Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

CARD to demand answers at pre-match rally on Saturday (ed. POSTPONED )

18911131417

Comments

  • Options
    Still no statement on the OS.
  • Options
    In fact where is pete's / grapevines long post or have I missed it skim reading - he usually pops up on here after a card statement - come forth out saviour this is your martine mcutchen
  • Options

    RD has just sold our best player for nothing, explicitly said that we can’t reinvest the money and still some continue to say we shouldn’t protest. Incredible.

    Exactly. I assume you're travelling down from the north for this one if we're not snowed in?
  • Options
    edited January 2018
    jamescafc said:

    colthe3rd said:

    To deal with the false “spiteful individuals” narrative, 13 people representing the various elements of the coalition met last night for two hours to consider what action to take. This was a plan worked up collectively at the meeting. There was no dissent in the room.

    The CARD statement was shared and agreed this morning by a wider group including about half a dozen people who couldn’t be there last night.

    This is how CARD works, and has always worked.

    So there would be absolutely no chance of a couple of individuals planting a seed, making suggestions and the others running with it?
    If you understood the personalities of the people round the table - all of whom have put many hours of their time into CARD over the last couple of years - you’d understand how wrong that is. It’s not just about turning up at occasional protests.

    The breadth of the group is the reason it isn’t prone to narrow agendas or reckless initiatives.
    What does this mean?
    It means that no single perspective can prevail without being challenged by others with a different background, so ideas that won’t work in practice or aren’t supported across the group won’t get adopted because they get unpicked at the discussion stage.
  • Options
    DOUCHER said:

    In fact where is pete's / grapevines long post or have I missed it skim reading - he usually pops up on here after a card statement - come forth out saviour this is your martine mcutchen

    ??
  • Options
    So we're at war and the vast majority hate the owner of the club.
    This owner is apparently looking to sell the club.
    And we're expecting the owner when he sells any players to give Robinson a percentage to buy.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    Richard Murray cannot speak for the future of the club.

    I guarantee that the most you hear will be, nothing, or that a vague promise the negotiations for the proposed takeover are ongoing, but nothing has been finalised.

    Demonstrating outside the club, the fans will let off steam and then their frustration will turn to anger.

    Roland is a coward , he will be no where near the Valley.

    He wants out, and will only sell to the highest bidder. he will make the final decision.

    Far better idea would to demonstrate outside Roland house in Belgium.

    Ruffle up Roland and his neighbours for the whole weekend, that is far better more effective course of action.
  • Options
    Many seem very sure that any potential buyer is fully aware of the facts about what's been going on under this regime. Why? Of course it's obvious to us as we've lived it day in day out. Few people outside the CAFC fraternity really understand what we've been put through and how damaging RD has been. Even selling off the silver before leaving wouldn't seem that out of order to an outsider. I'm just not sure CARD are guaranteed to get the positive press on this occasion. Lean on Murray by all means but in private not in the car park.
    As for buyers not being put off, how do we know? We don't even know for sure who they are. If Chinese or middle eastern for example then gatherings of such nature are not something they would be used to and could be misconstrued. They might not want/need the agro when I'm sure other clubs are available to buy without the hassle of a disgruntled fan base.
    That's really my only worry other than I don't see RM being able to say anything worthwhile so it all seems a bit pointless.
    That's my opinion and it's just that, an opinion. I'm certainly no apologist and want him gone for good in the hope of a better future. And hope is all we can do as no car park gatherings are going to guarantee that
  • Options

    Richard Murray cannot speak for the future of the club.

    I guarantee that the most you hear will be, nothing, or that a vague promise the negotiations for the proposed takeover are ongoing, but nothing has been finalised.

    Demonstrating outside the club, the fans will let off steam and then their frustration will turn to anger.

    Roland is a coward , he will be no where near the Valley.

    He wants out, and will only sell to the highest bidder. he will make the final decision.

    Far better idea would to demonstrate outside Roland house in Belgium.

    Ruffle up Roland and his neighbours for the whole weekend, that is far better more effective course of action.

