If the name 'Francis' was there instead of 'Solly' or 'Wiggins', we'd be seeing 2s and 3s. Wagstaff can set up 1 and score 1 and run tirelessly when almost everyone else has given up. But he gets 4s and 5s.
Whether you like a player or not shouldn't reflect on the score you give them.
Never underestimatte the weirdness of our support Rugby
Cafcbrennans the best so far, Hamer more than Wagstaff, and BWP miles ahead for scoring and setting one up and looking up for it which describes Waggys second half quite well.
If the name 'Francis' was there instead of 'Solly' or 'Wiggins', we'd be seeing 2s and 3s. Wagstaff can set up 1 and score 1 and run tirelessly when almost everyone else has given up. But he gets 4s and 5s.
Whether you like a player or not shouldn't reflect on the score you give them.
Agree. Unfortunately some decided in pre-season that Green was "class" and Wagstaff a "headless chicken".
Yet in the last couple of years we've seen both (if starting regularly) are capable of around 15 goals and assists, but neither look Championship standard at the moment.
Never underestimatte the weirdness of our support Rugby
Cafcbrennans the best so far, Hamer more than Wagstaff, and BWP miles ahead for scoring and setting one up and looking up for it which describes Waggys second half quite well.
Hamer 5 Solly 5 Morrison 5 Taylor 4 Looked lost Wiggins 4 One of those bad days Wagstaff 7.5 The only creative outlet Hollands 5 Anonymous Stephens 6 Better than Hollands Jackson 5 Not a captain's performance Kermorgant 5 Disappointing Wright Phillips 8 The only one still making an effort and trying to gee others up at 0-4
Hamer 4 - failed to command his area Solly 6 Morrison 4.5 - Spent most of the match watching Taylor watching the ball Taylor 4 - Same as MM; reverse names Wiggins 4.5 - off day? Wagstaff 6.5 Hollands 5.5 Stephens 6 Jackson 5 - Still looks unfit following injury Kermorgant 6.5 Wright Phillips 7.5
Hamer 4, you have the number one shirt, command your area take control do your job. Solly 6 Morrison 5 Taylor 5 Wiggins 6 Wagstaff 6 Hollands 6 Stephens 5 Jackson 5 Kermorgant 6 Wright Phillips 7
Hamer - 5 Solly - 5 - his worst game this season Morrison - 5 Taylor - 4 Wiggins - 5 Wagstaff - 4 - gets an extra point for a goal Hollands - 5.5 Stephens - 6 Jackson - 5 Kermorgant - 5.5 Wright Phillips - 7.5 - extra point for goal and assist and looked really good and up for it second half
Seriously you thought Waggy was a 3 without that goal? So setting up the other goal counts for nothing and he was worse than Hamer who shipped 4 goals?
Hamer - 5 Not great and and I wouldn't have a problem in Sullivan getting some games because he's a decent/brave keeper. Still like Hamer though...he's done ok this season. Solly - 6 Like most others he was bit off but still did some good things and never gave up. Morrison - 6 Not convinced he was especially bad. Taylor - 5 A bit hesitant but another strong character who will have recovered from bad games before. Wiggins - 5.5 Some mistakes but always gives everything. Wagstaff - 7 Had a really good spell but then faded. Ought to stay in the team for a bit now. Took his goal well (his first headed goal?) Hollands - 5 Never got going. All the games must be catching up with him. Stephens - 5.5 His shooting ability will always keep him in the game but he was out-gunned by County. Jackson 5 Surely not fit? Kermorgant - 6 As ever, most of his good work had to be done outside the box. Was well marked. Wright Phillips - 8 Zero service in the first half but never gave up. Well taken goal and smart cross for Wagstaff's header. Attitude 100% spot on and at least no-one is talking about his barren spell now.
Powell - Wonder if he regrets not making two substitutions with 20 mins left. It just petered out when we should've had them under siege. Might have also been useful to give Hollands a bit of a rest and give Russell some game time.
