World Cup 2026 - USA/Canada/Mexico

Algarveaddick

Jints said:

Swindon_Addick said:

Something that may be of relevance to anyone planning to go to a game in the USA who doesn't travel there regularly - there's been an announcement that they're going to start asking for much more information from people applying for the visa waiver that Brits need when we go there. The demands sound quite onerous and seem to include details of social media accounts. The reports I've seen don't go into detail about what sort of social media posting would be considered unacceptable - I've seen all sorts of rumours but nothing actually firm. It does seem however that, given the things last 2 years, if you don't currently have a waiver it might be a good idea to apply now rather than waiting and having to do a lot more paperwork.

The BBC article on this refers to a similar requirement about social media for student visas, which already exists, from which it seems that they aren't worried about people making jokes about the President (phew) but that people who are outspoken about Israel might struggle. It also, crucially, points out that the big increase in paperwork may mean it takes longer to get a waiver than it used to, which would be another good reason to apply early.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dz0g2ykpeo

The proposals are out for a two month consultation and will be implemented before the WC

Anyone entering the US will have to provide access to social media accounts used for the last five years together with the following.  

a. Telephone numbers used in the last five years;

b. Email addresses used in the last ten years;

c. IP addresses and metadata from electronically submitted photos;

d. Family member names (parents, spouse, siblings, children);

e. Family number telephone numbers used in the last five years;

f. Family member dates of birth;

g. Family member places of birth;

h. Family member residencies;

i. Biometrics—face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris;

j. Business telephone numbers used in the last five years;

k. Business email addresses used in the last ten years.

We were looking at going until the orange loony took over the asylum. Seeing this, certainly the right decison, third world cup in a row in a totalitarian state... 

The cost would have been prohibitive anyway, as it turns out.  

paulsturgess

Dallas stadium is air conditioned.

New York could be roasting in June. 

bobmunro

Flights to Dallas on 16th June and back from NYC on 29th June all booked. We've still got to book the hotels in Dallas, Boston and NY and based on comments on here we may limit Dallas to three nights so we've got five nights each in Boston and NY. Still got to book the internal from Dallas to Boston and the AMTRAK from Boston to NY.

The US Darts Masters in on at MSG 26/27 June so might see if we can get tickets for the 26th.

Flights and hotel also booked for the final - you never know!

Stuart_the_Red

Jints said:

Swindon_Addick said:

Something that may be of relevance to anyone planning to go to a game in the USA who doesn't travel there regularly - there's been an announcement that they're going to start asking for much more information from people applying for the visa waiver that Brits need when we go there. The demands sound quite onerous and seem to include details of social media accounts. The reports I've seen don't go into detail about what sort of social media posting would be considered unacceptable - I've seen all sorts of rumours but nothing actually firm. It does seem however that, given the things last 2 years, if you don't currently have a waiver it might be a good idea to apply now rather than waiting and having to do a lot more paperwork.

The BBC article on this refers to a similar requirement about social media for student visas, which already exists, from which it seems that they aren't worried about people making jokes about the President (phew) but that people who are outspoken about Israel might struggle. It also, crucially, points out that the big increase in paperwork may mean it takes longer to get a waiver than it used to, which would be another good reason to apply early.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dz0g2ykpeo

The proposals are out for a two month consultation and will be implemented before the WC

Anyone entering the US will have to provide access to social media accounts used for the last five years together with the following.  

a. Telephone numbers used in the last five years;

b. Email addresses used in the last ten years;

c. IP addresses and metadata from electronically submitted photos;

d. Family member names (parents, spouse, siblings, children);

e. Family number telephone numbers used in the last five years;

f. Family member dates of birth;

g. Family member places of birth;

h. Family member residencies;

i. Biometrics—face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris;

j. Business telephone numbers used in the last five years;

k. Business email addresses used in the last ten years.

F*ck the Orange Shitgibbon and his racist cabal!

As you can tell I have no intention of going to the States while that bunch of loonies are in charge! Even if my brother does live there!

ME14addick

Stuart_the_Red said:

Jints said:

Swindon_Addick said:

Something that may be of relevance to anyone planning to go to a game in the USA who doesn't travel there regularly - there's been an announcement that they're going to start asking for much more information from people applying for the visa waiver that Brits need when we go there. The demands sound quite onerous and seem to include details of social media accounts. The reports I've seen don't go into detail about what sort of social media posting would be considered unacceptable - I've seen all sorts of rumours but nothing actually firm. It does seem however that, given the things last 2 years, if you don't currently have a waiver it might be a good idea to apply now rather than waiting and having to do a lot more paperwork.

