Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

23 Russian diplomats expelled and other actions.

1235713

Comments

  • sm
    sm Posts: 2,958
    Greenie said:

    .

    And there was me thinking that the lesson of history was that it was appeasement that led to wars rather than keeping the peace.
  • I would be classed as Corbyn supporter but on this he has got it completely wrong in refusing to accept the obvious IMO, this is not risking a world war, as we don't want that, none of our allies want that & neither does Putin despite his regular shows of strength.

    We can't just keep letting Russia get away with acting however it likes.

    I do still have doubts that the governments of western nations will do the right thing though by hitting Putin & his pals where it really hurts by banning them, their families & their money from being able to enter our nations, give them the pariah treatment and watch them back down.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,729
    No, I think taking your time and getting it right on this works best here. Where we wanted and needed instant action like Grenfall we see the dragging of feet!
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,315
    sm said:

    Greenie said:

    .

    And there was me thinking that the lesson of history was that it was appeasement that led to wars rather than keeping the peace.
    The situation in Europe in the 30s was completely incomparable to this. War was completely inevitable then and the UK probably shouldn't have dithered. This is...totally different
  • sm
    sm Posts: 2,958

    No, I think taking your time and getting it right on this works best here. Where we wanted and needed instant action like Grenfall we see the dragging of feet!

    Putin has been around since 1999, Grenfall was refurbished in 2015. Putin is responsible for a lot more deaths.
  • Big_Bad_World
    Big_Bad_World Posts: 5,859
    sm said:

    No, I think taking your time and getting it right on this works best here. Where we wanted and needed instant action like Grenfall we see the dragging of feet!

    Putin has been around since 1999, Grenfall was refurbished in 2015. Putin is responsible for a lot more deaths.
    Can't you just accept that Jermey is right? His supporters say so and that's paramount.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,729
    sm said:

    No, I think taking your time and getting it right on this works best here. Where we wanted and needed instant action like Grenfall we see the dragging of feet!

    Putin has been around since 1999, Grenfall was refurbished in 2015. Putin is responsible for a lot more deaths.
    Yes, but you can't stop those deaths - He is Russian.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,729

    sm said:

    No, I think taking your time and getting it right on this works best here. Where we wanted and needed instant action like Grenfall we see the dragging of feet!

    Putin has been around since 1999, Grenfall was refurbished in 2015. Putin is responsible for a lot more deaths.
    Can't you just accept that Jermey is right? His supporters say so and that's paramount.
    Why can't you accept he is wrong, his critics say so and that's paramount.
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,145

    sm said:

    Leuth said:

    What Corbyn has done is raise awareness of the many human rights abuses occurring within this very country. On something as thorny and murky as this I think he's best-off condemning but also suggesting a methodical way forward. What else could he do? He's already said he'll crack down on money laundering. A military response? Is that what you want?

    I am afraid Corbyn is rather late to the party when it comes to human rights abuses in Russia. NO I don't want a military response - but Putin, his regime and his mafia chums need to be treated like the pariahs they are - complete confiscation of all their foreign assets aka as proceeds of crime (including Chelsea FC) would be a start.
    Surely the point is Corbyn can't do any of this, and having already said they'd be tougher on finance - he's already ticked that box?

    Like i say, it seems to be who is saying it, rather than what they are saying.
    I think it was more about how he said what he said. The balance, the emphasis, within his speech as a whole. There is a tradition in Parliament that when there is a real threat to the nation, the Opposition is cautious about point-scoring.

    I think he has a legitimate and important question about why the UK had not submitted its evidence to the independent authority on chemical weapons, before coming out and accusing Russia. However he went much further than that, casting doubt on the competence of security agencies and Porton scientists. Anyone dispassionate who had reviewed his words in advance might have said, "look Jeremy, you may feel these points about Iraq WMDs are valid, but maybe its better to let people outside Parliament say it, as many people will take it the wrong way, coming from you. Unfortunately, his key adviser on such matters apparently is Seamus Milne.

  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729

    sm said:

    No, I think taking your time and getting it right on this works best here. Where we wanted and needed instant action like Grenfall we see the dragging of feet!

    Putin has been around since 1999, Grenfall was refurbished in 2015. Putin is responsible for a lot more deaths.
    Yes, but you can't stop those deaths - He is Russian.
    Ah yeah, better let him kill who he wants on the streets of Britain.
  • Sponsored links:



  • sm
    sm Posts: 2,958

    sm said:

    No, I think taking your time and getting it right on this works best here. Where we wanted and needed instant action like Grenfall we see the dragging of feet!

    Putin has been around since 1999, Grenfall was refurbished in 2015. Putin is responsible for a lot more deaths.
    Yes, but you can't stop those deaths - He is Russian.
    Exactly the argument of the appeasers before the Second World War - Corbyn is very keen to use international law against Blair/Nato/US but not Putin, why is this?

