All this is completely unrelated to anything Charlton, but as has been mentioned I now work alongside the RSPCA.
As part of a recent ad campaign some research was carried out and it turns out the market researchers found views around the RSPCA to be flawed.
Such things as 'They're too wealthy' or 'They're government funded' or 'I heard somebody reported xyz to them and they did nothing' came out.
So I personally would like to know the experiences of others? It is not going to be used by the RSPCA it is purely for me to see the good the bad and the ugly from those I would argue are trustworthy and Doucher too...
Thanks for any responses. Admin you know what to do if this thread is unacceptable for any reason...
Comments
RSPCA told me to go ahead a seal them in.
Lost a bit of respect for them that day. Was many years ago by the way.
She was telling me how she was stopped in the street the other day by RSPCA reps and despite declining to donate she gave valid reasons for not supporting them... She's a registered veterinary nurse so will have experiences of them, rather than just being against supporting them with no real valid reason
We got our cat from battersea in the end, both the RSPCA and Cats protection wouldn't let us because we worked - a dog i understand, a cat? Why not?
Like most of the more recognised charities i imagine they get more focus and therefore more undeserved criticism, though anyone that employs chuggers goes down in my estimation.
The RSPA are a little different in that they perform enforcement duties and by the nature of much of their work it requires a larger organisation to coordinate nationally
Ended up calling out the local dog warden - which I didn't even know existed.
Why do so many people fail to understand why people in charities can be paid large sums?
Its simple, talented person goes for job A (in a company) and is offered £200,000, he/she is also offered job B (a charity) but is offered £100,000 to do a job with very similar stresses and difficulty. He/she picks job A obviously.
For charities to get talented workers they need to pay competitive salaries, its as simple as that. These charities would be even more inaffective if they paid lower salaries because they wouldn't get the same level of expertise.
Much like in football, to be competitive you need to offer more money to get better players.
Now whether the charity is run well is a whole different question!
Because charities are funded through donations their employees should be paid less than they can earn for doing the same job elsewhere?
This is the real world.
In 2016, the RSPCA:
Received 1,153,744 calls to their 24-hour cruelty line, one every 27 seconds (up by 3.15 percent)
Investigated 149,604 complaints of alleged animal cruelty. This is more than 400 allegations of animal cruelty every day (up by 4.62 percent)
Issued 84,725 advice and improvement notices (up by 3.99 percent)
Successfully prosecuted 744 people (down by 6.53 percent)
Secured 628 disqualification orders following prosecution (down 4.46 percent)
Had a prosecution success rate of 92.5 percent (up by 0.1 percent)
Rescued and collected 129,602 animals
Branches rehomed more than 35,000 animals
Microchipped, neutered and treated 256,979 animals
The majority of complaints received by them in 2016 continued to be about the welfare of dogs (84,994), followed by cats (36,156) and equines (19,530).
People often think of the RSPCA - in terms of size - as equivalent to the police force.
The RSPCA has just 287 full-time uniformed inspectors - each one covers on average an area of 172 square miles - compared to the police force which has a police officer covering an average area of half a square mile.
The RSPCA make no money from the adoption fees charged because so many of the animals that come into them need need to be rehabilitated before they are ready to be rehomed.
Their 17 animal centres and 5 veterinary hospitals alone cost £110,000 a day to run to care for animals in need.
Each year it costs over £123 million to provide all of the services they offer.
For every £1 given to the RSPCA:
82p is spent on animal welfare
1p is spent on governance
17p is spent raising the next £1
Not sure if this info is meant to help people understand their position or not but there does seem to be a lot of negative stories which is truly sad. From what I've seen so far the hq is full of people desperate to help animals.
There was no mention of the RSPCA in the top 100.
I see that some of the same people (not necessarily anyone on CL) who are obsessed by market forces and defend extraordinary salaries with the mantra "You would take it if it was offered to you", suddenly do an about turn when it comes to experts in the charity field earning good money.
It would snarl at you when you entered the kitchen, not sure why just the kitchen it had free roam of the house & garden, was terrified of large women on the street, anyone with a stick, would hump your leg constantly & eventually turned on my at the time heavily pregnant sister. It then badly bit my sisters OH whilst he tried to get the dog away from her, then went for my Dad. I will be grateful if I don't hear the noises that were coming from the dog ever again in my life. There was a hell of a lot of blood.
When contacted the RSPCA didn't want to know. No help, no guidance, no support. My parents loved that dog & it broke their hearts to put him down but for obvious reasons we didn't feel safe around him.
If I was ever lucky enough to be in the position that I'm at home more during the day I'd go to the Dogs Trust, which I have heard nothing but good experiences. I hadn't lived without a dog until I moved out of my parents house.