Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)
Comments
-
We've been wondering why Muir would be having any trouble putting the money together for this. What if HE is the one the EFL disallowed and the rest of the consortium are trying to put the money together to salvage the takeover?2
-
When we hit 1000 pages can we have a 24 hr truce and a game of football before going back in our trenches and lobbing truths, half-truths, lies, and brickbats again ?8
-
Did you find out his favourite Pot Noodle?soapboxsam said:
Just a few more questions if you don't mine ,J BLOCK said:
Genuinely, I’m as sick of all this as everyone else, can tell you straight up I’m not lying.soapboxsam said:
Well I trust your not pulling our plonker J Block because when my son tried to get information out of Elliott at the Olympic stadium last month he laughed and said my lips are sealed.J BLOCK said:Something else to add to this, I was in a boozer in petts wood last night and spoke to Paul Elliott for a short while who was in there, he said he’s doing a lot of work down at Charlton and “watch next week” was his words.
What was Paul Elliott drinking ?
Did he wink when he said 'watch next week ?
Are you 100% sure it wasn't a dead ringer ?
Did anyone else hear PE say these words ?
Do you crave to be ITK ?
Were you sober at the time ?
Is your hearing 100 % ?
Do you know Doucher ?
Thanks for you time J block,
Answers in your own time or by midday today,
Cheers mate.2 -
To the trolls like Dick and Stu, this was because someone asked if Muir was still in Britain twice and I didn't see it, and then two people asked how I knew my contact, and again, I didn't see it. So I'd prefer it if people could message me, if that's ok with you. You can pop back to Nick on the other forum and tell him you had a pop at me though. I'm sure he'll be proud of you. Pathetic.JamesSeed said:If anyone wants to know anything can they put it in a message to me please.
15 -
Get over yourself ffs. Seriously, just because other people see things differently or disagree with you does not make them a troll.JamesSeed said:
To the trolls like Dick and Stu, this was because someone asked if Muir was still in Britain twice and I didn't see it, and then two people asked how I knew my contact, and again, I didn't see it. So I'd prefer it if people could message me, if that's ok with you. You can pop back to Nick on the other forum and tell him you had a pop at me though. I'm sure he'll be proud of you. Pathetic.JamesSeed said:If anyone wants to know anything can they put it in a message to me please.
You've been a Charlton fan 5 minutes and you're on here telling long term Charlton fans and posters every 5 minutes how to behave and think about our club.
Seriously wind your ego in.21 -
oh my lord, its like a school playground on here!15
-
Wow, this thread is going off the reservation now.
Some random tweet sparks a load of teeth nashing and stropping.
Sort yourselves out2 -
nth london addick said:
all We need now is people being called trolls then we will hit the full house of tonight’s flouncing bingo evening session.
HouseJamesSeed said:
To the trolls like Dick and Stu, this was because someone asked if Muir was still in Britain twice and I didn't see it, and then two people asked how I knew my contact, and again, I didn't see it. So I'd prefer it if people could message me, if that's ok with you. You can pop back to Nick on the other forum and tell him you had a pop at me though. I'm sure he'll be proud of you. Pathetic.JamesSeed said:If anyone wants to know anything can they put it in a message to me please.
20 -
Muir and others have plenty of money, they're not struggling to fund the takeover themselves - they don't want to. The investors have pooled their funds to spread the risk. Buying a 3rd division football club and taking it to the Premiership is a high risk strategy that has a good chance of failing. By getting a consortium in place the potential losses and gains are diluted - reducing the risk. I think Swansea did something similar very successfully and only declined when the consortium sold (though I might be wrong on that bit). They were certainly considered a very well run club for a number of years.NapaAddick said:We've been wondering why Muir would be having any trouble putting the money together for this. What if HE is the one the EFL disallowed and the rest of the consortium are trying to put the money together to salvage the takeover?