    Remember more journalists have been murdered in Russia under Putin than those who died in Grenfell Tower.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_journalists_killed_in_Russia

    There use to be a time when socialists were proud of being internationalists.
  • Big_Bad_World
    Big_Bad_World Posts: 5,859

    sm said:

    No, I think taking your time and getting it right on this works best here. Where we wanted and needed instant action like Grenfall we see the dragging of feet!

    Putin has been around since 1999, Grenfall was refurbished in 2015. Putin is responsible for a lot more deaths.
    Can't you just accept that Jermey is right? His supporters say so and that's paramount.
    Why can't you accept he is wrong, his critics say so and that's paramount.
    At last, we're getting somewhere.
  • _MrDick
    _MrDick Posts: 13,107
    If I were an Arsenal fan, I wouldn’t be heading out to Moscow for the away leg of their Europa League cup tie
  • Greenie
    Greenie Posts: 9,172
    sm said:

    Greenie said:

    .

    And there was me thinking that the lesson of history was that it was appeasement that led to wars rather than keeping the peace.
    Please clarify which part of history are you on about, your comment is a bit vague.
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,145
    Greenie said:

    sm said:

    Greenie said:

    .

    And there was me thinking that the lesson of history was that it was appeasement that led to wars rather than keeping the peace.
    Please clarify which part of history are you on about, your comment is a bit vague.
    Well I am surrounded by 15 million people who if you asked them would answer in unison "Neville fucking Chamberlain", for starters.

  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,315
    As I said above though, it's a silly comparison
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,729
    Comparing to Neville Chamberlain is beyond ridiculous :)
  • sm
    sm Posts: 2,958

    Comparing to Neville Chamberlain is beyond ridiculous :)

    How about Lord Rothermere or all those so called socialists who turned a blind eye to Uncle Joe?
  • sm
    sm Posts: 2,958
    _MrDick said:

    If I were an Arsenal fan, I wouldn’t be heading out to Moscow for the away leg of their Europa League cup tie

    Should be alright Usmanov is a big pal of Putin's and ordinary Russians are not thugs and have a pretty good idea as to how the regime behaves.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,729
    edited March 2018
    sm said:

    Comparing to Neville Chamberlain is beyond ridiculous :)

    How about Lord Rothermere or all those so called socialists who turned a blind eye to Uncle Joe?
    It was the socialists who were on the streets of this country fighting the facists.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Greenie
    Greenie Posts: 9,172

    Greenie said:

    sm said:

    Greenie said:

    .

    And there was me thinking that the lesson of history was that it was appeasement that led to wars rather than keeping the peace.
    Please clarify which part of history are you on about, your comment is a bit vague.
    Well I am surrounded by 15 million people who if you asked them would answer in unison "Neville fucking Chamberlain", for starters.

    Ahh old Nev again...then you dont know your history PA, its well documented that clever Nev was playing for time, he knew Adolf was on the war path, he also know that like now we have a very underfunded war machine, he also knew that Britain was his country and prioritised it above all other countries (quite right. 15 million people in other counties were not his responsibility). There is audio statement at the IWM of a member of his staff who said after 'the peace in our time' speech that Nev said to him, 'get yourself trained if you want to be in the Air Force, war is not far away'.
    At the time Chamberlain was pilloried for being subservient to Hitler, because he didn't puff his chest out and bang the war drum, but it transpires that he was right. However people dont want to know that because it doesn't fit in with their narrative.
    Great men make the right decisions for their country not for their party, or what the average bloke in the street thinks he knows.
  • A-R-T-H-U-R
    A-R-T-H-U-R Posts: 7,678
    More interesting developments - unconnected they say?
    Hmmmm.

    bbc
    UK police have launched a murder investigation after the death of Russian businessman Nikolai Glushkov in south-west London.

    Police say Mr Glushkov, whose family has been informed, died from "compression to the neck".

    Police say there is, at this stage, no evidence linking the death to the incidents in Salisbury,

    Mr Glushkov is the former deputy director of Russian state airline Aeroflot.

    He was jailed in 1999 for five years after being charged with money laundering and fraud.
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456

    No, I think taking your time and getting it right on this works best here. Where we wanted and needed instant action like Grenfall we see the dragging of feet!

    What a ridiculous post.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,729
    edited March 2018
    Why? - more people died. We are still having arguments on the representation on the enquiry! You think I am appeasing the Russians when I am merely saying slow down and get all the facts!
  • Greenie said:

    Greenie said:

    sm said:

    Greenie said:

    .

