Palace kit is ok tbh. What is wrong is the complete mimicking of Barcalona even down to the shade of maroon which is not associated with Palace at all. Why do clubs insist on messing with their original shade. Millwalls this year was more navy blue rather than the traditional royal blue. No class or appreciation of history. Please god we stay with our traditional shade of red.
We were allowed to vote on the basic design once upon a time. In the mid-90s I think. The club printed four kits on the programme and asked us to choose. Makes sense, really given that we're the ones who'll buy it! Not sure which manufacturer it was, possibly Ribero?
yes and the white, green, purple shirt was designed by a fan
We were allowed to vote on the basic design once upon a time. In the mid-90s I think. The club printed four kits on the programme and asked us to choose. Makes sense, really given that we're the ones who'll buy it! Not sure which manufacturer it was, possibly Ribero?
yes and the white, green, purple shirt was designed by a fan
We were allowed to vote on the basic design once upon a time. In the mid-90s I think. The club printed four kits on the programme and asked us to choose. Makes sense, really given that we're the ones who'll buy it! Not sure which manufacturer it was, possibly Ribero?
yes and the white, green, purple shirt was designed by a fan
Thought it was Quaser......................
I have no idea, just agreeing that we had options in the past. You may be right with Quaser though.
Knowing someone who works for the community scheme (who were told the news at their weekly meeting on Friday), the new kit will be revealed at the Hartlepool game. The club will announce sometime this week we are moving away from Macron & signing up with a new unknown brand (Nike) on the website & the new kit will be parachuted in by the Red Devils after the game.
The green and purple was Quasar. The choice of four red shirts was Le Coq Sportif! We winds up with the one with collars with the white bit just below them.
The green and purple was Quasar. The choice of four red shirts was Le Coq Sportif! We winds up with the one with collars with the white bit just below them.
The Redbus shirt? Think that's my favourite. I thought it might have been the original PL promotion shirt. That was Quasar.
Surely if we are getting new sponsers, it would make sense for it to be Jimenez's 'Le Bordes' company as rumoured as that would then allow us to potentially exploit a few loopholes with the financial fair play rules??
Knowing someone who works for the community scheme (who were told the news at their weekly meeting on Friday), the new kit will be revealed at the Hartlepool game. The club will announce sometime this week we are moving away from Macron & signing up with a new unknown brand (Nike) on the website & the new kit will be parachuted in by the Red Devils after the game.
What with parachutes, new kits, presentations, lap of honour, singers etc will there be any time for a football match???????????????
Hmmmm that parachuting kit in sounds a bit odd. But I guess the kit might be available to buy after the game as the season will have officially ended then, meaning so will our association with Macron and KRBS. Or am I 2+2'ing and getting 5?
So the red devils are parachuting the trophy in before hand, Shaun WP at half time to sign on the pitch and afterwards with the new kit, thats three sticks of six jumpers...18 hairy arsed para's on the pitch must equate to a pitch invasion!
Knowing someone who works for the community scheme (who were told the news at their weekly meeting on Friday), the new kit will be revealed at the Hartlepool game. The club will announce sometime this week we are moving away from Macron & signing up with a new unknown brand (Nike) on the website & the new kit will be parachuted in by the Red Devils after the game.
What with parachutes, new kits, presentations, lap of honour, singers etc will there be any time for a football match???????????????
No. Hartlepool have done the decent thing and 170 smurfs will parachute in to deliver the 3 points...................
Dazzler mate. I really, really don't want to rain on your parade fella but you might want to take AFKA's advice over the page a bit more seriously. It's not as simple as saying "I don't make any profit therefore I'm not in trade" these days (this advice is based on Blakemore v Bellamy I assume but things have moved on since).
We know that club employees visit CL for instance and although I'm sure your intentions are well meaning I'm equally sure you don't want any grief from the clubs lawyers or the authorities. It might be advisable to have another look at the situation is all I'm saying.
That's my advice on the subject, offered only with the best of intentions, take it or leave it...
I don't see the problem with making ur own personal Charlton tees. It isn't like ur forging replica shirts, someone mentioned that you're taking money out of the club, but looking around the superstore online there is nothing similar on there. The chap isn't making any profit and isn't mass producing these. Ok legally ur breaking trade mark rules, but the club won't take a hand full of fans to court over this matter.
I'm not sure on the details of trademark law in the UK, but in the US and internationally (and presumably here in the UK too) a company has to defend it's trademarks else it risks losing them. So it's not a case of the club wouldn't take a few fans to court over it, they may have no choice, otherwise EA could use it in future and cite the clubs previous record of non-enforcement of the trademark. Ultimately it wouldn't end in court, the club's lawyers would simply send a standard cease and desist and that would be the end of it. Or if the club liked the shirts it could grant a license to use the trademark, probably with strict terms on where and how it can be used.
The other issue is that Dazzler may not be making money, but unless he is printing the shirts by hand, the printing company is definitely making money out of reproducing the club's trademark.
I don't see the problem with making ur own personal Charlton tees. It isn't like ur forging replica shirts, someone mentioned that you're taking money out of the club, but looking around the superstore online there is nothing similar on there. The chap isn't making any profit and isn't mass producing these. Ok legally ur breaking trade mark rules, but the club won't take a hand full of fans to court over this matter.
It's irrelevant if someone is making a profit or a loss, is not mass producing it or if the item in question isn't being sold by the club. If someone owns the rights to a trade-mark by using it without their permission an offence is being committed.
Comments
yes and the white, green, purple shirt was designed by a fan
The club will announce sometime this week we are moving away from Macron & signing up with a new unknown brand (Nike) on the website & the new kit will be parachuted in by the Red Devils after the game.
Or am I reading too far into all of this?
(love that answer !)
How stupid mistaking a monkey in clothes for a french spy!
We know that club employees visit CL for instance and although I'm sure your intentions are well meaning I'm equally sure you don't want any grief from the clubs lawyers or the authorities. It might be advisable to have another look at the situation is all I'm saying.
That's my advice on the subject, offered only with the best of intentions, take it or leave it...
The other issue is that Dazzler may not be making money, but unless he is printing the shirts by hand, the printing company is definitely making money out of reproducing the club's trademark.