Marcus Maddison apparently free to leave Posh in January. £2.6m release clause.
I've said this before - he is a fantastic player. Not wired up right but when he is on his day he is brilliant - you've only got to check his stats out for the last couple of seasons to see that.
He's just tuned 26 so a great age too.
I'd hope he's on our wish list...he's something special if a little erratic
Marcus Maddison apparently free to leave Posh in January. £2.6m release clause.
I've said this before - he is a fantastic player. Not wired up right but when he is on his day he is brilliant - you've only got to check his stats out for the last couple of seasons to see that.
He's just tuned 26 so a great age too.
I'd hope he's on our wish list...he's something special if a little erratic
Marcus Maddison apparently free to leave Posh in January. £2.6m release clause.
I've said this before - he is a fantastic player. Not wired up right but when he is on his day he is brilliant - you've only got to check his stats out for the last couple of seasons to see that.
He's just tuned 26 so a great age too.
I'd hope he's on our wish list...he's something special if a little erratic
Toney & Maddison double swoop would be ideal
He wants £13m for Toney
hl probably get that but not from us
Can't we just arrange a swap deal for Toney?
We take Ivan Toney, they get Tony Keohane in return
In my opinion it’s worth splashing some cash in January if we are in contention for a play off spot as long as that cash is splashed on players you would sign next summer anyway.
Bringing players into a struggling side can be difficult for the newbies to fit in.
I would err on the side of caution and budget for a splash in the summer.
1. Defends too deep so team harder to link with midfield
2. May beat Rojo on a footrace because latter is hungover (24/7) 3. Octopus defending. 4. Poor passing, few forward, fewer finding man. 5. Dumped by every side winning promotion to Champ
6. Barely more than six foot, doubt he'd have done better on Smith assault. Struggles against big physical forwards.
Mattie pollock at Grimsby has scouts in abundance looking at him. A really good classy young centre half who is ready to step up. His father is Jamie pollock once of. Middlesbrough and Manchester City. The old man is massively overweight these days but his son is class. Gallen get up and see this lad.
Marcus Maddison apparently free to leave Posh in January. £2.6m release clause.
I've said this before - he is a fantastic player. Not wired up right but when he is on his day he is brilliant - you've only got to check his stats out for the last couple of seasons to see that.
He's just tuned 26 so a great age too.
I'd hope he's on our wish list...he's something special if a little erratic
Losing two of the ‘vertebrae’ from the spine of a side (in Taylor and Gallagher) is not what a newly promoted team at the wrong end of the table and on a bad run needs - regardless of potential Middle Eastern millions.
I met Conor's Dad a few weeks back. It was an interesting chat about where he sees him for the remainder of the season.
He told me that there's no way Conor would leave Charlton in Jan for another Champ club because he's happy at Charlton, but he did imply that Chelsea would be happy if he went on loan to another Prem club from Jan.
They're a Chelsea supporting family and I'd agree there is no way he'll leave perm from Chelsea, rather would expect to try to break into the first team, but I would suggest a loan is a distinct possibility.
I met Conor's Dad a few weeks back. It was an interesting chat about where he sees him for the remainder of the season.
He told me that there's no way Conor would leave Charlton in Jan for another Champ club because he's happy at Charlton, but he did imply that Chelsea would be happy if he went on loan to another Prem club from Jan.
They're a Chelsea supporting family and I'd agree there is no way he'll leave perm from Chelsea, rather would expect to try to break into the first team, but I would suggest a loan is a distinct possibility.
They didn't do that last season for Abraham, Mount, James and Tomori last season though, they stayed at their loan clubs all season. Indeed Tammy Abraham probably suffered from having a PL loan too soon (Swansea)
I met Conor's Dad a few weeks back. It was an interesting chat about where he sees him for the remainder of the season.
He told me that there's no way Conor would leave Charlton in Jan for another Champ club because he's happy at Charlton, but he did imply that Chelsea would be happy if he went on loan to another Prem club from Jan.
They're a Chelsea supporting family and I'd agree there is no way he'll leave perm from Chelsea, rather would expect to try to break into the first team, but I would suggest a loan is a distinct possibility.
Burnley have a settled first XI. I expect they are up there in having the least changes week to week on their team sheet. Gallagher would have to be happy with the odd 10-20 minute cameo off the bench.
Dyche also likes to play with known quantities who’ll give you 7/10 week on week and a young player like Conor doesn’t seem to fit with that ethos. Why would they bring him in for six months and shoehorn a player that doesn’t fit into their style of play?
The only way a PL loan makes sense for Conor is it he gets regular minutes? Will he get that at Burnley? No.
The only way Gallagher on loan makes sense for Burnley is if they have a guarantee that he’ll be there for the long term? Will that happen? Not unless they are prepared to pay Chelsea 50m+.
The only way letting Gallagher go makes sense for Chelsea is if someone comes in with a stupid offer and they can reinvest the cash in multiple first teamers.
