Etheridge 5 Gomez 4 Ben Haim 5 Bikey 4 Solly 5 Buyens 4 Gudmundsson 4 Jackson 3 Cousins 3 not a left wing back/winger waker up peeters you penis when will you learn Tucudean 2 as strong as a little girl. Vetokele 4
(I know the 1.5 might seem ridiculous but I genuinely don't see how this guy is a pro footballer especially on tonight's performance. Has no first touch, no ball control, no strength, trips over his own feet and spends half the game on the floor.)
Etheridge 5 Gomez 4 Ben Haim 5 Bikey 4 Solly 5 Buyens 4 Gudmundsson 4 Jackson 3 Cousins 3 not a left wing back/winger waker up peeters you penis when will you learn Tucudean 2 as strong as a little girl. Vetokele 4
Bob 2. Grow a pair or do one.
forgot to mention George's pathetic dive. Pathetic anus
Etheridge 4 - shaky all game Gomez 4 - poor start to the match Ben Haim 5 - won nothing in the air Bikey 5 Solly 6 - got forward well Buyens 5 - poor distribution Gudmundsson 9 - his best showing Jackson 6 - got in the box well Cousins 4 - non existent Tucadean 5 Vetokele 5
Etheridge 6 Didn't feel he was to blame for any of the goals. Gomez 5 Looked out of his depth, although he did improve in the second half. Ben Haim 6 Despite the result, he had a reasonable game. Bikey 6 Effectively played at full back and was heavily relied upon to feed ball to forwards. Unfair criticism from others Solly 7 Got into some good positions and was keen to get forward. Buyens 6 Reasonable game Gudmundsson 7 Always looking to get a shot in. Jackson 6 Reasonable game Cousins 5 Anonymous for much of the game Tucudean 4 Weak and ineffectual. He's becoming as big a joke as Leaburn! Vetokele 5 Not much better than Tucudean!
The main difference between the sides was the forwards. They had two who were always a threat and looked likely to score. We had two who were never going to score in a million years!
Etheridge 5 Don't like marking younger players below 'par' but felt he could have done better with a couple of the goals. After watching again on TV I feel he wasn't quick enough for the first and left his goal exposed for the second after his dive for the attempt which crashed the crossbar . Like Pope he is inexperienced at this level although I do think he has tremendous potential. Gomez 5 Like Etheridge I do not like marking youngsters down Ben Haim 6 Our best defender Bikey 6 Certainly he is no left back Solly 6 Kept going. Buyens 6 Average Gudmundsson 7 Our only creative spark Jackson 6 Played well . Can't play 2 full games in a week anymore. Cousins 5 Still don't like him playing wide left Tucudean 5 Ineffectual. Vetokele 5 Is he unfit? Looks a shadow of the player from earlier in the season
Etheridge - 6. Not at fault for the goals from where i was sitting, though poor distribution at times. Gomez - 5. Extremely shaky first half, but sort of grew into the game slowly. Though his inexperience is apparent (not his fault though). Ben Haim - 7. Solid performance. Bikey - 4. Get nervous whenever he's on the ball. Heavy touch and ridiculous cross field balls. Solly - 6. Tried hard and got forward. Buyens - 7. One of our better perfomers. Gudmundsson - 7. Offered some creativity, our only threat for most of the game. Jackson - 7. Thought he was playing well, only player who was making forward runs and trying to get on the end of the ball. Didn't deserve to come off imo. Cousins - 6. Kept going and running until the end. Tucudean - 2. Seems harsh but he was so so so bad. Would've been a 3 if it weren't for that pathetic embarrassing dive at the end. Terrible performance which is a shame as i thought he had a blinder against Cardiff. Vetokele - 6. Tried hard but his body language suggests he's lacking some confidence atm.
Peeters - 3. No animation on the touch line and when he did get up, it was just to tell the team to pump it forward which was playing into the hands of a typical Mick McCarthy side. When we ran at them, we caused problems, but for most of the game it was just route 1. Also, how Tucudean was on the pitch for the whole 90 minutes is beyond me. Piggot or Grant deserved at least a 5 minute cameo imo as it clearly wasn't Tucudean's game (which it rarely is anyway).
Oh well. They're second in the league for a reason. Keep the faith. COYR
Etheridge 5 Don't like marking younger players below 'par' but felt he could have done better with a couple of the goals. After watching again on TV I feel he wasn't quick enough for the first and left his goal exposed for the second after his dive for the attempt which crashed the crossbar . Like Pope he is inexperienced at this level although I do think he has tremendous potential. Gomez 5 Like Etheridge I do not like marking youngsters down Ben Haim 6 Our best defender Bikey 6 Certainly he is no left back Solly 6 Kept going. Buyens 6 Average Gudmundsson 7 Our only creative spark Jackson 6 Played well . Can't play 2 full games in a week anymore. Cousins 5 Still don't like him playing wide left Tucudean 5 Ineffectual. Vetokele 5 Is he unfit? Looks a shadow of the player from earlier in the season
Etheridge is 24. He's older than Igor, Solly, Gomez, Cousins, Gudmundson and Tucudean. Quite shocking that really.