The BBC article on this refers to a similar requirement about social media for student visas, which already exists, from which it seems that they aren't worried about people making jokes about the President (phew) but that people who are outspoken about Israel might struggle. It also, crucially, points out that the big increase in paperwork may mean it takes longer to get a waiver than it used to, which would be another good reason to apply early.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dz0g2ykpeo

The proposals are out for a two month consultation and will be implemented before the WC

Anyone entering the US will have to provide access to social media accounts used for the last five years together with the following.  

a. Telephone numbers used in the last five years;

b. Email addresses used in the last ten years;

c. IP addresses and metadata from electronically submitted photos;

d. Family member names (parents, spouse, siblings, children);

e. Family number telephone numbers used in the last five years;

f. Family member dates of birth;

g. Family member places of birth;

h. Family member residencies;

i. Biometrics—face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris;

j. Business telephone numbers used in the last five years;

k. Business email addresses used in the last ten years.

F*ck the Orange Shitgibbon and his racist cabal!

As you can tell I have no intention of going to the States while that bunch of loonies are in charge! Even if my brother does live there!

It's crazy that in the land of the free such information is required. Why is a business email address needed, it's madness. So many people will not want to travel to the USA now it has such draconian rules and not safe for anyone who disagrees with the current administration. 

Weegie Addick

Thought these were proposed rather than enacted? 

ForeverAddickted

No surprise that the Egyptian FA have hit out, over their match with Iran being the "Pride" match

Seems a bit stupid that FIFA didn't just move it, as surely they knew it would cause backlash?

Not sure why its an issue, given that in Qatar the rainbow armband wasn't allowed because we had to respect the Home Nation... Surely its just a repeat of accepting that works the other way around as well?

Throws hand grenade into thread, walks away whistling

(I'm genuinely not trying to stir up deliberate drama and argument... Just felt it was relevant)

bobmunro

Weegie Addick said:

Thought these were proposed rather than enacted? 

Yes, two month consultation. 

It will likely not happen, or at worse be watered down significantly. The hospitality lobby will kick back on it - of 184 countries surveyed just one is showing a reduction in overseas visitors during 2025 - the USA.

Jints

Weegie Addick said:

Thought these were proposed rather than enacted? 

Yep. Two months consultation but seems probable that will be fully enacted in the new year. 

ME14addick

bobmunro said:

Weegie Addick said:

Thought these were proposed rather than enacted? 

Yes, two month consultation. 

It will likely not happen, or at worse be watered down significantly. The hospitality lobby will kick back on it - of 184 countries surveyed just one is showing a reduction in overseas visitors during 2025 - the USA.

The current administration doesn't listen to logic. It shouldn't even be considered in the first place. 

Swindon_Addick

Weegie Addick said:

Thought these were proposed rather than enacted? 

Yes, the full version of this is a proposal and doesn't come in for a couple of months. Some of the requirements are already in place and there have been stories of the occasional person being denied entry to the US because of something they've said on social media.

I think the key thing is if you're going to go to the World Cup and your not planning to restrict yourself to Canada or Mexico, it will be much easier to apply for the visa waiver now rather than wait a couple of months and be asked for all the extra info.

Swindon_Addick

ForeverAddickted said:

No surprise that the Egyptian FA have hit out, over their match with Iran being the "Pride" match

Seems a bit stupid that FIFA didn't just move it, as surely they knew it would cause backlash?

Not sure why its an issue, given that in Qatar the rainbow armband wasn't allowed because we had to respect the Home Nation... Surely its just a repeat of accepting that works the other way around as well?

Throws hand grenade into thread, walks away whistling

(I'm genuinely not trying to stir up deliberate drama and argument... Just felt it was relevant)

From what I've heard, Seattle had told FIFA that this date fell during Pride and therefore they would be making it a Pride match. FIFA was fully aware of this and made a choice to schedule a match where both nations would be near-certain to object. I think we have to assume this was a deliberate choice by FIFA to prevent a Pride game from taking place.

As to why they would do that, well it's probably best if I leave people to speculate rather than share my political views on the subject.

bobmunro

ME14addick said:

bobmunro said:

Weegie Addick said:

Thought these were proposed rather than enacted? 

Yes, two month consultation. 