In conclusion, it ain’t happening. The only logical move is if someone like Brentford or Fulham come in for him and can guarantee Chelsea he will get minutes with them.
I met Conor's Dad a few weeks back. It was an interesting chat about where he sees him for the remainder of the season.
He told me that there's no way Conor would leave Charlton in Jan for another Champ club because he's happy at Charlton, but he did imply that Chelsea would be happy if he went on loan to another Prem club from Jan.
They're a Chelsea supporting family and I'd agree there is no way he'll leave perm from Chelsea, rather would expect to try to break into the first team, but I would suggest a loan is a distinct possibility.
Burnley have a settled first XI. I expect they are up there in having the least changes week to week on their team sheet. Gallagher would have to be happy with the odd 10-20 minute cameo off the bench.
Dyche also likes to play with known quantities who’ll give you 7/10 week on week and a young player like Conor doesn’t seem to fit with that ethos. Why would they bring him in for six months and shoehorn a player that doesn’t fit into their style of play?
The only way a PL loan makes sense for Conor is it he gets regular minutes? Will he get that at Burnley? No.
The only way Gallagher on loan makes sense for Burnley is if they have a guarantee that he’ll be there for the long term? Will that happen? Not unless they are prepared to pay Chelsea 50m+.
The only way letting Gallagher go makes sense for Chelsea is if someone comes in with a stupid offer and they can reinvest the cash in multiple first teamers.
In conclusion, it ain’t happening. The only logical move is if someone like Brentford or Fulham come in for him and can guarantee Chelsea he will get minutes with them.
And Burnley's style of football hardly matches what Chelsea play and indeed what Bowyer (when everyone is fit) play either!
Danny Drinkwater can't get a game at Burnley, which could hardly help their cause with Chelsea after...
I met Conor's Dad a few weeks back. It was an interesting chat about where he sees him for the remainder of the season.
He told me that there's no way Conor would leave Charlton in Jan for another Champ club because he's happy at Charlton, but he did imply that Chelsea would be happy if he went on loan to another Prem club from Jan.
They're a Chelsea supporting family and I'd agree there is no way he'll leave perm from Chelsea, rather would expect to try to break into the first team, but I would suggest a loan is a distinct possibility.
Burnley have a settled first XI. I expect they are up there in having the least changes week to week on their team sheet. Gallagher would have to be happy with the odd 10-20 minute cameo off the bench.
Dyche also likes to play with known quantities who’ll give you 7/10 week on week and a young player like Conor doesn’t seem to fit with that ethos. Why would they bring him in for six months and shoehorn a player that doesn’t fit into their style of play?
The only way a PL loan makes sense for Conor is it he gets regular minutes? Will he get that at Burnley? No.
The only way Gallagher on loan makes sense for Burnley is if they have a guarantee that he’ll be there for the long term? Will that happen? Not unless they are prepared to pay Chelsea 50m+.
The only way letting Gallagher go makes sense for Chelsea is if someone comes in with a stupid offer and they can reinvest the cash in multiple first teamers.
In conclusion, it ain’t happening. The only logical move is if someone like Brentford or Fulham come in for him and can guarantee Chelsea he will get minutes with them.
And Burnley's style of football hardly matches what Chelsea play and indeed what Bowyer (when everyone is fit) play either!
Danny Drinkwater can't get a game at Burnley, which could hardly help their cause with Chelsea after...
Danny Drinkwater is an arsehole, chelsea dont care if he's getting a game or not, they were banned from signing anyone and still farmed him out on loan.
Comments
hl probably get that but not from us
We take Ivan Toney, they get Tony Keohane in return
I would err on the side of caution and budget for a splash in the summer.
They want him on a permanent deal according to the Daily Mail. Chelsea won't entertain letting him go unless they offer silly money.
Losing two of the ‘vertebrae’ from the spine of a side (in Taylor and Gallagher) is not what a newly promoted team at the wrong end of the table and on a bad run needs - regardless of potential Middle Eastern millions.
He told me that there's no way Conor would leave Charlton in Jan for another Champ club because he's happy at Charlton, but he did imply that Chelsea would be happy if he went on loan to another Prem club from Jan.
They're a Chelsea supporting family and I'd agree there is no way he'll leave perm from Chelsea, rather would expect to try to break into the first team, but I would suggest a loan is a distinct possibility.
The only way Gallagher on loan makes sense for Burnley is if they have a guarantee that he’ll be there for the long term? Will that happen? Not unless they are prepared to pay Chelsea 50m+.
The only way letting Gallagher go makes sense for Chelsea is if someone comes in with a stupid offer and they can reinvest the cash in multiple first teamers.
In conclusion, it ain’t happening. The only logical move is if someone like Brentford or Fulham come in for him and can guarantee Chelsea he will get minutes with them.
Danny Drinkwater can't get a game at Burnley, which could hardly help their cause with Chelsea after...