[cite]Posted By: Mike_CAFC[/cite]If he is dutch i would have a shot at Maceo Rigters, Still at Blackburn they obviosuly don't want him anymore and weren't we linked with him once before.
He was an u21 star and in their full squad when Blackburn signed him so I doubt he has fallen as far as our level now
Rigters isnt a bad shout, and cfgs, Rigters had a trial at Southend just last year but failed to earn a contract according to wikepedia. Slightly worrying if this is the person lol.
"Asked about recent triallists, Parkinson revealed contracts were not being offered to Etienne Esejas, Guillaume Norbert, Guillem Bauza or Gunnar Thorvaldson".
So does that by implication mean we have not yet "not offered contracts to Mulley and Furtune"...which is a double negative so means we have offered both contracts? I am confused.
[cite]Posted By: CAFCOlly[/cite]Rigters isnt a bad shout, and cfgs, Rigters had a trial at Southend just last year but failed to earn a contract according to wikepedia. Slightly worrying if this is the person lol.
[cite]Posted By: valleyman[/cite]"Asked about recent triallists, Parkinson revealed contracts were not being offered to Etienne Esejas, Guillaume Norbert, Guillem Bauza or Gunnar Thorvaldson".
So does that by implication mean we have not yet "not offered contracts to Mulley and Furtune"...which is a double negative so means we have offered both contracts? I am confused.
he's already said that Fortune was only ever training with us and that was the agreement. Plus we have signed Fry now and have four CH's. Another is a luxury was can't afford.
[quote][cite]Posted By: valleyman[/cite]So does that by implication mean we have not yet "not offered contracts to Mulley and Furtune"...which is a double negative so means we have offered both contracts? I am confused.[/quote]
If it is Jhon van Beukering then some more (unpromising) info from: http://www.swansea.vitalfootball.co.uk/article.asp?a=205967#ixzz0vktfuJsn
July 24, 2010
"No Contract For Trialist Van Beukering
Swansea City have released trialist striker John van Beukering after he failed to impress during his week at the club.
The Dutchman didn't arrive at the Liberty Stadium with too much promise though. He's struggled for goals in recent seasons and has a reputation in his home country of being overweight - nicknamed 'John van BurgerKing'.
The 26 year-old told press in Holland that whilst it's a pity not to be offered a contract, he said he didn't really like the "conditions"."
Comments
He was an u21 star and in their full squad when Blackburn signed him so I doubt he has fallen as far as our level now
Which to me suggests he's not with a British club at the moment?
So does that by implication mean we have not yet "not offered contracts to Mulley and Furtune"...which is a double negative so means we have offered both contracts? I am confused.
ok he has fallen that far then. I stand corrected
he's already said that Fortune was only ever training with us and that was the agreement. Plus we have signed Fry now and have four CH's. Another is a luxury was can't afford.
fortune was training with them today.
Jhon van Beukering
Do you know something we dont?
Roughly 1 in 3 over the last 3 years, 49 in 92 before that.
Interview
On the other hand, known as John Van BurgerKing, and known for being a little on the large side....
Swansea trial
July 24, 2010
"No Contract For Trialist Van Beukering
Swansea City have released trialist striker John van Beukering after he failed to impress during his week at the club.
The Dutchman didn't arrive at the Liberty Stadium with too much promise though. He's struggled for goals in recent seasons and has a reputation in his home country of being overweight - nicknamed 'John van BurgerKing'.
The 26 year-old told press in Holland that whilst it's a pity not to be offered a contract, he said he didn't really like the "conditions"."
More from Pauolo Sousa on him from 2009