Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Charlton v A.F.C.Wimbledon

Your marks please

Rudd:
Solly:
Fox:
Konsa:
Pearce:
Holmes:
Ulvestad:
Crofts:
Lookman:
Magennis:
Ajose:

Novak n/a
«13

Comments

  • Rudd 6
    Solly 5 merked for first goal
    Fox 6.5 generally pretty assured
    Konsa 5.5 time for Bauer
    Pearce 6
    Holmes 7 a huge effort
    Ulvestad 7.5 MOM looks proper
    Crofts 7 helped us dominate midfield
    Lookman 7 great goal
    Magennis 7 good game
    Ajose 4.5 gaaaah
  • edited September 2016
    Rudd: 6
    Solly: 5
    Fox: 6
    Konsa: 6
    Pearce: 6
    Holmes: 7
    ulvastad 6.5
    Crofts: 5
    Lookman: 5 ( 7 for 1st half and 3 for a lazy 2nd half)
    Maggenis: 6
    Ajose: 4
  • Proverbial game of 2 halves

    Rudd: 6 question marks for 2nd goal. Went through him from close range.
    Solly: 6 not his usual self
    Fox: 6 meh
    Konsa: 6 some good some bad
    Pearce: 6.5 pretty dominant
    Holmes: 6 bit greedy sometimes
    Ulvestad: 6 ran the show in 1st half, not sure he came out after the break
    Crofts: 5.5 meh
    Lookman: 7 mom kept trying, lovely goal
    Magennis: 6
    Ajose: 4 anonymous. Can't read flick-ons and doesn't work hard enough imo

    Novak n/a pretty poo when he came on.

    No idea how we lost that.

  • Rudd: 5 doesn't get tested much, but doesn't save much does he?
    Solly: 4.5 captain for the game, and we looked lost as a team, and thats no coincidence.
    Fox: 5.5 couple of good passes but picked a couple of wrong balls too
    Konsa: 5.5 fairly steady
    Pearce: 4.5 hoof hoof hoof
    Holmes: 5.5 couple of great runs but by god is he a selfish prick
    Ulvestad: 5.5 decent first half, mediocre second
    Crofts: 5 yawn
    Lookman: 6 good goal, shouldn't take corners and tired a lot
    Magennis: 5.5 had no help all game, lots of people in north lower calling him lazy, which is weird considering we have....
    Ajose: 3 fucking move around a bit mate! Had a couple of chances that he never looked like scoring

    Novak n/a for a big man he gets muscled around very easily. Came on and immediately slotted into central midfield judging by how deep we were

    Slade: very poor performance, Botaka should have come on, and we needed more energy in the midfield once Ulvestad got tired
  • edited September 2016
    Rudd: 5
    Solly: 4.5
    Fox: 6
    Konsa: 6
    Pearce: 5.5
    Holmes: 6.5
    Ulvestad. 6.5
    Crofts: 5.5
    Lookman: 6.5
    Magennis: 5
    Ajose: 3
  • Rudd: 5
    Solly: 6
    Fox: 5
    Konsa: 5
    Pearce: 6
    Holmes: 7
    Ulvestad. 7
    Crofts: 5
    Lookman: 7
    Magennis: 5
    Ajose: 4
  • First time I've been to a game and not left marks.

    Sorry.
  • Rudd: 5.5
    Solly: 5.5
    Fox:5.5
    Konsa: 5.5
    Pearce: 6
    Holmes: 6.5
    ulvastad 5.5
    Crofts: 4.5
    Lookman: 5.5
    Maggenis: 6
    Ajose: 5
  • Rudd: 5
    Solly: 5
    Fox: 6
    Konsa: 5
    Pearce: 5
    Holmes: 6
    Ulvestad: 6
    Crofts: 6
    Lookman: 6
    Magennis: 5
    Ajose: 4
    Novak n/a
  • Rudd: 5
    Solly: 5
    Fox: 5
    Konsa: 6
    Pearce: 5
    Holmes: 6
    Ulvestad: 5
    Crofts: 5
    Look man: 6
    Magennis: 6
    Ajose: 4
  • Sponsored links:


  • Rudd ... 6 : Nothing to do all game and could do nothing about the goals... No fault can be laid at his door today
    Solly ... 6 : Dependable and one of the few to keep trying when it went 2-1, did a great cutback with no one there which should have made it 2-2
    Fox ... 6 : Better than Solly today, linked up well with Lookman and put in some good challenges
    Konsa ... 5 : Needs to be given a rest, he's good but we need experience at the back
    Pearce ... 7 : Best Defender on the pitch, was constantly putting in some excellent tackles and blocks today
    Holmes ... 7 : How he didnt score I'll never know
    Ulvestad ... 6.5 : Tidy player... Was impressed... Gets a half mark for his assist
    Crofts ... 6 : Here there and everywhere
    Lookman ... 7 : Was a right handful and should have had more than one goal today, shouldnt be taking corners though
    Magennis ... 6 : Was a handful for the opposition today yet wasteful in front of goal
    Ajose ... 5 : Just isn't working for him at the moment
  • Rudd 6 - no chance for first goal , every chance for second one.
    Solly6 - assured display for most of match but got done by their no10 for first goal and might have done better to cut out cross for second
    Konsa 6- coped with most things but seemed to hit panic button after their substitutions
    Pearce 6 - just a pro doing his best no more no less
    Fox 5 - bit disappointed with his distribution and hesitancy in attack but basically
    Coped defensively
    Holmes 8 - worked very hard indeed . Second half he came across from the right wing to the left wing as quickly as he could to block tackle the ball into touch .Can't remember too many wingers doing that in games . Bit greedy with the ball especially that attempted chip that fell into the keepers arms after a long mazy run but most good things involved him . MOM
    Crofts 6 - just a pro doing his job no more no less
    Ulverstad 7 - added a bit of energy and dynamism to midfield but clearly still getting to grips with this after long period out . Tired second half but looks promising
    Look man 5 - sublime touches and a real handful especially first half .Should have scored in second minute . anonymous from 48 th minute to 80th .
    Magennis 7 - real worker but a bit frustrating that he did not put the chance away that Novak hooked up to him late second half although he had a lot to do against two defenders . Frustrating not to see him draw blood from a collision with either of them or goal keeper . Must learn to smash people up a bit more .
    Arose 3 - disappointing. Did not work hard enough and fluffed his big chance first half blazing over bar when he should have scored.more impressed with their number 10.
    Novak 5 - good hook over his shoulder to Magennis but seemed to struggle to get into it .


    Slade 4 - that is a game that we should have won . We should have been three up before they came back into it and at least 2 - 1 up after they equalised .Not too sure how we lost that apart from the obvious - somehow they scored two goals because we sat too deep in defence and midfield drifted out of it . Think he got it wrong by not switching out either Of the wingers and putting Botaka on and another body in midfield to put his foot on the ball and gain control - Bauer / Foley .
  • Rudd: 5.5
    Solly:4.5 not a captain, got turned by their forwards a couple of times.
    Fox: 5.5 better than Solly today
    Konsa: 5.5 some mistakes but made some crucial tackles
    Pearce: 5.5
    Holmes: 6.5 energy and looks like he cares
    Ulvestad: 6 good first half but faded
    Crofts: 4.5
    Lookman: 6 brilliant goal, but faded in 2nd half
    Magennis: 6 keeps going.
    Ajose: 4 doesn't read the game

    Slade - should have made more subs. Ardley did and guess what, Wimbledon won because of it.
  • Rudd: 5
    Solly: 4
    Fox: 6
    Konsa: 5
    Pearce: 5
    Holmes: 6
    Ulvestad: 6
    Crofts: 7
    Lookman: 6
    Magennis: 5
    Ajose: 4


  • Rudd: 5
    Solly: 4.5
    Fox: 6
    Konsa: 5.5
    Pearce: 6
    Holmes: 6.5
    Ulvestad: 7
    Crofts: 5
    Lookman: 7
    Magennis: 6
    Ajose: 5
  • edited September 2016
    Rudd: 5.5
    Solly: 5.5
    Fox: 6.5
    Konsa: 4.5
    Pearce: 6
    Holmes: 6.5
    Ulvestad: 6.5
    Crofts: 6.5
    Lookman: 6.5
    Magennis: 6
    Ajose: 4.5

