Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England v Sri Lanka & Pakistan

1235752

Comments

  • Does anybody know a stream for this.

    I don't know my sky go details and hoping to watch an hour over lunch!
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,767
    206-5

    Hales 75* (177)
    Bairstow 84* (123)

    A very unlike Hales innings but one that I'm sure will stand him in good stead for the future.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,767
    In fact Hales scored just 6 in the first hour today whereas Bairstow has hit 30.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,990
    Hales out 86

    224-6
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,767
    And then he gives his wicket up after doing all the hard work.
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,651
    I feel for him. He deserved a ton.
  • RugbyAddick
    RugbyAddick Posts: 2,079
    This cricket is so boring, even the commentators have pissed off.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,990
    231-7

    Ali 0
  • Atletico Addick
    Atletico Addick Posts: 5,843
    Bairstow and Hales the only two with patience and respect here. Thought it'd be a walk in the park but not so much.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,990
    Broad played on 2

    233-8

    We do like a collapse.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,990
    Bairstow 100 no.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,767
    Hundred for Bairstow - courtesy of an overthrow.

    So sad that his dad couldn't be around to see him score it at the ground that is and was their home.

  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,651
    243-8 at lunch
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280

    CHG said:

    Does anyone know why we aren't starting at 10:30 today?

    I would have though , having lost an entire session yesterday, that that would be the case.

    They try to make the time up at the end of the day.

    Yes - I know we can play until 7.

    But I don't get why we would risk bad light etc, when we could go out at 10:30 when we know it's fine.

    Seems strange - hey ho.
    Joe, its because, here in England, the playing conditions are generally set for an 11 o'clock start in order to make the wicket as dry as possible. Extra time is added on at end of day as obviously the wicket will be in a condition that wont make it advantageous for bowling - which they believe might be the case for 10.30 start. You wont remember this, but many moons ago, in the 50 over final - it was always played in September 10.30 start, and essentially it was a case of win the toss, win the game, because you would normally bowl first and whip 3 or 4 out before the wicket dried properly.
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    CHG said:

    CHG said:

    Does anyone know why we aren't starting at 10:30 today?

    I would have though , having lost an entire session yesterday, that that would be the case.

    They try to make the time up at the end of the day.

    Yes - I know we can play until 7.

    But I don't get why we would risk bad light etc, when we could go out at 10:30 when we know it's fine.

    Seems strange - hey ho.
    Cricket in general is not known for its use of common sense, to say the rules and procedures are rigid is an understatement.

    For a reason in this instance though CHG - as explained to A2tR above.
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    edited May 2016
    McBobbin said:

    McBobbin said:

    Essex have signed Wahab Riaz and Adam Milne. I'm not having this chat about B list overseas players ;)

    Wow, thats some pace duo .
    Not exactly huge names, but they are very, very quick. I'm looking forward to seeing them tomorrow, briefly, through the hood of my raincoat. funnily enough our most effective bowlers of recent years have been David Masters and last season Jesse Ryder. The conditions and small ground suit trundlers.
    I would suggest Wahab Riaz is a big name and Adam Milne will be a big name- both VERY quick.
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,651
    289-9 Bairstow gone 140
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,990
    298 All out
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,651
    298 all out
  • SL 12/2

    One a piece for Jimmy and Broad - both caught by Bairstow.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Gravesend_Addick
    Gravesend_Addick Posts: 7,299
    I thought 298 was a below par score but I forgot Sri Lanka are shite!
  • 12/3

    Another for Broad and another catch for Bairstow!
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,990
    12-3
  • Atletico Addick
    Atletico Addick Posts: 5,843
    Oh dear Sri Lanka. Bet they are praying for some downpour.
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    i missed a trick here - i wonder what Englands odds were when they were 80odd for 5?
  • CHG
    CHG Posts: 4,529

    i missed a trick here - i wonder what Englands odds were when they were 80odd for 5?

    England never went outside evens on Betfair, kept an eye on it.

  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    Jimmy giving SL a bit of lip - wasnt it SL who got really upset with Jimmy last time?, or was that India?
  • India I think - mainly Jadeja.
  • Gravesend_Addick
    Gravesend_Addick Posts: 7,299
    Bad light stops play.

    Playing a test match in Yorkshire in May is a recipe for disaster
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,990

    Bad light stops play.

    Playing a test match in Yorkshire in May is a recipe for disaster

    Not before Chandimal went 1st ball after tea, c Vince b Stokes 15

    43-4