Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Why Hasn't Alan Curbishley Found A Job Yet?

How has arguably our greatest ever manager not been able to find a club yet? It's been almost 2 years since Curbs left West Ham and he still gets overlooked ahead of the likes of Iain Dowie!

What do you guys think about it?

http://www.footballfancast.com/football-blogs/eing-overlooked
«1

Comments

  • Was on good salaries here and at West Ham which in todays climate would possibly put people off and he thinks he deserves a Premiership club.

    George Graham thought the same. . . .
  • West ham paid him £2m last year, he's still counting it.
  • He should put in a speculative application to Twente Enschede. Champions League, and all that...
  • I don't think he got overlooked in favour of Iain Dowie. That's just the Hull chairman telling porkies. Curbs would never have taken that job. Surely noone would actually think Iain Dowie would be a better choice than Curbs, would they?!
  • I went to art school in Enschede. Twente were relegated that season.
  • I think he's looking for a job in South East London.........................................
















    Yer right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • [cite]Posted By: dabos[/cite]I don't think he got overlooked in favour of Iain Dowie. That's just the Hull chairman telling porkies. Curbs would never have taken that job. Surely noone would actually think Iain Dowie would be a better choice than Curbs, would they?!

    Curbs turned down Hull before Dowie was approached. Said he would only consider them next season if they stayed up.
  • Here's a theory; if his settlement at West Ham is effectively a compensation for him being out of work (rather than a lump sum) he is getting "paid" by them while he's out of work and would have to forgo that if he took another paid job. Remember after he left us he clearly had a tie in period and when jobs came up he kept saying odd things like I'm going to be on holibobs and I'll think about new jobs on December 17th. Similar issue. Can't believe he wants to be out of work, and can't believe nobody wants him. It must be commercial
  • There are so mnay managers out of work it is easy even for a godd one like curbs to be overlooked, also he has been choosy, turning down clubs like Hull. I also wonder if Chairmen are worried by the power he wielded at Charlton and they do not want a manager who effectively wants control of the club top to bottom.
  • [cite]Posted By: Kap10[/cite] I also wonder if Chairmen are worried by the power he wielded at Charlton and they do not want a manager who effectively wants control of the club top to bottom.

    Could be.

    After West Ham and us to a lesser extent, where he,quite rightly and well done him, played football to keep a team up not please the TV pundits i don't think chairmen think he is "sexy" or a name that is going to win them favour with their fans. Sad but I feel it may be true.

    Also Chairmen may not be happy with a manager willing to start, and win, an unfair dismissal case.

    I still think he will end up in a job sooner rather than later but maybe just not what we expect. McClaren has done well in Holland and I think that might open the doors for other English managers in Europe. Curbs for PSV. you heard it here first.
  • Sponsored links:


  • [quote][cite]Posted By: Henry Irving[/cite][quote][cite]Posted By: Kap10[/cite] Curbs for PSV. you heard it here first.[/quote]

    Don't let mrs Curbs hear you saying that, its a long way from Chingford!!
  • Not saying it's the reason he hasn't found a job but can you imagine Curbs in a job interview? No eye contact, monosyllabic answers, shrugs of the shoulders with the odd 'praps' thrown in.
  • I think Curbs has a reputation of being a bit of a 'steady-the-ship-man'. i.e if a chairman brings him in, he's effectively saying "we just want to stay where we are and are making no efforts to progress".
  • I know Hodgson said he is staying at Fulham but I would not be surprised to see him end up there if a big club or the England job come up for Hodgson.

    If not maybe Ipswich, would suit him in terms of location and I can't see Keane lasting there much into next season unless they have a really good start.
  • I think it's a mixture of things, he's not an "exciting" manager as Henry said. I can't imagine him managing a team too far away from where he lives. I agree I could see him at someone like Fulham or Ipswich in the future if things work out that way. I don't see him ever going abroad like McClaren (or Tony Adams, gone to manage in Azerbaijan!), not even sure he'd even go up north either.
  • Ipswich Nailed on.
  • Or Narridge if Lamber gets a bigger job eg Celtic
  • You are the Chairman of a Club and you know full well that, nowadays, the chances of your next Manager going at the end of his contract are somewhat remote.

    So, are you going to employ someone who is likely to accept an out of court settlement or someone who is going to sue you for every penny remaining on that contract? And if you do lose in court you also know that you will probably have to pay up all the coaching staff that came with Manager too.

    It would be the equivalent of a Manager signing a player on £70k a week who has a history of injuries. Only for that player to fulfill the prophecy. Talking about that, Chairmen probably have Curbs transfer record at West Ham in mind too.
  • [cite]Posted By: Addick Addict[/cite]You are the Chairman of a Club and you know full well that, nowadays, the chances of your next Manager going at the end of his contract are somewhat remote.

    So, are you going to employ someone who is likely to accept an out of court settlement or someone who is going to sue you for every penny remaining on that contract? And if you do lose in court you also know that you will probably have to pay up all the coaching staff that came with Manager too.

    It would be the equivalent of a Manager signing a player on £70k a week who has a history of injuries. Only for that player to fulfill the prophecy. Talking about that, Chairmen probably have Curbs transfer record at West Ham in mind too.

    So to summarise AA.....?
  • [cite]Posted By: carly burn[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Addick Addict[/cite]You are the Chairman of a Club and you know full well that, nowadays, the chances of your next Manager going at the end of his contract are somewhat remote.

