MacG: 6 Clare: 6 a bit erratic tonight Lavelle: 7 attacked the ball well in second half Purrington: 7 Dobson: 7 Matthews: 6 Gilbey: 6 Fraser: 6.5 - I hope there is more to come B-T: 8 Stockley: 6 - looked knackered for last 20 Washington: 6 - seemed determined to get a yellow card Lee: 4 Referee: 6 Opposition: 4 but it was only through a goalkeeping mistake that we managed to beat them.
MacG: 6 hes clearly been told to come for yhings Clare: 6 not his best Lavelle: 6 Purrington: 6 Dobson: 6.5 Matthews: 6.5 he was good today Gilbey: 7.5 if he could keep this up... Fraser: 7.5 clever footballer B-T: 7.5 Stockley: 6 Washington: 6.5 Duracell bunny Lee: 5 Referee: 6 ref was ok but the east stand lino was terrible Opposition: 4 poor
MacG: 6.5 nothing to do , kicking not great Clare: 6 good and bad Lavelle: 6 good second half Purrington: 6.5 best game for a while Dobson: 7 couple of mistakes Matthews: 6 didn't do a lot Gilbey: 7.5 much better Fraser: 7 has real quality B-T: 8 a revelation at left wing back Stockley: 6 faded badly Washington: 6 worked hard , but not much came off Lee: 3 oh dear Referee: 7 Opposition: 4
MacG: 6 - took a couple of crosses and not much else to do Clare: 6 - some poor distribution but reasonably sound and made one excellent tackle in the second half (he wasn't to know the guy was flagged offside) Lavelle: 6.5 - fairly solid against their big centre-forward Purrington: 6.5 - pretty decent in a position where he has sometimes struggled Dobson: 6.5 - displayed his usual endeavour and spread the play well on occasions, albeit he gave the ball away once or twice in dangerous areas in the second half Matthews: 6 - a tidy enough display Gilbey: 7 - got in some good positions but lacks composure and his first touch often let's him down Fraser: 6.5 - a very neat and tidy player, who can see a forward pass. Not fully fit yet but there is much more to come from him B-T: 8: MoTM - torched the opposition with his pace. Understandably faded in the second half but he still produced our best effort on goal and pulled back one excellent cross from the byeline. I hope he's fit for Saturday, as we have been largely starved of entertainment, especially recently Stockley: 5 - very rusty but an important contributor defensively on set plays Washington: 7 - his movement was first class and he did very well for a player just returning to the side Lee: 4 - he gave the ball away repeatedly when we had retreated towards the end, although did manage to waste a couple of minutes of injury time near the corner flag (albeit not with the panache of Tony Watt) Referee: 7 - good Opposition: 4 - a poor performance, especially in the light of their recent form. Harris cannot really believe that they were worth a point but I can understand him trying to keep his players' morale up for the run in.
MacG: 7 Good handling, and more commanding Clare: 7 Lavelle: 6 Purrington: 7 Dobson: 7 Matthews: 7 Gilbey: 7.5 Fraser: 7 B-T: 8 Stockley: 6.5 Washington: 6.5 Lee: 5 Referee: 7 Opposition: 3 Very passive performance when we were potentially there for the taking.
MacG: 5.5 came and caught the ball a couple of times never really made a save Clare: 6 Makes some strange decisions sometimes Lavelle: 7 was ok Purrington: 6.5 was ok Dobson: 6.5 bit under par but ok Matthews: 6.5 better than usual Gilbey: 7 scored and possibly could have had another one or two Fraser: 7 as stated elsewhere missed him when he went off B-T: 7.5 good first half tired a bit in the second Stockley: 5 below his best falls over to easy Washington: 5.5 a bit headless chicken but did ok for 2nd game back Lee: 4 disappointing again Referee: 5 some poor decisions Opposition: 3 fortunately worse than us
MacG: 6.5 Looked a bit more convincing but distribution not so good. Clare: 6.5 Hit and miss Lavelle: 6 Did OK but was up against a difficult big man Purrington: 6.5 Defensively sound but rarely made a forward pass Dobson: 6.5 Usual performance but a couple of errors than usual. Didn't get booked! Matthews: 6.5 Did a decent job Gilbey: 7 Some good runs and a goal. Fraser: 7 Looks useful. Maybe more to come. B-T: 7.5 Made a difference Stockley: 6.5 Makes a nuisance of himself even when not on top attacking form Washington: 6.5 Some good runs. We seem to play better with Washington Lee: 4 Hmmm Referee: 5 Opposition: 4