It will likely not happen, or at worse be watered down significantly. The hospitality lobby will kick back on it - of 184 countries surveyed just one is showing a reduction in overseas visitors during 2025 - the USA.

The current administration doesn't listen to logic. It shouldn't even be considered in the first place. 

Every country has the right to vet overseas visitors - it's just a matter of degree, and what is proposed it way too much. 

Leuth

Hey guys, let's not make this political! Wibble 

bobmunro

Swindon_Addick said:

Weegie Addick said:

Thought these were proposed rather than enacted? 

Yes, the full version of this is a proposal and doesn't come in for a couple of months. Some of the requirements are already in place and there have been stories of the occasional person being denied entry to the US because of something they've said on social media.

I think the key thing is if you're going to go to the World Cup and your not planning to restrict yourself to Canada or Mexico, it will be much easier to apply for the visa waiver now rather than wait a couple of months and be asked for all the extra info.

That works if you have booked your hotels as where you are staying is part of the ESTA application.

My youngest reminded me yesterday when I suggested we get them now that he already has a US work visa - so he will be ok at least!

cafctom

Bostonaddick said:

cafctom said:

Booking flights/hotels for a tournament like this feels like a military operation requiring speed, efficiency and of course a fair bit of money you're willing to part with.

Here's my itinerary so far (very much subject to change):

14-16th June - Chicago (sightseeing)
16th-18th - Dallas (England v Croatia)
18th-20th - Nashville (sightseeing)
20th-22nd - Memphis (sightseeing)
22nd-25th - Boston (England v Ghana)
25th-28th - New York/New Jersey (England v Panama)
28th-29th - Philadelphia (sightseeing)
29th-30th - Washington DC (sightseeing)
30th June - July 2nd - Atlanta (England in R32, as long as they top the group).
 
Happy to meet up with any other Addicks heading out there. 

A few things for you to consider as you are planning Tom.  3 days per location with two of them travel days may feel like you are traveling more than sightseeeing. You might want consider picking one of Nashville/Memphis and staying longer.  While they are different there is some overlap in experiences between the two cities that may feel a little similar.  Same goes with Philadelphia and Washington DC.

Also on a side note, Dallas in summer is ungodly hot and is also potentially the least interesting city in America.

Personally I find Boston and Nyc more enjoyable than Philadelphia (where I live) andDC if there is any consideration in adjusting your itinerary to stay longer in those two cities.

Thanks for the tips. Very helpful.

Yes I only want to stay in Dallas two nights, as I know the heat will be unbearable.

My other half is flying out to join me for Memphis/Nashville so I feel as though she’s going to want to cover both if that’s all she’s coming out for.

It is an ambitious trip, and it’s going to be gruelling at times I imagine. But should also be a lot of fun. I’m looking forward to visiting Philadelphia, Washington and Atlanta for the first time but also expect one night in each is probably enough to see the place. 

ElfsborgAddick

Rossman92 said:

I’ve just had a look at the stadium maps in regard to ticket pricing. 4 categories of tickets, green being the cheapest. Look how little effing space there is for the “cheap” seats 😂

FIFA said Cat 4 is an accessible price point for the tournament. What an absolute joke

This tournament will be one big flop from a commercial standpoint, no doubt in my mind 

The prices are outrageous and very insulting with the 'availability' of the categories 3 and 4.

The World Cup in '94 was thought it would be a failure but all grounds sold out, this will be no different.

ME14addick

bobmunro said:

ME14addick said:

bobmunro said:

Weegie Addick said:

Thought these were proposed rather than enacted? 

Yes, two month consultation. 

It will likely not happen, or at worse be watered down significantly. The hospitality lobby will kick back on it - of 184 countries surveyed just one is showing a reduction in overseas visitors during 2025 - the USA.

The current administration doesn't listen to logic. It shouldn't even be considered in the first place. 

Every country has the right to vet overseas visitors - it's just a matter of degree, and what is proposed it way too much. 

Of course they do, but if you are hosting the World Cup, you shouldn't be putting unecessary barriers in the way.

clive

Supporters hoping to attend next year's World Cup final face paying vast prices, with tickets in the 'supporter value tier' starting at £3,119 ($4,185).
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c80x38e04yro

Raith_C_Chattonell

Stuart_the_Red said:

Jints said:

Swindon_Addick said:

Something that may be of relevance to anyone planning to go to a game in the USA who doesn't travel there regularly - there's been an announcement that they're going to start asking for much more information from people applying for the visa waiver that Brits need when we go there. The demands sound quite onerous and seem to include details of social media accounts. The reports I've seen don't go into detail about what sort of social media posting would be considered unacceptable - I've seen all sorts of rumours but nothing actually firm. It does seem however that, given the things last 2 years, if you don't currently have a waiver it might be a good idea to apply now rather than waiting and having to do a lot more paperwork.