    So, are you going to employ someone who is likely to accept an out of court settlement or someone who is going to sue you for every penny remaining on that contract? And if you do lose in court you also know that you will probably have to pay up all the coaching staff that came with Manager too.

    It would be the equivalent of a Manager signing a player on £70k a week who has a history of injuries. Only for that player to fulfill the prophecy. Talking about that, Chairmen probably have Curbs transfer record at West Ham in mind too.

    So to summarise AA.....?

    Curbs will probably end up joining Messrs Graham, Hoddle, Gullit, Jewell, Souness etc etc on the TV pundit circuit.
  • Sponsored links:


  • but with an unblemished record
  • [cite]Posted By: Addick Addict[/cite]You are the Chairman of a Club and you know full well that, nowadays, the chances of your next Manager going at the end of his contract are somewhat remote.

    So, are you going to employ someone who is likely to accept an out of court settlement or someone who is going to sue you for every penny remaining on that contract? And if you do lose in court you also know that you will probably have to pay up all the coaching staff that came with Manager too.

    It would be the equivalent of a Manager signing a player on £70k a week who has a history of injuries. Only for that player to fulfill the prophecy. Talking about that, Chairmen probably have Curbs transfer record at West Ham in mind too.

    Very harsh on Curbishley.

    He had an explicit clause in his Wet Spam deal saying that only he - as club manager - had control over transfer policy and then at the start of the 08/09 season their MD sold McCartney and Anton Ferdinand to Sunderland without Curbishley's authorisation.

    He sued them for constructive dismissal and, quite rightly, won the case since they had breached the terms of his contract - what was he meant to do just walk away quietly?
  • I'd second the idea that his transfer record at West Ham was particularly poor. Even if he did keep them up.

    I do think a lot of him, but I also think that the perception of the footballing world is that he has ideas well above his station.
  • edited May 2010
    [cite]Posted By: Ormiston Addick[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Addick Addict[/cite]You are the Chairman of a Club and you know full well that, nowadays, the chances of your next Manager going at the end of his contract are somewhat remote.

    So, are you going to employ someone who is likely to accept an out of court settlement or someone who is going to sue you for every penny remaining on that contract? And if you do lose in court you also know that you will probably have to pay up all the coaching staff that came with Manager too.

    It would be the equivalent of a Manager signing a player on £70k a week who has a history of injuries. Only for that player to fulfill the prophecy. Talking about that, Chairmen probably have Curbs transfer record at West Ham in mind too.

    Very harsh on Curbishley.

    He had an explicit clause in his Wet Spam deal saying that only he - as club manager - had control over transfer policy and then at the start of the 08/09 season their MD sold McCartney and Anton Ferdinand to Sunderland without Curbishley's authorisation.

    He sued them for constructive dismissal and, quite rightly, won the case since they had breached the terms of his contract - what was he meant to do just walk away quietly?

    I'm not saying he shouldn't have sued. But that remains on his CV and it is for that reason that some clubs may be wary of employing him.

    As for his transfer record, his first three panic signings were Quassie, Davenport and Boa Morte followed by the likes of Llunberg, Dyer, Neill and Faubert who all ended up costing the Club tens of millions in signing on fees and wages. His successes were Scotty P and Upson but that does not make up for the legacy he left them with.

    He also let go for approximately £8 million in total three players to Fulham - Paintsil, Konchesky and Zamora who, apart from injuries, have been relative fixtures in their success story over the last couple of years. It was, of course, the second time that Curbs had sold Konchesky and he was joined at Fulham by another player who had previously fallen out with Curbs in the shape of Danny Murphy.

    As has already been said a club like us or Ipswich is tailor made for Curbs providing he goes back to doing what he does best. And that is building a team bit by bit rather than trying to buy one. But will anyone take that chance?
  • he wont be out of work more much longer; after the takeover is completed in the summer, he'll will made our director of football.
  • Lazy git, I'd cut his benefit off...
  • Have there been that many jobs that would suit both him and the club in question? Last season saw 5 premiership clubs get rid of their managers Man City clearly wanted a glamour name, Bolton were after Coyle, Burnley wanted someone ready for the Championship (and cheap) and then there were Pompey and Hull and with the positions both those clubs are in , footballing terms and financially, why would anyone want to go there?
  • edited May 2010
    as everyone is well awre,the january transfer window is not the best time to to business,especially if you have icelandic owners who really are only interested in premiership football. i bet they were gutted that sir alan delivered it for them against all odds.
  • [cite]Posted By: ThreadKiller[/cite]as everyone is well awre,the january transfer window is not the best time to to business,especially if you have icelandic owners who really are only interested in premiership football. i bet they were gutted that sir alan delivered it for them against all odds.

    He was awful. I understand your love for him at this club but at west ham he was awful. Yes they broke the contract by doing deals themselves but after the crock of shite he brought in and getting rid of some of our better players ie Zamora and konchesky you can hardly blame them for wanting to get involved
  • As you support the hammers uncle I can understand what you are saying but I watched enough of them on tv and your fans complained alot about Zamora so I think most would of been happy with him going. But they then sold McCartney and Anton Ferdinand to Sunderland and they were two of your better players, and this season Westham were either good or really bad and Curbs has been gone for a while.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!