MacG: 5 does not impress, letting a long throw bounce in the 6 yard box, really! Clare: 8 lots of effort and work rate Lavelle: 7 solid enough Purrington: 7 Dobson: 8 motm Matthews: 5 don’t impress Gilbey: 6 only cos he scored Fraser: 5 anonymous B-T: 8 very bright we should have given him the ball more Stockley: 6.5 working hard Washington: 5 don’t know fit Lee: 2 he really is quite poor Referee: 8 Opposition: 2 as poor as us if not worse
MacG: 7 Early scare from a long throw but actually came out & caught two crosses. Clare: 6.5 One really crap attempt at a clearance Lavelle: 5 Didn’t win a header all night mainly because he was too slow getting to the challenge Purrington: 6 He loves a backwards pass Dobson: 7.5 Full of energy but another who made one awful pass that could have cost us a goal. Matthews: 7 Solid defensive performance & got forward Gilbey: 6.5 Some good runs but missed the target from two good chances Fraser: 6.5 Started really brightly but a few crap crosses B-T: 8 MOTM Solid in defence and caused them problems all night going forward Stockley: 5 Struggled to get into the game but some good headed clearances Washington: 6.5 Worried their defence all night Lee: 3 Kept losing the ball Referee: 5 Ok Opposition: 2 Awful
MacG: 6 - Not a lot to do but better (ie coming for two crosses); distribution poor though Clare: 6.5 - Did OK Lavelle: 6 - Did OK but lost nearly everything in the air Purrington: 5.5 - Just about got through the game OK Dobson: 6 - Poor first half but much better near the end Matthews: 5.5 - Quiet game which is a bonus for him Gilbey: 7 - Could have had three and a yellow first half Fraser: 6 - Early knock hampered him but slowly getting into it B-T: 7.5 (MoM) - Did what you want from a winger; beat his man, good crosses, cut inside and shot, easy peasy! Stockley: 4.5 - Tried hard but rarely involved Washington: 6.5 - All action and showed real fight Lee: 4 - Oh dear. His ever decreasing circles mean he'll be up his own arse by the end of the season! Referee: 6 - Let a lot go which probably did us a favour Opposition: 3 - Poor, they never really tried to win it (when we were there for the taking)
MacG: 6 Better than recently. Good to see him catching a couple of crosses. Distribution still not great though. Clare: 6 Some good, some bad, but generally solid. Lavelle: 6 Took time to settle, but grew into the game. Purrington: 6 Looked very solid. Dobson: 6 Usual solid performance, but far from his best. Matthews: 5 No attacking threat at all. Not a wing-back. Prefer DJ at RWB. Gilbey: 6.5 Much better from him and a goal too. Takes up some odd positions at times, which I think is why many, including me, say he often hides. Fraser: 7 You don't notice him much when he is on the pitch, but, boy, do you notice it when he is not on the pitch. Quietly and efficiently gets on with the job. I hope the injury isn't too bad. B-T: 7 Excellent first half, but faded badly second half otherwise would have been higher mark. Stockley: 6 Makes a difference at both ends of the pitch. Doesn't seem to be fully match fit yet. Washington: 6.5 Great to have him back. He makes such a difference. Second name on the team sheet (after Dobson) for me. Lee: 5 Not good at all. Seemed to be getting in the way. We noticeably got worse when he replaced Fraser Referee: 6 Okay. Let it flow more than some. Opposition: 4 Not good. You can see why they are in the relegation zone. I was really surprised that Neil Harris hadn't got them "up" for this. They seemed to be lacking effort as well as quality. made us look good!
Comments
Clare: 6
Lavelle: 6
Purrington: 6
Dobson: 7
Matthews: 6
Gilbey: 8
Fraser: 6
B-T: 7
Stockley: 6
Washington: 7
Lee: 5
Referee: 7
Clare: 6.5
Lavelle: 6.5
Purrington: 6
Dobson: 7
Matthews: 6
Gilbey: 7
Fraser: 7
B-T: 8
Stockley: 6
Washington: 6.5
Lee: 6
Referee: 7.5
Opposition: 5
Clare: 6 a bit erratic tonight
Lavelle: 7 attacked the ball well in second half
Purrington: 7
Dobson: 7
Matthews: 6
Gilbey: 6
Fraser: 6.5 - I hope there is more to come
B-T: 8
Stockley: 6 - looked knackered for last 20
Washington: 6 - seemed determined to get a yellow card
Lee: 4
Referee: 6
Opposition: 4 but it was only through a goalkeeping mistake that we managed to beat them.