    A campaign isn't about a single act that will bring about change. That's unrealistic. We're here today, in my view, because the protests have been varied, generally well targeted, and different actions and different groups have complemented each other.

    Getting violent isn't the way, of course. Right now though, the club know CARD hasn't gone away and continues to have effective sway on the media and hopefully in numbers in protest.

    But Saturday is a rally gathering to hear what the conduit between board and fans has to tell us about the security of our club and its integrity in competition.
  • Options
    I think Murray would be best advised to provide an update this week referring to KR mentioning that was his plan to do so. In that statement, he could say that he is going as far as he can but talks are at a sensitive stage and he understands the anxiety of fans, but he hopes for a swift resolution.
  • Options
    I hope egos are not what is driving this. I hope there is one deep rooted aim and that is support for Charlton and to see the failure of RD and KM gone. KM has gone but the poison is still in the club.
    My take is to expect Murray to come and address the crowd is a rather far fetched expectation.
    We all appear to be of the view Murray has been too supportive of the current regime and now is his time to assist the club.
    I feel he may respond but not to a shouting protest.
    It would be wise for CARD to write him a letter ( their words are usually excellent) symbolically present it to the club at the protest and let him respond to that. I hope the response may be directly to CARD
    , which they can publish, or through the club.
    He must know what is needed and that he is expected to manage in a different way. If he does not, forget the protest- all is lost.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options

    Just read through the whole of this thread and have come to the conclusion that as is nearly always the case, CARD have announced a well thought through protest that puts Murray/the club on the spot. Trouble for me is that it comes about a month too late.
    The announcement of a protest before the transfer window began would have drawn even more criticism and dissent, and would likely have been less popular on the day. However, knowing the history of Duchatelet with football clubs, going back way before he got his claws into Charlton, this transfer window outcome was inevitable unless some fool coughed up his ridiculous asking price. In my view, these (or similar) questions and requests for guarantees should have been asked of the owner and CEO before Christmas, not of a doddery old twat with no authority a week or so before the window ends!
    I think many of us perhaps felt a sense of complacency that the sale would go through in good time, the squad would be replenished in January and we would at least be contesting the play-offs. The opportunity was there on the back of the ROT election campaign announcement for further pressure to be exerted, for assurances to be sought from those in a real position of power, not a cardboard cut-out left to face the crowd!
    I think the protest movement as a whole needs to up the ante, here as well as in Belgium, even if it means making what might be seen initially as unpopular decisions. We cut Roland some slack thinking he would be gone by now and look at what he is currently doing to our club, eviscerating it before our eyes!
    Let's not be fooled again. We need to continually ramp up the pressure any way we can until Duchatelet has gone.


    I've got so flippin' wound up typing this that I won't be able to sleep now and I need to be up for work in 5 hours!!

    I've had mixed feelings about this approach and have spent a lot of time trying to figure out why. @foresthillred's post has clarified it perfectly for me. So THIS.
  • Options
    edited January 2018

    clb74 said:

    So we're at war and the vast majority hate the owner of the club.
    This owner is apparently looking to sell the club.
    And we're expecting the owner when he sells any players to give Robinson a percentage to buy.

    We’re expecting the owner not to weaken a promotion chasing team while he has a financial interest in its status next season.
    When you say expect, is that in the form of a prediction or a demand?

    I only ask because in the form or a prediction that is, exactly, what I expect him to do. Not just because he is selling the club and will be keen not to reward the fans that have been refraining from putting money into the club by not buying programs, burgers etc. but because that is what he has done previously.

    If I were a betting man I would put all my money on him weakening the squad.
  • Options
    I think this offers Murray an opportunity to reposition himself. If I was advising him, I would suggest he makes as comprehensive a statement as he can, but not face to face, but in the next day or so.
  • Options
    JamesSeed said:

    colthe3rd said:

    colthe3rd said:

    colthe3rd said:

    To deal with the false “spiteful individuals” narrative, 13 people representing the various elements of the coalition met last night for two hours to consider what action to take. This was a plan worked up collectively at the meeting. There was no dissent in the room.

