I would have voted for him, and maybe did in some online something, just for what Bowyer says. He just seems like such a lovely bloke. And his football this season has been on another planet.
That said, can't argue with Taylor. He's been immense. Yesterday was a brilliant finish to a brilliant season. Another who seems like a thoroughly decent bloke off the pitch, but a right bastard on it.
I agree, assuming Bielik and Cullen aren't eligible (both of whom are younger than Lapslie and Dijksteel). I don't know when votes are taken but it's really been in the last few games that Dijksteel has really grown into his own. He's our first choice RB with or without Solly as far as I'm concerned.
I agree, assuming Bielik and Cullen aren't eligible (both of whom are younger than Lapslie and Dijksteel). I don't know when votes are taken but it's really been in the last few games that Dijksteel has really grown into his own. He's our first choice RB with or without Solly as far as I'm concerned.
Cullen's older than any of them. Maybe just me but I don't see young player of the year as an award for a player we've signed on loan to play for the first team. Makes sense to me that it's one of our own young players who has made an impact in the first team and improved in the past year.
Cullen Born: 7 April 1996 (age 23 years) Bielik Born: 4 January 1998 (age 21 years) Lapslie Born: 5 September 1997 (age 21 years) Dijksteel Born: 27 October 1996 (age 22 years)
Bloody hell Bielik is the youngest of that group??? I thought he was 23/24.
He is going to be some player in a few years.
I preferred him at CB earlier on in the season but he now looks very comfortable in midfield and we're a better team with him there. I'm sure there was something on here recently about Bowyer saying Bielik is now releasing the ball quicker, that's probably what bothered me. He's running with the ball when there's space rather trying to do it every time and running into trouble.
I agree, assuming Bielik and Cullen aren't eligible (both of whom are younger than Lapslie and Dijksteel). I don't know when votes are taken but it's really been in the last few games that Dijksteel has really grown into his own. He's our first choice RB with or without Solly as far as I'm concerned.
Cullen's older than any of them. Maybe just me but I don't see young player of the year as an award for a player we've signed on loan to play for the first team. Makes sense to me that it's one of our own young players who has made an impact in the first team and improved in the past year.
Cullen Born: 7 April 1996 (age 23 years) Bielik Born: 4 January 1998 (age 21 years) Lapslie Born: 5 September 1997 (age 21 years) Dijksteel Born: 27 October 1996 (age 22 years)
If the award was voted on now, I wonder if Morgan might have pipped Lapslie
Comments
So wouldnt expect an announcement too soon
Very deserved in my opinion
Josh Cullen
That said, can't argue with Taylor. He's been immense. Yesterday was a brilliant finish to a brilliant season. Another who seems like a thoroughly decent bloke off the pitch, but a right bastard on it.
Cullen Born: 7 April 1996 (age 23 years)
Bielik Born: 4 January 1998 (age 21 years)
Lapslie Born: 5 September 1997 (age 21 years)
Dijksteel Born: 27 October 1996 (age 22 years)
So realistically was only between Lapslie / Morgan / Dijksteel
Could be wrong with that being the requirements for the award
Certainly hope its usual bullshit from someone wanting five mins attention on FaceBook