If what we are hearing about two investors being declined by the EFL is true, then I expect a number of conversations in the background are happening re whether the other investors will stump up more cash (and therefore increase their risk exposure), whether they can find new investors to replace the funding, or whether RD will lower the price and therefore reduce the risk to the same levels previously accepted. To do this RD may decide to invest further in Charlton and clear the first charge debts on the assets (£7mil) in order to lease the valley and training ground as a long term revenue stream to compensate for a lower sale price than he finds acceptable. This seems a logical step for both parties if they can't find the right funding and risk exposure, even if it is a truly unpalatable thought for us fans.16 - Sponsored links:
-
By Jove you have hit the nail right on the SwedeBeardface said:
Muir and others have plenty of money, they're not struggling to fund the takeover themselves - they don't want to. The investors have pooled their funds to spread the risk. Buying a 3rd division football club and taking it to the Premiership is a high risk strategy that has a good chance of failing. By getting a consortium in place the potential losses and gains are diluted - reducing the risk. I think Swansea did something similar very successfully and only declined when the consortium sold (though I might be wrong on that bit). They were certainly considered a very well run club for a number of years.NapaAddick said:We've been wondering why Muir would be having any trouble putting the money together for this. What if HE is the one the EFL disallowed and the rest of the consortium are trying to put the money together to salvage the takeover?
If what we are hearing about two investors being declined by the EFL is true, then I expect a number of conversations in the background are happening re whether the other investors will stump up more cash (and therefore increase their risk exposure), whether they can find new investors to replace the funding, or whether RD will lower the price and therefore reduce the risk to the same levels previously accepted. To do this RD may decide to invest further in Charlton and clear the first charge debts on the assets (£7mil) in order to lease the valley and training ground as a long term revenue stream to compensate for a lower sale price than he finds acceptable. This seems a logical step for both parties if they can't find the right funding and risk exposure, even if it is a truly unpalatable thought for us fans.
You have posted it in a much better way than I have tried to
Doff my cap to you4 -
Anyone for Horlicks?0
-
Don't be so tight on the 'likes' then D, give him onenth london addick said:
By Jove you have hit the nail right on the SwedeBeardface said:
Muir and others have plenty of money, they're not struggling to fund the takeover themselves - they don't want to. The investors have pooled their funds to spread the risk. Buying a 3rd division football club and taking it to the Premiership is a high risk strategy that has a good chance of failing. By getting a consortium in place the potential losses and gains are diluted - reducing the risk. I think Swansea did something similar very successfully and only declined when the consortium sold (though I might be wrong on that bit). They were certainly considered a very well run club for a number of years.NapaAddick said:We've been wondering why Muir would be having any trouble putting the money together for this. What if HE is the one the EFL disallowed and the rest of the consortium are trying to put the money together to salvage the takeover?
If what we are hearing about two investors being declined by the EFL is true, then I expect a number of conversations in the background are happening re whether the other investors will stump up more cash (and therefore increase their risk exposure), whether they can find new investors to replace the funding, or whether RD will lower the price and therefore reduce the risk to the same levels previously accepted. To do this RD may decide to invest further in Charlton and clear the first charge debts on the assets (£7mil) in order to lease the valley and training ground as a long term revenue stream to compensate for a lower sale price than he finds acceptable. This seems a logical step for both parties if they can't find the right funding and risk exposure, even if it is a truly unpalatable thought for us fans.
You have posted it in a much better way than I have tried to
Doff my cap to you
2 -
Done I was hoping big rob from France would give it a promoteRedChaser said:
Don't be so tight on the 'likes' then D, give him onenth london addick said:
By Jove you have hit the nail right on the SwedeBeardface said:
Muir and others have plenty of money, they're not struggling to fund the takeover themselves - they don't want to. The investors have pooled their funds to spread the risk. Buying a 3rd division football club and taking it to the Premiership is a high risk strategy that has a good chance of failing. By getting a consortium in place the potential losses and gains are diluted - reducing the risk. I think Swansea did something similar very successfully and only declined when the consortium sold (though I might be wrong on that bit). They were certainly considered a very well run club for a number of years.NapaAddick said:We've been wondering why Muir would be having any trouble putting the money together for this. What if HE is the one the EFL disallowed and the rest of the consortium are trying to put the money together to salvage the takeover?
If what we are hearing about two investors being declined by the EFL is true, then I expect a number of conversations in the background are happening re whether the other investors will stump up more cash (and therefore increase their risk exposure), whether they can find new investors to replace the funding, or whether RD will lower the price and therefore reduce the risk to the same levels previously accepted. To do this RD may decide to invest further in Charlton and clear the first charge debts on the assets (£7mil) in order to lease the valley and training ground as a long term revenue stream to compensate for a lower sale price than he finds acceptable. This seems a logical step for both parties if they can't find the right funding and risk exposure, even if it is a truly unpalatable thought for us fans.
You have posted it in a much better way than I have tried to
Doff my cap to you2 -
Except on SundaysAppyAddick said:Breakfast
Lunch
Dinner followed by pudding
End of
FACT
BAASS.........
