Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

Players Marks: Nottingham Forest v Charlton

For those of you at the City Ground today your marks please, just copy and paste the list. The thread will remain open for marks until Tuesday lunchtime and Stats will be out by the evening:

Hamer
Solly
Morrison
Cort
Wiggins
Cook
Hollands
Pritchard
Jackson
Kermorgant
Wright Phillips
Haynes

Fuller n/a
Kerkar n/a
«13

Comments

  • Options
    Hamer - 4.5
    Solly - 7
    Morrison - 6.5
    Cort - 6
    Wiggins - 6.5
    Cook - 4
    Hollands - 5.5
    Pritchard - 5.5
    Jackson - 4.5
    Kermorgant - 6
    Wright Phillips - 5
    Haynes - 4 (forgot he came on!)

    Fuller n/a
    Kerkar n/a
  • Options
    edited September 2012
    @lancashire_lad I watched the whole stream so feel free not to include these marks into your final total.

    Hamer - 5 - Big blunder with the 1st goal and looked a bit dodgy all match which is unusual for him
    Solly - 6 - Average not quality
    Morrison - 6 - Some good tackles but like the rest of the defense he was torn to pieces by Forest's passing game
    Cort - 5.5 - There was no ariel battle for him to dominate and he lacked agility at times
    Wiggins - 6 - Nothing going forward and he was average defensively
    Cook - 4.5 - Not in the game at all
    Hollands - 5.5 - was chasing shadows so he couldn't offer anything going forward
    Pritchard - 5.5 - Got overpowered in midfield
    Jackson - 5 - Not in the game on the wing but when moved to centre mid he did well and spread the ball about nicely, shame he was only there for about 5-10 mins.
    Kermorgant - 6 - Lacked service so wasn't in the game much
    Wright Phillips - 6 - Ditto Kermorgant
    Haynes - 4.5 - Did nothing at all

    Fuller and Kerkar both made an impact when they came on and probably ended up being our 2 best players even though they only played for 5 mins.
  • Options
    edited September 2012
    Hamer - 5
    Solly - 6
    Wiggins - 5.5
    Cort - 5.5
    Morrison - 5.5
    Pritchard - 5
    Hollands - 5.5
    Jackson - 5
    Cook - 5
    Kermorgant - 5.5
    Bwp - 5.5
    Haynes - 5.5
  • Options
    Hamer 5
    Solly 7
    Morrison 6
    Cort 6.5
    Wiggins 6
    Cook 5
    Hollands 4
    Pritchard 4
    Jackson 4
    Kermorgant 6
    Wright Phillips 3
    Haynes 4

    Fuller 6
    Kerkar 6
  • Options
    Hamer - 5
    Solly - 7
    Morrison - 6
    Cort - 6
    Wiggins - 6
    Cook - 5
    Hollands - 5
    Pritchard - 5
    Jackson - 5
    Kermorgant - 6
    Wright Phillips -5.5
    Haynes - 5
  • Options


    Hamer 5. At fault for the first goal
    Solly 7. Wasn't able to get forward much. One excellent late surge.
    Morrison 6. Hard afternoon's work
    Cort 6.5 won a lot of high balls one superb tackle may have saved a goal
    Wiggins 6. As Solly minus the surge.
    Cook 4. Why was he given that role? Needs to think faster
    Hollands 5. I hope this was just an off day
    Pritchard 5. I thought he did ok fighting the tide.
    Jackson 4. As Hollands but insert "really really"
    Kermorgant 5. Not his best. But there are better defenders around this season.
    Wright Phillips 5. With hindsight should have been sacrificed for a 4-5-1
    Haynes 5. Didn't make an impact

    Fuller n/a
    Kerkar n/a

  • Options
    Hamer - 3 -appalling star jump for the first goal and jittery throughout
    Solly - 6 - given more trouble than usual
    Morrison - 5 - not as commanding as usual
    Cort - 5 - ditto
    Wiggins - 5 - looked to play aimless balls up the line all the time
    Cook - 4 - failed to shine..... anonymous
    Hollands - 6 - battled.... in vain
    Pritchard - 4 - extra point for effort/willing but looked out of his depth
    Jackson - 3 - again.... where is the real JJ????
    Kermorgant - 6 - put body on the line but was 2nd bes for most of the game
    Wright Phillips - 5 - no service to him left him anonymous
    Haynes - 4 - invisible
  • Options
    Hamer - 5
    Solly - 6
    Morrison - 6
    Cort - 6
    Wiggins - 6
    Cook - 4
    Hollands - 5
    Pritchard - 5
    Jackson - 5
    Kermorgant - 6
    Wright Phillips - 6
    Haynes - 5

