Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton report Crystal Palace to Football League over unpaid transfer fee

edited January 2010 in General Charlton
CRYSTAL Palace’s financial woes worsened this week as South London rivals Charlton complained to the Football League over an unpaid transfer fee.

The South London Press has learned that Charlton officials are “furious” that they have not yet received £100,000 owed to them as part of the transfer that saw Paddy McCarthy swap The Valley for Selhurst Park in 2008.

The instalment was due in December but cash-strapped Palace have not yet handed over the money, leaving Charlton - themselves in a difficult financial situation - short of cash.

Charlton reported Palace to the Football League earlier this month and this week lodged a complaint as the matter has still not been resolved.
«134

Comments

  • I'm surprised we waited as long as we did given our own problems.
  • We've hardly waited that long - somewhere between three and seven weeks, I suspect the rumours of Palace's imminent demise are worrying our board and they want the money before the receivers are called in.
  • [cite]Posted By: BlackForestReds[/cite]We've hardly waited that long - somewhere between three and seven weeks, I suspect the rumours of Palace's imminent demise are worrying our board and they want the money before the receivers are called in.

    Football finances look like the banking sector 18 months ago. If one or two clubs fail I wouldn't be surprised if there was a domino effect though the whole system.
  • [cite]Posted By: BlackForestReds[/cite]We've hardly waited that long - somewhere between three and seven weeks, I suspect the rumours of Palace's imminent demise are worrying our board and they want the money before the receivers are called in.

    Didn't read it properly the first time. I thought the debt was outstanding from when he left in June 2008 or whenever it was.

    Yes I am sure you are right about our Board worrying. £100K would pay for Moo2 for nearly 3 months!
  • If its likely one big club goes the trickle down effect could be awful.

    Its comedy atm watching SSN wondering why no money is being spent or even loan deals occuring.

    They had that ugger jock Bryan Swanson in the studio with regular updates but hes since disappeared as theres been literally nothing to report of what Sky considers newsworthy.....

    Give you a clue mate theyre all skint!!
  • maybe they will offer a player instead ........ Ambrose any one :-)
  • Would love to see the orange twats face when he signs that cheque.
  • [cite]Posted By: Off_it[/cite]Would love to see the orange twats face If he signs that cheque.

    ;-)
  • Bet the fuckers have had thier money from Cardiff.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Apparently they're also in dispute with a company that owns the land behind their main stand, so they're looking to move to another SE London club. Their chairman thinks ground sharing is the future of football and the club can be run from a portakabin in another club's carpark!!!
  • [cite]Posted By: stevietwells[/cite]Apparently they're also in dispute with a company that owns the land behind their main stand, so they're looking to move to another SE London club. Their chairman thinks ground sharing is the future of football and the club can be run from a portakabin in another club's carpark!!!

    Now that is just too far fetched!
  • I wonder if thats been tried before....

    :-)
  • someone called Addickted gently winding up the Glazier's on the Palace BBS

    http://forums.cpfc.org/showthread.php?t=195884&page=3

    Contains many unfunny Clown references. They really hate us so much : - )
  • edited January 2010
    Boringly unfunny clownshite as usual, still I suppose that is cutting edge humour in Croydon so we should pat them on their little heads for at least trying! They owe us the money, they should pay and Charlton have every right to report it to the authorities- end of or we could let them pay it back in instalments at a high rate of interest. Maybe we could do what lovely Leeds did to us in the 80's??
  • [cite]Posted By: pilchard[/cite]Boringly unfunny clownshite as usual. They owe us the money, they should pay and Charlton have every right to report it to the authorities- it end of. Maybe we could do what lovely Leeds did to us in the 80's??

    As some middle eastern bloke said "let he who is without sin cast the first stone"
  • I would drop it on Jordans spongy head.
  • I know these staged deals are all the rage these days - but is it really a sensible sales policy in these times? I mean, clubs are effectively giving credit to other clubs and often both parties are complete basket cases financially.

    We're all robbing Peter to pay Paul at the moment and it's really about time the authorities started doing something to get it all under control.
  • What amazed me earlier this week was Sullivan's revelation that WH owe other clubs £40m in transfer fees and the Sheff Utd compensation - amazing figure
  • [cite]Posted By: Exiled_Addick[/cite]it's really about time the authorities started doing something to get it all under control.
    No. Like it or lump it, football works within a free market framework. If one club thinks it's prudent to sell an asset to another club for a set fee paid over an agreed payment schedule, why should "authorities" intervene? It's business.
  • Sponsored links:


  • [cite]Posted By: Exiled_Addick[/cite]I know these staged deals are all the rage these days - but is it really a sensible sales policy in these times? I mean, clubs are effectively giving credit to other clubs and often both parties are complete basket cases financially.