Clare: 6.5
Lavelle: 6.5
Purrington: 6
Dobson: 7
Matthews: 6
Gilbey: 7
Fraser: 6
B-T: 7.5
Stockley: 7
Washington: 6
Lee: 5
Referee: 8
Opposition: 5
Clare: 6 - some poor distribution but reasonably sound and made one excellent tackle in the second half (he wasn't to know the guy was flagged offside)
Lavelle: 6.5 - fairly solid against their big centre-forward
Purrington: 6.5 - pretty decent in a position where he has sometimes struggled
Dobson: 6.5 - displayed his usual endeavour and spread the play well on occasions, albeit he gave the ball away once or twice in dangerous areas in the second half
Matthews: 6 - a tidy enough display
Gilbey: 7 - got in some good positions but lacks composure and his first touch often let's him down
Fraser: 6.5 - a very neat and tidy player, who can see a forward pass. Not fully fit yet but there is much more to come from him
B-T: 8: MoTM - torched the opposition with his pace. Understandably faded in the second half but he still produced our best effort on goal and pulled back one excellent cross from the byeline. I hope he's fit for Saturday, as we have been largely starved of entertainment, especially recently
Stockley: 5 - very rusty but an important contributor defensively on set plays
Washington: 7 - his movement was first class and he did very well for a player just returning to the side
Lee: 4 - he gave the ball away repeatedly when we had retreated towards the end, although did manage to waste a couple of minutes of injury time near the corner flag (albeit not with the panache of Tony Watt)
Referee: 7 - good
Opposition: 4 - a poor performance, especially in the light of their recent form. Harris cannot really believe that they were worth a point but I can understand him trying to keep his players' morale up for the run in.
Clare: 7
Lavelle: 6
Purrington: 7
Dobson: 7
Matthews: 7
Gilbey: 7.5
Fraser: 7
B-T: 8
Stockley: 6.5
Washington: 6.5
Lee: 5
Referee: 7
Opposition: 3 Very passive performance when we were potentially there for the taking.
Clare: 6 Makes some strange decisions sometimes
Lavelle: 7 was ok
Purrington: 6.5 was ok
Dobson: 6.5 bit under par but ok
Matthews: 6.5 better than usual
Gilbey: 7 scored and possibly could have had another one or two
Fraser: 7 as stated elsewhere missed him when he went off
B-T: 7.5 good first half tired a bit in the second
Stockley: 5 below his best falls over to easy
Washington: 5.5 a bit headless chicken but did ok for 2nd game back
Lee: 4 disappointing again
Referee: 5 some poor decisions
Opposition: 3 fortunately worse than us
Clare: 6.5 Hit and miss
Lavelle: 6 Did OK but was up against a difficult big man
Purrington: 6.5 Defensively sound but rarely made a forward pass
Dobson: 6.5 Usual performance but a couple of errors than usual. Didn't get booked!
Matthews: 6.5 Did a decent job
Gilbey: 7 Some good runs and a goal.
Fraser: 7 Looks useful. Maybe more to come.
B-T: 7.5 Made a difference
Stockley: 6.5 Makes a nuisance of himself even when not on top attacking form
Washington: 6.5 Some good runs. We seem to play better with Washington
Lee: 4 Hmmm
Referee: 5
Opposition: 4
Clare: 8 lots of effort and work rate
Lavelle: 7 solid enough
Purrington: 7
Dobson: 8 motm
Matthews: 5 don’t impress
Gilbey: 6 only cos he scored
Fraser: 5 anonymous
B-T: 8 very bright we should have given him the ball more
Stockley: 6.5 working hard
Washington: 5 don’t know fit
Lee: 2 he really is quite poor
Referee: 8
Opposition: 2 as poor as us if not worse
Clare: 6.5 One really crap attempt at a clearance
Lavelle: 5 Didn’t win a header all night mainly because he was too slow getting to the challenge
Purrington: 6 He loves a backwards pass
Dobson: 7.5 Full of energy but another who made one awful pass that could have cost us a goal.