Dinner was earlier then you had a sunday tea with tinned salmon sandwiches, cockles, prawns, winkles and whelks and a homemade sponge cake.2 -
No time for that at the moment, he's on tenterhooks mate with all the other Mods waiting for this thread to hit 1000 and the subsequent meltdown of the sitenth london addick said:
Done I was hoping big rob from France would give it a promoteRedChaser said:
Don't be so tight on the 'likes' then D, give him onenth london addick said:
By Jove you have hit the nail right on the SwedeBeardface said:
Muir and others have plenty of money, they're not struggling to fund the takeover themselves - they don't want to. The investors have pooled their funds to spread the risk. Buying a 3rd division football club and taking it to the Premiership is a high risk strategy that has a good chance of failing. By getting a consortium in place the potential losses and gains are diluted - reducing the risk. I think Swansea did something similar very successfully and only declined when the consortium sold (though I might be wrong on that bit). They were certainly considered a very well run club for a number of years.NapaAddick said:We've been wondering why Muir would be having any trouble putting the money together for this. What if HE is the one the EFL disallowed and the rest of the consortium are trying to put the money together to salvage the takeover?
If what we are hearing about two investors being declined by the EFL is true, then I expect a number of conversations in the background are happening re whether the other investors will stump up more cash (and therefore increase their risk exposure), whether they can find new investors to replace the funding, or whether RD will lower the price and therefore reduce the risk to the same levels previously accepted. To do this RD may decide to invest further in Charlton and clear the first charge debts on the assets (£7mil) in order to lease the valley and training ground as a long term revenue stream to compensate for a lower sale price than he finds acceptable. This seems a logical step for both parties if they can't find the right funding and risk exposure, even if it is a truly unpalatable thought for us fans.
You have posted it in a much better way than I have tried to
Doff my cap to you 1 -
I hope the takerover happens or collapses on pg 999RedChaser said:
No time for that at the moment, he's on tenterhooks mate with all the other Mods waiting for this thread to hit 1000 and the subsequent meltdown of the sitenth london addick said:
Done I was hoping big rob from France would give it a promoteRedChaser said:
Don't be so tight on the 'likes' then D, give him onenth london addick said:
By Jove you have hit the nail right on the SwedeBeardface said:
Muir and others have plenty of money, they're not struggling to fund the takeover themselves - they don't want to. The investors have pooled their funds to spread the risk. Buying a 3rd division football club and taking it to the Premiership is a high risk strategy that has a good chance of failing. By getting a consortium in place the potential losses and gains are diluted - reducing the risk. I think Swansea did something similar very successfully and only declined when the consortium sold (though I might be wrong on that bit). They were certainly considered a very well run club for a number of years.NapaAddick said:We've been wondering why Muir would be having any trouble putting the money together for this. What if HE is the one the EFL disallowed and the rest of the consortium are trying to put the money together to salvage the takeover?
If what we are hearing about two investors being declined by the EFL is true, then I expect a number of conversations in the background are happening re whether the other investors will stump up more cash (and therefore increase their risk exposure), whether they can find new investors to replace the funding, or whether RD will lower the price and therefore reduce the risk to the same levels previously accepted. To do this RD may decide to invest further in Charlton and clear the first charge debts on the assets (£7mil) in order to lease the valley and training ground as a long term revenue stream to compensate for a lower sale price than he finds acceptable. This seems a logical step for both parties if they can't find the right funding and risk exposure, even if it is a truly unpalatable thought for us fans.
You have posted it in a much better way than I have tried to
Doff my cap to you2 -
And if its any consolation, I looked up the definition of "Binary"nth london addick said:
Done I was hoping big rob from France would give it a promoteRedChaser said:
Don't be so tight on the 'likes' then D, give him onenth london addick said:
By Jove you have hit the nail right on the SwedeBeardface said:
Muir and others have plenty of money, they're not struggling to fund the takeover themselves - they don't want to. The investors have pooled their funds to spread the risk. Buying a 3rd division football club and taking it to the Premiership is a high risk strategy that has a good chance of failing. By getting a consortium in place the potential losses and gains are diluted - reducing the risk. I think Swansea did something similar very successfully and only declined when the consortium sold (though I might be wrong on that bit). They were certainly considered a very well run club for a number of years.NapaAddick said:We've been wondering why Muir would be having any trouble putting the money together for this. What if HE is the one the EFL disallowed and the rest of the consortium are trying to put the money together to salvage the takeover?
