Seemingly two right backs in the door where does this leave Clare, unless we really are playing 3 at the back again.
As we saw on Saturday, it looks like we're thinking of the wider picture with regards to Recruitment - In the sense that we'll have the variation within the squad to play multiple positions, where half the starting eleven arent square pegs.
Seemingly two right backs in the door where does this leave Clare, unless we really are playing 3 at the back again.
As we saw on Saturday, it looks like we're thinking of the wider picture with regards to Recruitment - In the sense that we'll have the variation within the squad to play multiple positions, where half the starting eleven arent square pegs.
I don’t really like the concept of signing one player to cover two positions without another backup as as soon as you get one injury you’re reliant on not getting any more. We’ve seen that we’re cursed with our injury list so asking Sessegnon to cover both full back spots won’t work unless we sign both of them. Utility is good but you still need the right number of players to cover. Hopefully we’ll still be looking for a proper wide left back, as a narrow player won’t work with Charlie Kirk at all. Cover that provides a different option is interesting though. Seems like a good potential signing
I don’t really like the concept of signing one player to cover two positions without another backup as as soon as you get one injury you’re reliant on not getting any more. We’ve seen that we’re cursed with our injury list so asking Sessegnon to cover both full back spots won’t work unless we sign both of them. Utility is good but you still need the right number of players to cover. Hopefully we’ll still be looking for a proper wide left back, as a narrow player won’t work with Charlie Kirk at all. Cover that provides a different option is interesting though. Seems like a good potential signing
Kirk won’t be here . Otherwise I agree conceptually , although he may think that having 3 full backs plus Clare is enough
I don’t really like the concept of signing one player to cover two positions without another backup as as soon as you get one injury you’re reliant on not getting any more. We’ve seen that we’re cursed with our injury list so asking Sessegnon to cover both full back spots won’t work unless we sign both of them. Utility is good but you still need the right number of players to cover. Hopefully we’ll still be looking for a proper wide left back, as a narrow player won’t work with Charlie Kirk at all. Cover that provides a different option is interesting though. Seems like a good potential signing
Agree, I hope he’s here primarily as competition for Egbo and we’re aiming for at least two players per position (which there’s room for if we bring in a few u21 loans and have the standout academy players covering).
In some positions that means signing two players, not everyone is coming in has to be automatic first choice.
Comments
In some positions that means signing two players, not everyone is coming in has to be automatic first choice.