Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

FA Cup 2019/20

1…1415161719

Comments

  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,288
    De Gea really having a shocker
  • paulie8290
    paulie8290 Posts: 23,344
    2 goals
    2 mistakes by DDG

    Henderson has to be first choice next season 
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 22,944
    Don't they normally play Romero in cups? Would almost certainly be 0-0 still if they had. 
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    paulie8290 said:
    2 goals
    2 mistakes by DDG

    Henderson has to be first choice next season 
    Henderson can’t be far off. 
  • Redvalleyeast
    Redvalleyeast Posts: 4,689
    In fairness,the 1st one did come at him quick from close range although got a good hand on it but the 2nd was so poor,really bad.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,288
    Guess Man Utd are focusing on the 3rd / 4th place trophy
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 22,944
    Beaten as his near post again for the 3rd.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,839
    Northern football fans rightly complain that shifting the FA Cup final to Saturday teatime is a nightmare for transport, with the real danger of spectators missing the last train home

    So it's typical that the lockdown FA Cup final with no spectators to worry about...is between 2 London teams!
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,345
    Lampard Jnr has developed a real team during his short time at Chelsea .. Oly G is stuck with a bunch of under achieving prima donnas .. Man Citteeee need a major overhaul and Arteta has got the gunners firing again .. good to see an all London not Manky final this year .. 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,839
    Chelsea 1-0 up already. 2 teams who are good in attack but shaky at the back, so should be plenty of goals
  • Sponsored links:



  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,777
    The gothic writing and numbers on the Arsenal shirts is a bit weird.
    I know it’s just a font, but it’s so synonymous with nazi Germany that I wonder if it was a good choice!
    Ladyromford just said that it being on a red and white shirt makes it even worse!
  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,777
    That penalty call was interesting. If VAR had determined that it was outside the box, would the ref have changed the yellow card to a red?
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,839
    lordromford said:
    That penalty call was interesting. If VAR had determined that it was outside the box, would the ref have changed the yellow card to a red?
    No, as the reason for the yellow was the covering defender Rudiger. Without him it would have been red and a penalty, as no attempt was made by Azp to get the ball
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,667
    lordromford said:
    The gothic writing and numbers on the Arsenal shirts is a bit weird.
    I know it’s just a font, but it’s so synonymous with nazi Germany that I wonder if it was a good choice!
    Ladyromford just said that it being on a red and white shirt makes it even worse!
    Wtf 
  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,777
    edited August 2020
    killerandflash said:
    lordromford said:
    That penalty call was interesting. If VAR had determined that it was outside the box, would the ref have changed the yellow card to a red?
    No, as the reason for the yellow was the covering defender Rudiger. Without him it would have been red and a penalty, as no attempt was made by Azp to get the ball
    Ah, ok. 
    I thought the guidelines were to not give both a pen + a red unless it was a violent challenge - is that not the case? 
    I just assumed the yellow was for being the last man. Didn’t think about Rudiger. 
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 35,994
    Chelsea look very dodgy at the back.

    Quite surprised Lampard hasn't made any moves yet to strengthen his defence for next season. They've signed Werner and Ziyech and are apparently about to sign Havertz but their problems are at the back.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,839
    lordromford said:
    killerandflash said:
    lordromford said:
    That penalty call was interesting. If VAR had determined that it was outside the box, would the ref have changed the yellow card to a red?
    No, as the reason for the yellow was the covering defender Rudiger. Without him it would have been red and a penalty, as no attempt was made by Azp to get the ball
    Ah, ok. 
    I thought the guidelines were to not give both a pen + a red unless it was a violent challenge - is that not the case? 
    I just assumed the yellow was for being the last man. Didn’t think about Rudiger. 
    No, the key thing is whether the defender was trying to get the ball or not

    Mistime a genuine tackle - penalty and yellow card
    Pull the attacker back - penalty and red card
  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,777
    killerandflash said:
    lordromford said:
    killerandflash said:
    lordromford said:
    That penalty call was interesting. If VAR had determined that it was outside the box, would the ref have changed the yellow card to a red?
    No, as the reason for the yellow was the covering defender Rudiger. Without him it would have been red and a penalty, as no attempt was made by Azp to get the ball
    Ah, ok. 
    I thought the guidelines were to not give both a pen + a red unless it was a violent challenge - is that not the case? 
    I just assumed the yellow was for being the last man. Didn’t think about Rudiger. 
    No, the key thing is whether the defender was trying to get the ball or not

