Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Rick Everitt's On The Shambles, and more, at Colchester. New Article

By Rick Everitt



How will we look back on this FA Cup third-round weekend in years to come? Certainly for one of the most shambolic, disorganised and embarrassing contributions that Charlton have ever made to the competition, albeit against a decent challenge from the defeat at seventh tier Northwich Victoria in 2010.



Losing 2-1 to third division Colchester United might not appear to be a disaster on quite that scale. Yet the U’s had taken one point out of 30 from their previous 10 League One matches and probably owed their progress in the FA Cup to the fact they had only faced non-league opposition to date.



They had conceded 59 times in 25 league matches, the most by a margin of 12 goals of any of the 92 senior clubs. By any standards they are in a mess. And yet they beat Championship Charlton very comfortably.



While some visiting fans did ultimately turn on their players, the reasons for the defeat were less on the pitch than watching from the sidelines. In the Charlton technical area was interim head coach Karel Fraeye. Nine winless games had already elapsed since he surprised almost everybody by putting out a side that prevailed over Sheffield Wednesday and then Birmingham City. Now his record was even worse than the man dismissed to make way for him in October, Guy Luzon.



Far behind him at the very back of the stand sat chief executive Katrien Meire, the club's sole executive director. Her last public statement had come two months earlier, when she asserted that all previous managerial changes over the previous 20 months had been proven to be the right decision because results had improved soon thereafter.



Even judged by her own miserable standards, therefore, Fraeye was a dead man walking going into the game, and most of the 1,800 Charlton fans massed behind the goal were determined to remind him and her of it from the outset. The principal charge against both is that their ambition has exceeded their ability, at this stage of their careers at any rate.



Fraeye, at least, has been held to account by sections of the media, as well as the increasingly angry Charlton crowd. Meire has simply made herself unavailable for interview, although the fusillade of hostile criticism is such that it threatens to mow her down anyway.



"I realise that there’s no one to hide behind any more," she had written in August. Yet by January she was happy for the club to deploy chairman Richard Murray as a human shield, after more than a thousand fans gathered to protest at the rear of The Valley’s west stand. Unfortunately, Murray’s arguments were so full of holes that she may as well have taken shelter behind a garden sieve.



Not all the bullets even came from directions that might have been expected. The club's former commercial director and continuing boardroom regular Steve Sutherland, a man not known for his revolutionary zeal, tweeted that Murray's statement was "disappointing", while the Charlton Athletic Supporters' Trust moved forward from their previous careful public neutrality to spray rapid fire in the chairman's direction.



Meanwhile, former chief executive Peter Varney had appeared deep behind the lines with a rocket launcher. In two media interventions, one through BBC Kent and then via a statement released to the South London Press on Sunday evening, Varney first reiterated the interest of a substantial backer in buying the club and then attacked Meire’s handling of the Charlton fans directly.



He also disclosed that he had made a new, recent approach to Duchatelet, without success. It’s unlikely that Murray’s hostility to Varney was decisive in this rejection, but equally the former's stance probably helps explain his continuing alignment with people whose ineptitude, even in carrying out their own warped ideas, seems set to destroy the club.



Whatever you make of the personalities involved, there’s little question in my mind that Varney’s investor possesses both the resources and the ambition to take Charlton back to the Premier League. This risk now is that those attributes will be diverted to a competitor club.



Duchatelet’s approach and that of his inadequate lieutenants, by contrast, is pointing the Addicks towards a future of declining support, lower division football and increasing public ridicule. The extent of alienation among supporters is extraordinary.



Widely reported moves to reinsert former stand-in boss Jose Riga into the dugout might be welcomed by some as a step-up from Fraeye, but his arrival could not truthfully be regarded as much more than the proverbial rearrangement of the deckchairs before the ship goes down.



Colchester will just be a footnote in this story, as will Fraeye and Meire. But the weekend may yet be remembered as a watershed - the days when the chance to save Charlton from several years of agonising decline was fatefully and fatally spurned.



If so then rest assured that we will not be going quietly.


«1

Comments

  • edited January 2016
    Well written @airmanbrown
  • A brilliant article, and I expected no less. What a bloody depressing read though, how can people so incompetent manage to run own a football club?
  • One bit really hits home: 'Whatever you make of the personalities involved, there’s little question in my mind that Varney’s investor possesses both the resources and the ambition to take Charlton back to the Premier League. This risk now is that those attributes will be diverted to a competitor club'. It means we have to fight this war with everything we have.
  • edited January 2016
    Suthers said:

    Another very good article by Rick but I'd like to correct his assertion that I am a 'Boardroom regular'. I have purchased my own car park pass, directors box seat and Millennium pass every season since leaving the Club in 2009.

    My invites to 'the boardroom' on matchdays previously were from CACT in my capacity as a Trust Ambassador and then only when the Trust were entertaining their commercial patrons, several of whom I have introduced to CACT. This season, CACT are no longer in 'the Boardroom' but have a table for 4 in the Centre Circle and, again, I sometimes join CACT CEO Jason Morgan on this table when applicable.

    I'll just add, that I have no contact with Katrien Meire on matchdays or any other day for that matter and never really have had, so I don't expect a matchday boardroom invitation any time soon!

