Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton Rumours Rumours Rumours - The Big Kahuna

16566687071307

Comments

  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,150

    The only regular in the know person is Dr Kish aka Ketts. Here is what he posted on CAFC picks 11 hours ago:-

    "Keep your eyes peeled over the next couple of days Ed, good news might not be far away.

    Think we need to remember that the transfer window doesn't open for another couple of weeks. There'll be a huge turnover of players this summer, with plenty coming in. We just need to be a little patient."

    Sounds promising, hopefully more than just Bulot rejoining us.

    But we don't need a huge turnover! I'm not sure that's completely good news. We just need to keep hold of the core of the team and add to it.
  • Dansk_Red
    Dansk_Red Posts: 5,730
    Just read that QPR get 20% sell on fee for Sterling if/when Liverpool sell him. Could be upwards of £8m. Liverpool paid less than £1m as a 15 year old.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,772

    The only regular in the know person is Dr Kish aka Ketts. Here is what he posted on CAFC picks 11 hours ago:-

    "Keep your eyes peeled over the next couple of days Ed, good news might not be far away.

    Think we need to remember that the transfer window doesn't open for another couple of weeks. There'll be a huge turnover of players this summer, with plenty coming in. We just need to be a little patient."

    Sounds promising, hopefully more than just Bulot rejoining us.

    But we don't need a huge turnover! I'm not sure that's completely good news. We just need to keep hold of the core of the team and add to it.

    The only regular in the know person is Dr Kish aka Ketts. Here is what he posted on CAFC picks 11 hours ago:-

    This - If we want to go for promotion.

  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,894
    Rumour (so I am on the correct thread) has it that RD is somewhat unimpressed with our position in the transfer market and consequently employed a top PR company to make us THE Ebay of Clubs.

    He has already, however, rejected a couple of suggestions as they are not perceived to be original enough - "Not knowingly Overpriced" for our youth academy and "All Tat Bought/No Fee Too Much" for our Network purchases.


  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,492
    From the BBC website:


    Liverpool hope to finalise a deal for Charlton teenager Joe Gomez later this week, with the 18-year-old scheduled to undergo a medical on Friday, according to Press Association Sport.

    It is understood the Anfield club have triggered a £3.5m release clause in the England Under-19 international's contract which has paved the way for the move to be completed and he will meet with club officials on Merseyside on Friday.
  • flyingkiwiDK
    flyingkiwiDK Posts: 5,725
    This from the ever reliable FR website..

    18 Jun 2015 10:03:04
    Young Striker Adam Campbell to be snapped up by Charlton after leaving Newcastle
  • Paddy Powell
    Paddy Powell Posts: 2,845
    edited June 2015

    From the BBC website:

    It is understood the Anfield club have triggered a £3.5m release clause in the England Under-19 international's contract which has paved the way for the move to be completed and he will meet with club officials on Merseyside on Friday.

    I mentioned that possibility on Monday (bottom of page 57). It was the only explaination I could think of for such a 'low' fee.

    I hope they are wrong, but it makes sense.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,894
    .

    From the BBC website:


    Liverpool hope to finalise a deal for Charlton teenager Joe Gomez later this week, with the 18-year-old scheduled to undergo a medical on Friday, according to Press Association Sport.

    It is understood the Anfield club have triggered a £3.5m release clause in the England Under-19 international's contract which has paved the way for the move to be completed and he will meet with club officials on Merseyside on Friday.

    In the old days a new contract had just two elements to it - how long and how much. Now the Owner, Manager, Player, Player's Agent, Player's Lawyer etc etc have to spend three months negotiating the level of the release clause.
  • Dansk_Red
    Dansk_Red Posts: 5,730
    Tottenham are interested in Swansea's Jonjo Shelvey, according to The Guardian.

    With Paulinho and Etienne Capoue likely to move on this summer, Tottenham boss Mauricio Pochettino would like to bolster his options in midfield and he feels Shelvey would fit perfectly into his system.
  • flyingkiwiDK
    flyingkiwiDK Posts: 5,725
    If the BBC article is correct and Gomez has a 3.5 mill release cause written into his contract I will be very disappointed. RD has definitely missed a trick if this is the case.

    Should be 5-6 mill minimum.

  • Sponsored links:



  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,150
    edited June 2015
    £3.5m release clause for Gomez? I hope that's not true.

    This from the ever reliable FR website..

    18 Jun 2015 10:03:04
    Young Striker Adam Campbell to be snapped up by Charlton after leaving Newcastle

    Highly rated.
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    edited June 2015
    A release clause? Does it mean we are shafted on this one even if there are others interested?
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,772
    How would you put a release cause in a 17 year old's contract? Hard to believe.
  • Paddy Powell
    Paddy Powell Posts: 2,845

    How would you put a release cause in a 17 year old's contract? Hard to believe.