The BBC article on this refers to a similar requirement about social media for student visas, which already exists, from which it seems that they aren't worried about people making jokes about the President (phew) but that people who are outspoken about Israel might struggle. It also, crucially, points out that the big increase in paperwork may mean it takes longer to get a waiver than it used to, which would be another good reason to apply early.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dz0g2ykpeo

The proposals are out for a two month consultation and will be implemented before the WC

Anyone entering the US will have to provide access to social media accounts used for the last five years together with the following.  

a. Telephone numbers used in the last five years;

b. Email addresses used in the last ten years;

c. IP addresses and metadata from electronically submitted photos;

d. Family member names (parents, spouse, siblings, children);

e. Family number telephone numbers used in the last five years;

f. Family member dates of birth;

g. Family member places of birth;

h. Family member residencies;

i. Biometrics—face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris;

j. Business telephone numbers used in the last five years;

k. Business email addresses used in the last ten years.

F*ck the Orange Shitgibbon and his racist cabal!

As you can tell I have no intention of going to the States while that bunch of loonies are in charge! Even if my brother does live there!

I doubt the authorities would let you in anyway once they copped a load of your CL username.

Rossman92

Just popped in the lottery to see the legit prices. $140 minimum to see Cape Verde v Saudi Arabia. Arguably the worst game of  the tourney 

Will be waiting for March to see if prices nosedive because that is outrageous 

man_at_milletts

This sounds to me as if FIFA are leading top class football to the execution block.
I think I will just step back and wait for the usual bollocks of how the money will filter down to grass roots football.

Addick Addict

My eldest has supported England home and away for the last nine years. Those ticket prices are a complete and utter joke. He's stuck between a rock and a hard place but the cheapest for the final, at $4,185, isn't a reward for loyal supporters but a tool for millionaires to say "I was there when we won the World Cup". 

My understanding is that the 1966 World Cup tickets were sold in batches with  a premium "Grade 1" 10-match ticket, including a guaranteed final spot, cost £25 7s 6d. That's the equivalent of £500 today.  

Karim_myBagheri

I wouldn't want to go to the final anyway. Be full of complete tossers in the stands. Most of whom would of been given tickets. Though sitting in-between Taylor swift and Jenifer Lawrence wouldn't be too bad. Then having to tell Leonardo di'caprio to sit down half way through the match as he tries to order a hotdog for his latest teen girlfriend.

Karim_myBagheri

Only just seen that the game will be split up into quarters for the American TV audience and advertising. They're hiding it by calling it water breaks. Mandatary and have to be between 3 and 5 minutes. 

Shag

Seriously don’t think I’ll bother going 

tickets prices are just a joke
official allocations a piss take 
Games split into 4 1/4s
VAR for everything 

let’s suck all the enjoyment out of it

fuck off fifa

SuedeAdidas

The people’s game 👍🏼

IdleHans

ForeverAddickted said:

No surprise that the Egyptian FA have hit out, over their match with Iran being the "Pride" match

Seems a bit stupid that FIFA didn't just move it, as surely they knew it would cause backlash?

Not sure why its an issue, given that in Qatar the rainbow armband wasn't allowed because we had to respect the Home Nation... Surely its just a repeat of accepting that works the other way around as well?

Throws hand grenade into thread, walks away whistling

(I'm genuinely not trying to stir up deliberate drama and argument... Just felt it was relevant)

I saw what you did there, you naughty boy

Friend Or Defoe

Shag said:

Seriously don’t think I’ll bother going 

tickets prices are just a joke
official allocations a piss take 
Games split into 4 1/4s
VAR for everything 

let’s suck all the enjoyment out of it

fuck off fifa

The world cup died when it was hosted in Qatar.

bobmunro

Bring back Blatter. We knew he was a wrong'un (and he knew we knew) but Infantile tries to come across as some sort of statesman where all he is fit for is licking the middle easy oil barons' arses and now bigly Orange man's ring piece.

Utterly contemptible.