Etheridge 6 Came well for crosses, good save at end Gomez 4 Very poor first half, out of position Ben Haim 7, a cut above Bikey 6 Bit shaky at times Solly 6 Not a right winger Bob! Buyens 6 OK Gudmundsson 7.5 Very good second half when moved into middle Jackson 4 Hardly noticed him Cousins 5 Poor by his standards Tucudean 5 Bullied out of it. Not the player he was on Saturday Vetokele 6 Tried hard, feeding off scraps
Tactics all wrong. Three across the back? Gomez left back ? Continuous high crosses, gobbled up by Ipswich defence?
Etheridge - 6. Not at fault for the goals from where i was sitting, though poor distribution at times. Gomez - 5. Extremely shaky first half, but sort of grew into the game slowly. Though his inexperience is apparent (not his fault though). Ben Haim - 7. Solid performance. Bikey - 4. Get nervous whenever he's on the ball. Heavy touch and ridiculous cross field balls. Solly - 6. Tried hard and got forward. Buyens - 7. One of our better perfomers. Gudmundsson - 7. Offered some creativity, our only threat for most of the game. Jackson - 7. Thought he was playing well, only player who was making forward runs and trying to get on the end of the ball. Didn't deserve to come off imo. Cousins - 6. Kept going and running until the end. Tucudean - 2. Seems harsh but he was so so so bad. Would've been a 3 if it weren't for that pathetic embarrassing dive at the end. Terrible performance which is a shame as i thought he had a blinder against Cardiff. Vetokele - 6. Tried hard but his body language suggests he's lacking some confidence atm.
Peeters - 3. No animation on the touch line and when he did get up, it was just to tell the team to pump it forward which was playing into the hands of a typical Mick McCarthy side. When we ran at them, we caused problems, but for most of the game it was just route 1. Also, how Tucudean was on the pitch for the whole 90 minutes is beyond me. Piggot or Grant deserved at least a 5 minute cameo imo as it clearly wasn't Tucudean's game (which it rarely is anyway).
Oh well. They're second in the league for a reason. Keep the faith. COYR
Comments
Gomez 4
Ben Haim 5
Bikey 4
Solly 5
Buyens 4
Gudmundsson 4
Jackson 3
Cousins 3 not a left wing back/winger waker up peeters you penis when will you learn
Tucudean 2 as strong as a little girl.
Vetokele 4
Bob 2. Grow a pair or do one.
Gomez 6
Ben Haim 6.5
Bikey 5
Solly 5.5
Buyens 6
Gudmundsson 7
Jackson 6.5
Cousins 6
Tucudean 4
Vetokele 5
Bulot n/a
Gomez 4
Ben Haim 6
Bikey 5
Solly 6
Buyens 6
Gudmundsson 7.5
Jackson 5
Cousins 4
Tucadean 3
Vetokele 3
Gomez - 4.5
Ben Haim - 7
Bikey - 5
Solly - 6
Buyens - 6
Gudmundsson - 7.5
Jackson - 6.5
Cousins - 5
Tucudean - 4
Vetokele - 5
Gomez - 5 (better second half)
Ben Haim - 6
Bikey - 4 (awful distribution)
Solly - 5
Buyens - 4
Gudmundsson - 7 (Charlton's most creative player)
Jackson - 4
Cousins - 4
Tucadean 2 (just woeful! Rightly booked for a second dive. Charlton's Billy Bendtner)
Vetokele - 5
Gomez 6
Ben Haim 6.5
Bikey 5.5
Solly 6.5
Buyens 6.5
Gudmundsson 6.5
Jackson 6
Cousins 6
Tucudean 1.5
Vetokele 4
(I know the 1.5 might seem ridiculous but I genuinely don't see how this guy is a pro footballer especially on tonight's performance. Has no first touch, no ball control, no strength, trips over his own feet and spends half the game on the floor.)
Etheridge - 6
Gomez - 2.5
Ben Haim - 7
Bikey - 6
Solly - 6
Buyens - 5
Gudmundsson - 6.5
Jackson - 5
Cousins - 4
Tucudean - 2
Vetokele - 4
We couldn't score in a Brothel.
Gomez 3
Ben Haim 5
Bikey 4
Solly 4
Buyens 4
Gudmundsson 4
Jackson 3
Cousins 2 haha
Tucudean 3
Vetokele 3
And yes I was at the game, deal with it.
Gomez 5 awful 1st half. better 2nd
Ben Haim 6
Bikey 5.5
Solly 6
Buyens 7
Gudmundsson 7
Jackson 5
Cousins 5.5
Tucudean 5.5
Vetokele 6
At the game and looking at the performance not just the result!!!!
