Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Nottingham Forest v Charlton

13»

Comments

  • edited September 2012
    Hamer 5
    Solly 7 MOM considering he was left totally exposed.
    Morrison 6.5
    Cort 7
    Wiggins 6
    Cook 3
    Hollands 6
    Pritchard 4
    Jackson 5
    Kermorgant 6
    Wright Phillips 4.5
    Haynes 5.5
  • Hamer 5
    Solly 6
    Morrison 7
    Cort 6.5
    Wiggins 6
    Cook 4
    Hollands 5.5
    Pritchard 4.5
    Jackson 5
    Kermorgant 5.5
    Wright Phillips 5.5
    Haynes 4.5

    CP 3
  • Hamer - 4
    Solly - 6
    Morrison - 7
    Cort - 7
    Wiggins - 6
    Cook - 3
    Hollands - 5
    Pritchard - 5
    Jackson - 4
    Kermorgant - 5
    Wright Phillips - 5
    Haynes - 4
  • Maglor said:



    Fuller n/a Fantastic Cameo looks like he should play ahead of Yann

    Lol your kidding, right?
  • Nicholas said:

    Hamer 4 At fault for the first goal, looked shakey all game
    Solly 7 solid
    Morrison 5 struggled with Forest movement
    Cort 5 same as above
    Wiggins 5 never got forward at all. gave the ball away a lot in the first half
    Cook 3 never settled, not sure how much was his fault as he was moved from the right to the middle to the left to up front
    Hollands 6 Got overrun as he had no help from the other midfielders
    Pritchard 5 struggled throughout
    Jackson 4 Struggled on the wing yet again, looked better in the middle but still doesn't look good enough.
    Kermorgant 5 struggled to win as many headers, but probably down to the lack of service
    Wright Phillips 5 struggled no service
    Haynes 3 Didn't look interested

    Powell 2 messed around with the formation too much.

    Only plus point was Fuller looked a threat as soon as he came in strong and good with the ball at his feet. Kerkar looked half decent aswell.

    Completely agree with this - however I watched the stream so maybe shouldnt be included.
  • Hamer 4
    Solly 8
    Morrison 6
    Cort 6
    Wiggins 7
    Cook 5
    Hollands 5
    Pritchard 5
    Jackson 5
    Kermorgant 6
    Wright Phillips 6
    Haynes 3

    Fuller 9
    Kerkar 9
  • Hamer 5
    Solly 5
    Morrison 7
    Cort 7
    Wiggins 5
    Cook 5
    Hollands 5
    Pritchard 5
    Jackson 5
    Kermorgant 6
    Wright Phillips 6
    Haynes 5
  • Hamer 5.5
    Solly 6.5
    Morrison 6.0
    Cort 6.5
    Wiggins 6.0
    Cook 4.5
    Hollands 6.0
    Pritchard 5.5
    Jackson 5.0
    Kermorgant 6.5
    Wright Phillips 6.0
    Haynes 5.5

    Fuller n/a
    Kerkar n/a
  • redbuttle said:

    As we are giving out low marks for yesterday, what about a zero for all of our so called fans who left when the second goal went in.....

    Why? At least they attended the fixture.

    Regarding Cook, he has the potential to be a good player but was poor on Saturday. In his favour he was enthusiatic and did not give up. But to be brutally honest his best contribution was in not being sent off and allowing CP to substitute him. Given the above, and the criticism of SE9, what would be the appropriate score for such a performance.
  • edited September 2012
    Hamer 5
    Solly 6.5
    Morrison 6
    Cort 6
    Wiggins 6
    Cook 4
    Hollands 6
    Pritchard 4
    Jackson 5
    Kermorgant 5
    Wright Phillips 5
    Haynes 5
  • Sponsored links:


  • Hamer 5
    Solly 5
    Morrison 5
    Cort 5
    Wiggins 5
    Cook 4
    Hollands 4.5
    Pritchard 4
    Jackson 4
    Kermorgant 5
    Wright Phillips 4 (I hope I'm not the only one who finds this man infuriating)
    Haynes 4

  • This thread is now closed for marks, statbank this afternoon
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!