Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Our attitude towards Cups

Don't get me wrong, we all know this will soon be forgotten about, but I just can't understand some of our fans reaction to our cup displays in the last decade. Our record is nothing short of a disgrace.
And the easy acceptance by fans, just seems to add to the apparent "could not give a f**k" attitude to cups, running through the club since at least 99/00.

Football is about entering and competing in competitions.
I know the league is more important to us (thats obvious), but having a good cup campaign, does not have to effect that in a negative way.
Winning football games (no matter what comp) can only breed confidence.
And we are skint. Get through two rounds and the big boys come in. Draw one of them and it could lead to much needed income and a potential great night.
Add to that, the fact fans are paying good money to support the team in these games.

I just can't understand our acceptance to the continued crap served up in cup competitions. Im obviously in a minority though.
«1

Comments

  • Totally agree. The cups are not a distraction, and as you say,winning becomes a habit. Would rather go into match with a 3-0 victory under our belt than a demoralising 4-3 defeat.
  • I agree it aint great but what can we do about it, you can only keep your chin up and keep the support up.
  • 4-3 loss wouldn't have been so bad if we was losing 4-0 and we made a bit of a comeback. But to be 3-0 up and then lose 4-3 is just awful!
  • I would love us to go on a cup run, get some big teams down at the Valley for a big payday, have a semi final at Wembley and beat Manure 5-0 in the final with Akpo getting a hat-trick, all this with lashings of FA Cup Final Its a Knockout with Stuart (hahaha! And here come the Belgians) Hall. Fact is, it wont happen and it does not matter, its the league that is King. So if my manager plays a few stiffs in a Worthless Beer Cup and they are found out not to be good enough then good, he now knows his options and that he has a fit team for Fridays crucial away match at Leighton. Whenever has a cup match been called crucial? So excuse we if i dont get a lob-on about a third rate cup game.

    On an aside, can you sort me out a piss-up in a brewery? Cheers.
  • Had we got through and the next round, we could have had an away trip to Man U, I sure the money would be welcome.
  • I can't agree. If the game had been at The Valley there would probably have been less than five thousand there. I believe we took 188 to the game. For them I feel sorry, but to be honest the fans have shunned this competition (all club's fans) for many years. If it didn't have a place in Europe up for grabs even the final would be contested by reserve and youth players (Arsenal even do that now).

    If we'd taken 2,000 there last night I would agree, but when the fans don't care enough to go, but only care enough to complain on a Forum from the comfort of their home (or office), then we can hardly expect a first eleven killing themselves for a win.

    For the record I'm not criticising those that didn’t go, as I would only have gone had it been at home, but as fans if we can’t be bothered to make cup games a priority then why should the club.
  • FA Cup Quarter final very close to going through at the Valley....

    I agree with you overall and to be fair if we were still premieship then fine... even championship club...

    But at the moment, Im sure Im not alone in the fact that we Sooooo clearly IMHO have much more importnat games and with a very very thin squad we cant risk importnat players...

    Until we are championship or have a much bigger/deeper squad I really wouldnt care if we forfeited from all the cups...
  • [cite]Posted By: kings hill addick[/cite]
    I believe we took 188 to the game.

    359
  • Nobody wants to see the team lose!

    BUT with a small squad and financial problems choices sometimes have to be made. If playing a weakened squad in a cup competition gives us a better chance of promotion which hopefully means both better football and help to the finances then I for one can live with that.
  • Strickly speaking that's not true Guinness, The teams in Europe don't enter the competition until the third round. West Ham, Newcastle and Everton are the only 'big' teams in the draw for the second round.

    As an unseeded team we would have to beat one of the following:

    Everton, Birmingham, Blackburn Rovers, Stoke, Fulham, Sunderland, Bolton, Wolves, Wigan, West Ham, Newcastle, West Brom, Blackpool, Burnley, Hull, Portsmouth, Leicester, Swansea, Middlesbrough, Ipswich, Watford, Preston, Cardiff*, Sheffield United*, Reading*.

    I can't see a big payday in many of those games. Sure is we drew one of the three mentioned away that would probably be enough to break even, but even with out first eleven out I'm not sure we'd beat any of those teams save for Portsmouth.

    Frankly we are better off out of the competition in my view.
  • Sponsored links:


  • [cite]Posted By: kings hill addick[/cite]If we'd taken 2,000 there last night I would agree, but when the fans don't care enough to go, but only care enough to complain on a Forum from the comfort of their home (or office), then we can hardly expect a first eleven killing themselves for a win.