    And there was me thinking that the lesson of history was that it was appeasement that led to wars rather than keeping the peace.
    Please clarify which part of history are you on about, your comment is a bit vague.
    Well I am surrounded by 15 million people who if you asked them would answer in unison "Neville fucking Chamberlain", for starters.

    Ahh old Nev again...then you dont know your history PA, its well documented that clever Nev was playing for time, he knew Adolf was on the war path, he also know that like now we have a very underfunded war machine, he also knew that Britain was his country and prioritised it above all other countries (quite right. 15 million people in other counties were not his responsibility). There is audio statement at the IWM of a member of his staff who said after 'the peace in our time' speech that Nev said to him, 'get yourself trained if you want to be in the Air Force, war is not far away'.
    At the time Chamberlain was pilloried for being subservient to Hitler, because he didn't puff his chest out and bang the war drum, but it transpires that he was right. However people dont want to know that because it doesn't fit in with their narrative.
    Great men make the right decisions for their country not for their party, or what the average bloke in the street thinks he knows.
    Nail on head, I repeat i'm no JC fan, but he's calling for prudence and proof before jumping off. The iraq reference was clumsy (and about as relevant as comparisons to chamberlain) but his message is being distorted through short term hysteria.
  • sm
    sm Posts: 2,958

    sm said:

    Comparing to Neville Chamberlain is beyond ridiculous :)

    How about Lord Rothermere or all those so called socialists who turned a blind eye to Uncle Joe?
    It was the socialists who were on the streets of this country fighting the facists.
    Not much fight shown against the likes of Putin who displays not a few fascist tendencies however.
  • sm
    sm Posts: 2,958

    Why? - more people died. We are still having arguments on the representation on the enquiry! You think I am appeasing the Russians when I am merely saying slow down and get all the facts!

    I've been looking at the facts on Putin for years - have you read Bill Browder's book on the death of Sergei Magnitsky?
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,729
    edited March 2018
    sm said:

    sm said:

    Comparing to Neville Chamberlain is beyond ridiculous :)

    How about Lord Rothermere or all those so called socialists who turned a blind eye to Uncle Joe?
    It was the socialists who were on the streets of this country fighting the facists.
    Not much fight shown against the likes of Putin who displays not a few fascist tendencies however.
    Are you honestly being serious? Go over to Russia and fight for the resistance there then! There are lots of unsavoury leaders in the world and Putin is one of them. we have a sorry history of supporting ones that have benefitted our country and we are very happy to launder dirty Russian money! What people are saying against the irrational and rabid is take a breath and do it properly and try to understand the best way to get the outcome you want and ideally the one that makes it less likely to be repeated and the world a safer place. How unreasonable is that?
  • sm
    sm Posts: 2,958

    More interesting developments - unconnected they say?
    Hmmmm.

    bbc
    UK police have launched a murder investigation after the death of Russian businessman Nikolai Glushkov in south-west London.

    Police say Mr Glushkov, whose family has been informed, died from "compression to the neck".

    Police say there is, at this stage, no evidence linking the death to the incidents in Salisbury,

    Mr Glushkov is the former deputy director of Russian state airline Aeroflot.

    He was jailed in 1999 for five years after being charged with money laundering and fraud.

    Jailed By Putin who is rather selective, to say the least, when it comes to who is accused of money laundering and fraud. Remember Putin's declared income is a mere c$100k per year and he has hardly any assets other than a garage in St Pete's- but I doubt he will be handed in for tax fraud.
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    Greenie said:

    Greenie said:

    sm said:

    Greenie said:

    .

    And there was me thinking that the lesson of history was that it was appeasement that led to wars rather than keeping the peace.
    Please clarify which part of history are you on about, your comment is a bit vague.
    Well I am surrounded by 15 million people who if you asked them would answer in unison "Neville fucking Chamberlain", for starters.

    Ahh old Nev again...then you dont know your history PA, its well documented that clever Nev was playing for time, he knew Adolf was on the war path, he also know that like now we have a very underfunded war machine, he also knew that Britain was his country and prioritised it above all other countries (quite right. 15 million people in other counties were not his responsibility). There is audio statement at the IWM of a member of his staff who said after 'the peace in our time' speech that Nev said to him, 'get yourself trained if you want to be in the Air Force, war is not far away'.
    At the time Chamberlain was pilloried for being subservient to Hitler, because he didn't puff his chest out and bang the war drum, but it transpires that he was right. However people dont want to know that because it doesn't fit in with their narrative.
    Great men make the right decisions for their country not for their party, or what the average bloke in the street thinks he knows.
    I don’t know what history you’ve been reading.

    It’s well documented the British and French empire could’ve quite easily crushed Germany before they entered czeckoslovakia. In fact, Hitler has said that was when he was most nervous. Chamberlain then got him to sign the Munich agreement that he declared “peace of our time”.

    Chamberlain was more naive than anything.