Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Richard Murray

24

Comments

  • I was going to post on here trying to defend Richard Murrey having met him several times over the years. But having read that interview posted by Scoham it is obvious that he totally supports Douchbag .
    As Douchbag represents every thing that is wrong with Charlton i cannot even try to defend Murrey, I'm afraid he is now part of the problem himself.
  • NugNug
    edited November 2016

    From what i gleaned from David White's remarks, Murray only has one horse. If he resigns he's out of Charlton/football for ever, if he sticks around he can influence the terms on which a new owner comes in and sustain his ego with a key position on the board. If ego is your driver, you do what you need to do, and the devil takes the hindmost. Murray is for himself, we're deluded if we think he will act in any other way.

    That's what I took from it and in my opinion the reason he will try to stop Varney being involed as he knows he'll be out. Nice to meet you last night Dippenhall!
  • RD thinking Fraeye was a good appointment is one thing, but what convinced Murray that Fraeye was up to it? Because he had a good relationship with the owner? Scouted our signings so had knowledge of them?
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited November 2016

    I just hope the next owners buy him out and tell him to do one.

    Me too but it depends what the terms of sale of the.club are, whether it includes the ground, god forbid if RD wants to hold on to it and only lease it to the club.

    If the ground is included in the sale, remember it can only can take place with the former directors agreement to it and anyone of them could block dealings in it .

    If it were me I would want my money out but would Murray? who could use this as a bargaining tool for a seat at the top table once again :open_mouth:
  • RedChaser said:

    I just hope the next owners buy him out and tell him to do one.

    Me too but it depends what the terms of sale of the.club are, whether it includes the ground, god forbid if RD wants to hold on to it and only lease it to the club.

    If the ground is included in the sale, remember it can only can take place with the former directors agreement to it and anyone of them could block dealings in it .

    If it were me I would want my money out but would Murray? who could use this as a bargaining tool for a seat at the top table once again :open_mouth:
    I'd hope any potential owner would laugh Duchatelet out the building at the prospect at him keeping hold of the ground or training ground.
  • RedChaser said:

    I just hope the next owners buy him out and tell him to do one.

    Me too but it depends what the terms of sale of the.club are, whether it includes the ground, god forbid if RD wants to hold on to it and only lease it to the club.

    If the ground is included in the sale, remember it can only can take place with the former directors agreement to it and anyone of them could block dealings in it .

    If it were me I would want my money out but would Murray? who could use this as a bargaining tool for a seat at the top table once again :open_mouth:
    I'd hope any potential owner would laugh Duchatelet out the building at the prospect at him keeping hold of the ground or training ground.
    Ron Noades managed to keep hold of Sainsburys much to the cost of Goldberg and Orange face.
  • RedChaser said:

    I just hope the next owners buy him out and tell him to do one.

    Me too but it depends what the terms of sale of the.club are, whether it includes the ground, god forbid if RD wants to hold on to it and only lease it to the club.

    If the ground is included in the sale, remember it can only can take place with the former directors agreement to it and anyone of them could block dealings in it .

    If it were me I would want my money out but would Murray? who could use this as a bargaining tool for a seat at the top table once again :open_mouth:
    I'd hope any potential owner would laugh Duchatelet out the building at the prospect at him keeping hold of the ground or training ground.
    Even if the potential owners didn't laugh at him, what would the ex-directors have to say - i.e those who legally still have funds tied up in the ground?
  • Scoham said:

    Mmmmmmmm, his support of them was for the most part when they first arrived.
    Don't get me wrong, I'd like to see him speak out too....but I'm not aware of him showing them any tangible support of late.

    Leave it out, he was still opening his beak up till 12 months ago.

    They have destroyed all the good work he did over the years and he still backed them up.

    He cannot have it both ways.
    Less than that

    http://www.cafc.co.uk/news/article/charlton-athletic-richard-murray-interview-2887963.aspx
    Interesting reflecting on that interview.

    Trying to sell it all.

    What is very very clear is that the priority is just to prove a club can still function in a league, but by spending wisely and cutting out unnecessary costs that other clubs might do.

    Absolutely nothing to do with football. Nothing to do with being competitive on the pitch.

    Nothing to do with entertainment .

    It's not even an experiment.....it's

    How much can we get away with? It's like an addiction.

    At what point will the whole thing collapse? How many things can we remove, save money on, but the wheels keeping turning?

    The whole thing was supposed to end up in league one.

    League one was our destiny from the moment Roland owned Charlton.

    If we survived last season....I think we would have eventually fielded a full acadamy 11.

    The wage budget would be pennies.
  • edited November 2016

    RedChaser said:

    I just hope the next owners buy him out and tell him to do one.

    Me too but it depends what the terms of sale of the.club are, whether it includes the ground, god forbid if RD wants to hold on to it and only lease it to the club.