    It's thier job, this is our hobbie!

    Players performance should not depend on fans turning up.
  • When we last played palace at selhurst i bought the programme to read at half time. I looked at the back pages where it shows all their results, scorers, home and away attendences etc. I saw that when they played Leeds away in the 1st round of the Carling Cup that year they took 32 fans to Leeds. Seriously why would you even print that in your own programme???
  • "Accepting" poor performance in the Cups isn't the same as saying it doesn't matter if we lose, but the cups pale in significance compared to the League. This is how I "accept" last night's defeat.

    I'm convinced there are loads of clubs all over the country who have done nothing in the cup for 10 years. In the Premiership we didn't really have an excuse, but now we're in League 1 I don't think last night's defeat is a disaster. Of course I'd rather we won, but it's not that big a deal.

    You can either look at the bright side, and say that hopefully our young players can learn something about last night's debacle and that it's good that Abbott and Martin are off the mark. Or you can get really annoyed about it, which isn't much fun really. I know which one I'll choose.
  • Thanks AFKA. I don't know where I picked that up from, but I stand corrected.
  • I am also in the minority as well!..... I think it is important to do well in the cup games......
    Obviously I am in a minority as others think that a team that has to play 3 games in a week at the start of the season has to 'rested' and avoid injury to key players.

    All very well but some of the key players, Reid, and Doc came on anyway!

    Like the FA cup game last year, I am sure it will seem a memory in a week or two!, but an unpleasant one at that.

    Yes we know the league is all important, so if it is so 'irrelevent' put out the kids then!......

    So the JPT will be the same and the FA cup as well....... just so we know!. Amazing seeing that Parky called the performance at Northwich 'unacceptable' that people seem happy to accept it!...... for the greater good!
  • [cite]Posted By: ken from bexley[/cite]I am also in the minority as well!..... I think it is important to do well in the cup games......
    Obviously I am in a minority as others think that a team that has to play 3 games in a week at the start of the season has to 'rested' and avoid injury to key players.

    All very well but some of the key players, Reid, and Doc came on anyway!

    Like the FA cup game last year, I am sure it will seem a memory in a week or two!, but an unpleasant one at that.

    Yes we know the league is all important, so if it is so 'irrelevent' put out the kids then!......

    So the JPT will be the same and the FA cup as well....... just so we know!. Amazing seeing that Parky called the performance at Northwich 'unacceptable' that people seem happy to accept it!...... for the greater good!

    The Northwich performance was unacceptable because the players didn't put a shift in not because they lost.
  • Stu,

    The point I was making was more to so with the choice of the eleven that start. I suspect that all the players gave their all last night. My wording perhaps failed to emphasise what I wanted to say "we can hardly expect a FIRST ELEVEN killing themselves for a win".

    As for the hobbie/job comment. That's fine just as long as you don't have a problem with booing, and just as long as you don't expect fans to cheer and sing and try to raise the team. Either it's a hobby where we sometimes watch and sonetimes don't and we can cheer and boo as we see fit, or we are fans that are stakeholders of the club and the club is us and we are the club. You can't have it both ways.

    If the fans don't care about the cup then who is to say that it is the Manager's or the players' job to make it a priority? After all it's only a job!
  • As I posted last night I think the furious (for want of a better word) reaction of many supporters is due to a cumulative effect. Yes, we all know and acknowledge that the club is working on very much reduced resources these days and yes, we know that it’s a long season and that in the scheme of things promotion far outweighs a cup run. We're not idiots who expect us to get to the ¼’s, semi’s, whatever every year so please stop pointing it out to us and maybe see the other side of the coin?

    My problem is that our cup form seems to make absolutely no chuffing difference to our league form anyway. It’s all very well to say every time we get bounced out of a cup by a team below us in the league that it’ll help us get promotion/stay up/push on/whatever but where’s the evidence for this? Did losing to Northwich last year result in us going on an unbeaten run of wins and walking away with the league then? (weren’t we out of all cup competitions by what Nov/Dec last year). Dunno about anyone else but I've seen no upside to getting stiffed in the cups year on year.

