Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Player Marks: Charlton 2-0 Exeter

13

Comments

  • Hamer - 7
    Solly - 8
    Morrison - 7
    Taylor - 7
    Wiggins - 7
    Wagstaff - 6
    Stephens - 6
    Hollands - 8
    Jackson - 6
    Hayes - 7
    BWP - 8
  • Hamer 6
    Solly 8 MOM
    Morrison 7
    Taylor 7
    Wiggins 7
    Wagstaff 6
    Stephens 7
    Hollands 6
    Jackson 6
    Hayes 6
    Wright Phillips 7
  • Hamer 7

    Solly 9

    Morrison 7.5

    Taylor 7.5

    Wiggins 7

    Wagstaff 6.5

    Stephens 6

    Hollands 6.5

    Jackson 5.5

    Hayes 6.5

    Wright Phillips 8



    Euell

    Hughes

    Pritchard
  • Hamer - 7
    Solly - 9
    Morrison - 7
    Taylor - 7
    Wiggins - 7
    Wagstaff - 7
    Stephens - 7
    Hollands - 7.5
    Jackson - 7
    Hayes - 7
    Wright
    Phillips - 8.5
  •  Hamer -6

     Solly -8 mom

     Morrison -7

     Taylor -7

     Wiggins -6.5

     Wagstaff -6 honestly believe he will play 2nd fiddle once danny green gets his chance,seems very reluctant at times to av ago at the left back.

     Stephens -6.5 not at his best today took goal well

     Hollands -7 work hard did a lot of the scrappy work in the middle.

     Jackson -6 like stephens didnt av 1 of his best games looked tired to me.

     Hayes -7 why people are digging him out is beyond me links well with BWP as the 1st goal showed looks a good partnership to me.

     Wright Phillips -8 another well taken goal unlucky with a couple of efforts and made  2nd goal loooks lazy at times  but puts the ball in the net ,enough said.

     

     

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

     

     

     

  • edited September 2011
    Hamer 6.5 Solly 9 Morrison 7 Taylor 7 Wiggins 7 Wagstaff 6 Stephens 7 Hollands 7 Jackson 6 Hayes 6.5 Wright Phillips 8
  • Hamer 6.5Solly 8.5Morrison 6.5Taylor 6.5Wiggins 7Wagstaff 7Stephens 7Hollands 6.5Jackson 7Hayes 6.5Wright Phillips 7.5
  • Hamer - 6
    Solly - 8.5
    Morrison - 6.5
    Taylor - 7
    Wiggins - 6
    Wagstaff - 6
    Stephens - 6.5
    Hollands - 8
    Jackson - 6
    Hayes - 6.5
    Wright-Phillips 8
  • Hamer - 7
    Solly - 8.5
    Morrison - 7.5
    Taylor - 7
    Wiggins - 7
    Wagstaff - 6.5
    Stephens - 7.5
    Hollands - 7
    Jackson - 6.5
    Hayes - 6
    Wright Phillips - 7.5
  • Hamer 5
    Solly 7
    Taylor 6
    Morrisson 7
    Wiggins 5
    Wagstaff 7
    Stephens 6
    Hollands 6
    Jackson 6
    Hayes 5
    BWP 8 

    Euell 6

    Pritchard 5

  • Sponsored links:


  • Hamer - 7
    Solly - 9
    Morrison - 7.5
    Taylor - 7
    Wiggins - 7.5
    Wagstaff - 5.5
    Stephens - 7
    Hollands - 7.5
    Jackson - 6
    Hayes - 6.5
    Wright Phillips - 9
  • edited September 2011
    Hamer 6.5Solly 8.5Morrison 7Taylor 6.5Wiggins 6Wagstaff 6Stephens 7Hollands 7Jackson 6Hayes 6Wright Phillips 7.5
  • Hamer - 7

    Solly - 9

    Morrison - 7.5

    Taylor - 7.5

    Wiggins - 7

    Wagstaff - 6.5

    Stephens - 6.5

    Hollands - 6.5

    Jackson - 6.5

    Hayes - 7

    Wright Phillips - 9
  • Hamer 7
    Solly 9
    Taylor 7
    Morrisson 7
    Wiggins 6.5
    Wagstaff 6.5
    Stephens 7
    Hollands 7
    Jackson 6.5
    Hayes 7
    BWP 8
  • Hamer - 6