    Fair enough - I was going to say directors' box regular; however it clashed with "former commercial director". But mainly I was just pulling your leg ... seems I got a bite!

    I've updated it now on my site.
  • Dansk_Red said:

    PL54 said:

    Suthers said:

    Another very good article by Rick but I'd like to correct his assertion that I am a 'Boardroom regular'. I have purchased my own car park pass, directors box seat and Millennium pass every season since leaving the Club in 2009.

    My invites to 'the boardroom' on matchdays previously were from CACT in my capacity as a Trust Ambassador and then only when the Trust were entertaining their commercial patrons, several of whom I have introduced to CACT. This season, CACT are no longer in 'the Boardroom' but have a table for 4 in the Centre Circle and, again, I sometimes join CACT CEO Jason Morgan on this table when applicable.

    I'll just add, that I have no contact with Katrien Meire on matchdays or any other day for that matter and never really have had, so I don't expect a matchday boardroom invitation any time soon!

    Fair enough - I was going to say directors' box regular; however it clashed with "former commercial director". But mainly I was just pulling your leg ... seems I got a bite!
    Troll
    Takes one to know one.
    BOOM o'clock
  • Once again the man that Always looks for the truth behind the mess that is charlton athletic.
    Good on you.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Once again the man that Always looks for the truth behind the mess that is charlton athletic.
    Good on you.

    That's fine.
  • just makes me even angrier.
  • edited January 2016
    Suthers said:

    Another very good article by Rick but I'd like to correct his assertion that I am a 'Boardroom regular'. I have purchased my own car park pass, directors box seat and Millennium pass every season since leaving the Club in 2009.

    My invites to 'the boardroom' on matchdays previously were from CACT in my capacity as a Trust Ambassador and then only when the Trust were entertaining their commercial patrons, several of whom I have introduced to CACT. This season, CACT are no longer in 'the Boardroom' but have a table for 4 in the Centre Circle and, again, I sometimes join CACT CEO Jason Morgan on this table when applicable.

    I'll just add, that I have no contact with Katrien Meire on matchdays or any other day for that matter and never really have had, so I don't expect a matchday boardroom invitation any time soon!

    Ok Steve, you're "not guilty". Just keep 'em peeled, so you don't get caught in the line of fire :smile:
  • Once again the man that Always looks for the truth behind the mess that is charlton athletic.
    Good on you.

    PL54 knows there are much important things in life,that's all.



    He writes all this stuff during the hours break he gets away from his cell.
  • edited January 2016
    Let's get the bastards out - Do you hear the people sing?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYb9sRLUDyM
  • One bit really hits home: 'Whatever you make of the personalities involved, there’s little question in my mind that Varney’s investor possesses both the resources and the ambition to take Charlton back to the Premier League. This risk now is that those attributes will be diverted to a competitor club'. It means we have to fight this war with everything we have.


    So very very true.
  • Good article Rick, please keep up the pressure on these fools.

    There can now only be one goal, out the Belgians and Dick head Murray, nothing more nothing less.
  • Has Murray spoken to Varney yet, like he said he would do?
  • Has Murray spoken to Varney yet, like he said he would do?

    No, in case Varney asks him where are the other two signings you promised
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited January 2016
    The club is a car that has crashed , turned over, rolled down a steep wooded bank, hit a big bolder at the bottom of the bank. caught fire and blown up, shot 20 meters into the air and landed on an unexploded WW2 bomb, and blown into a thousand pieces until nothing of the car is recognizable. In short we are fucked. PS The driver was believed to have been a failed old politician from Belgium who didn't have a licence or any insurance!
  • I wonder if Roland the rat has realised the cost of our defeat at Colchester.
    A full hose in the 4th round against Spurs and tv money.
  • Welly said:

    I wonder if Roland the rat has realised the cost of our defeat at Colchester.
    A full hose in the 4th round against Spurs and tv money.

    Exactly what I thought when I saw the draw. Imagine Spurs or Leicester at The Valley in the 4th round. We may as well have just gone to Colchester and given them an envelope full of cash.
  • edited January 2016
    He needs to get used to it. We are going to make the money dry up big time. He is too much of an idiot to realise how bad it is going to get for him. We may only represent a third of the income (in Meire's words) but you take our third away, the other two thirds are going to be greatly reduced. We can stop sponsors, we can dry up the money. And WE WILL!!
  • RD has blown a full house for himself at the valley 4th round due to thinking he's clever and employing a low cost manager that he thinks will get away with doing the same job as a more naturally suited manager.

    You get what you pay for.

    Complete deluded mug.

    Arrogant beyond belief.

    Yet he is a millionaire....

    Are his fortunes based more on luck? He must have done something right, just fucking leave football alone you don't get it and never will !!!!!!

    Accept failure, please. Annoyingly he can afford to "not accept failure" and he won't give in. He has too much money. That's the worry.

    Good article btw I read it on twitter
  • edited January 2016
    He may have had his marbles as a younger man. He is now truly an idiot. What he did when he wasn't is irrelevant,
  • Depressing read as it is all true.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!