    The CARD statement was shared and agreed this morning by a wider group including about half a dozen people who couldn’t be there last night.

    This is how CARD works, and has always worked.

    So there would be absolutely no chance of a couple of individuals planting a seed, making suggestions and the others running with it?
    If you understood the personalities of the people round the table - all of whom have put many hours of their time into CARD over the last couple of years - you’d understand how wrong that is. It’s not just about turning up at occasional protests.

    The breadth of the group is the reason it isn’t prone to narrow agendas or reckless initiatives.
    Well I can only take your word for it but this idea seems to have missed the mark. I don't remember so many on here questioning CARD's proposed actions so much and it hasn't even been stickied.

    Can you explain what the point of this exercise is and if it's a long term play how does it fit in?
    Yet it has attracted 116 likes, which is vastly more than any critical comment made about it.

    For the reasons I’ve already set out, I don’t and won’t speak for others involved in CARD. It’s fair comment that people can’t be expected to judge other people who haven’t identified themselves, but I think the idea CARD is a narrow group needs to be knocked down.

    It’s very unlikely that any statement would achieve universal support and of course in drawing up any plan you look at its shortcomings and weigh them up. But you might adopt it in spite of these.

    My view is that a situation in which RD sells Konsa, possibly others, puts nothing back in and then continues to own the club as the season dribbles away is unacceptable. If that is the position then we may not be able to stop it but we should certainly not accept it. I don’t think Karl Robinson accepts it either.

    Richard Murray chose to be Duchatelet’s spokesperson and recently has chosen to take on an active role within the club. He’s not an employee - he can’t be ordered to do so. As such I really don’t see why he shouldn’t be asked again for the statement that Robinson was pretty obviously trying to force him to make with his comments last Saturday.

    Do you really think Robinson was under the impression RM planned to make a statement?
    I stated that I don't remember so many on here not in full support. Go back to other initiatives and how many negative comments were there from long term posters and going by your metric of success how many likes did it get?

    Regardless, you haven't really answered my questions though. You'd do well as a politician.

    And just to add CARD haven't asked Murray for a statement, they've demanded guarantees. The two are quite different.
    As a matter of interest is there a point at which you would be happy to add your voice to any protest? If Konsa is sold? If Aribo joins him? Bauer? Clarke? Becuase that isn't outside the realms of possibility.
    Or is it ok to sit back and watch it happen without comment?
    And as for some people saying that we should acquiesce in case we put off prospective owners. Well if any prospective owners aren't well intentioned, then I hope the fact that Charlton fans don't take it lying down does put them off.

    This protest was never going to be as do or die as previous protests held when Duchatelet was refusing to budge over many issues including his ownership, because there's a sense of relief that the club is finally up for sale. But what harm could it do to let the world know that some things are still happening that don't sit well with us.
    Would I be pissed off and very angry about it? Yes of course. If Roland is going to sell those players and not reinvest in the team is this protest/gathering whatever you want to call it going to make any bit of difference? Let's face it he has been doing it since he took over and the protests haven't sopped him.

    I'm just questioning what this action hopes to achieve and what (if any) the long term goal is of it. I could potentially see some credit in it if it's leading to a bigger play but someone from CARD needs to say so because on the face of it this action on it's own has very little merit.

    So back down with your condescending post.
  • Options
    All the time Duchatelet remains as owner there is nothing that we can do to stop him selling players (assuming that the players in question agree to the move).
    If, however, I was one of the prospective buyers I would be monitoring the situation during the transfer window. If I had a tentative offer of say £25m on the table and the club sold players for £5m, then surely my revised offer would be £20m and Roland doesn't actually gain anything. Or am I being too simplistic?
  • Options

    Addickted said:

    What if Murray decides to not turn up on Saturday?

    Which is highly likely.
    Then he should answer fan's legitimate concerns about the club in a statement or at a press conference beforehand. If he has now adopted or accepted RD's view that there is no need as in effect acting CEO of a football club to communicate with fans then he should resign.
  • Options
    AddickFC81; it is not a protest, it is a rally.

    We are seeking answers and clarification.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!