Matthews: 7 Solid defensive performance & got forward
Gilbey: 6.5 Some good runs but missed the target from two good chances
Fraser: 6.5 Started really brightly but a few crap crosses
B-T: 8 MOTM Solid in defence and caused them problems all night going forward
Stockley: 5 Struggled to get into the game but some good headed clearances
Washington: 6.5 Worried their defence all night
Lee: 3 Kept losing the ball
Referee: 5 Ok
Opposition: 2 Awful
Clare: 6
Lavelle: 6
Purrington: 6
Dobson: 7
Matthews: 6
Gilbey: 7
Fraser: 6
B-T: 7
Stockley: 6
Washington: 6
Lee: 6
Clare: 6
Lavelle: 6
Purrington: 7
Dobson: 6
Matthews: 6
Gilbey: 7
Fraser: 6
B-T: 8
Stockley: 6
Washington: 6
Lee: 5
Referee: 5
Opposition: 4
Pearce: n/a
Clare: 6
Lavelle: 7
Purrington: 6.5
Dobson: 7.5
Matthews: 6
Gilbey: 7.5
Fraser: 7
B-T: 8
Stockley: 6.5
Washington: 7
Lee: 5
Referee: 6
Opposition:5
Clare: 6
Lavelle: 6
Purrington: 6
Dobson: 7
Matthews: 6
Gilbey: 6.5
Fraser: 6
B-T: 7.5
Stockley: 6
Washington: 6.5
Lee: 5.5
Referee: 7
Opposition: 5
Clare: 6.5
Lavelle: 6
Purrington: 6
Dobson: 6
Matthews: 6.5
Gilbey: 7
Fraser: 7
B-T: 7.5
Stockley: 5.5
Washington: 6
Lee: 3
Referee: 7
Opposition: 3
Clare:6
Lavelle:7
Purrington:6
Dobson: 6
Matthews:6
Gilbey: 7
Fraser:7
B-T: 8
Stockley:6
Washington:7
Lee: 3
Clare: 6
Lavelle: 6
Purrington: 6
Dobson: 7
Matthews: 6
Gilbey: 7
Fraser: 7
B-T: 8
Stockley: 6
Washington: 6.5
Lee: 5.5
Referee: 7
Opposition: 5
Pearce: n/a
Clare: 6.5
Lavelle: 6.5
Purrington: 6.5
Dobson: 7
Matthews: 6.5
Gilbey: 7
Fraser: 6.5
B-T: 8
Stockley: 7
Washington: 6.5
Lee: 4
Referee: 7
Clare: 6.5 - Did OK
Lavelle: 6 - Did OK but lost nearly everything in the air
Purrington: 5.5 - Just about got through the game OK
Dobson: 6 - Poor first half but much better near the end
Matthews: 5.5 - Quiet game which is a bonus for him
Gilbey: 7 - Could have had three and a yellow first half
Fraser: 6 - Early knock hampered him but slowly getting into it
B-T: 7.5 (MoM) - Did what you want from a winger; beat his man, good crosses, cut inside and shot, easy peasy!
Stockley: 4.5 - Tried hard but rarely involved
Washington: 6.5 - All action and showed real fight
Lee: 4 - Oh dear. His ever decreasing circles mean he'll be up his own arse by the end of the season!
Referee: 6 - Let a lot go which probably did us a favour
Opposition: 3 - Poor, they never really tried to win it (when we were there for the taking)
Clare: 5
Lavelle:5
Purrington: 5
Dobson: 6
Matthews: 4
Gilbey: 6
Fraser: 4
B-T: 7
Stockley: 5
Washington: 5
Lee: 5
Clare: 6
Lavelle: 7
Purrington: 6
Dobson: 6
Matthews: 6
Gilbey: 7
Fraser: 6
B-T: 7.5
Stockley: 6
Washington: 6
Lee: 4
Referee: 6
Opposition: 3
Clare: 6 Some good, some bad, but generally solid.
Lavelle: 6 Took time to settle, but grew into the game.
Purrington: 6 Looked very solid.
Dobson: 6 Usual solid performance, but far from his best.
Matthews: 5 No attacking threat at all. Not a wing-back. Prefer DJ at RWB.
Gilbey: 6.5 Much better from him and a goal too. Takes up some odd positions at times, which I think is why many, including me, say he often hides.
Fraser: 7 You don't notice him much when he is on the pitch, but, boy, do you notice it when he is not on the pitch. Quietly and efficiently gets on with the job. I hope the injury isn't too bad.
B-T: 7 Excellent first half, but faded badly second half otherwise would have been higher mark.
Stockley: 6 Makes a difference at both ends of the pitch. Doesn't seem to be fully match fit yet.
Washington: 6.5 Great to have him back. He makes such a difference. Second name on the team sheet (after Dobson) for me.
Lee: 5 Not good at all. Seemed to be getting in the way. We noticeably got worse when he replaced Fraser
Referee: 6 Okay. Let it flow more than some.
Opposition: 4 Not good. You can see why they are in the relegation zone. I was really surprised that Neil Harris hadn't got them "up" for this. They seemed to be lacking effort as well as quality. made us look good!