The Charlton/University of Greenwich shirt sponsorship seems to me to be the only one that doesn't 'devalue' the brand of either side. I hate it when I see clubs that have sponsors that are basically promoting gambling to kids for instance or look to have sold their soul to a corporate but the Charlton/University of Greenwich one just seems so right and is a win/win for both sides. I think it's great for Charlton to be associated with a Uni and it's got to be fantastic for the University of Greenwich to be able to promote its name globally and be associated with such a popular sport. Anybody think of a similar non-naff shirt sponsorship of is ours the only one ?
http://eta.ecommzone.com/lz/CAFC/00AROQ/06a7b2fe606b33ab875fd7eff711fa6f71/actions/redirect.aspx?url=http://addicks.clubstore.co.uk/away-replica?utm_source=CA&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=AwayReplica
Comments
http://m.northampton-news-hp.co.uk/8203-Northampton-Town-reveal-pink-away-kit/story-27473269-detail/story.html
If so. Fair play to Northampton.
Also, again fairly recently Barcelona had "UNICEF" on their shirts.
Meanwhile the fans have launched their own kit in protest at Ashley's business model.
And I say that as someone with stage 4 cancer on the scale on which 1= diagnosed and 5= dead or as good as.
But if you're asking me who in the entire world isn't aware of cancer, I'd probably struggle to give you a definitive answer.
I think the alternative home kit is a lot nicer. They also mention the fact that they don't approve of having wonga as the sponsor for ethical reasons.