    Mistime a genuine tackle - penalty and yellow card
    Pull the attacker back - penalty and red card
    Cheers. 
    Is this a recent change or were the guidelines I mentioned never a thing? 
    I could swear there was a whole debate about avoiding a “Double Jeopardy” situation. 
    Did I imagine that?
    😳
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,839
    lordromford said:
    killerandflash said:
    lordromford said:
    killerandflash said:
    lordromford said:
    That penalty call was interesting. If VAR had determined that it was outside the box, would the ref have changed the yellow card to a red?
    No, as the reason for the yellow was the covering defender Rudiger. Without him it would have been red and a penalty, as no attempt was made by Azp to get the ball
    Ah, ok. 
    I thought the guidelines were to not give both a pen + a red unless it was a violent challenge - is that not the case? 
    I just assumed the yellow was for being the last man. Didn’t think about Rudiger. 
    No, the key thing is whether the defender was trying to get the ball or not

    Mistime a genuine tackle - penalty and yellow card
    Pull the attacker back - penalty and red card
    Cheers. 
    Is this a recent change or were the guidelines I mentioned never a thing? 
    I could swear there was a whole debate about avoiding a “Double Jeopardy” situation. 
    Did I imagine that?
    😳
    Changed a year ago I think
  • JaShea99
    JaShea99 Posts: 5,456
    I know it’s a popular opinion on here anyway for obvious reasons, but Murphy really does talk absolute nonsense. Numerous examples from this game alone but just to give one - when Arsenal had an early free kick, Murphy said “It’s in!” before realising it had gone over, so quickly changed it to “nah, just didn’t come down quick enough.” Twat.
  • Sponsored links:



  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 22,944
    Great finish from Aubameyang that.
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 22,944
    JaShea99 said:
    I know it’s a popular opinion on here anyway for obvious reasons, but Murphy really does talk absolute nonsense. Numerous examples from this game alone but just to give one - when Arsenal had an early free kick, Murphy said “It’s in!” before realising it had gone over, so quickly changed it to “nah, just didn’t come down quick enough.” Twat.
    Thought Ceballos had been given a yellow card rather than Kovacic who actually fouled someone too.
  • Bournemouth Addick
    Bournemouth Addick Posts: 16,283
    Surely he's off! 
  • JaShea99
    JaShea99 Posts: 5,456
    North Lower Neil said:
    JaShea99 said:
    I know it’s a popular opinion on here anyway for obvious reasons, but Murphy really does talk absolute nonsense. Numerous examples from this game alone but just to give one - when Arsenal had an early free kick, Murphy said “It’s in!” before realising it had gone over, so quickly changed it to “nah, just didn’t come down quick enough.” Twat.
    Thought Ceballos had been given a yellow card rather than Kovacic who actually fouled someone too.
    Yep. Could fill a page with the rubbish he’s talked in this game.
  • stackitsteve
    stackitsteve Posts: 12,102
    Really can’t believe they haven’t shown a replay of the goalkeeper there. Hands in the box or not. Should have shown it again
  • Bournemouth Addick
    Bournemouth Addick Posts: 16,283
    stackitsteve said:
    Really can’t believe they haven’t shown a replay of the goalkeeper there. Hands in the box or not. Should have shown it again
    Looked outside to me. 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,288
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Chelsea look very dodgy at the back.

    Quite surprised Lampard hasn't made any moves yet to strengthen his defence for next season. They've signed Werner and Ziyech and are apparently about to sign Havertz but their problems are at the back.
    Was talking to a guy at work yesterday about that 

    Chelsea could very much become like Arsenal if they're not careful - Its alright trying to sign loads of attacking megastars but even teams of that quality need their Fernandinho's etc which neither team has which is why neither truly competed in the League this season
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,839
    Shocking injury luck for Chelsea. 2 hamstrings and Pedro dislocates his shoulder 
  • jacob_CAFC
    jacob_CAFC Posts: 2,063
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Chelsea look very dodgy at the back.

    Quite surprised Lampard hasn't made any moves yet to strengthen his defence for next season. They've signed Werner and Ziyech and are apparently about to sign Havertz but their problems are at the back.
    Was talking to a guy at work yesterday about that 

    Chelsea could very much become like Arsenal if they're not careful - Its alright trying to sign loads of attacking megastars but even teams of that quality need their Fernandinho's etc which neither team has which is why neither truly competed in the League this season
    They need at least a new gk, new Cb and left back to compete 
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,667
    killerandflash said:
    Shocking injury luck for Chelsea. 2 hamstrings and Pedro dislocates his shoulder 
    Battle of Stamford bridge 
    Sandgate 
    Nicking Scotty Parker. 


    FUCK em

Categories

“Marketplace”