Gomez 3
Ben Haim 5
Bikey 6
Solly 6
Buyens 6
Gudmundsson 6
Jackson 5
Cousins 4
Tucudean 2
Vetokele 6
Gomez 5.5
Ben Haim 6
Bikey 6
Solly 6
Buyens 5.5
Gudmundsson 7
Jackson 6
Cousins 5
Tucudean 5
Vetokele 5.5
Gomez 4 - poor start to the match
Ben Haim 5 - won nothing in the air
Bikey 5
Solly 6 - got forward well
Buyens 5 - poor distribution
Gudmundsson 9 - his best showing
Jackson 6 - got in the box well
Cousins 4 - non existent
Tucadean 5
Vetokele 5
Etheridge 5
Gomez 6
Ben Haim 6
Bikey 4
Solly 5
Buyens 5.5
Gudmundsson 7.5
Jackson 6
Cousins 5
Tucudean 4
Vetokele 5
Gomez 6
Ben Haim 6
Bikey 7
Solly 6
Buyens 6
Gudmundsson 7.5
Jackson 5
Cousins 5
Tucudean 5
Vetokele 5
Gomez 5 Looked out of his depth, although he did improve in the second half.
Ben Haim 6 Despite the result, he had a reasonable game.
Bikey 6 Effectively played at full back and was heavily relied upon to feed ball to forwards. Unfair criticism from others
Solly 7 Got into some good positions and was keen to get forward.
Buyens 6 Reasonable game
Gudmundsson 7 Always looking to get a shot in.
Jackson 6 Reasonable game
Cousins 5 Anonymous for much of the game
Tucudean 4 Weak and ineffectual. He's becoming as big a joke as Leaburn!
Vetokele 5 Not much better than Tucudean!
The main difference between the sides was the forwards. They had two who were always a threat and looked likely to score. We had two who were never going to score in a million years!
Etheridge 5 Don't like marking younger players below 'par' but felt he could have done better with a couple of the goals. After watching again on TV I feel he wasn't quick enough for the first and left his goal exposed for the second after his dive for the attempt which crashed the crossbar . Like Pope he is inexperienced at this level although I do think he has tremendous potential.
Gomez 5 Like Etheridge I do not like marking youngsters down
Ben Haim 6 Our best defender
Bikey 6 Certainly he is no left back
Solly 6 Kept going.
Buyens 6 Average
Gudmundsson 7 Our only creative spark
Jackson 6 Played well . Can't play 2 full games in a week anymore.
Cousins 5 Still don't like him playing wide left
Tucudean 5 Ineffectual.
Vetokele 5 Is he unfit? Looks a shadow of the player from earlier in the season
Gomez - 5. Extremely shaky first half, but sort of grew into the game slowly. Though his inexperience is apparent (not his fault though).
Ben Haim - 7. Solid performance.
Bikey - 4. Get nervous whenever he's on the ball. Heavy touch and ridiculous cross field balls.
Solly - 6. Tried hard and got forward.
Buyens - 7. One of our better perfomers.
Gudmundsson - 7. Offered some creativity, our only threat for most of the game.
Jackson - 7. Thought he was playing well, only player who was making forward runs and trying to get on the end of the ball. Didn't deserve to come off imo.
Cousins - 6. Kept going and running until the end.
Tucudean - 2. Seems harsh but he was so so so bad. Would've been a 3 if it weren't for that pathetic embarrassing dive at the end. Terrible performance which is a shame as i thought he had a blinder against Cardiff.
Vetokele - 6. Tried hard but his body language suggests he's lacking some confidence atm.
Peeters - 3. No animation on the touch line and when he did get up, it was just to tell the team to pump it forward which was playing into the hands of a typical Mick McCarthy side. When we ran at them, we caused problems, but for most of the game it was just route 1. Also, how Tucudean was on the pitch for the whole 90 minutes is beyond me. Piggot or Grant deserved at least a 5 minute cameo imo as it clearly wasn't Tucudean's game (which it rarely is anyway).
Oh well. They're second in the league for a reason. Keep the faith. COYR
Gomez - 6
Ben Haim - 6.5
Bikey - 6.5
Solly - 7.5
Buyens - 8
Gudmundsson - 7.5
Jackson - 6
Cousins - 6
Tucudean - 6
Vetokele - 6
Gomez 6
Ben Haim 6.5
Bikey 6
Solly 6
Buyens 6.5
Gudmundsson 7
Jackson 5
Cousins 5
Tucudean 4.5
Vetokele 5
Bulot n/a
Gomez 4 Very poor first half, out of position
Ben Haim 7, a cut above
Bikey 6 Bit shaky at times
Solly 6 Not a right winger Bob!
Buyens 6 OK
Gudmundsson 7.5 Very good second half when moved into middle
Jackson 4 Hardly noticed him
Cousins 5 Poor by his standards
Tucudean 5 Bullied out of it. Not the player he was on Saturday
Vetokele 6 Tried hard, feeding off scraps
Tactics all wrong. Three across the back? Gomez left back ? Continuous high crosses, gobbled up by Ipswich defence?