    To get him to sign for us in the first place.
  • SMW28
    SMW28 Posts: 154
    edited June 2015
    I reckon the release clause would have been decided by JG and his representatives as they knew he was being tracked and probably didn't want the big clubs being put off. Not ITK but just a thought
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,385
    edited June 2015
    seth plum said:

    A release clause? Does it mean we are shafted on this one even if there are others interested?

    presumably a release clause states that any bid of or more than the agreed figure in the clause will mean that the player can move should he decide to do so.
    If, for example, Liverpool bid 3.5 mllion and Southampton 5 million, Gomez can choose either club. CAFC however cannot hold out for the larger amount bid by Southampton because Liverpool have bid the amount agreed in the release clause.
    But it all depends on the actual wording of the clause in the contract
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,639

    How would you put a release cause in a 17 year old's contract? Hard to believe.

    To get him to sign for us in the first place.
    exactly, why can't some people see this instead of using it as another stick to beat RD over the head with? The alternative would have been a Poyet situation and a fee decided by tribunal of two shirt buttons and a bag of Tesco pick n mix.

  • Addicted
    Addicted Posts: 2,804
    Also, it might not be true
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,150
    edited June 2015

    How would you put a release cause in a 17 year old's contract? Hard to believe.

    To get him to sign for us in the first place.
    exactly, why can't some people see this instead of using it as another stick to beat RD over the head with? The alternative would have been a Poyet situation and a fee decided by tribunal of two shirt buttons and a bag of Tesco pick n mix.

    No issues with a release clause - just the figure, it's far too low. If true.
  • Paddy Powell
    Paddy Powell Posts: 2,845
    edited June 2015

    How would you put a release cause in a 17 year old's contract? Hard to believe.

    To get him to sign for us in the first place.
    exactly, why can't some people see this instead of using it as another stick to beat RD over the head with? The alternative would have been a Poyet situation and a fee decided by tribunal of two shirt buttons and a bag of Tesco pick n mix.

    It wouldn't have even gone to a tribunal. Gomez at 17 years old would have been an EPPP payment of less than £1m + add ons. Just like Kasey Palmer.

    Poyet was 19 and not eligible under EPPP rules. He would have been a tribunal case.


  • Sponsored links:



  • Starinnaddick
    Starinnaddick Posts: 4,351
    Talkshite reporting a release clause although they have probably picked up the BBC report.
  • EastStand
    EastStand Posts: 4,109
    If there is a release clause thats a massive kick in the balls for us.
    Whoever agreed to that is a bloody idiot.
  • Starinnaddick
    Starinnaddick Posts: 4,351
    EastStand said:

    If there is a release clause thats a massive kick in the balls for us.
    Whoever agreed to that is a bloody idiot.

    As mentioned earlier in the thread maybe that was the only way we could get him to sign a new contract.
    At least we get a transfer fee . It could have been a development fee like Poyet.
  • flyingkiwiDK
    flyingkiwiDK Posts: 5,725

    How would you put a release cause in a 17 year old's contract? Hard to believe.

    To get him to sign for us in the first place.
    exactly, why can't some people see this instead of using it as another stick to beat RD over the head with? The alternative would have been a Poyet situation and a fee decided by tribunal of two shirt buttons and a bag of Tesco pick n mix.

    No issues with a release clause - just the figure, it's far too low. If true.
    This
  • sammy391
    sammy391 Posts: 3,790
    I'm sure if that's the case , Roland will put his 'contractual lawyer' ; Ms.Miere on the case of finding a loophole or ways round it!
  • Paddy Powell
    Paddy Powell Posts: 2,845
    Rich Cawley tweeting that reports of a release clause are incorrect.

    I hope he's right.
  • Reports that Joe Gomez has £3.5m release clause are not right. If that was the price then deal would already be done and dusted.

    — Richard Cawley (@RichCawleySLP) June 18, 2015
  • All_Thaid_Up
    All_Thaid_Up Posts: 2,293
    If you remember last year Suarez had. 40m clause and arsenal bid 40.000.001. He didnt end up there he went to Barca for more money.

  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 5,836

    EastStand said:

    If there is a release clause thats a massive kick in the balls for us.
    Whoever agreed to that is a bloody idiot.

    As mentioned earlier in the thread maybe that was the only way we could get him to sign a new contract.
    At least we get a transfer fee . It could have been a development fee like Poyet.
    We should give RD some credit for this as it is more than we would have got under the previous regime. However, it is still far too low
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,639

    How would you put a release cause in a 17 year old's contract? Hard to believe.

    To get him to sign for us in the first place.
    exactly, why can't some people see this instead of using it as another stick to beat RD over the head with? The alternative would have been a Poyet situation and a fee decided by tribunal of two shirt buttons and a bag of Tesco pick n mix.

    No issues with a release clause - just the figure, it's far too low. If true.
    but there are two parties involved in agreeing a release clause. too low, we don't get a decent fee, too high and he doesn't sign a contract and we get next to no fee. what would you prefer?

This discussion has been closed.