    Solly - 8 MOM

    Morrison - 7

    Taylor - 7

    Wiggins - 6

    Wagstaff - 6

    Hollands - 7

    Stephens - 6.5

    Jackson - 6

    Hayes - 6

    Wright - Phillips - 7.5

  • edited September 2011
    I wasn't there BUT.....Hamer keeps blank sheet (which is why he's there) and still gets scores of 5 or only just better. Does he have to score from a corner or save a pen to get a score.......
    Agree .......... he's done his job and done it well, hence the clean sheet. And yet he gets marked a 5 = poor?

    If he hasn't got much to do, then that's down to the entire defence playing well as a unit, of which he is an integral part.

    With no glaring errors and participating as required, his performance has to be marked as an average of the whole defence, surely?
  • Hamer 6 Fotunate with the goal that wasn't

    Solly 8.5 Not sure what more he can do to convince those were so sure he'd fail. MOM

    Morrison 6.5

    Taylor 6.5

    Wiggins 6.5 I was getting a bit concerned about his attacking strengths before HT but much better second half. 

    Wagstaff 6.5 Quiet for spells but always a threat when he comes alive

    Stephens 6.5 Not one of his best again but 2 goals in 7 is fine for me

    Hollands 7 Seemed to step up a gear when Exeter briefly threatened to gain upper hand

    Jackson 5.5 Quiet one this time

    Hayes 6 Played a huge part in first goal but didn't quite work for him at times

    Wright Phillips 8 Another goal, another inventive, skillful afternoon. Must be a nightmare to play against
  • Hamer - 7 - Not much to do, great stop on the goal line, it was not over the line. Clean sheet so confidence should improve.
    Solly - 9 - MOTM - I think the Solly v Francis arguement has been put to bed.

    Morrison - 7 - Good patnership developing with Taylor

    Taylor - 7 - Ditto

    Wiggins - 5 - Poor, still not convinced, would like to see a change.

    Wagstaff - 7 - Good game
    Stephens - 7 - Needs to be more consistant, good finish though.

    Hollands - 6 - Played well, not much to worry about after they went to ten.

    Jackson - 5 - I thought JJ looked tired and lacked energy.
    Hayes - 7 - If only his touch matched the quality of his positional play, set up BWP so thats all right.
    Wright Phillips - 8 - Tireless running, good finish and loved his geeture to the Exeter fans at the end for all the stick he was getting.

     

    Powell - 7 - I thought he should have gone 3-5-2 after they went to ten men, however we won 2 - 0 so what do I know?
  • Hamer 6

    Solly 8.5

    Morrison 7

    Taylor 7

    Wiggins 7

    Wagstaff 7.5

    Stephens 7

    Hollands 7.5

    Jackson 6.5

    Hayes 7

    Wright Phillips 7.5
  • Hamer 7
    Solly 9
    Morrison 7
    Taylor 7.5
    Wiggins 75.
    Wagstaff 6
    Stephens 6.5
    Hollands 7
    Jackson 6.5
    Hayes 7
    Wright Phillips 8
  • Sponsored links:


  • Hamer - 5 - doesnt fill me with confidence even when he has little to do (slipeed over at one long ball in the box but was lucky, was their goal a goal and kicking poor)
    Solly - 8.5 - even the doubters now seem to him
    Morrison - 7
    Taylor - 7
    Wiggins - 5.5 - worries me
    Wagstaff - 6.5
    Stephens - 6.5
    Hollands - 8
    Jackson - 6
    Hayes - 6
    Wright Phillips - 7
  • Agree .......... he's done his job and done it well, hence the clean sheet. And yet he gets marked a 5 = poor?
    5 is average, not poor
  • Hamer 6

    Solly 8

    Morrison 7

    Taylor 7

    Wiggins 7

    Wagstaff 7

    Stephens 7.5

    Hollands 7

    Jackson 6

    Hayes 7

    Wright Phillips 8
  • Hamer - 7 - Not much to do, great stop on the goal line, it was not over the line. Clean sheet so confidence should improve.
    Solly - 9 - MOTM - I think the Solly v Francis arguement has been put to bed.