Hamer 5 Solly 4 - Very poor by his own high standards Morrison 6 - Tried to keep a flailing defence together Taylor 4 - Am I the only one who thought the goal was down to him? Wiggins 4 - So one footed it is criminal Wagstaff 6 Hollands 5 Stephens 5 Jackson 5 Kermorgant 6 Wright Phillips 7.5 - Thought he played the same as he has done recently. Very well with bags of effort
id stick with hamer because i dt think sullivan is any better id give cort a run of games,jacko isnt fit ,hes running through treacle so if green is fit id play him left side and put waggy on right same 2 upfront
If the name 'Francis' was there instead of 'Solly' or 'Wiggins', we'd be seeing 2s and 3s. Wagstaff can set up 1 and score 1 and run tirelessly when almost everyone else has given up. But he gets 4s and 5s.
85 posts in the thread and only four people gave Waggy five or less. When LL puts up the stats tomorrow, I would expect Waggy to be in the top two with BWP. As for Francis, you are having a laugh. If he'd been playing we would probably have lost 6-2. He's helped Bournemouth to lose their last five games. We've only last our last two!
Hamer - 5 Solly - 5 - his worst game this season Morrison - 5 Taylor - 4 Wiggins - 5 Wagstaff - 4 - gets an extra point for a goal Hollands - 5.5 Stephens - 6 Jackson - 5 Kermorgant - 5.5 Wright Phillips - 7.5 - extra point for goal and assist and looked really good and up for it second half
Seriously you thought Waggy was a 3 without that goal? So setting up the other goal counts for nothing and he was worse than Hamer who shipped 4 goals?
Pathetic.
you can blame hamer for about 1 goal which was mainly taylors fault and waggys cross for the goal was poor way to near the keeper just really good play from wright-phillips and ill give him the header that was a good goal but apart from that he did nothing just gave the ball away all the time, he was dreadful!!
Dreadful apart from the goal, the assist, the excellent cross kerno tried to punch in, our first shot on target and a couple more shots in the 2nd half, his running and hard work.
Clearly marking based on your prejudices not on the performances on the day.
Not Waggy's biggest fan but probably the best of a bad bunch (first half though he was as bad as the rest of them).
How Hamer can get a 5 is beyond me, apart from the goals he was terrible (didn't command and un-nerved the defence).... although he slightly improved in the second half.
Dreadful apart from the goal, the assist, the excellent cross kerno tried to punch in, our first shot on target and a couple more shots in the 2nd half, his running and hard work.
Clearly marking based on your prejudices not on the performances on the day.
This.
We all see things differently, granted ...... but some posters' marking is beyond credibility.
Comments
Solly 6
Morrison 6
Taylor 5
Wiggins 6
Wagstaff 7
Hollands 5
Stephens 4
Jackson 4
Kermorgant 6
Wright Phillips 7
Whether you like a player or not shouldn't reflect on the score you give them.
Cafcbrennans the best so far, Hamer more than Wagstaff, and BWP miles ahead for scoring and setting one up and looking up for it which describes Waggys second half quite well.
Weird
Yet in the last couple of years we've seen both (if starting regularly) are capable of around 15 goals and assists, but neither look Championship standard at the moment.
Solly 6.5
Morrison 6
Taylor 5
Wiggins 5
Wagstaff 5
Hollands 5.5
Stephens 5
Jackson 5
Kermorgant 6
Wright Phillips 7
Solly 5.5
Morrison 5.5
Taylor 5.5
Wiggins 6
Wagstaff 6.5
Hollands 5.5
Stephens 5.5
Jackson 5.5
Kermorgant 5.5
Wright Phillips 6.5
referee - 4 - his dislike of Kermi not even subtle
Notts Co - 8.5 - the best side we have played this season in my view
Solly 5
Morrison 5
Taylor 6
Wiggins 6
Wagstaff 7.5 MOM
Hollands 6
Stephens 6
Jackson 5
Kermorgant 6.5
Wright Phillips 7
Solly 5
Morrison 5
Taylor 4 Looked lost
Wiggins 4 One of those bad days
Wagstaff 7.5 The only creative outlet
Hollands 5 Anonymous
Stephens 6 Better than Hollands
Jackson 5 Not a captain's performance
Kermorgant 5 Disappointing
Wright Phillips 8 The only one still making an effort and trying to gee others up at 0-4
Solly 5
Morrison 4
Taylor 4
Wiggins 4
Wagstaff 7
Hollands 4
Stephens 4
Jackson 4
Kermorgant 5
Wright Phillips 7
Solly 5
Morrison 5
Taylor 5
Wiggins 5
Wagstaff 7 MOM - ran his socks off
Hollands 5.5
Stephens 5
Jackson 5
Kermorgant 5
Wright Phillips 6
Bad day at the office...but much better 2nd half.
