Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

'Sponsors' Dinner tonight at The Valley

15791011

Comments

  • Redskin said:

    So work on Sparrows Lane being suspended turns out to be nothing more than unsubstantiated rumour. It also points to the likelihood of RD still being the owner next season and that all talk of RD selling up is just that: talk.

    Bit odd then that the Sparrows Lane hold-up was briefed to a senior management meeting last week in March and Richard Murray is positioning himself to remain chairman under an Elliott-fronted takeover.

    Who knows if the Elliott thing stacks up? Everything is talk unless it happens, but it's certainly being explored.
    Has Peter given up the ghost on making a bid Rick?
  • Tony will be back once Johann is sold. ;-)
  • PS Murray clinging onto his seat in the boardroom would usually be hilarious, if the club wasn't such a shambles.

    He's turning into a bit of a boardroom mercenary. Doesn't matter who the owner is, as long as he gets his padded seat in the West Lower.
  • JVL said:

    Thanks for the report, Henry. Pretty ghastly mood all round it seems, although it sounds like more fun than I thought it would be.

    We were Tony Watt's sponsor this season, then Lookman's, but couldn't face going to be honest. Got drunk in Simpsons and then the Jampot instead.

    Old school City drinking...Like!!! Jampot was a great favourite from the late 80s onwards, along with the Red Lion, the other side of Lombard Street. Happy Days :smile:
  • Spoke briefly to Riga and he was pretty low key. I didn't get a hint that he knew his future although one player seemed to think he did and that it wasn't good (for Riga). Meeting with RD tomorrow according to one player.

    Thanks for the as ever informative report Henry. This stuck out for me. When you say tomorrow does that mean from yesterday's perspective or today's? Either way I guess it means RD is around today as well, but will he make an appearance at the game tomorrow? Fingers crossed...

  • TelMc32 said:

    JVL said:

    Thanks for the report, Henry. Pretty ghastly mood all round it seems, although it sounds like more fun than I thought it would be.

    We were Tony Watt's sponsor this season, then Lookman's, but couldn't face going to be honest. Got drunk in Simpsons and then the Jampot instead.

    Old school City drinking...Like!!! Jampot was a great favourite from the late 80s onwards, along with the Red Lion, the other side of Lombard Street. Happy Days :smile:
    Yes takes me back - although I can include the 70's as well :(
  • Sponsored links:


  • rikofold said:

    Spoke briefly to Riga and he was pretty low key. I didn't get a hint that he knew his future although one player seemed to think he did and that it wasn't good (for Riga). Meeting with RD tomorrow according to one player.

    Thanks for the as ever informative report Henry. This stuck out for me. When you say tomorrow does that mean from yesterday's perspective or today's? Either way I guess it means RD is around today as well, but will he make an appearance at the game tomorrow? Fingers crossed...

    What ? And miss his own funeral ?
  • edited April 2016
    Nicholas said:

    "around 90%" of players have a clause meaning their wages drop with relegation but different percentages depending on each contract".

    And Rolands not planning for relegation. What a fucking joke.

    Isn't that fairly standard for clubs these days ? Those that don't have a contingency for relegation get financially screwed if they do get relegated and are committed to wages out of kilter with the league they are in.

    I imagine people would be angrier (if that's possible) if they didn't have them in the players' contracts.

    http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/no-relegation-clauses-newcastle-united-10851167

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/4192856/QPR-face-financial-apocalypse-if-they-are-relegated-from-Prem.html

  • PL54 said:

    Nicholas said:

    "around 90%" of players have a clause meaning their wages drop with relegation but different percentages depending on each contract".

    And Rolands not planning for relegation. What a fucking joke.

    Isn't that fairly standard for clubs these days ? Those that don't relegation clauses in players' contracts get financially screwed if they do get relegated and are committed to wages out of kilter with the league they are in.

    I imagine people would be angrier (if that's possible) if they didn't have them in the players' contracts.

    http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/no-relegation-clauses-newcastle-united-10851167

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/4192856/QPR-face-financial-apocalypse-if-they-are-relegated-from-Prem.html

    Yes it is standard - as are release clauses so it goes both ways.
  • Sorry was Lookman told to "Man up" by one of his team-mates after the Bolton game or a fan?
  • rikofold said:

    Spoke briefly to Riga and he was pretty low key. I didn't get a hint that he knew his future although one player seemed to think he did and that it wasn't good (for Riga). Meeting with RD tomorrow according to one player.

    Thanks for the as ever informative report Henry. This stuck out for me. When you say tomorrow does that mean from yesterday's perspective or today's? Either way I guess it means RD is around today as well, but will he make an appearance at the game tomorrow? Fingers crossed...

    Tomorrow as in today ie Friday.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Curb_It said:

    The sponsors dinner is included in the package that is bought usually at the beginning of the season. I don't see why people should boycott something they've already paid for.

    Well plenty of st holders are boycotting having already paid for their seat. They have a similar understanding to a boycott that I have.
  • mogodon said:

    Given that players at various clubs know each other and chat, the lack of any respect for Meire and the way she has behaved will put off many potential signings as much as the general malaise at the club. Which makes it more important than ever that her position is made untenable by our actions at the last two home matches in this division.

    ...Roland and Katrien - all of football is laughing at you.
    ...Roland et Katrien - tout du football se moque de vous.
    ...Roland en Katrien - allemaal van het voetbal wordt lachen naar je.

    (doesn't really sound as good in Dutch, does it?)
  • I assume Watt doesn't have a relegation clause and is on decent money. Hence our desire to loan. If nobody wants him, League One is possible. Well done Henry for getting a very telling sense of how the players really feel about all this crap.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!