If what we are hearing about two investors being declined by the EFL is true, then I expect a number of conversations in the background are happening re whether the other investors will stump up more cash (and therefore increase their risk exposure), whether they can find new investors to replace the funding, or whether RD will lower the price and therefore reduce the risk to the same levels previously accepted. To do this RD may decide to invest further in Charlton and clear the first charge debts on the assets (£7mil) in order to lease the valley and training ground as a long term revenue stream to compensate for a lower sale price than he finds acceptable. This seems a logical step for both parties if they can't find the right funding and risk exposure, even if it is a truly unpalatable thought for us fans.
You have posted it in a much better way than I have tried to
Doff my cap to you
A collection of Wheelie Bins is commonly known as a "Binary"
We are on this earth to learn!! 8 -
Nah, not having that I'm calling your bluff: A Binary is a bin with lots of aeration holes in it to release its pungent smells.T_C_E said:
And if its any consolation, I looked up the definition of "Binary"nth london addick said:
Done I was hoping big rob from France would give it a promoteRedChaser said:
Don't be so tight on the 'likes' then D, give him onenth london addick said:
By Jove you have hit the nail right on the SwedeBeardface said:
Muir and others have plenty of money, they're not struggling to fund the takeover themselves - they don't want to. The investors have pooled their funds to spread the risk. Buying a 3rd division football club and taking it to the Premiership is a high risk strategy that has a good chance of failing. By getting a consortium in place the potential losses and gains are diluted - reducing the risk. I think Swansea did something similar very successfully and only declined when the consortium sold (though I might be wrong on that bit). They were certainly considered a very well run club for a number of years.NapaAddick said:We've been wondering why Muir would be having any trouble putting the money together for this. What if HE is the one the EFL disallowed and the rest of the consortium are trying to put the money together to salvage the takeover?
If what we are hearing about two investors being declined by the EFL is true, then I expect a number of conversations in the background are happening re whether the other investors will stump up more cash (and therefore increase their risk exposure), whether they can find new investors to replace the funding, or whether RD will lower the price and therefore reduce the risk to the same levels previously accepted. To do this RD may decide to invest further in Charlton and clear the first charge debts on the assets (£7mil) in order to lease the valley and training ground as a long term revenue stream to compensate for a lower sale price than he finds acceptable. This seems a logical step for both parties if they can't find the right funding and risk exposure, even if it is a truly unpalatable thought for us fans.
You have posted it in a much better way than I have tried to
Doff my cap to you
A collection of Wheelie Bins is commonly known as a "Binary"
We are on this earth to learn!!
1 -
I still don’t know what the fuck it means2
- Sponsored links:
-
Yes and you’re just another troll. It’s always the same people. I don’t give a flying f what you think of me.RodneyCharltonTrotta said:
Get over yourself ffs. Seriously, just because other people see things differently or disagree with you does not make them a troll.JamesSeed said:
To the trolls like Dick and Stu, this was because someone asked if Muir was still in Britain twice and I didn't see it, and then two people asked how I knew my contact, and again, I didn't see it. So I'd prefer it if people could message me, if that's ok with you. You can pop back to Nick on the other forum and tell him you had a pop at me though. I'm sure he'll be proud of you. Pathetic.JamesSeed said:If anyone wants to know anything can they put it in a message to me please.
You've been a Charlton fan 5 minutes and you're on here telling long term Charlton fans and posters every 5 minutes how to behave and think about our club.
Seriously wind your ego in.
It’s always the same shit propogsted by your leader Nick Gray. Just F off back to your sad little forum. And your middle name isn’t Charlton, unlike mine.7 -
A Binary is a gender fluid Nary1
-
JamesSeed said:
Yes and you’re just another troll. It’s always the same people. I don’t give a flying f what you think of me.RodneyCharltonTrotta said:
Get over yourself ffs. Seriously, just because other people see things differently or disagree with you does not make them a troll.JamesSeed said:
To the trolls like Dick and Stu, this was because someone asked if Muir was still in Britain twice and I didn't see it, and then two people asked how I knew my contact, and again, I didn't see it. So I'd prefer it if people could message me, if that's ok with you. You can pop back to Nick on the other forum and tell him you had a pop at me though. I'm sure he'll be proud of you. Pathetic.JamesSeed said:If anyone wants to know anything can they put it in a message to me please.