Solly-5
Morrison-6
Taylor-5
Wiggins-5.5
Wagstaff-7
Hollands-6
Stephens-6
Jackson-6
Kermorgant-6
Wright Phillips-7
Solly 6
Morrison 4.5 - Spent most of the match watching Taylor watching the ball
Taylor 4 - Same as MM; reverse names
Wiggins 4.5 - off day?
Wagstaff 6.5
Hollands 5.5
Stephens 6
Jackson 5 - Still looks unfit following injury
Kermorgant 6.5
Wright Phillips 7.5
Solly 6
Morrison 5
Taylor 5
Wiggins 6
Wagstaff 6
Hollands 6
Stephens 5
Jackson 5
Kermorgant 6
Wright Phillips 7
Pathetic.
Solly - 5.5
Morrison - 5
Taylor - 5
Wiggins - 5
Wagstaff - 6
Hollands - 5
Stephens - 4.5
Jackson - 5
Kermorgant - 5
Wright Phillips - 6
Solly 7
Morrison 6
Taylor 5
Wiggins 6
Wagstaff 6.5
Hollands 6
Stephens 6
Jackson 6
Kermorgant 6.5
Wright Phillips 7.5
Solly - 6
Morrison - 6
Taylor - 4
Wiggins - 6
Wagstaff - 6
Hollands - 6
Stephens - 4
Jackson - 5
Kermorgant - 6
Wright Phillips - 7
Bloke behind the goal who headed the ball - 9
Solly - 6
Morrison 5.5
Taylor 4
Wiggins 5
Wagstaff 6.5
Hollands 5
Stephens 6
Jackson 5
Kermorgant 6.5
Wright Phillips 6.5
Solly - 6 Like most others he was bit off but still did some good things and never gave up.
Morrison - 6 Not convinced he was especially bad.
Taylor - 5 A bit hesitant but another strong character who will have recovered from bad games before.
Wiggins - 5.5 Some mistakes but always gives everything.
Wagstaff - 7 Had a really good spell but then faded. Ought to stay in the team for a bit now. Took his goal well (his first headed goal?)
Hollands - 5 Never got going. All the games must be catching up with him.
Stephens - 5.5 His shooting ability will always keep him in the game but he was out-gunned by County.
Jackson 5 Surely not fit?
Kermorgant - 6 As ever, most of his good work had to be done outside the box. Was well marked.
Wright Phillips - 8 Zero service in the first half but never gave up. Well taken goal and smart cross for Wagstaff's header. Attitude 100% spot on and at least no-one is talking about his barren spell now.
Powell - Wonder if he regrets not making two substitutions with 20 mins left. It just petered out when we should've had them under siege. Might have also been useful to give Hollands a bit of a rest and give Russell some game time.
Solly 4 - Very poor by his own high standards
Morrison 6 - Tried to keep a flailing defence together
Taylor 4 - Am I the only one who thought the goal was down to him?
Wiggins 4 - So one footed it is criminal
Wagstaff 6
Hollands 5
Stephens 5
Jackson 5
Kermorgant 6
Wright Phillips 7.5 - Thought he played the same as he has done recently. Very well with bags of effort
solly 6
taylor 4
morro 6
wiggins 5
waggy 7
hollands 6
stevens 6
jacko 4
bwp 7
kermit 7
id stick with hamer because i dt think sullivan is any better id give cort a run of games,jacko isnt fit ,hes running through treacle so if green is fit id play him left side and put waggy on right same 2 upfront
Solly - 6
Taylor - 3
Morrison - 6
Wiggins - 5
Wagstaff - 7
Hollands - 5.5
Stephens - 5.5
Jackson - 4
Wright - Phillips - 7
kermorgant - 7
Sorry, didn't read your comment before scoring LL. Points for fun only then.
Clearly marking based on your prejudices not on the performances on the day.
How Hamer can get a 5 is beyond me, apart from the goals he was terrible (didn't command and un-nerved the defence).... although he slightly improved in the second half.
Solly - 5
Morrison - 5
Taylor - 5
Wiggins - 6
Wagstaff - 7
Hollands - 6
Stephens - 5.5
Jackson - 5
Kermorgant - 6
Wright Phillips - 7
We all see things differently, granted ...... but some posters' marking is beyond credibility.