    Fuller n/a
    Kerkar n/a
  • Options
    edited September 2012
    Hamer 4 Solly 6 Morrison 6 Cort 5 Wiggins 5 Cook 5 Hollands 5 Pritchard 4 Jackson 4 Kermorgant 5 Wright Phillips 4 Haynes 5
  • Options
    Hamer 4 At fault for the first goal, looked shakey all game
    Solly 7 solid
    Morrison 5 struggled with Forest movement
    Cort 5 same as above
    Wiggins 5 never got forward at all. gave the ball away a lot in the first half
    Cook 3 never settled, not sure how much was his fault as he was moved from the right to the middle to the left to up front
    Hollands 6 Got overrun as he had no help from the other midfielders
    Pritchard 5 struggled throughout
    Jackson 4 Struggled on the wing yet again, looked better in the middle but still doesn't look good enough.
    Kermorgant 5 struggled to win as many headers, but probably down to the lack of service
    Wright Phillips 5 struggled no service
    Haynes 3 Didn't look interested

    Powell 2 messed around with the formation too much.

    Only plus point was Fuller looked a threat as soon as he came in strong and good with the ball at his feet. Kerkar looked half decent aswell.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    Hamer-5
    Solly-7
    Morrison-6
    Cort-7
    Wiggins-6
    Cook-4
    Hollands-6
    Pritchard-5
    Jackson-5
    Kermorgant-6
    Wright Phillips-5
    Haynes-4

    Fuller n/a
    Kerkar n/a
  • Options
    edited September 2012

    Hamer 5
    Solly 5
    Morrison 7
    Cort 5
    Wiggins 6
    Cook 1
    Hollands 5
    Pritchard 4.5
    Jackson 5
    Kermorgant 6.5
    Wright Phillips 5
    Haynes 6

    Fuller n/a - you might say n/a but we were a different team when he came on

    Kerkar n/a

  • Options
    Oh, if you didn't realise, Cook was disgracefully bad
  • Options
    That's shocking marking, se9. Makes a mockery of the system.
  • Options
    It's not mate. It's my opinion and that was the worst individual performance since the bad days a few years ago.
  • Options
    edited September 2012

    For those of you at the City Ground today your marks please, just copy and paste the list. The thread will remain open for marks until Tuesday lunchtime and Stats will be out by the evening:

    Hamer - 5
    Solly - 7
    Morrison - 6
    Cort - 6
    Wiggins - 5
    Cook - 5
    Hollands -5
    Pritchard -5
    Jackson - 5
    Kermorgant - 5
    Wright Phillips - 5
    Haynes - 5

    Fuller n/a
    Kerkar n/a

    Thought Fuller showed more in his short cameo than the rest put together, sorely lacking any craft or creativity throughout.

  • Options
    Don't normally comment on marking, but you make yourself look silly with that marking se9.
  • Options
    Hamer - 6
    Solly - 7
    Morrison - 5
    Cort - 5
    Wiggins - 6
    Cook - 4
    Hollands - 5
    Pritchard - 6
    Jackson - 5.5
    Kermorgant - 5
    Wright Phillips - 6
    Haynes - 4.5

    Fuller n/a
    Kerkar n/a
  • Options
    edited September 2012

    Don't normally comment on marking, but you make yourself look silly with that marking se9.

    Mate I can't think of many ways it could have been worse, they were completely dominating us down that side, Cook offered Solly no support and we were lucky we only let in one goal from that flank in the first half. It was so bad Cook was switched with Jackson after half time and then shortly after subbed.

