Been reading stuff like the first report for years. When we played Ipswich in the 5th round all those years ago, one of the reports mentioned "penned in hordes from the Surrey docks vomiting abuse". The Surrey docks?!? Millwall stronghold if ever there was.
And it's def better than top of the league because its mentioning Charlton .
The "top of the league" version is better on three counts. It scans better, is better grammatically and doesn't have an ambiguous line in it. "who gives a f**k with charlton athletic", could be construed as decidedly anti-Charlton. ;-)
not to bad. shame the reporter didn't say the penalty was not one and it would of been nice to mention our fans but overall best one ive read from the so called high brow papers. better than the guradian. and the above report from the telegraph.
fair report on FiveLive by Mike Ingram who said don't be fooled by the result as it was never a 4-0 drubbing and that we gave a very good account of ourselves and did not deserve to be on the end of that score line.
Those of us there at the game know what happened. Until the second goal we matched them across the park and even after that goal the players heads never dropped. I came away really upbeat as this was a very good team performance against a Premiership side which has a number of international players and which has recently beaten Liverpool and Arsenal. A similar level against the Wendies and I will be very happy.
Comments