You've been a Charlton fan 5 minutes and you're on here telling long term Charlton fans and posters every 5 minutes how to behave and think about our club.
Seriously wind your ego in.
It’s always the same shit propogsted by your leader Nick Gray. Just F off back to your sad little forum. And your middle name isn’t Charlton, unlike mine.
Get a grip. No idea what forum are you talking about and you are coming across as paranoid. Regardless of whether or not my middle name is Charlton I'm a Charlton fan and always have been.
Enjoy your 15 minutes of fame you utter oddball and pull yourself together ffs.
Back to ignore mode.13 -
@JamesSeed you really are in need of a time out
RCT is a proper fella as is @Stu_of_Kunming and @dickplumb
You’ve been rude and aggressive all day
A few days ago I raised concern that you were being targeted but it seems I need not have shown such concern for your well being12 -
JamesSeed said:
To the trolls like Dick and Stu, this was because someone asked if Muir was still in Britain twice and I didn't see it, and then two people asked how I knew my contact, and again, I didn't see it. So I'd prefer it if people could message me, if that's ok with you. You can pop back to Nick on the other forum and tell him you had a pop at me though. I'm sure he'll be proud of you. Pathetic.JamesSeed said:If anyone wants to know anything can they put it in a message to me please.
3 -
Admin can you close this thread now please.
Mwah, Mwah, Mwah2 -
400 pages too late.Charltonparklane said:Admin can you close this thread now please.
1 -
RodneyCharltonTrotta said:JamesSeed said:
Yes and you’re just another troll. It’s always the same people. I don’t give a flying f what you think of me.RodneyCharltonTrotta said:
Get over yourself ffs. Seriously, just because other people see things differently or disagree with you does not make them a troll.JamesSeed said:
To the trolls like Dick and Stu, this was because someone asked if Muir was still in Britain twice and I didn't see it, and then two people asked how I knew my contact, and again, I didn't see it. So I'd prefer it if people could message me, if that's ok with you. You can pop back to Nick on the other forum and tell him you had a pop at me though. I'm sure he'll be proud of you. Pathetic.JamesSeed said:If anyone wants to know anything can they put it in a message to me please.
You've been a Charlton fan 5 minutes and you're on here telling long term Charlton fans and posters every 5 minutes how to behave and think about our club.
Seriously wind your ego in.
It’s always the same shit propogsted by your leader Nick Gray. Just F off back to your sad little forum. And your middle name isn’t Charlton, unlike mine.
Get a grip. No idea what forum are you talking about and you are coming across as paranoid. Regardless of whether or not my middle name is Charlton I'm a Charlton fan and always have been.
Enjoy your 15 minutes of fame you utter oddball and pull yourself together ffs.
Back to ignore mode.
An investor connected to a British club had to pull out because of those connections. A new investor is nearly in place. They’ll be buying the club and the ground.nth london addick said:
By Jove you have hit the nail right on the SwedeBeardface said:
Muir and others have plenty of money, they're not struggling to fund the takeover themselves - they don't want to. The investors have pooled their funds to spread the risk. Buying a 3rd division football club and taking it to the Premiership is a high risk strategy that has a good chance of failing. By getting a consortium in place the potential losses and gains are diluted - reducing the risk. I think Swansea did something similar very successfully and only declined when the consortium sold (though I might be wrong on that bit). They were certainly considered a very well run club for a number of years.NapaAddick said:We've been wondering why Muir would be having any trouble putting the money together for this. What if HE is the one the EFL disallowed and the rest of the consortium are trying to put the money together to salvage the takeover?
If what we are hearing about two investors being declined by the EFL is true, then I expect a number of conversations in the background are happening re whether the other investors will stump up more cash (and therefore increase their risk exposure), whether they can find new investors to replace the funding, or whether RD will lower the price and therefore reduce the risk to the same levels previously accepted. To do this RD may decide to invest further in Charlton and clear the first charge debts on the assets (£7mil) in order to lease the valley and training ground as a long term revenue stream to compensate for a lower sale price than he finds acceptable. This seems a logical step for both parties if they can't find the right funding and risk exposure, even if it is a truly unpalatable thought for us fans.
You have posted it in a much better way than I have tried to
Doff my cap to you16 -
Thanks JamesSeed hopefully over soon!3
-
I really hope so.superdulvertonred said:Thanks JamesSeed hopefully over soon!
3
This discussion has been closed.