    I'm not drunk and look at my previous ratings, I'm not knee jerk but I was disgusted with that performance. A 1 is warranted by a performance with no redeeming features - I saw none from Cook's display today.
  • Options
    Hamer - 6 at fault for the first goal, no way he should be beaten from that angle.
    Solly - 7 Solid, even though he was left seriously exposed.
    Morrison - 7 Don't think he did much wrong, couple of good tackles.
    Cort - 6 Some decent headers away, when we were being bombarded.
    Wiggins - 6 Couldn't do anythng but hoof it into the box and hope.
    Cook - 4 Looked like a boy up against men.
    Hollands - 6 Let down by his fellow midfielders.
    Pritchard - 4 Chasing shadows , no real position.
    Jackson - 5.5 Looked more comfortable in the middle.
    Kermorgant - 5 Did the best with what he had
    Wright Phillips - 6 Didn't get much service but took up a position on the right to cover for Cook/Pritchard
    Haynes - 5 Not sure if 100% fit or just a bit lazy.

    Fuller n/a
    Kerkar n/a These two looked very good when they came on , completely changed the game momentum. Look forward to seeing more of Fuller.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    Hamer - 5.5 - At fault for first goal, and looked shaky all match
    Solly - 7 - Gave a good performance overall
    Morrison - 6.5 - Can't remember too much of him, needs to be stronger at organising defence in my opinion.
    Cort - 6.5 - Ok, nothing special
    Wiggins 6 - Poor in first half, but better second.
    Cook - 4.5 - Felt sorry for him, put out of position and really struggled
    Hollands 6 - Played ok, hard work for him.
    Pritchard 4.5 - Energy can only get you so far, looked really poor and stood out as weak.
    Jackson 5 - Dreadful first half, but was stronger in the middle in the second half
    Kermorgant 6 - Couldn't do too much, Forest centre-halves were good.
    Wright Phillips 6 - No service of any kind, but played ok on the right.
    Haynes 5.5 - Not good.

    Fuller n/a - 9 Changed the game.
    Kerkar n/a 7.5 - Looked talented.
  • Options
    Hamer 6
    Solly 7
    Morrison 6
    Cort 6
    Wiggins 6
    Cook 4
    Hollands 6
    Pritchard 4
    Jackson 5
    Kermorgant 6.5
    Wright Phillips 5.5
    Haynes 6

    Fuller 8 on the time he played, looked very strong on the ball, can't wait to see more of him.
  • Options

    Hamer 6 poor first goal
    Solly 7
    Morrison 6 struggled. didn't help with no midfield
    Cort 6 same as above
    Wiggins same again
    Cook 3 total shit
    Hollands5 tried but not good enough
    Pritchard 4 shit
    Jackson 3 shit
    Kermorgant 5 no service from midfield
    Wright Phillips same as above
    Haynes 5 nuff said


    thought all our problems came from a wank performance in midfield . not worried but slightly concerned at our lack of quality and know how in the middle.
  • Options
    edited September 2012

    se9addick, to get a 1 you'd need to score about 6 own goals. The most annoying thing is you're just wasting Lancashire Lad's time by dicking about with the scores like that. In fact, anyone who's bothered to put player ratings in for this match has wasted their time. And everyone who subsequently puts in marks as you've skewed the marking for Cook so badly. Might take a leaf out of Henry's book and abstain from the player marks if the result is this shit
  • Options
    Mate I've explained why I think Cook deserves a 1. My ratings, surprisingly, aren't pegged to the number of own goals a player scores rather I rate their contribution to the team.

    Stick your player ratings from today's game up to balance things out.
  • Options
    To balance what you've done out I'd have to give Cook a 10. Which he doesn't deserve. Rating Cook at a 1 obviously doesn't make sense but if you're determined to stick with it then I'm not going to waste my time doing a load of ratings when it is now pointless. Been an embarrassing day for this board
  • Options
    Players marks thread. Take your pointless bickering elsewhere.
  • Options
    Not really mate, if 50 people give a mark then mines will only have a 2% influence on the result. That's how averages work.

    Dont feel disheartened from having your say simply because I have.
  • Options
    Hamer - 6
    Solly - 7 MOM
    Morrison - 6
    Cort - 5.5
    Wiggins - 5
    Cook - 4.5
    Hollands - 5.5
    Pritchard - 5.5
    Jackson - 5
    Kermorgant- 6
    Wright Phillips- 5.5
    Haynes - 5.5

    Fuller - 8
    Kerkar - 7
  • Options

    To balance what you've done out I'd have to give Cook a 10. Which he doesn't deserve. Rating Cook at a 1 obviously doesn't make sense but if you're determined to stick with it then I'm not going to waste my time doing a load of ratings when it is now pointless. Been an embarrassing day for this board

    Bazza, take you and your long nose onto other thread. cheers
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!