    Poor performance once we had scored. Dropped deep, hoofed it forward far too much. Subs should've came on but didn't. Ajose had chances but never looked like scoring. Time for Bauer to come in for Konsa, he's a talented lad but no messing about anymore. We need our best players on the pitch to win games.
  • edited September 2016
    Rudd: 5 - difficult to mark. Almost nowt to do but we lost.

    Solly: 4.5 - taken to the cleaners second half.

    Fox: 6 - solid. Seemed to care more than a few others. Lumped it too much but probably on instruction. One excellent chase back and tackle after being skinned.

    Konsa: 5 - ok. Both centre halfs can't be proud of the Wimbledon goals.

    Pearce: 5 - solid but basically an uncultured league 1 CB. Just lumped it time after time

    Holmes: 6 - tried ever so hard but should have passed to lookman twice when he was clear. First touch and turn is instinctively backwards. It wasn't the last time I saw him. Must be the coaching.

    Ulvestad: 6: some promising signs first half but rubbish second and playing far too deep. Again probably on coach's instructions.

    Crofts: 4: too deep and a couple of awful mistakes.

    Lookman: 6: an absolute class above but too in and out and just seemed to give up at the end. Should not be taking corners.

    Magennis: 6: tried hard. The big no 9 that Wimbledon brought on showed him how to do it though!

    Ajose: 2. One point for not putting his top on back to front and another for finding the pitch at the end of the tunnel. Otherwise a compete waste of space. And it didn't look like he was having a bad day. I think this guy is up there with mcClown.

    Slade - 2. Only saving grace is he's not a network stooge but I've never rated him and I'm not going to start now.
  • Rudd: 6
    Solly: 6
    Fox: 7
    Konsa: 6
    Pearce: 6
    Holmes: 6.5
    Ulvestad: 6
    Crofts: 6
    Lookman: 7.5
    Magennis: 6.5
    Ajose: 5.5
  • Rudd: 6
    Solly: 6.5
    Fox: 6
    Konsa: 6
    Pearce: 6.5
    Holmes: 7.5
    Ulvestad: 6
    Crofts: 6
    Lookman: 6.5
    Magennis: 7
    Ajose: 5.5
  • Rudd: 7
    Solly: 7
    Fox: 7
    Konsa: 7
    Pearce: 7
    Holmes: 9.5
    Ulvestad: 7
    Crofts: 7
    Lookman: 7
    Magennis: 7
    Ajose: 3

    Novak. Seemed to play in the wrong position !!
  • Sponsored links:


  • Rudd 5 Nothing to do but didn't make saves when he needed to.
    Solly 5 looked vulnerable when they sent on their big guns
    Fox 6 great block before we scored, did ok throughout
    Konsa 6 did ok
    Pearce 6 read game well but looks too small to be a dominant centre back
    Holmes 7 looked to create , neededto feed him a bit more
    Ulvestad 7 looks the best of the central midfield options but too similar in style to the others
    Crofts 6 mixture of good and bad
    Lookman 7 some touches of real quality but needs to work for 90 mins
    Magennis 7 tried hard but looked a bit tired
    Ajose 4 Just didn't contribute.
  • Rudd - 5
    Solly - 5
    Konsa - 4 Looked like a youth team centre half deputizing. Compared to Gomez at the same stage? No contest.
    Pearce - 5
    Fox - 5
    Crofts - 5
    Ulvestad - 6
    Holmes - 8 Absolutely outstanding. Played like Jimmy Bullard at his best. If he carries on like this expect him to leave in January.
    Lookman - 7 Very good game. Slightly delicate though for this level?
    Ajose - 5
    Magennis - 5
    Novak - 5
  • Rudd: 6
    Solly: 6
    Fox: 6
    Konsa: 5
    Pearce: 5
    Holmes: 6.5
    Ulvestad: 5
    Crofts: 5
    Lookman: 7
    Magennis: 6.5
    Ajose: 4
  • Rudd: 5
    Solly: 6
    Fox: 6
    Konsa: 5
    Pearce: 6
    Holmes: 7
    Ulvestad. 7
    Crofts: 6
    Lookman: 7
    Magennis: 5
    Ajose: 4
  • Rudd: 6 very hard to mark him today.
    Solly: 6 give the armband to Pearce, good and bad moments today.
    Fox:6.5 decent game,
    Konsa:5.5 this game cried out for Bauer, good prospect.
    Pearce:6 good competitor,
    Holmes:6.5 good runs and tackles but made some bad decisions today.
    Ulvestad:6.5 Really good 1st half but lack of matches showed in 2nd.
    Crofts:5.5 not quite on it today.
    Lookman:7 outstanding 1st half, faded with the rest 2nd.
    Magennis:6.5 honest hard working player. knackered in the end.
    Ajose:4 needs to find his form from the bench. 2 great chances wasted.
  • Rudd 6 yet to see him make a save this season
    Solly 6.5 good game until he got done for the first goal
    Fox 6.5 some poor passing but overall fairly solid
    Konsa 6.5 good experience but struggled when the big guys came on
    Pearce 6.5 did OK but needs to lead
    Holmes 7 lots on target shots but slightly below his standard today
    Ulvestad 6 some good link up play
    Crofts 5.5 sometimes solid and sometimes simply poor
    Lookman 7 good goal and some fabulous skills but by passed at times
    Ajose 4 poor
    Maggennis 7 lots of effort and good link play

    Ref had a poor game overall and Slade should have changed it when Dons went long ball.
  • Magennis, lookman, 6 holmes 5 thats all i can muster... Rudd is dodgy ist goal was poked through him
  • Rudd: 5
    Solly: 5 thought he had a poor game by his standards
    Fox: 6 did okay
    Konsa: 5 think he needs a break Tex in
    Pearce: 5 bang average defender Bauer in
    Holmes: 6.5 worked hard caused them problems
    Ulvestad: 5 thought he was very average offered little
    Crofts: 4 Does nothing
    Lookman: 6.5 so much talent went off boil in 2nd half
    Magennis: 6.5 worked hard caused problems not a goal scorer though
    Ajose: 4 looks out of sorts
  • vffvff
    edited September 2016
    Rudd: 6 - not much to do apart from pick the ball out of the net
    Solly: 6 - assured first half, not sure what happened second, seemed to lose focus
    Fox: 6 - Good first half, poor crossing and distribution generally. Managed his quick winger.
    Konsa: 6 - some mistakes, what you expect of a young player, but has pace which the defence needs
    Pearce: 6 - vocal and helped organise defence
    Holmes: 7 - good player energy and fight but didn't click really well with final ball & interchanges with players around him.
    Ulvestad: 5.5 - some good fighting runs, but mostly didn't seem to be on same page as his teammates. Hope that changes with more games. Not seeing box to box or creative midfielder though.
    Crofts: 5 - Shows weakness of midfield that he is on the pitch and not just a squad player.
    Lookman: 7 - great first half and goal with some lovely skill but faded and should have gone off after 65 to 70 mins.
    Magennis: 6.5 - Good player for League one, strong and direct. Liked the look of him.
    Ajose: 4.5 - failed to hit target with 3 chances. If Charlton did not intend to purchase players that play to his strengths then why purchase him in the first place or put him on the pitch ? Ajose is not going to score from high crosses and lumping balls forward.

    Novak n/a - looked like he will score when he gets the chance

    Slade - failed to change the game or address Wimbledon getting on top after 65 - 70 mins, why did he not change things ? Only one sub used when the game is going away makes absolutely no sense.
  • Rudd: 6
    Solly: 6
    Fox: 6
    Konsa: 6
    Pearce: 6
    Holmes: 7
    Ulvestad: 6
    Crofts: 6
    Lookman: 7
    Magennis: 7
    Ajose: 5
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!