    Those discounting last night’s result as ‘a bit disappointing but more of an inconvenience to be got out of the way’ are maybe are looking at the issue in isolation and not taking into account that it happens every year without fail and after a while surely even the most optimistic supporter has to say enough is enough. Don't they? Or what would it take?
  • Bournemouth - Its still not important!! I agree if we were comfortably off in the Prem and also financially then a cup run would be nice, however we had a good chance to compete in the FA cup back then, as Curbs used to say 'A prem club will win the FA Cup so why not us?'. I think your arguement is about 5 years too late!!
  • Thing is Bournemouth, we have to give the reserves a game, and the cup games are less important than the league fixtures. In January 2008 we went to Norwich and won 1-0 in the FA Cup with the reserves and youth players. It's a gamble for sure, but if we don't ever play them we will never get any yardstick to test them. To play so many is, perhaps, a little risky, but I'd rather give half a dozen of them a game in a cup competition we don't expect to do well in than use half a dozen league games to give each of them an outing.

    I guess at the end of the day some fans care more about the cup results than others. I don't really care, it doesn't make me right, but I suspect it doesn't make me wrong either.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Got to look at the positives now and with such a small squad we can't afford to tire/injury players.
  • [cite]Posted By: Bournemouth Addick[/cite]As I posted last night I think the furious (for want of a better word) reaction of many supporters is due to a cumulative effect.

    Exactly.

    In isolation, its a take-it-or-leave-it defeat in an unnecessary cup which we could in honesty do without with a threadbare squad.

    Collectively though its yet another chapter to add to the ever growing embarrassing book of 'Charlton limping out of cups at the first opportunity to lower division teams',
  • [cite]Posted By: ISawLeaburnScore[/cite]I agree it ain't great but what can we do about it, you can only keep your chin up and keep the support up.
    Couldn't have put it better.
  • [cite]Posted By: kings hill addick[/cite]As for the hobbie/job comment. That's fine just as long as you don't have a problem with booing, and just as long as you don't expect fans to cheer and sing and try to raise the team. Either it's a hobby where we sometimes watch and sonetimes don't and we can cheer and boo as we see fit, or we are fans that are stakeholders of the club and the club is us and we are the club. You can't have it both ways.

    I don't try to find it both ways.

    If people want to boo, thats entirely their choice, you won't find me doing it, but nor will you find me those condeming those who do, claiming they should be banned from the valley and hung on harvey gardens.
  • Agreed Organiser.

    Not only does winning become a habit but it is often the team that wants it the most that wins.

    If the fans have a shoulder-shrugging attitude then the players are going to not care either.
    We should care and we should want to win and just blindly accept that we haven't.

    If we fail to get promoted at the end of the season but do really well in the cup then we might not think the season is a total waste.
  • The small squad with new players finding their feet doesn't really wash with me.
    It's exactly the same for the majority of other sqauds in our league at this time of the season.
  • Going back to what Ken said above, isn't there a rule that you have to field your strongest side for the JPT, or did I imagine that?

    Also, people are saying that all teams treat the League cup with disdain - I think that is only true of the early rounds of the competition - once you get closer to getting your hands on the trophy, the attitude changes (I'm obviously having to imagine this, so bear with me!).
  • [cite]Posted By: Saga Lout[/cite]Going back to what Ken said above, isn't there a rule that you have to field your strongest side for the JPT, or did I imagine that?

    Also, people are saying that all teams treat the League cup with disdain - I think that is only true of the early rounds of the competition - once you get closer to getting your hands on the trophy, the attitude changes (I'm obviously having to imagine this, so bear with me!).

    I think you have to pick 5 first teamers in the JPT.
  • [quote][cite]Posted By: kings hill addick[/cite]Strickly speaking that's not true Guinness, The teams in Europe don't enter the competition until the third round. West Ham, Newcastle and Everton are the only 'big' teams in the draw for the second round.

    As an unseeded team we would have to beat one of the following:

    Everton, Birmingham, Blackburn Rovers, Stoke, Fulham, Sunderland, Bolton, Wolves, Wigan, West Ham, Newcastle, West Brom, Blackpool, Burnley, Hull, Portsmouth, Leicester, Swansea, Middlesbrough, Ipswich, Watford, Preston, Cardiff*, Sheffield United*, Reading*.

    I can't see a big payday in many of those games. Sure is we drew one of the three mentioned away that would probably be enough to break even, but even with out first eleven out I'm not sure we'd beat any of those teams save for Portsmouth.

    Frankly we are better off out of the competition in my view.[/quote]

    West Ham away would have been a decent payday, as would a few of the others.

    If you think that missing out on another souce of revenue at a time when we don't have a pot to piss in is a good thing then fair enough, I would disagree that we are better off out of it.
  • West ham, Newcastle or Everton away would've been a decent pay day. They'd also bring 3k to the Valley if we'd drawn them at home.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!