    If the ground is included in the sale, remember it can only can take place with the former directors agreement to it and anyone of them could block dealings in it .

    If it were me I would want my money out but would Murray? who could use this as a bargaining tool for a seat at the top table once again :open_mouth:
    I doubt if he could sell the club without the ground and avoid having to agree it with the former directors - I think it would be triggered by change of control regardless. It appears that RD may have bought the club without even understanding the effect of their charge on the assets - certainly Meire didn't fully understand it for some time.
    If she didn't understand it albeit as a corporate lawyer rather than a conveyancer, that doesn't do her credibility any good at all, what ever small amount she may have left.

    Just as well the former directors have an arms length finger in the pie, a complication RD could have done without :smirk: .
  • Sponsored links:


  • Murray would have told them that the Loans were only repayable in Premier League and not to worry about them, other Ex Directors did the documentation with lawyers to protect themselves I believe, Murray left detail to Varney and the Lawyers normally.
    Football side of business has always been his main focus,that's why when Chappell became Chair of PLC, he just took over Chair of Football from Martin Simons.
    Let's not forget he signed Dowie,Reed,Pardew and Parkinson as Managers ,Powell was all Varney's doing the only time Murray had no involvement in football matters and we got promoted,surprise ,surprise.
    He is not just sitting next to Meire and keeping quiet,he will be involved in transfers,agents,managers all to do with football as he was the one with all the connections,she may do execution of deals and paperwork, but he will be throwing in names and calling agents, managers and clubs, he can't stop himself as someone said it is an obsession.

    Slater would have done the takeover deal with RD/KM rather than Murray though.
  • Murray would have told them that the Loans were only repayable in Premier League and not to worry about them, other Ex Directors did the documentation with lawyers to protect themselves I believe, Murray left detail to Varney and the Lawyers normally.
    Football side of business has always been his main focus,that's why when Chappell became Chair of PLC, he just took over Chair of Football from Martin Simons.
    Let's not forget he signed Dowie,Reed,Pardew and Parkinson as Managers ,Powell was all Varney's doing the only time Murray had no involvement in football matters and we got promoted,surprise ,surprise.
    He is not just sitting next to Meire and keeping quiet,he will be involved in transfers,agents,managers all to do with football as he was the one with all the connections,she may do execution of deals and paperwork, but he will be throwing in names and calling agents, managers and clubs, he can't stop himself as someone said it is an obsession.

    Slater would have done the takeover deal with RD/KM rather than Murray though.
    But I think the word was that Murray found Duchatalet, and would have talked about his own loan as biggest part and that not to worry about the other ex Directors as they would be compliant.
  • It is a shame as when he had a great manager he was a great chairman. When he had not so great managers he was not such a great chairman.
  • It is a shame as when he had a great manager he was a great chairman. When he had not so great managers he was not such a great chairman.

    He chose the not-so-great managers!
  • The fact he turned down Curbishley's offer to help him find his successor says it all , I mean seriously how on earth could Murray have believed himself to be a better footballing judge than curbs

    And then appoint Dowie!! We all know if was a point scoring thing over he old mate Tango man - which makes it even worse.
  • Dave2l said:

    Scoham said:

    Mmmmmmmm, his support of them was for the most part when they first arrived.
    Don't get me wrong, I'd like to see him speak out too....but I'm not aware of him showing them any tangible support of late.

    Leave it out, he was still opening his beak up till 12 months ago.

    They have destroyed all the good work he did over the years and he still backed them up.

    He cannot have it both ways.
    Less than that

    http://www.cafc.co.uk/news/article/charlton-athletic-richard-murray-interview-2887963.aspx
    Interesting reflecting on that interview.

    Trying to sell it all.

    What is very very clear is that the priority is just to prove a club can still function in a league, but by spending wisely and cutting out unnecessary costs that other clubs might do.

    Absolutely nothing to do with football. Nothing to do with being competitive on the pitch.

    Nothing to do with entertainment .

    It's not even an experiment.....it's

    How much can we get away with? It's like an addiction.

    At what point will the whole thing collapse? How many things can we remove, save money on, but the wheels keeping turning?

    The whole thing was supposed to end up in league one.

    League one was our destiny from the moment Roland owned Charlton.

    If we survived last season....I think we would have eventually fielded a full acadamy 11.

    The wage budget would be pennies.
    In a way Roland's biggest failure has been precisely that, as he hasn't spent wisely. Clubs like Burton Albion and indeed MKD (on the pitch) have tight transfer and wage budgets. We have spent money on players, an awful lot of which have been disasters and are currently being loaned out (with us paying part of their salary no doubt)

    By contrast we've wasted and are continuing to waste money on failed "laptop type" transfers, poor fees for selling players (e.g. JBG), poor treatment of injured players AND paying off managers

Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!