Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

12 March @ Bromley Addicks

1246710

Comments

  • She's here.

    He's not.

    More tomorrow

    What? On time? Check it's really her Henry ;-)
  • Sub judice
  • Good meeting, thought she came across very well. I'll leave it for the usual people to do the write up.
  • edited March 2015

    Good meeting, thought she came across very well. I'll leave it for the usual people to do the write up.

    ,
  • edited March 2015
    She got off lightly I thought. Amazing what 5 wins can do.

    That said, well done KM and those that organised. Not sure why one person was censored though?
  • She got off lightly I thought. Amazing what 5 wins can do.

    Or perhaps a lot of fans really don't want to know what Roland's inside leg measurement is.
  • She got off lightly I thought. Amazing what 5 wins can do.

    Disagree, got a lot more info than at previous meetings as the mood was more relaxed and she answered the questions in more detail due to that IMHO.

    A lot more looking forward rather than back.

    She enjoyed and she'll be back next season.

    raised about 200 quid for the Upbeats and there were about 95 people there.

    Anyway, more tomorrow
  • edited March 2015

    Good meeting, thought she came across very well. I'll leave it for the usual people to do the write up.

    .
    Too frank Franck. Quite gross really
  • She got off lightly I thought. Amazing what 5 wins can do.

    Disagree, got a lot more info than at previous meetings as the mood was more relaxed and she answered the questions in more detail due to that IMHO.

    A lot more looking forward rather than back.

    She enjoyed and she'll be back next season.

    raised about 200 quid for the Upbeats and there were about 95 people there.

    Anyway, more tomorrow
    We'll done Henry. Pleased it went well. Look forward to the redacted extensive minutes by 8.00am.

  • Curb_It said:

    Good meeting, thought she came across very well. I'll leave it for the usual people to do the write up.

    They're too busy wanking, no doubt.
    Too frank Franck. Quite gross really
    Finished already? !
  • Sponsored links:


  • it was a good evening and Katrien came across well, very relaxed, a couple of times she did appear a bit frustrated, when she was asked questions that she had already at length answered.

    More tomorrow after Kings Hill Addick has filed his meeting report. In all,seriousness it was good to see fellow CL's including KHA, His Dad, HI and Fanny.
  • Yes a good evening and I believe she was open to some reasoned arguments from people.

    She also batted away some mildly aggressive statements which she seems to have heard before and she said has answered before.

    The guy from the trust that was censored , Athletico , was because he had been invited along on the the basis that ( his words) " he would just observe and would make no comments".

    Another Bromley Addicks success

  • Censored?
  • Gagged?
  • I understand the pride those involved with the Trust must have but they don't need to be represented at every meeting. I think he was asked not to allow a discussion to be side tracked when most of those there had come to hear Katrien speak.

    I wouldn't use the work censored.
  • edited March 2015
    He was told not to speak, sounds like censorship to me.

    It was immediately after a question to KM about the Trust when part of her response was effectively that she did not like the way they had organised an anti ownership meeting (not her exact words but that was what she meant). A response I found disappointing as it is not accurate. It was also immediately after someone in the room had stood up to give his own negative slant on the Trust. I think a right of reply would not have been remiss and would not have side tracked the meeting. Personally I thought it was a shame.
  • edited March 2015
    Double post on poxy phone
  • Sponsored links:


  • Athletico used the word censored so I did in reply.

    In truth he was just reminded of the ground rules that he set when he asked to come along.


  • The Sex tape: Last year sold only half the slots. Rang other clubs and they didn't have prices or only a few slots so saw it wasn't a priority for them so an opportunity for us.
    Looked at different options for campaign and this was the last resort. "a bit borderline" "far too explicit" "I thought maybe just some kissing and cuddling"
    They PR firm sent out the teaser without KM knowing and the press team didn't know either. Didn't tell "the owner" and thought she might get fired. It made headlines in Belgium "Sex on the field of Duchatelet" RD was OK about it when he heard how many hits it has had.
    Would do it again but not in same way.
    Been a real spike in enquiries. Already sold half the slots and had lots of contact from companies we've not done business with. Usual channels of the website and programme don't get us to city boys etc who want to hire a pitch. Told the commercial manager have to sell all the slots now. One german firm wanted to buy the rights to the video.

    So that was a total failure then !
  • I understand the pride those involved with the Trust must have but they don't need to be represented at every meeting. I think he was asked not to allow a discussion to be side tracked when most of those there had come to hear Katrien speak.

    I wouldn't use the work censored.

    not a Trust representative as far as I am aware.
  • razil said:

    I understand the pride those involved with the Trust must have but they don't need to be represented at every meeting. I think he was asked not to allow a discussion to be side tracked when most of those there had come to hear Katrien speak.

    I wouldn't use the work censored.

    not a Trust representative as far as I am aware.
    Trust board member actually
  • Kap10 said:

    I asked a question about the objectives of "a challenging Championship team" and "Breaking Even" and what was the time frame. I don't feel that the answer was very clear, except that "Break-Even" appears to be more of an aspiration than an objective and there was no specific timeframe.

    The club is looking to retain the existing squad, but Eagles and Johnson will have to work to get a new contract, she is looking to bring in 2-3 players over the summer and bring in revenue from player sales, who are not involved in the first team squad. Like me the immediate response from one was that won't amount to much money, but its was then pointed out Polish Pete, Rezza and George (?).

    She has a budget target each season for player sales, the budget for player purchases are flexible and next season a decision will be made based on possibility of promotion of what investment in players will be made in January.

    Under Bob the players got to feel they were the "worst players in the world" and Bob could not turn the loss of confidence around. Pointed out that we are now winning in a better way than we were at the begining of the season.

    Roland decides the transfer price, KM said she negotiates the best price. It did not appear that there is a specific transfer price policy.

    She calls Roland to his face but calls him The Owner to "us" because we can't pronounce his name - its a sort of gutteral pronunciation.

    Morning Kap. Those are the questions that most interest me so thanks for giving it a go.

    Re the bit in bold above, does that refer to transfers within the network? Did you understand it to mean that, say, RD sets a price for, say, Tony Watt, and Katrien will try to push him down a bit (of course the quote price for TWWW is currently looking like a bargain, but I'm just trying to understand the system)
  • Does s/he have a name? Ken perhaps

    Anyway there are plenty of meetings they dont attend, like East Kent

    :)
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!