    We're all robbing Peter to pay Paul at the moment and it's really about time the authorities started doing something to get it all under control.

    Pretty much the same situation as it was with the banks. As long as those on the inside/running the show are getting a cushy living out of it nothing wil get done until the 'Sh** hits the fan'. Who suffers? The ordinary man in the street/football fan.
  • [cite]Posted By: Chizz[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Exiled_Addick[/cite]it's really about time the authorities started doing something to get it all under control.
    No. Like it or lump it, football works within a free market framework. If one club thinks it's prudent to sell an asset to another club for a set fee paid over an agreed payment schedule, why should "authorities" intervene? It's business.

    Because it runs the risk of bankrupting the whole of football or at least several clubs. I'm not saying these kinds of deals should be banned, just more heavily regualted and that clubs who miss payments should face stiffer penalties. The recent trend for transfer embargos is a good start and like the way the PL has redirected Pompey's TV money.
  • Apparently we under paid them when we brought that polific striker Mattias Svensson off of them.
  • Exiled makes a valid point I think although as Chaz says its a free market. The FL is also able to impose transfer embargoes on clubs, like Palace, who are late with staged payments.

    In this case I guess that since Palace are already under a transfer embargo not paying Charlton does them no extra damage so their attitude is that we are a lesser priority then the palace players or the tax man so we don't get paid.

    However football clubs are treated as preferred creditors if a club goes in administration and have to be paid in full.

    This gives them an "unfair" advantage over even the HMR&C (who are not happy about that) or the local printer or pie supplier. So not a free market it that case.

    If however the league made a rule that fees had to be paid rather than having a buy now pay later attitude we might see a reduction in fees paid and bring them in line with what clubs can afford.
  • Perhaps we should present them with a winding up order........
  • [cite]Posted By: Charlton Dan[/cite]Perhaps we should present them with a winding up order........

    Love it.....LOL!!
  • [cite]Posted By: Exiled_Addick[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Chizz[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Exiled_Addick[/cite]it's really about time the authorities started doing something to get it all under control.
    No. Like it or lump it, football works within a free market framework. If one club thinks it's prudent to sell an asset to another club for a set fee paid over an agreed payment schedule, why should "authorities" intervene? It's business.

    Because it runs the risk of bankrupting the whole of football or at least several clubs. I'm not saying these kinds of deals should be banned, just more heavily regualted and that clubs who miss payments should face stiffer penalties. The recent trend for transfer embargos is a good start and like the way the PL has redirected Pompey's TV money.
    There are a couple of problems with this. First, whenever rules, procedures or guidlines, are put in place, clubs work out ways to circumvent, avoid or ignore them. Just because a rule is in place, it doesn't mean it will be followed (for example, "bungs" are illegal - but do they still happen?) The second problem is that, whereas many clubs are well-run with smart, intelligent, business-savvy professionals managing the administrative and financial affairs of the club, are the "authorities" (the Premier League, The Football League, FA, UEFA or FIFA) awash with people who can make these decisions?

    In my view, if a club is well run (and Charlton, over the last fifteen years over-all have been), they deserve to do well; and if a club is badly managed (Leeds, Palace, Southampton, Newcastle, Portsmouth, etc, etc). Not for "football" manage its constituent clubs' affairs.

    If you make the right financial investments (ensuring you own your ground; invest in youth player development; engender relationships with relevant local businesses; look after your relationship with your fans) you deserve to fail. If you spunk your dough on rubbish (renting expensive goldfish (Leeds); saddling yourself with unmanageable debt (several clubs); paying over the odds for sub-prime players (many clubs)) and if you fail to meet your financial obligaions (Palace) you deserve to fail.
  • OR we could just join in with the HMR&C winding up petition which would be easier and cheaper.

    Personally I don't think we would.

    For all the bad blood I think our board would shy away as it wouldn't look good one club trying to close down another and especially when we are not in a healthy state ourselves. Could come back to bite us on the bum.
  • Lets let them off, after all they're our brothers and sisters in football, fellow Londoners, and South-East Londoners to boot, aand they are going through a hard time financially. We should respond in the sympathetic way we did when that Palace woman made that appeal on their pitch at half time in that game.
  • The hypocracy of some of their fans is quite breathtaking.

    If Charlton fans said things along the lines of 'hope you go bust', they would have a coronory. Yet owing us money is seen as something good and funny.

    That money is important to us and may impact on what we do in the window.

    They can post as many clown pictures as they like, but it is their own club that is currently the complete laughing stock.

    Lets see how much those clowns laugh if their situation worsens.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!