Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Response from the club re Behavioural Contracts

124»

Comments

  • edited August 2016




    Always Being Cunts
  • Fact is, if this fan was as bad as he's been made out to be then he would have been banned. The powers that be have tried to gag people.
  • I don't do Twitter, but I really do think the 1984 stuff should have its own feed.

    Deserves a much wider audience.
  • Swisdom said:

    Swisdom said:

    http://www.cafc.co.uk/news/article/2016-17/charlton-statement-3243379.aspx

    I don't suppose this will get the same level of social media coverage but at least they have responded swiftly to something. In truth it shouldn't have ever got into the public eye since it was a matter between an individual and the club and was, it sees, resolved.

    I think this is hugely damaging for the club and, again, has got blown way out of proportion - the truth is much less glamourous than the letter would have people believe.

    I hope the person who got the letter is proud of themself though - they come out of it looking like a wonderful person....

    Blown out of proportion? Are you kidding me, they are trying to take away the blokes legal right to express himself, it's bollocks.

    Have you seen the tweets in question? They may not make him look wonderful, but it makes the club look like the bullying fuckwits they are. Your post just makes you look a bit of a bellend.
    I haven't seen the tweets - or seen the video footage they are talking about but it was obviously suitably vitriolic they felt the need to ask him to stop. Which he agreed to do and apologised. And everyone could and should have just got on with their lives.


    As Charlton slithered down the leagues and then went out of business.....
  • What is it they say Swisdom, don't bite the hand that feeds, but licking their arses and flicking their balls is taking the piss!!!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!