Do you think it would be good for the poor baby to grow up without her father?
Possibly. I'm not sure I'd want a paedophile to bring up my daughter.
Er, not sure what you're suggesting. Do you mean he could be a threat to his daughter? There's an old Chinese saying "Even a vicious tiger will not eat its own cubs" which basically means however bad a person is, he won't hurt his own children. If you're saying that Johnson could do anything remotely similar to his daughter, that he could be THAT twisted, then I really don't know what to say.
I don't think he's suggesting that.
I just think he's hypothesising that it may well be better to have an absent father than a convicted paedophile father.
Personally I would utterly disown any family member convicted of it - so I actually think that absent father would be preferable.
They might not be innocent and niave and nor am I any way fooling myself that they are or she is, but she is a child by law and as such a child by mind and actions
that's why we have the law that's why we have adults not allowed to have such liasons with children
Connor Wickham has Morale fibre and standing and not an ounce of paedophile thoughts, he done the right thing
Adam Johnson on the other hand is a filthy peado bastd and the girl could have stripped naked and begged him for it, it would make no difference he knew she was 15 and should not have been anywhere with that child to get himself in that situation, the fact he was shows he didn't care and wanted to do it
Do you think it would be good for the poor baby to grow up without her father?
Possibly. I'm not sure I'd want a paedophile to bring up my daughter.
Er, not sure what you're suggesting. Do you mean he could be a threat to his daughter? There's an old Chinese saying "Even a vicious tiger will not eat its own cubs" which basically means however bad a person is, he won't hurt his own children. If you're saying that Johnson could do anything remotely similar to his daughter, that he could be THAT twisted, then I really don't know what to say.
Sadly Jessie, there are people who will do the most heinous things to their own children (and sometimes grandchildren). Working in the prison service for over a decade I have had the misfortune to have met a considerable number of them.
Do you think it would be good for the poor baby to grow up without her father?
Possibly. I'm not sure I'd want a paedophile to bring up my daughter.
Er, not sure what you're suggesting. Do you mean he could be a threat to his daughter? There's an old Chinese saying "Even a vicious tiger will not eat its own cubs" which basically means however bad a person is, he won't hurt his own children. If you're saying that Johnson could do anything remotely similar to his daughter, that he could be THAT twisted, then I really don't know what to say.
Sadly Jessie, there are people who will do the most heinous things to their own children (and sometimes grandchildren). Working in the prison service for over a decade I have had the misfortune to have met a considerable number of them.
Are still allowed to let them fall down the stairs AUN?
They might not be innocent and niave and nor am I any way fooling myself that they are or she is, but she is a child by law and as such a child by mind and actions
that's why we have the law that's why we have adults not allowed to have such liasons with children
Connor Wickham has Morale fibre and standing and not an ounce of paedophile thoughts, he done the right thing
Adam Johnson on the other hand is a filthy peado bastd and the girl could have stripped naked and begged him for it, it would make no difference he knew she was 15 and should not have been anywhere with that child to get himself in that situation, the fact he was shows he didn't care and wanted to do it
I agree Adam Johnson is a filthy bastard, by law he is not a Paedo. Let's knock that term on the head here as described by Redskin, he is an ephebophile... this is only to show how wrong Johnson is.
This man deliberately groomed and manipulated his child victim using his fame and status - he has twisted and turned, manipulated, minimised, and blame shifted. He and his Defence team have used every trick in the sex offender book.
On no level is there any excuse for his behaviour or anything admirable about the man. So why anyone would try and minimise, excuse and blame shift on his behalf is beyond me!
If he is found guilty I hope he gets locked away for a long time.
This man deliberately groomed and manipulated his child victim using his fame and status - he has twisted and turned, manipulated, minimised, and blame shifted. He and his Defence team have used every trick in the sex offender book.
On no level is there any excuse for his behaviour or anything admirable about the man. So why anyone would try and minimise, excuse and blame shift on his behalf is beyond me!
If he is found guilty I hope he gets locked away for a long time.
Perhaps being sent to the naughty step would be more apt
This man deliberately groomed and manipulated his child victim using his fame and status - he has twisted and turned, manipulated, minimised, and blame shifted. He and his Defence team have used every trick in the sex offender book.
On no level is there any excuse for his behaviour or anything admirable about the man. So why anyone would try and minimise, excuse and blame shift on his behalf is beyond me!
If he is found guilty I hope he gets locked away for a long time.
Perhaps being sent to the naughty step would be more apt
On no level is there any excuse for his behaviour or anything admirable about the man. So why anyone would try and minimise, excuse and blame shift on his behalf is beyond me!
Comments
I just think he's hypothesising that it may well be better to have an absent father than a convicted paedophile father.
Personally I would utterly disown any family member convicted of it - so I actually think that absent father would be preferable.
Sadly Jessie, there are people who will do the most heinous things to their own children (and sometimes grandchildren). Working in the prison service for over a decade I have had the misfortune to have met a considerable number of them.
Let's knock that term on the head here as described by Redskin, he is an ephebophile... this is only to show how wrong Johnson is. Ephebophilia is the primary or exclusive adult sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19.
Just remember that next time you're looking at a stunning clearly legal woman who is under 20.
As for Johnson he has knowingly had sexual relations with the girl and groomed her after finding out her age and will do the time for it.
This confirms his perverse taste in women.
He will be a prison bitch to someone called Trevor, they will all know why he is there and that doesn't go too well in a lot of prisons.
Back to the girl, I think the girl knew and to this day knows what she was doing at the time but didn't consider the repercussions.
Consequences are more an after thought for a teenager, rather than part of any plan.
To use a more extreme example Traci Lords was the most popular actress of her era at the same age.
On no level is there any excuse for his behaviour or anything admirable about the man. So why anyone would try and minimise, excuse and blame shift on his behalf is beyond me!
If he is found guilty I hope he gets locked away for a long time.
I might give her a ring, shoulder to cry on and all that.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/live-adam-johnson-awaits-verdict-7476143
I personally believe he is guilty as sin
Nonce.