    Morrison - 7 - Good patnership developing with Taylor

    Taylor - 7 - Ditto

    Wiggins - 5 - Poor, still not convinced, would like to see a change.

    Wagstaff - 7 - Good game
    Stephens - 7 - Needs to be more consistant, good finish though.

    Hollands - 6 - Played well, not much to worry about after they went to ten.

    Jackson - 5 - I thought JJ looked tired and lacked energy.
    Hayes - 7 - If only his touch matched the quality of his positional play, set up BWP so thats all right.
    Wright Phillips - 8 - Tireless running, good finish and loved his geeture to the Exeter fans at the end for all the stick he was getting.

     

    Powell - 7 - I thought he should have gone 3-5-2 after they went to ten men, however we won 2 - 0 so what do I know?

    Can you explain in which way Wiggins was poor?

  • Hamer 7
    Solly 8.5
    Taylor 7
    Morrisson 7
    Wiggins 7
    Wagstaff 6.5
    Stephens 7
    Hollands 7
    Jackson 6.5
    Hayes 7
    BWP 8

  • Hamer - 7 - Not much to do, great stop on the goal line, it was not over the line. Clean sheet so confidence should improve.
    Solly - 9 - MOTM - I think the Solly v Francis arguement has been put to bed.

    Morrison - 7 - Good patnership developing with Taylor

    Taylor - 7 - Ditto

    Wiggins - 5 - Poor, still not convinced, would like to see a change.

    Wagstaff - 7 - Good game
    Stephens - 7 - Needs to be more consistant, good finish though.

    Hollands - 6 - Played well, not much to worry about after they went to ten.

    Jackson - 5 - I thought JJ looked tired and lacked energy.
    Hayes - 7 - If only his touch matched the quality of his positional play, set up BWP so thats all right.
    Wright Phillips - 8 - Tireless running, good finish and loved his geeture to the Exeter fans at the end for all the stick he was getting.

     

    Powell - 7 - I thought he should have gone 3-5-2 after they went to ten men, however we won 2 - 0 so what do I know?



    Can you explain in which way Wiggins was poor?
    Yes I can, he is not physically strong enough, he looks nervous on the ball, his positional play and game reading need work too. Also he doesn't seem to understand that footballs bounce and in the last two games he has misjudged a bouncing ball. I am not slaughtering Wiggins at all, IMHO I thought he had a poor game, I'm sure he will come good but on saturday he was our weakest link.

  • Hamer - 7 - Not much to do, great stop on the goal line, it was not over the line. Clean sheet so confidence should improve.
    Solly - 9 - MOTM - I think the Solly v Francis arguement has been put to bed.

    Morrison - 7 - Good patnership developing with Taylor

    Taylor - 7 - Ditto

    Wiggins - 5 - Poor, still not convinced, would like to see a change.

    Wagstaff - 7 - Good game
    Stephens - 7 - Needs to be more consistant, good finish though.

    Hollands - 6 - Played well, not much to worry about after they went to ten.

    Jackson - 5 - I thought JJ looked tired and lacked energy.
    Hayes - 7 - If only his touch matched the quality of his positional play, set up BWP so thats all right.
    Wright Phillips - 8 - Tireless running, good finish and loved his geeture to the Exeter fans at the end for all the stick he was getting.

     

    Powell - 7 - I thought he should have gone 3-5-2 after they went to ten men, however we won 2 - 0 so what do I know?



    Can you explain in which way Wiggins was poor?
    Yes I can, he is not physically strong enough, he looks nervous on the ball, his positional play and game reading need work too. Also he doesn't seem to understand that footballs bounce and in the last two games he has misjudged a bouncing ball. I am not slaughtering Wiggins at all, IMHO I thought he had a poor game, I'm sure he will come good but on saturday he was our weakest link.
    I completely disagree with your assessment. Hardly put a foot wrong and would be one of my first names on the teamsheet.


  • JtRJtR
    edited September 2011
     Hamer7.5 Solly8 Morrison7 Taylor7 Wiggins7 Wagstaff6 Stephens7.5 Hollands7 Jackson6 Hayes6 Wright Phillips7.5
  • This thread is now closed for marks as I am now compiling the stats.
  • lanccy, once compiled can you say what the lowest mark for a goalkeeper keeping a clean sheet has been , if time and info permits

Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!