us and I don’t think he was in high demand 

    Isn’t that true of every club owner, manager, club media etc etc. it’s called PR.

    It’s what they do to get fans onside, don’t think it’s specific to just Holden.
    No, it’s not specific to him and on the whole I am positive about his appointment, I just prefer the whole mixing with the fans in the oak thing done once we are turning in consistent performances on the pitch.  

    Hopefully he will go on to deliver that and the early signs are that he’s the most competent manager we’ve had since Bowyer (Adkins much more successful, but I think he’d lost the plot a bit by the time we got him), but getting consistent results is key.  
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,730
    When you look at Burstow and Leaburn, both are able lads in different ways but what I saw with Burstow was somebody who hadn't learned the other part of the game whereas Leaburn was definitely developing it. Of course we haven't seen Burstow for a season, but his game, IMO, needed league one or two defenders kicking lumps out of him. I won't go against the manager but personally I don't like the sound of such a move.
  • Foxycafc said:


    Ackers asking me whether he has good recruiting skills was not on my Summer transfer bingo list 
    Spent last season on loan in the National league and only started 10 games. Yep he's definitely the player we need.
  • Redhenry
    Redhenry Posts: 5,359
    Sessegnon would be a mistake imo. He obviously has a knee injury which was being nursed throughout the season. Another Solly 

    Sess performances were still really good tho, Solly struggled the last few seasons IMHO
  • Burstow? Ffs
  • MintoHumbugs
    MintoHumbugs Posts: 753
    I really hope Kirk, Lavelle and DJ are nowhere near the starting 11 come start of the season. Preferably,  all have moved on .
  • sam3110 said:
    Has he progressed in that 18 month period? Because he wasn't good enough to start every game in League 1 when we sold him
    Top scorer with 10 goals in 24 starts for Chelsea U21s last season.

    Not exactly setting the world alight but he's still only 19 (turns 20 in August). If you ignore the fact he was with us before and we were linked with a Chelsea youth striker i think people would generally be a lot more positive.